HOW DID THEY DO IT?
IT'S LITERALLY REALER THAN REAL LIFE
>babbys first video game
>>337701843
If real life looks like that to you then you might need glasses.
>outside in daytime
>60% of screen is black
woah.... truly this is the power of the ps4......
JUST HOW
>>337702065
It's almost like he's under something blocking the sunlight.
how do you take picures in photo mode ?
>>337702331
Just use the share button on your controller.
>>337702431
is that how you get the "take picture of Sully" trophy?
>>337702551
nevermind. Its at a later chapter.
>>337702243
Are you telling me when you go in the shade it's absolute black while the everything in the sunlight is washed out white from the brightness?
>jpg instead of png
Never take a screenshot ever again.
>>337703754
it's supposed to be eye adaptation to the environment.
it is a real thing, when you are in a black box and then exposed to sunlight everything will seem way too bright.
don't know how accurately portrayed it is in OPs screenshot though.
>>337701843
iTT: peasants are impressed by little
The perfect, photo-real environment in which to murder thousands upon thousands of people.
>>337701843
shame there's no video game to go with their tech demo
>>337702889
jesus christ it's like they just took a rock texture and stretched it into a mountain
>>337703920
>take png screenshot via capture card
>filesize >4MB
blame 4chan.
>>337702243
Holy fuck that looks like fucking shit
Jesus christ that ground
Those rocks with no shadowing or light interaction
Not going to lie though, it does look pretty goodFor something running on a 1.6GhZ APU and dogshit VRAM
>>337703930
>grass clipping though wood
So this is the power...
>console plebs witnessing things that were a common thing on PC since 2009
G-graphics d-dont matter though, r-right?
What's PC bros' excuse?
>>337703930
That's not how the eyes work. Either you can see stuff in the dark because your pupils are enlarged, or you can see stuff in the brightness because they're contracted. OP's image is ridiculous because it's both extremes combined - probably to hide shitty graphics
so woah.... power of the ps4......
>>337702125
It looks pretty good but it's not photorealistic yet.
Textures need some work.
Where were (You) when the Naughty GODS did it again?
>>337704291
I don't need a fucking excuse
Crysis 2 looked better than this in 2011
ArmA 3 looks better than this
Fuck, XCOM 2 looks better than this frequently
Repeatedly saying that something looks good don't make it true. Also
> Dat real-time framerate
>>337704291
That.. looks like shit.
>>337704285
Pls post screenshots of a similiar detailed games on pc since 2009
>>337701843
Half Life 2 did High Dynamic Range a century ago.
How long until PC games catch up?
>>337704595
>AAA first person games looks better than AAA third person gameIt actually not
>Gotta throw shitty XCOM2, maybe no one will notice
wow who took these photos
>>337704595
>Crysis 2 looked better than this in 2011
kek
>ArmA 3 looks better than this
even more kek
>Fuck, XCOM 2 looks better than this frequently
holy shit, top kek
>>337704754
battlefront looks better than that
>>337704754
i like that you actively post shitty screenshots.
gj anon, triggering all the pc people and playstation 4 players.
>>337704734
Stay mad sonyggers!
>MGS V looked better more than a year ago
>OMG GUIZE LOOK AT DESE GRAPHICS
pathetic, not even the best of this generation
>>337701843
All I want is an Elena of my own ;_;
>>337704910
Oh my, it's a FIRST PERSON GAME, that type of game that had more detail than third person back in the days...
>>337701843
PC btfo. If PC can even get CLOSE to this with a rig that cost less than 1500 in the next decade.... Well... They wont so i dont have to worry.
>>337705018
At least this game's actually finished
It is surprising how many Uncharted graphics threads we are getting recently. It is like you ps4 players haven't played a game with good graphics in your whole life.
The game looks gorgeous, yes, but these graphics are nothing compared to what is available on PC. I wonder how would you ps4 players react if you got to play SWBF, Tomb Raider, perfectly modded Skyrim and Crysis on PC.
Still kudos to the Naughty Dogs for creating a beautiful game that can run on a ps4.
>>337705054
hurts doesn't it.
>>337701843
>ps4 screenshot using the share button
literally a bullshot creator
So did Drake finally defeat the evil pic related?
>>337705169
But people are laughing at PC because it gets literally no games like that on its own. Everything that beautiful on PC is console port.
>>337704754
>dat -9000 LOD in the background
>using a desert so they don't have to include framerate killing flora
>low res desert texture
>unsharp
10/10 it's shit
>>337705286
but the top one is a bullshot.
Why are Sonyggers even trying
Based on specs, it's simply not fucking possible to compete with PCs can do. With a 1.6GHz processor, there isn't much that you can optimize away. Even if Naughty Dog are taking full advantage of all 8 cores, there's only so much you can do. This is pretty much the pinnacle of what you can do with a PS4, and it runs like dogshit. Why do you think that they have to release the PS4K?
>>337705439
Kek, Sonygger delusion.
>>337701843
They don't.
Downgrade incoming as always.
>>337705439
why does the lighting on the character models' skin make them all look like they are about to explode
I can't get fucking past it every time it's posted, fuck.
>>337705286
whats that game on top
>>337704291
Unreal Tournament 4 puts Uncharted 4 to shame.
>>337705543
Monster hunter 4
>>337705162
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGGPQKBfLxc
> January 2015
> 60FPS 1080p
>>337705473
>it's simply not fucking possible to compete with PCs can do
Yes, PC can do that. Are they doing that? Not really, because almost everybody on PC has literal toaster PC and plays shitty F2P moba shit.
>>337705542
and i never understand what you mean by that.
>>337705149
are you fucking retarded
>>337705651
>Are they doing that?
see
>>337705286
>>337705514
There was no downgrade, PCuck. The game is better looking than any PC game has ever been with vastly inferior hardware....it's time you took PC devs to task and told them to stop making le 8-bit indie games and "Poop in my Soup" and start making REAL games like this.
>>337705624
>Prebaked shadows
No.
>>337705713
Show me 2009 third person game with such level of graphics detail pls
>>337702661
Take a picture of him when Nate takes his Sony Xperia (tm) phone out.
>>337705439
what an unfortunate haircut
>>337705651
Ever heard of turning the settings down
>>337704734
Half-Life 2's HDR was added in later and ruined its aesthetic.
>>337705710
the reflections off of his tan skin freak me out, they aren't right. They're trying to be right but they aren't
he looks like he's about to blow up or melt at any given time. It's especially noticeable when light is going through his ears
>>337705754
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3s6JLlfNe8
>>337705710
The animations. You usually see problems in that kind of thing. It's hard to see a lot that's wrong with U4's animations. Especially the facial stuff. Just so damn good.
>>337705809
pcfags btfo. Show me one pc game that looks better than this.
>>337701843
>it's blindingly light outside
>yet somehow it's pitch black inside
So did the developers just let this slip by or what?
>>337705956
Yes I know about Unreal Tournament but the video you posted before had pre-baked lighting which is not very impressive
>>337705892
IDK lost coast looked pretty good at the time. still looks nice now.
The game looks pretty good at a distance. Though if you sit too close you start to see that weird shadow haze they use to apply shading and notice how flat anything that isn't a set piece is.
The areas are really big though, and running around them is kinda fun. Wouldn't have bought it if I didn't have money to burn.
G-G-G-GUSY, I AM SCARED. W-W-WHY DON'T WE, T-T-THE MASTER R-R-RACE, GET EXCLUSIVES THAT A-A-ARE LO-O-O-KING THAT GREAT?
A-A-ARENT W-W-WE M-M-M-MASTR RACE?
>>337706052
Came out a year later, retard.
>>337705794
You know Crysis had a third person mode, right?
>>337706051
Nearly all games have some form of pre-baked lighting. It's cheap and very effective. I can guarantee that UC4 uses pre-baked lighting in some form, seeing as most lighting conditions are static.
Regardless, that's not even the best that can be done. Close, though.
>game developers finally learning that lighting is infinitely more important than MOAR TRIANGLES and textures
>>337704910
this is 10 years old and looks better than the PS4. DELETE THIS NOOOOOOOOOOOOW BHFASPHIHI{OGAESRHSOK{RHRHE}PKRHS
>>337705149
>>337705794
so this... is the power... of ps4 shitposting...
.............................
disappointing lack of Goonies references.
>>337706051
I hope you're not implying that the lighting in UC4 isn't pre-baked.
If so, you're retarded.
>>337705809
>silky smooth 720p/30fps
>>337706143
>moving goalposts
It's easy to make high detailed game go third person. But make average third person game in first person view and you will see the difference.
Consoles need EXCLUSIVE games to stay relevant. Without these exclusive no one will buy these garbo consoles.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8FPunc_RTE
> Where were you when literal photorealism was achieved
Game looks better in motion, like most games. I never trust screenshots.
>>337706362
>It's easy to make high detailed game go third person.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Are you retarded?
>>337706240
>>337706343
Do you even know what pre-baked lighting actually is? The video you posted before was a small room and I estimate that the pre-baking process would take up around 2 or 3 hours every time you boot it up.
It seems you have no idea what you're talking about
>>337706357
at least get your facts right.
it's 1080/30
>>337706420
>Without these exclusive no one will buy these garbo consoles
>bestselling games on XO and PS4 are multiplats
>>337704291
ITT faggots who fap to baked lighting
The interiors in this game look astounding.
>>337706484
>and I estimate that the pre-baking process would take up around 2 or 3 hours every time you boot it up.
Jesus christ, this is what console gaming does to people's brains.
>>337706461
Show me the game on PC, in third person, from 2009 that looks like the fucking game in the OP pic. It's so hard to you to understand?
>>337704342
Do I really need to explain you mong?
In the picture the bit in the sun it really overexposed and bright because the player is in the shadow and the camera has adjusted to allow in more light that same way your eye would. If the player walks into the sunny area that will be less bright as the camera adjusts and the area in the shadow will appear darker from outside
>>337706135
no, dummy, lost coast was the tech demo that introduced HDR and new graphical effects. it was THEN added to HL2.
faggot.
>>337702243
>they're still not giving console games AF
Utterly fucking retarded.
>>337706484
It takes about 5 seconds to load. I've run it on my 970. It runs at absolutely stable 60FPS, probably pushing much higher. So does UT5. So do all the UT demos.
> 60Hz 1080p monitor
> 2016
Pre-baked lighting is calculated when the level is generated. You don't make it when the level loads.
Uncharted 4 is a really good game that's only topped by the 2nd title in the series, Among Thieves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8F8BjrVD8s
It's pretty technically impressive too.
>>337706607
That's like asking for an RTS that looks that good. Stop bringing irrelevant details into the mix, Crysis was an anomaly anyway.
>>337706535
Holy fuck that twisted armpit, did she died?
>>337706560
baked lighting doesn't mean it's bad.
If anything they're usually better looking than extremely taxing global illumination solutions.
>>337706608
Yes and yes. But I'm saying BOTH are happening at the same time: shadows are dark to the point that it's #000000 black and outside it's white bright
Hey guys
>>337706607
you're legitimately retarded
end yourself for the good of mankind
>>337706880
she's finemore or less
>>337706894
DELETE THIS
>>337706846
>Crysis was an anomaly anyway
And Uncharted isn't? :^D Still looks worse than Forza Apex
>>337706648
HL2: November 16, 2004
Lost Coast: October 27, 2005
HDR was added to original HL2 with the Source 2006 update, retard.
>>337706484
>pre-baking process would take up around 2 or 3 hours
do you even know what prebaked even means?
>>337706846
Uncharted 4 is a third person game.
Crysis is a first person game. First person games generally have more detailed graphics than third person. That's a fact. You compare console game to AAA blockbuster game that uses all the glorious gpu power.And Uncharted still looks better, because art design > technologies
>>337706969
THIS IS NOT, I REPEAT, THIS IS NOT! REAL! LIFE!
THIS IS IN FACT, A SCREENSHOT OF A PLAYSTATION 4 GAME
WHOAAAA
>>337706894
Thats a first person game. It would be soo much harder to make it look that good if it was a third person game.
>>337705251
no they got a kid togheter
They also reveale they are murderers to the kid in the Epiolog
>>337705473
"Based on specs, it's simply not fucking possible to compete with PCs can do."
THEORETICALLY.
And yet, it does.
Where are all the so-called amazing PC games that the ps4 supposedly can't compete with? They are pure fiction, they only exist in your head, based on ideal pc specs and development.
>>337706894
hey , this is off topic, maybe but how do you enable vsync on ME on PC. even when you turn it on in the menu it still has horrible screen tear.
>>337707048
I don't know what you're implying because I'm too lazy to read the whole conversation, but Lost Coast's developer commentary is all about the HDR and other lighting effects.
>>337704734
360 launch titles did HDR around the same time HL2 finally got HDR.
>>337707023
As I said, it is a first person game, and I was asking for a third person game, similar to Uncharted.
>>337706989
You are very helpful in this discussion.Actually not.
>>337707074
you sucka at using the photomode.
>>337707203
>>337707048
im sure you guys are having an argument that doesnt exist
>>337706994
Drake gonna prone bone that hole
>>337706969
Reminds me of pic related.
>>337707032
Crysis was made on the condition that basically nobody could run it at max settings at launch. Eventually, technology caught up and it still looks good today.
More games should follow this example. The whole idea of max settings is that it's max settings - developers shouldn't be slaves to technical specs, give the option to turn it down and we're all happy and the game will eventually look fucking amazing in 5 years.
And no, Uncharted looks about as good as all the other PS4 games. Which is to say, not great. Modded Skyrim looks about as good.
Besides all this, Crysis had a whole bunch of gimmicks and open-ended gameplay and a huge island. It had drivable vehicles - not setpieces - and a lot of options for taking on an enemy group.
Uncharted 4 is a perfectly linear corridor shooter. It's just that some of the corridors look nice.
>>337706048
it's not blindingly light outside, Drake's eyes have adjusted to the level of light in the shade creating the appearance of it being blindingly light outside
>>337707048
So exactly what I said. after lost coast. thanks. idiot.
>>337707203
Lost Coast had HDR, original Half-Life 2 did not, retard.
>>337707123
I'm not arguing about that.
I'm just saying that baked lighting is usually better looking than global illumination, because if you bake it you can make it more accurate and detailed as it doesn't need to be rendered in real time.
Just finished chapter 10 (I think its CH10, its called "The Twelve Towers"), holy fuck that was comfy
>Driving around the desert with Sully and Sam
>Listening to stories and banter
>Bunch of ruined towers to explore that are obviously not optional
>Shootouts can be approached stealthily, straight gunfights, or in my case driving around running people over in my car as Sam/Sully shoot
It was fun
>>337707272
>As I said, it is a first person game, and I was asking for a third person game
It has a third person mode, ergo it's a third person game.
>>337705794
i'll do you one better and give you a 2008 game
>>337707351
How can devs make games that can't run on current technology without having that current technology themselves
>>337707378
>Half-Life 2's HDR was added in later and ruined its aesthetic.
Thanks, retard.
>>337707123
Is it first person or third person?? I just don't know anymore
>>337707272
> Actually not
HAHAHAHAHAHA OMG SO EPIC!!! U TOTALLY BTFOd HIM!!!
>>337707173
>Where are all the so-called amazing PC games that the ps4 supposedly can't compete with?
see
>>337705286
Also, pic related.
>>337707353
Ok then why is the inside still almost pitch black?
>>337707489
the things in the distance look even worse than that uncharted 4 screenshot
ah yes the power of 30 frames per second
>>337705892
your parents ruined your aesthetics with their genes
>>337707509
Same way Crysis did. Made features that were pretty much the pinnacle of what was possible at the time, but that were too taxing to be practical. Because one day, technology will make it practical. Obviously, they cannot include the newer technological innovations, so newer games will always look better, obviously, but that doesn't mean that ultra-high options shouldn't exist.
>>337707365
I like that I can play it at 1080p/60fps with my 4+ year old pc.
>>337707653
>i dont know what depth of field is
>>337707516
And?
My original post was>>337706052
Then you went on about what year it came out.
just shut the fuck up.
>>337707572
but paragon is also on PS4?
actually console exclusive there with crossplay between PS4 and PC
>>337707463
And again. If you make a first person mode in third person game, it will not look as good as in third person, because you will see all the objects closer.
This is a first person game with more graphics details, it was made for first person mode.
>>337707489
So you're saying that this game that was a timed console exclusive look as good as Uncharted 4?It's not even with graphics mode on this screenshot, mate
>>337707725
that table and chair on the right look like they're floating, and the first cry2 screenshot looks like shit, what are you trying to prove?
>>337701843
Dark is dark
Light is light
>realistic
Go outside, and see the contrast between dark and light. It's only realistic compared to each other because there is no MIDTONES.
>>337707725
It's not a very good sequel to the OG Crysis IMO but still a great shooter t b h f a m i l y
>>337707818
It came out after Half-Life 2 (which originally did not have HDR). Point invalidated, retard.
>>337705809
>photo mode
Man, NaughtyDog. You're really shoving your head up your own ass with this game.
allegorithmic software
https://www.allegorithmic.com/blog/texturing-uncharted-4-matter-substance
>spent $9,999,999,999 THOUSAND on just my gpu alone
>barely get better graphics than a $350 console
>>337707108
HOW IS THIS EVEN POSSIBLE?!
>>337707725
sadly the rest of the game is a piece of shit, while uncharted has fun gameplay and entretaining story and characters, crysis is just a glorified benchmark
>>337707872
>And again. If you make a first person mode in third person game, it will not look as good as in third person, because you will see all the objects closer.
What?
Are you retarded?
The game has the same visuals in 3rd person as it does in first person.
>>337707572
oh shit son you got me good, fuck ps4 I want some of that troll tower shit
>>337707973
dumb frogposter
>>337707984
>while uncharted has fun gameplay
You guys suck at taking screenshots
Are all these Uncharted screenshots LQ or are the game's textures all blurry/muddy ?
>>337707997
Now, show me the third person game, which was made for third person, not first person, made in 2009 and that has the same level detail as Uncharted 4.
>>337707918
photo mode seems to become a standard for Sony titles.
first infamous and now ratchet and uncharted.
people love taking screenshots and it's free marketing for sony.
>>337707776
Depth of field doesn't hide super simple geometry
>>337707897
Agreed. It was decent for a generic fps. But it felt like it was designed with consoles in mind.
How old are all the people in here arguing about who has da most realistic graphics
Im 23 and think you are all retarded
We are at the point now where all AAA games look so nice it doesn't matter who is 0.02% more real looking
Im more interesting in interesting art styles, or architecture. Or just good gameplay
>>337707978
HOW IS SUCH A SMALL BOX SO POWERFUL?
MASAKA....
>>337708108
>I'll post an anime face! That'll show him!
Uncharted 4 is great fun and nothing you can say will change that fact, does that made you mad, anon? try to calm down.
I feel sorry for the designers and artists whose work was wasted on this buggy piece of shit game
>>337708108
uncharted 4 does have fun gameplay.
sadly there's not much in it.
>>337707725
That's fitting beause it's a 4+ year old game. hope you still enjoy that shit matey
>>337708168
see
>>337707489
Also, I'm loving all these qualifiers you have to put on the game.
Kinda sad how UC4 has to be compared to games from almost a decade ago.
>>337707908
I KNOW!
that wasn't my point.
you said it looked bad in HL2/.
I said it looked good in lost coast (you know , the tech demo that introduced it first)
I literally don't care WHEN it came out. When the point is the HDR.
look, just don't reply to me. You are arguing things that have no point to the topic.
>>337705794
Let's take a trip back to 2002
>>337707984
> Multiple options for taking on enemies
> Cool suit abilities that are actually useful
> Driveable vehicles
Versus
> Totally linear third-person shooter just like every other totally linear third person shooter that ever came out
>>337708303
wow. But bad reflections though.
>>337707709
This. Honestly the motion blur in Crysis is still state of art, it's just too hardware taxing to implement it for consoles and devs are too lazy to add it as an option for PC.
>>337707984
>run
>cover/peek fire
>wait 5 minutes for cutscene to play
>repeat
So much fun
>>337708282
>Uncharted 4 is great fun
>>337708304
>uncharted 4 does have fun gameplay
>>337708350
>Bringing up a shitty unrelated tech demo when I was clearly talking about an actual game
lrn2argue, retard
>>337708154
ps4's share button compresses the fuck out of images, it makes a 1080p image less than 400kb
There's some buy posting images from his capture card, they are less compressed and look much better
>>337707342
I wasn't having an argument. I made one post: >>337707203
I don't know why >>337707402 is calling me a retard. He probably thinks I'm someone else.
>>337708407
Per-object motion blur isn't that taxing anon, it's just hard to pull off.
>>337708324
>>337708354
It doesn't look even remotely similiar, though. Even with mods.
>>337708329
So, you're comparing a third person game to first person shooter/gpu benchmark, and I asking to provide a remotely similiar looking game from 2009 on PC is moving goalposts?
Really not getting why people think this game is the best looking game of all time, especially amongst journalists.
They should know better that many other games have handled graphics better, uncharted 4 certainly looks good, but it's not the best.
Some of the images in this thread have oddly blurred and somewhat muddy textures.
I'm guessing these are vestiges of the game's 60fps history.
None of this matters anyway
Gameplay > Graphics
>>337708451
Wow! Anime girls laughing! You sure showed him, anon!
Real talk
>supposed to be getting to that time when PC manages to reach and/or surpass the level of graphics seen in the best looking console exclusives
>PS4K is going to catapult console games visually ahead of us again by another 4-5 years
Hold me bros I'm scared, I've been feeling sick to my stomach watching playthroughs of Uncharted 4 and realising literally nothing looks better on PC even though we spend $1000's on high-end hardware and the only thing keeping me sane was knowing eventually the good graphics will trickle down to us and ONLY us as current-gen couldn't handle it.
But now they can! PS4K is 2.3x as powerful, how the fuck do we compete? Can you even imagine how goddamn amazing the next Naughty Dog game will look on that thing?
We're done. We're finished. The mailmen delivering preordered GTX 1080 gpus will be the first to notice the stench of our dead bodies after we commit suicide over this shameful defeat.
>all this shilling
>it's all graphics based
That's hilarious. All these Uncharted threads shilling like mad and not one of them goes on about the gameplay. Because there fucking isn't any. Within a year no one will be playing it yet I still replay games like FEAR because it has something Uncharted doesn't, great art direction and gameplay with nothing sacrificed.
>>337708229
I can't believe how long it's been since Crysis 3 came out.
>>337708469
>unrelated tech demo
>unrelated
>calls other people retard
ok dude. have a seat.
>>337708576
>It doesn't look even remotely similiar, though. Even with mods.
GTA 4 modded looks much better, yes.
>So, you're comparing a third person game to first person shooter
That's irrelevant, there are plenty of first person shooters that look like shit and plenty of third person games that look great.
Just admit that you don't like how a decade-old game looks better than Uncharted 4.
>>337708650
dumb frogposter
>>337708576
Yes.
It doesn't change anything, in terms of technical details. The genre of a game doesn't mean it necessarily takes more resources to render the same scene. What about this is hard for you to understand?
>>337708492
i capture my stuff with an elgato at 1080p during photo mode.
using share button and then transfering via USB stick is such a fucking hassle.
sadly i haven't taken many screenshots of different areas yet.
>>337708303
It doesn't look like that much work.
It's just 10-15 elements copy and pasted 100 times, the geometry is super blocky too.
>>337708650
Dumb frogposter.
>>337708576
2 0 0 2
P C
G A M E
I S
C O M P A R A B L E
T O
A
2 0 1 6
P S 4
G A M E
>stay salty
>>337708679
uncharted 4 seriously has even less good gameplay parts than any other game in the series as well.
There's less combat, more retarded walk while talking to companion segments so they don't called cutscenes etc.
The gameplay is slightly better, but eurogamer were fairly on point when they said it's almost a walking simulator.
>>337708650
>PS4K is going to catapult console games visually ahead of us again by another 4-5 years
>thinking the new "power" will be vidya based
Fucking kek. The new power will be for streaming and watching movies in 4K while giving a little more power to make the VR "practical" the games themselves will gain nothing and will continue to be developed the same as they have been since launch.
sonyggers conclusion : PS4 always win
/thread
>>337708774
Well, then it looks like it is the game, because the textures here are still pretty damn blurry.
>>337708650
lmao the 4k is exclusively for video dumbass
>>337703754
nigger have you EVER been outside before?
>>337708650
I know this is literal retard tier bait but
> 2.3x better
No, it runs at 2.3GHz, up from 1.6.
Sony have made a statement saying that games are strictly prohibited from adding more features to the PS4K version. They'll run better, and probably in 60fps, but they won't look better.
The average PC gamer plays on a toaster and plays games appropriate for a toaster.
>>337701843
Wait so you are telling me THAT is running on a $400 CONSOLE? Not a $2500 pc monster race rig?
Sony always wins bby :)
>>337708953
depends where you look
>>337708774
>Barely looks better than TLOU
You can't make this shit up.
woah...
>>337708834
*climbing simulator
>>337708780
but that's just 1 room in a big open world game.
ubisofts artists are seriously wasted on these shitty games.
even asscreed 2 had great looking architecture.
>>337708834
yeah, the story is good, but the gameplay is lacking compared to even 3's setpieces.
Its more of a stealth game honestly. The gun fights are annoying as fuck in 4. people just appear out of nowhere, its better to just stealth the levels.
you even get a trophy for it in the cemetery level.
and so far not enough actual puzzles.
just seems very light on content so far. I'm only just past the cemetery in scotland.
all of these games look great what the fuck are you guys arguing about
>This thread
It's literally a mental illness at this point.You're trying too hard to convince yourself that you did well by buying a PS4 and it's the best thing ever.I own all playstations from 1-4 but shit is pathetic.It has to be false flagging....
>>337704910
>modded
>>337709067
2.3x better refers to the GPU
It has double the compute units and runs at a higher clock
also "no additional features" refers to gameplay only, in anything graphics related devs have free reign.
>>337709284
>gaf masturbating to a Sony product
Next up water is wet.
>>337705743
"I don't understand how anything works, I'm just a sonygger cuck that will believe anything." Yes, you do sound that retarded.
>>337701843
what's with these uncharted shill threads? I'm still not going to buy your game naughty dog
>>337701843
>tfw you realize the physical universe only renders as much detail as absolutely necessary
>if you're not looking at molecules under a microscope, they don't exist
>tfw we are living in a simulation
Looks like uncharted 3.
>summer
>>337709206
yeah, nah.
>>337709310
>do the madagascar chase from the trailer
>it's all gameplay using both new mechanics the rope and the car driving
>it's fucking amazing
>nothing in the game is as exciting
>it was in the fucking trailer
yes the game lacks some setpieces and the 2nd half all being jungle kinda sucks.
>>337709362
Actually we're trying to highlight how much pcucks get fucked over in terms of shitty optimisation on their platform.
someone is b8ting too hard
1998
>>337709364
Actually, that's vanilla Crysis running in 4k.
https://boards.fireden.net/v/thread/316735664/#q316738160
>>337708695
look at the buildings ahaha
PC gamers talk about graphics so much but are seemingly blind to everything other than texture resolution and volume lighting, it's hilarious
.Ask one to explain 'art direction' and their head will explode
>>337701843
That's impossible OP. You could claim it's more pretty than real life, but not that its more real looking. Real life is already 100% real (we have to assume)' and nothing can be more real looking, even if it would be prettier.
>>337704754
This game was made on a PC
>>337704754
I'm playing Mad Max at 60 fps and it looks much better than this, honestly.
I've played every Crysis maxed out and I still think Uncharted 4 is the best looking game I've ever played. Why do you hate a game that you never played just because it's exclusive to a system you don't have? If it was multiplat everyone in this board would love it
>>337709632
>look at the buildings
What about them?
Have you never seen a brick apartment building?
>>337709620
Actually, it's very clear that he's using ENB to change the lighting settings
Vanilla crysis is extremely bland in colour
>>337709364
You know I've always wondered.
Was The World Dio's stand, or Johnathan's? Considering how all the Joestar's acquired a stand due to Dio having Johnathan's body, it should be his right?
>>337709691
>If it was multiplat everyone in this board would love it
No, not really.
Just look at RotTR, same shit, and it's just as divisive on /v/ as every other game.
And sadly, Uncharted 4 doesn't even look as good as some F2P games.
>>337701843
>real life has banding
well shit pupper if I didn't knew better I'd say your brain is kaput.
>>337709364
Which is something you'll never get to do on your old games. But go ahead and buy the game again for the privilege of playing it remastered for "HD".
>>337709428
No, they really do mean that you cannot give the 4K version better graphics. They're trying to get 1080p with it. And if
> twice as powerful
is true, then that's about all it can do. 1080p = 1920*1080 ~= 2 million pixels
1280*720 ~= 1 million pixels (More like 900k)
Obviously it goes a little further than # of pixels, but it won't improve much.
>>337709779
>Laptop screenshot with no AA
Are you retarded m8?
Yes anon, it's 100% vanilla, the game itself looks great at 4k.
The fact tht you are discussing if it looks better than Crysis, a game fron 9 YEARS AGO, whether U4 or Crysis actually looks better, says a lot...
>>337709718
point fucking proven, jesus christ
Just beat the game.
They completely fucked up Uncharted's artstyle with the realism. Don't get me wrong, it looks absolutely amazing sometimes, but that's the problem, sometimes. Character models can look fucking real in cutscenes at times, and like PS3 models during gameplay. Vistas can be breathtaking, but the shadows cast on the ground can have absolutely TERRIBLE aliasing.
Having shit look so realistic means you can instantly tell when they are cutting corners because of hardware. Uncharted 4 is the best looking game I have ever seen when the illusion works, but it's still running on a PS4. Meaning that when limitations show their ugly face, it's all the more noticeable.
The amount of shilling in this thread is ridiculous.
>>337701843
>REALER THAN REAL LIFE
>>337701843
Even the new DOOM looks better than that and it has to run 60FPS on consoles.
>>337709928
All the settings are on max except for AA, which was on 4x
Also, AA does not affect the lighting
Just deal with it, Crysis looked impressive in 2007, it was a major step up from Far Cry, especially the ground textures, but for 2016 vanilla crysis looks pretty bad
That's why everyone plays it modded nowadays
>>337709983
Whenever I see Sonygger arguments it reminds me of liberals.
>What's wrong with that building?
>HOLY SHIT, THANKS FOR PROVING MY POINT RETARD!
>How is Trump racist?
>HOLY SHIT, YOU FUCKING RACIST ASSHOLE, HOW IS HE NOT?
>>337709901
Are you implying that I'm not a PC user?
Because the only console I have is a PS2 and I got that like last year
Also, I've only played Uncharted 1 like 40 minutes because I got terribly bored
Pretty much up to the part that your picture shows, then I just quit
>>337709903
>they really do mean that you cannot give the 4K version better graphics
completely false
better graphics is the whole fucking point
>>337710091
>All the settings are on max except for AA, which was on 4x
And you're running it at a laptop resolution and trying to compare it to a 4k screenshot.
I'll say it again, you're retarded.
>>337709551
I wish they would have kept that a secret , but I guess they needed that to hype everyone up to buy it.
>>337710205
No, no it isn't. The point is to give games better performance and viability in VR.
>>337710213
Resolution literally only affects the LOD
It does not change the lighting or the piss filters
>game comes out
>nobody discussing it
>all the threads are just shitposts over shitposts
Why /v/?
>>337710384
>resolution affects the LOD
The fuck?
>>337710384
> Resolution affects LOD
You FUCKING RETARD
>>337709943
All it says is that you guys like to mention Crysis. Every single time it gets trotted out. No one actually still plays that game, it just gets dressed up and trotted out in front of the people in an effort to make it seem like the PC can compete. Then put away in a ox afterwards until next time.
A game from 9 years ago an you guys don't have anything more recent to talk about . Talk about becoming irrelevant
>>337708650
Underrated post.
This is great. Absolute top tier troll/bait.
This is the analogue to a /pol/ cuck video, asking, omg "how can us white guys compete with bbc?!"
False flag for luls, as it's clearly a console gamer. Nicely done, anon.
>>337710417
>>337710281
>>337710089
It looks decent but nothing about it looks revolutionary like every ID game up to Doom 3 did.
>>337710401
People that don't own a PS4 obviously don't want to discuss it.
People that do own a PS4 apparently don't like discussion and would rather shitpost instead.
It's a mystery.
>>337709452
There was no downgrade, the final game looks much better
>>337710492
>I don't know how computer graphics work but allow me to retort with an ad hominem to show how intelligent I am
Bravo
This is a PC game from 1981 running at 240fps
>>337710514
>put away in a ox
>>337710384
LOD = level of detail
>>337710024
People keep saying "omg how dey do it?! PS4 BEST EVER! UNCHARTED BEST GAME EVER!" as if graphics are impressive.
But if you know shit about CGI or 3D modeling/sculpting, you know that realistic graphics are not actually difficult to do at all. Everything that impresses you guys? It's fucking specular maps and reflections. You think foliage is impressive? Nigga, it's an automated plug-in, you just brush that shit over ground meshes and it hides lazy geometry. Textures? Shit, we've had photo-real textures for nearly a decade now, it's just that compression means you can actually have them at a decent resolution in some cases. Even lighting is easy as hell, Unity can run the same lighting engine Unreal has.
But there's always a trade off. Maybe it's dynamic shadows, render distance that has to be hidden with photographs, or cut texture resolution on anything that isn't the player model. The fact that they can make a good looking game DESPITE console limitations isn't a triumph of technology, it just means we're finally in an age where consoles can do things PCs could do 7 years ago, and game budgets allow console games to do it too. There's still cuts and laziness, it's just hidden better.
>>337710718
No shit, sherlock
>>337710651
>that shit dof, bloom and chromatic aberration
lol
>>337710648
Check who I was replying to.
LoD refers to lower-detail meshes used to reduce GPU load for far away objects where detail doesn't matter. Tesselation has recently been used to augment or even replace it, which is a procedural method of doing basically that.
>>337710198
Is that supposed to look good?
>>337710559
Well it's 60FPS on console which is why it doesn't look revolutionary, but it's comparable to games that run 30FPS on consoles and these put everything they have into graphics so it's not that bad.
>>337710651
I bet it doesn't even have dynamic lighting. It's all pre-baked shit and besides, it's not third person so it's way easier to do good graphics.
>>337710514
You say people don't play Crysis anymore like people usually play 9 year old games xDDD
>>337710806
So how does the resolution magically alter models, textures, etc?
>>337710384
that not what LOD means.
LOD means how much stuff you can see from farther away.
resolution improves aliasing so the screen has no jaggies.
>>337710384
>It does not change the lighting
You're fucking retarded.
Come back to me with your own 4k screenshots, until then, fuck off.
>>337710878
And when you up your resolution, you're gonna get higher LOD than when you use lower resolutions
Also, texture resolution goes up, but Crysis has no 4K textures, so you're gonna get the same shitty 1080p texture resolution
Again, does not add any piss filters or change the shaders
>>337711051
>how does my computer display things at higher resolutions when I set my resolution higher
Gee, I wonder
>>337710514
The point is that, while better-looking games exist (For instance, the "New" Battlefront game which while a shit game looks fucking amazing) this is a game that looks comparable despite having been released so long ago. Nobody talks about it because there isn't much to talk about - most people agree that it's a generally decent game, but a bit repetitive and lacklustre.
>>337711169
>how does my computer display things at higher resolutions when I set my resolution higher
That doesn't make the actual assets less detailed though, you god damn fucking mongoloid cunt.
>>337710990
How about 18 year old games?
>>337711161
>resolution affects lighting
Has to be a troll post right?
>>337710076
Well they weren't lying when they said it was running on a PS4.
What they DIDN'T say is that all the PS4's resources were being used solely for rendering the animation, with nothing left to run the gameplay engine and other backend stuff. Of course, the idiots who fall for this pre-release shit don't realize that.
TL;DR neo-NaughtyDog fans are dumb as shit.
Pic related is basically the same thing.
> Cookie-cutter shooter
> Amazing graphics
>>337706962
true autism
>>337704754
25 years ago
>>337711307
>That doesn't make the actual assets less detailed though
Yes, because it doesn't downscale things, the actual assets will just look uglier because they're not at 4k resolution
>>337711371
>I'm retarded and don't know how lighting and shading work, please rape my face!
>>337711395
Fucking Dice. They should fire everyone except whoever works on the engine, sound and graphics.
>>337711460
So you finally agree with me that resolution does not affect LOD? Good.
anyone here hasn't gone insane?
raise your hand?
>>337711465
>exact same resolution but different settings
>SEE, RESOLUTION MAKES THE LIGHTNIGHS BETTER
>>337711391
the top one is running on a computer anon.
>>337711169
>texture resolution goes up
>so you're gonna get the same shitty 1080p texture
so it doesn't go up/
resolution makes the screen less blurry and aliased. thats all. You'll get a nice clean image of whatever is in the game, but the detail won't go up. and thats what LOD refers to. Especially from objects farther away. They'll still be blurry boxes even if you are running it at 6K if the LOD is low.
>>337711465
game?
>>337704214
Have you never seen a mountain? I long in New Mexico and you're fucking retarded if you don't think mountains look like that
>>337711559
All the developers in the world are laughing at you in unison right now
Take any game and run it at 1080p, look in the distance, memorize it
Now run it at 640x480, notice how you can see fuck-all in the distance?
That's because the resolution is too low for higher levels of detail
>>337711169
>>And when you up your resolution, you're gonna get higher LOD than when you use lower resolutions
That's...not what Level of Detail means, dude.
Level-of-Detail is a technical term for when a game engine swaps in more or less detailed (polygon-wise) models for things depending on your distance from them. Like when you see a tree far away and as you get closer, the game swaps in a higher-poly tree model to save rendered polygons. It's a performance optimization thing, it has NOTHING to do with your screen resolution.
>so you're gonna get the same shitty 1080p texture resolution
THAT IS NOT HOW TEXTURE RESOLUTION IS MEASURED YOU FUCKING DOLT. YOUR SCREEN SIZE HAS NOTHING TO FUCKING DO WITH THE RESOLUTION OF THE TEXTURE ON A MODEL.
Jesus christ, how do you people even tie your shoes?
>>337711603
>>exact same resolution
Jesus christ, you're even more fucking retarded than you look.
It's literally the exact same settings except one is running at ~25% resolution while the other is running at 100% resolution.
In other words, it's comparable to a 4k screenshot vs a 1366x768 screenshot (actually moreso, since a 768p image is ~13% of the pixelcount of a 4k image).
>>337711679
Battlefield 4
>>337711654
>nitpicking select parts of the sentence instead of retorting the entire sentence
Your arguing skills are beyond retardation
>>337711603
But it doesn't make the light scattering better.
>>337711792
>YOUR SCREEN SIZE HAS NOTHING TO FUCKING DO WITH THE RESOLUTION OF THE TEXTURE ON A MODEL
Go play Rise of The Tomb Raider in 1080p and then 4K and report back to me
>>337701843
realer than real life when theres little to no motion blur when turning and framerate isnt a hinderance
>>337711818
>>337711465
lol the reason PS1 was so shitty was becasue the resolution was bad. We could have had PS4 graphics years ago but the resolutions was so bad.
Lighting, LOD, all kinds of graphics would be better SOLELY becasue of resolution.
If only 4K was a thing years ago, amirite fellas?
>>337711949
Are you trying to tell me that they create assets for each and every resolution possible?
So if there are custom resolutions available, they'll create more than 1 million different versions of the assets?
>>337711792
You guys are guys are getting troled hard. Can't you tell he's merely pretending? I mean nobody can be this retarded for real.
>>337702243
Where's his shadow?
>>337702243
holy shit absolutely no grounding in the environment. it looks like he's fucking floating above the ground what the fuck ps4...
>>337712101
>Retard gets BTFO
>Responds with a retarded strawman
Jesus christ, it's like talking to a 12 year old.
>>337711949
You're conflating two things you know nothing about.
Check this, right? If you have bad eyesight, and you look at a painting, it might look blurry. When you put on glasses, suddenly it's crisp and sharp and detailed. The PAINTING didn't change. What changed was the RENDERING of the image.
If you play a game on Ultra settings with high-res textures and max model detail, but run it at 240p, no shit it's gonna look blurry and undetailed. But that wouldn't change the fact that actual high-poly models and textures are being rendered in-game. You can't see them because of the resolution, but they're still there.
>>337709206
>>337708774
How did they make a game that look hardly better than a PS3 game?
>>337712021
>>337712246
>tfw no 4k eyesight
>>337711851
you know how so many people are telling you you're wrong?
>>337711720
seriously this is not what LOD means.
You are eliminating jaggies which means you can see more of whats being presented. the LOD was always the same.
I know what you mean about resolution, but just don't call it LOD. thats just going to get people calling you out.
>>337711353
that's literally a flat texture
>>337710779
Exactly, it's always ever been about using trickery and illusion to create the best grafics with limited resources.
One of the first examples that I always think of are the stairs in Ocarina of Time: they're actually just a flat ramp, but the texture makes it look otherwise.
Another example is that in games like Star Fox 64 and Ocarina of Time, the only things that are being rendered at any given time are what is actually visible on the screen. That's why, in Star Fox 64, if a charge shot kills an enemy off screen it won't count.
>>337712398
>>337712403
Your eyesight really can't be measured in pixel resolution, because it really doesn't work that way. A 4k monitor displays the same density of pixels across the entire screen, but our eyes don't function like that. We only really see detail in the very center portion, and around the edges is mostly blurry, with a lot of movement and stuff being filled in by our brains.
>>337702243
Is that supposed to look good? Hahahahah
>>337712224
the only one getting Blown are the idiots think resolution does fuck all to fucking lighting and LOD.
>>337712362
Dragon's Dogma was really ugly though
>le graffix don't matter! It's about GAMEPLAY
>see these threads
Fuck, you neckbeards are never happy with anything.
>>337712517
>there has to be more to life.
>>337712557
I was making a joke, anon. It's fine.
>>337710623
>hold direction to platform
Is there any actual platforming in these games or is it all cinematic scripted garbage?
>>337712517
>>337701843
I imagine how these screenshots will be perceived a decade form now.
>>337712702
>>337712672
Mostly cinematic garbage.
Is it weird that I found it to be an oddly refreshing change of pace when Rise of the Tomb Raider made me press E to actually grab a ledge after I jumped to it?
>>337712727
I was fucking blown away by Mafia 1 when it was released. I thought graphics COULD NOT POSSIBLY GET ANY BETTER.
And here we are.
>>337712626
>does fuck all to fucking lighting
I literally just posted an example of resolution having an effect on lighting in >>337711465.
And while that other guy is a retard, resolution can have an effect on the rendering quality of distance objects.
http://international.download.nvidia.com/geforce-com/international/comparisons/metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes/metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes-nvidia-dynamic-super-resolution-cross-section-7-3840x2160-vs-1280x720.html
>>337712470
So show me a better looking Playstation game from 1998.
>>337712727
> Yes, this is an actual PC game screenshot
Hilarious
>>337712702
>>337712806
What part of this is supposed to be impressive? This looks exactly like every other modern AAA game.
>>337712636
Its easy to make any shit look nice with proper colors and ambient occlusion and some indirect lighting.
>>337712886
>I thought graphics COULD NOT POSSIBLY GET ANY BETTER.
I thought so about Farcry. I was thinking to myself this is as far as we go, from here on is all about enemies on screen, enemy AI, complex gameplay, etc. Surely we can't push graphics more than this.
Ground textures are fucky, everything has a slight blur to it, and the colors are fucked up. I will admit the hair looks fabulous.
>>337712806
>>337712982
This. Can someone actually explain to me how Uncharted is meant to be more impressive than say pic related?
>>337712912
there are so many factors that affect LOD.
resolution solely isn't one of them. its why watching a youtube video of gameplay isn't definitive of the actual product.
your examples have different factors that have nothing to do with resolution.
hook up your PC to a 480i tv and you'll still have all of those effects if you set your game to max graphics.
>>337713414
Its PlayStation 4 exclusive.
This is reason enough.
>>337713475
>resolution solely isn't one of them
I never said it was, all I said is that it can have an effect, and it can.
>>337713414
There are far better ROTR shots that this though.
almost everything in the game is rendered dynamically. Unlike Uncharted 4, where tons of shit are pre-baked.
Do Sonyggers actually think this game looks good? The Witcher 3 looks better for fucks sake.
Vanishing of Ethan Carter looked better than that and it came out almost 2 years ago.
And it was made by around 8 people on either .01% or .001% of the budget that Uncharted 4 had.
>>337713545
>There are far better ROTR shots that this though.
Yeah, on PC. ROTR on PS4 doesnt look as good as Uncharted 3 on PS4.
all these games look about the same but >>337713309 this looks really great thou.
>>337713097
That game looked incredible, too. I haven't been that impressed by graphics since then.
>>337713679
Another screenshot.
>>337704776
>It actually not
but it is
shill
>>337713781
>ROTR on PS4
RoTTR isn't even on PS4 yet m8.
>>337713830
looks like Crysis 1 desu.
>>337713943
but it will be, and my post will hold true
>>337706607
Third person sucks dick anyway, but im pretty sure crysis did.
>>337713975
>still have word filters
seriously?
Best looking games right now.
Battlefront>Crysis 3>Uncharted 4
There, end of the story
>>337713309
Why do console games never have anisotropic filtering? On PC it's always been such a cheap thing to turn on, subtracting maybe 1 or 2 FPS if that even for a much better looking game. Why do console games, no matter what, NEVER ever have it on? Is there some sort of bizarre licensing reason? Is there some kind of hardware constraint like low memory that makes the effect more expensive on consoles? I just don't get it. I mean Uncharted 4 is a nice looking game but it would look so much better if you could have some fucking texture filtering.
>>337714083
I just type them as desu senpai tbqh.
>>337714223
>>337714235
They do have it, except for some reason they have real trouble with it.
UC4 for example can only go up to like 4x
>>337714436
It feels like everyone has been playing catch up with Crysis for almost 10 years now, and other games are only now finally managing to catch up.
>>337714461
4x is the minimum uncharted 4's AF goes down to, and that's only when there's a lot of shit going on.
Sam has the best character model i ever saw in a video game. He is literally photorealistic in some scenes. Motherfucker who made him did a 10/10 job.
Shitty screen but you can see how good he can look in-game.
Uncharted 4's graphics are horribly overated. The character models are amazing but the environments look pretty bad. Heck I even think Uncharted 3 had better environmental graphics.
Naughty Dog is pretty good when it comes to adding detail and stuff. Usually interiors will have a lot of random stuff and details most other developers neglect. This was nothing to do with system power, I've noticed this in their PS3 games.
Never played Uncharted 4 or own a PS4, but it looks pretty good for what would be considered a weak computer, running at half the framerate of course, so not really all that impressive.
They're on the right track, some things seem to look better than any PC game, but then severely lacking in other departments.
Their foliage is modeled nicely, but whatever else they're doing with it seems to just turn it into rubber. The ground looks kind of shitty. Looks like it's supposed to be wet, but has no reflections, so it just looks awkward.
I know Uncharted 4 doesn't take place in Hell, but this is also a rocky surface with a light source. Should look more like that and less like jelly.
>farcry 4 on ps4 looks better
heh
Here OP, have a PC game.
I remember when people said the PS4 peaked graphically in early 2014 because of "PC architecture".
They didn't believe me when I said the graphics will continue to improve regardless.
>>337701843
Bloodborne looks better than this 2bh.
Especially central yharnam.
I stop to look at the environmental detail everytime.
Damn, Did PS4 finally get to Renaissance painting tier of Graphics?
>>337714906
>>337714968
We're so close to photorealism it's insane.
By 2020 most games will look like this even on a low tier level, and the AAA games will look absolutely photorealistic in most cases.
>>337715124
Naughty Dog is usually good at making use of the limitations. The Last of Us was the best looking game I ever playeduntil I built a PC and played literally any PC gameand Uncharted 4 looks better than plenty of PC games. But plenty of PC games look better than it.
>>337714968
>grass disappearing with distance
>>337715305
I don't like superphotorealism. Real life is too bright.
yeah but is it fun. i've only played uncharted 1 and it's about as fun as a barrel of bricks. it's pretty but like, ok
>>337715378
>and played literally any PC game
Undertale?
>>337715483
Consoles
>grass disappearing in front of you
>chunks rendering in front of you
>>337715484
Graphics are about to accelerate more than ever before because Sony & MS are about to launch new consoles every year which means PC gaming won't necessarily be held back by consoles anymore.
Hardware will be able to keep up with the software on an industry wide level for the first time.
>>337712517
PAYNE
>>337715616
That's not relevant to what I am saying.
>>337701843
this is what PS4 cucks think reality looks like?
let me show you something from UE4 on pc
>>337701843
cant you apply loads of editing and filters in photo mode though?
false advertising tbqh... sneaky tactics from ND but you'll probably see it in every AAA game now
>>337715825
Now let us see another texture from different perspective
(I'm pro PC gaming)
>>337715778
It's relevant to this entire thread.
>>337714906
> tfw no dinosaur horror game in this setting
>>337715305
> We're so close to photorealism it's insane
people have been saying that for ages, and we're not
>>337716118
If it was relevant to the whole thread, then why are you quoting me?
>>337716038
https://forums.unrealengine.com/showthread.php?58385-Koola-s-stuff
Screenshots in this thread. Dynamically lighted and rendered. Plants are speedtree.
>>337715124
Games don't look much better now than they did in 2014.
>>337716038
here, have the video instead
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nLGoqqDc0w
>30 fps
>>337716775
The big problem is that this was captured in engine.
>>337716743
Wait until probably 2018. Pascal cards would be more widespread and better textures, reflection, lighting, etc. would be achieved.
>>337717003
nope, it's realtime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbDQYXNDXKM
>>337716743
And to think I thought the gameplay for BF4 was shallow.
>>337716775
>literally a tech demo
i mean come the fuck on, like fucking graphics and water still doesn't look as good as they did in those nvidia tech demos from years ago,
>>337714565
Is this supposed to be more impressive than this, from 3 years ago?
>>337701843
noice, they only needed 20 years to catch up with scumm
![[PSP] Scummvm emulator screenshot fateofatlantis .jpg](https://i.imgur.com/6hEtK5C.jpg "[PSP] Scummvm emulator screenshot fateofatlantis")
>>337717443
Except you can't play Uncharted 4 on the go so they still haven't caught up.
>>337717637
on that incredible and wondrous new eye adaptation simulation tech i mean
step by step
>>337717218
so is uncharted 4, what's your point?
>This thread
>>337717262
It is more impressive, the animation quality adds so much.
>>337710779
>But if you know shit about CGI or 3D modeling/sculpting
Anon, I've found the problem.
Generally speaking the people who spend their time shitposting on /v/ are not the people who know even the first thing about what they're talking about. I've seen people on here honestly ask why an open world game like new vegas can't have as many people onscreen as dynasty warriors when dynasty warriors can do it, or why game A with 1.5 times the budget of game B isn't exactly 1.5 times the graphical quality.
I just beat this today
The combat in U4 is fantastic. so fast paced and organic. I am rewarded for constantly running around, flanking, jumping over shit, pulling off people off cliffs. It is pure action and the graphics seriously look as good as the UE4 paris tech demo sometimes
Yes sometimes you see a shitty texture or something off about the look of things but 95% of the time the game seriously looks gorgeous.
I fucking hated the epilogue
>>337702243
That actually looks really good for mountainous terrain
>>337704291
ITT: people who have never been hiking in the mountains speculate how it should look and are completelywrong
>>337719009
this
animations are worth a lot
>>337719009
Anon, it's all mocapped animation, it's the same exact shit. At best they're using better actors.
>>337721623
The facial capture used in crysis wasn't as sophisticated.
>>337721457
Nobody cares that you're from Bumfuck Montana and go for walks outside.
>>337704595
>XCOM 2 looks better than this
D E L U S I O N A L
>>337721623
crysis animation is good but its not as good as U4's
>>337708117
Looks nice, can you go there?
>>337716775
>Using a tech demo as an argument
>>337721876
Your opinion is objectively wrong about how they look
>>337708451
>posts gifs instead of makiing an actual argument
Please shitpost somewhere else
>>337722383
I have stated no opinion on that subject. You seem to have me confused with someone else.
>>337715483
you have to sacrafice something else it wouldn´t run properly even on high end.
>>337711465
Lighting actually looks better at lower res
Damn...
>>337713069
Holy shit this is dragon's dogma?
>>337701843
Consolefags discovering fire
>Cute
Meanwhile, 9 years ago on the PC...
>>337705710
why did elena get sad at this part I'm autistic and cant read people
>playing through Witcher 2 this moment and it looks better than this shit
>Crysis still looks better than everything
>>337715124
yep, pretty funny. PS3 didn't peak with Naughty Dog's second game, Uncharted 4 is only the beginning.
>>337725841
She saw him going back to his old ways and getting involved with the mystery and the hunt for the treasure- after they'd already agreed they were only there for Sam.
>>337705710
>wearing the tux at that point in the game
pretty funny
I like the bullet time mode, makes me Nathan Payne.
>>337726154
Just out of curiosity, what game looks better than Uncharted 2? I know it isn't 3.
>>337726271
Man, women. Man. Women.
>>337701843
100 Million$ on visuals. 1$ for gameplay design and story. What you expect from Western devs.
Naughty Dog are god devs. Literally the best and most talented developers of games ever.
Just look at pic related. They're able to push out so fucking much with the PS3 from Uncharted 1 to 3.
The difference between Uncharted 4 and real life? There's no difference. Just need VR for Uncharted 4 even though there's barely any difference.
Sony always wins, baby. 60 FPS too.
#4ThePlayers
>>337726271
I thought she said she actually liked their adventures and was was sad to leave it all behind
>>337727128
>someone took the time to edit his hair in the picture for 4 to look like JUST
are people really this desperate, his hair never looks different than this, it just looks wet when it's raining
>>337727347
He looks like the biggest douchebag with this hair
>>337701843
Rocks are flat in real life?
>>337702065
>What is tonemapping
>>337705956
>when you get killed by certain guns you turn into a skeletal.
TECHNOLOGY
>>337705710
How does mocap still end up looking like thunderbirds?
>>337710902
its not 60 fps, it dips constantly.
>>337705169
Once you're in-game, battlefront and U4 look about the same graphically but U4 has better animations
t. owner of both
>>337704595
>Any of those games
>Looking remotely close to this masterpiece
Yeah, no. Sorry, friend.
>>337731326
>battlefront and U4 look about the same graphically
lol
>>337702243
This is the owrst uncharted 4 screenshots, the nathan drake house are awesome but this really sucks, looks irreal and everything doesn't look natural, i know is a jungle but the gloss looks fake.
>>337708171
>What is Mad Max
>>337705169
Crysis may look good on a technical level, but it's so... hmm.. lifeless? You know? It lacks that soul that Uncharted 4 has. It's clear they spent a lot of time making damn sure Crysis was going to make people drop their jaws, but Naughty Dog aims for something higher than that with their hand-crafted environments that truly look out of this world, while being so reminiscent of our own..
>>337733397
Higher resolution doesn't necessarily mean better graphics.
>>337732350
>I was playing crysis
>My point was on the map
>I've jump a cascade
>find a secret way
>Enter to the basement
>Save a girl from being tortured
>Fight against tanks without any QTE
>I could destroy it as i want.
Crysis has more soul in gameplay than mostly of the games of today if you wat the story then go for uncharted or look to a movie.
>Crysis came out 9 years ago
When will the screenshot meme end ?
This game looks gorgeous on screen, isn't that what counts ?
Why bother screenshoting and uploading it here ?
>>337706894
Looking at this game, relatively simple but extremely stylish in design, just makes me mad as fuck when I think about the sequel.
>sonyggers crying again
wowww
>>337701843
I really dislike these ironic shill posts.
u4 is better than TLOU and U2 and I love both of those games
>>337733853
Fuck.
Is it pre-rendered ?
If not what kind of GPU would be able to pull this ?
>>337725841
she wasnt sad, she was turned on.
>>337711710
They don't.
>>337722223
You climb that tower in the early parts of the game. Lots of fun rope-swinging sequences.
looks pretty good for a 350 dollar console
>>337733853
An environment so fake I wouldn't be surprised if a small child's hand came down to place some GI Joe figures in the middle.
>484 replies
How is it so easy to get this many replies?
>>337735194
People who love video games love to argue about things and one of those things is usually graphics.
>>337734476
I can play it with a hd7750 at 1080p and 30 fps in medium graphics.
This is one of the best optimized maps that i see.
>>337734476
>>337735127
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3V--20IEW8
>>337708282
>Is a fact because i say it
Sure anon, keep being delusional
Battlefront, another mediocre game much like Uncharted 4, looks significantly better than UC4 at a stand still and especially in motion.
With the real life mod installed it pulls away in the graphics department to a degree that comparing the two is a moot point.
>>337735194
/v/ gets easily triggered by the ps4
>>337704595
Okay, im kinda on your side here but Crysis 2 and XCOM do not look even nearly as good m80
Why do people still care about graphics? Compared to what we had in the 90s, everything is just plain amazing. If we had fun with those old graphics, why are people so uppity about how these console graphics are so "bad?"
>>337710205
You better do your research ps4k isnt 4k graphics 144fps machine its just for VR and upping games to 1080/60fps
>>337708215
crysis 2 is literally my go-to example of console tech limitations ruining a game. idk why you'd use it to waggle your PC tech dick
>>337736415
It's called standards.
Post YFW PC cucks will NEVER get Uncharted 4
I'm sorry OP, did you say something?
>>337738081
Above isn't a real game.
![dscn1589[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/1xNvkOn.jpg "dscn1589[1]")
