>2 days after realease
>still no reviews
Why is this allowed?
That means it's shit.
>>337670090
>i can't think and form an opinion of my own - the post
>>337670090
They didn't distribute free review copies prior to release.
>>337670245
Sure, let me sink 60 bucks into a game I don't know is going to be good or not instead of looking at what other people have said to get a picture of how decent or how poor it possibly is.
ie, the entire fucking reason reviews exist in the first place.
>>337670348
>being this entitled
>>337670348
Click the critic reviews section, the "critics" just haven't finished their reviews yet.
Why would you honestly care what polygon or IGN have to say? There is WAY more than enough media on the net to get an informed opinion on this game.
>>337670305
Why not? Isn't that pretty standard? Seems like a big fuck up if they didn't get any pre-release reviews
>Game is so bad they don't give out review copies
Anyone who bought this game is dumb as fuck.
>>337670245
>you aren't allowed to know before you paid, goy!
>>337670410
>being this much of a consumer retard
>>337670471
t. poorfag
>>337670465
They decided not to and some youtubers maybe websites even said "FUCK YOU NOT GONNA REVIEW IT ON MY CHANNEL THEN".
>>337670182
Nah, that's not how you judge games on metacritic
> High critic score, low user score: Game is shit and reviewers are getting paid to give it a good score or are just SJW faggots worshipping the game for being "progressive"
> Low critic score, High user score: Game is great but reviewers either aren't getting paid or just suck at the game
> High critic, high user score: Game is gud
> Low critic score, low user score: game is shit
tl;dr critic scores don't mean shit
>>337670471
That's a convenient conclusion you just jumped to
It's becoming a more common practice these days, and their main reason isn't "because it is so bad they don't want people to review it."
Because reviewers cant beat it just look at polygon
There's a lot to cover. The campaign is 10 hours long with unlockable classic maps and multiple difficulty levels
There's snapmap which you have to learn to use
There's a ton of different multiplayer modes to play
You need to play each aspect to review it properly
>>337670410
>entitled maymay
kill yourself.
>>337670576
>It's becoming a more common practice these days
What other AAA games didn't have review copies then?
>>337670565
The ones on the left would keep falling down
>>337670182
dunno, playing it now
its good
not groundbreaking, but best old school fps in ... i guess since original quake and doom days
a solid 8/10
>>337670575
User scores are just a console war battle ground though, everything is a 1 or a 10. You can't talk about agenda driven critics and then promote user scores
You wanna know why this game is good?
Because it remembers its a game and not a movie
>>337670348
Pirate it then faggot and try it for yourself.
>>337670442
> Polygon
https://youtu.be/9yYp8ZeQ-I8?t=6m (use adblock)
Judging by the way they play they're probably going to get up to the foundry, give up, and give it a 4/10 score and complain about how the summoners should be transexual
>>337670830
new wolfenstein doesnt count?
>>337670856
THEN PLAY THE GAME AND DO YOUR OWN DAMN REVIEW
fuck
>>337670090
this game looks 2 ez.
was watching a DraQu_ stream on Ultra Nightmare and he was buttfucking the game with zero problems. Lame. It also really does look empty af.
>>337670963
>>>337670090 (OP)
>this game looks too easy.
>was watching a DraQu_ stream on Ultra Nightmare and he was buttfucking the game with zero problems. Lame. It also really does look empty as fuck.
Fixed that for you
>>337670305
>>337670465
>>337670565
it seems like they really screwed up the marketing for this game 2bh
>They decided not to and some youtubers maybe websites even said "FUCK YOU NOT GONNA REVIEW IT ON MY CHANNEL THEN".
IGN was so mad they gave it a 7 in their 'pre-review' dont know how legit that score is though. ign also gave blops 3 a fucking 9 ffs
>>337671034
what exactly did you fix? retard
>>337670918
new wolf wasnt really that old school outside of some game play elements like no regenerating health and dual welding
it still took pointers from modern campaign structures
wolf was good, but many dont consider it a good old fps since its narrative ehavy
>>337670886
> That in progress review
> 6 hours in and he only just reached the sanctum
> 6 hours
> 6
> fucking
> hours
How fucking bad can you get? I got to sanctum in half that time
>>337671229
The Old Blood is better imo because it has less cutscenes.
I wish the game had more RtCW weapons like tesla gun, flamethrower etc but machinegames decided to do a remake of Wolf3D and that game only had hitscan weapons
>>337671319
took me over 7 hours, and im pretty good at fps games
unless you run like retarded sanic ignoring the logs and most exploration the game is pretty long
stop trying to force some retarded meme kid, no this game isnt fucking 3 hour long
>>337671417
the old blood has worse pacing and structure
zombies show up wy too late and you are way too strong by then and used to the gameplay
it just seems like dlc
>>337671108
I toook it squarly out of bookface realm
>>337670934
Buy him the game first shillard.
>PC
Found your problem
All the reviews are for the console versions
>>337671484
>retarded sonic ignoring logs
i'm playing games not reading books you shit shill
They didn't send out review copies because they weren't turning Multiplayer and Snapmap servers on before release
>>337670348
>60 bucks
poorfag detected
>>337670090
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqe248Pokzc
It's pretty great.
>>337673379
>Shitty fast talking
>Annoying voice
>Opens with a shitty joke
Kill this man
