DSII>DSIII

you´re wrong, end of the discussion.

>>338155148
/thread

>>338155148
First post best post as always

DS2 mechanically>>DS3 mechanically,
DS3 level design >>>DS2 level design
ds3 needs it's dlc soon though since it's a pretty short game compared to ds2 and build variability is pretty limited
armour needs to be fixed and weapons scaling need to be more varied than just C strength and C dex

Both uninspired mediocrity totally lacking in atmopshere. Fromsoft miss the mark with sequels.

Sheeit

DS2 had a better spell system and better PvP as far as balance/variety goes.

Sure you can use whatever you want in DS3 but you're going to get memed on by an estoc/dark sword

>>338154412

You're objectively wrong.
/thread

>>338154412
Please ban these fucking threads jesus christ I'm so fucking tired of faggot souls

>>338154412
3 didn't have souls memory, healing crystals, despawing enemies, and it didn't have anything nearly as offensive as Ornstien&_____ or the rats.

2 is only a good with scholar. On launch it was legit bad.

>>338154412
Stop trying to force this meme

File: 1461988036539.jpg (219KB, 1047x722px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

219KB, 1047x722px

Das2 with DLC > Das3 > Das2 vanilla

Das3 was a disappointment but will still probably pull ahead of das2 when the dlc comes out, since fromsoft dlc is always better than the main game

>>338155148
this

>>338157459
Justify your statement, DS3 has no shortage of flaws, the DS2 is a bad game meme doesn't make DS3 immune to being bad also.