Why is this allowed?
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: Why is this allowed?
Why is this allowed?
Cinematic trailer Tracer was ugly
>>338149437
>Freckles
No.
>>338149437
Tracer is ugly in every iteration
>>338149405
It's not, of course. Didn't you hear about the SFM takedown?
>>338149405
Alive is also a cinematic trailer you fgt
>>338149720
Cinematic trailer is the NAME of the trailer
>>338149782
u mean the reveal trailer
>>338149405
i thought the shill campaign was over already
fuck
Holy fuck yes another overwatch thread
Cheers love!
>>338151169
I just want a better sfm model teebeeeech
>>338149405
SFM has really shitty lighting effects. Like, holy shit. Granted, it runs on an engine created like, what, 12 years ago?
>>338151271
Better than Dark Souls 3 shitposters at this point
>>338151591
its the exact same model as ingame, just most SFM animators can't do lighting and shader work worth shit
I look like a boyish version of Tracer.
What's SFM?
>>338152076
Its not. It was built from the ground up before people were able to rip the models.
Its why her hair is all wrong and her face has freckles.
Look at any pic with ported models like mercy and dva. Its really noticable that its just a altered femscout in new clothes
>>338152169
something film maker, basically cgi stuff.
mostly used to make stuff for neckbeards to fap to.
>>338152169
source film maker
people rip the models from the game and do as they please with them
for some reason the model always look different than how she does in game
probably because lighting
>>338152087
C H I S W I C K
H
I
S
W
I
C
K
>>338149405
>SFM Tracer = Ugly
I don't think so OP
>>338152469
Oh you're right, thanks for pointing that out. Because the lighting is usually so different even ripped models can look a bit off sometimes.
>>338154485
I'm gonna need a source there, partner.
