It wasn't THAT bad.
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: It wasn't THAT bad.
It wasn't THAT bad.
>>337594013
It was quite okay. Definitely better than 'modern' RPGs, but not as good as the classics.
>>337594013
The game has no romance options. That's one of the reasons why I haven't played it.
>>337594013
It wasn't bad at all
There just isn't any reason to pay for and play a game that is worse in every way than the 20 y old games that it's supposed to imitate.
>>337594327
Faggot
>>337594013
Boring as fudge sadly. I wanted to like it and played everything to completion, but never again.
>>337594013
It just wasn't good
>>337594395
>Pay for
>Implying
>>337594013
I recently tried replaying the first Baldur's Gate which made me realize PoE was actually quite good.
>>337594013
Sadly, it was.
>>337594013
I cant avoid the sensation of filler in some dialogues. Not talking about the backers' shit of course.
Also, I never feel powerful or at least strong.
>>337594013
It simply was quite forgettable
It could be miles better if Josh "Master of Balance" Sawyer wasn't such an autist.
>>337597010
>Also, I never feel powerful or at least strong.
That's because Sawyer nerfed everything that was strong into the ground.
>>337597348
theres simply way too many classes, the game could do with less
>>337594013
Not giving your party ai so you could enjoy the meta game of managing your party so they work well. I felt so bored having to micro manage everyones attacks and abilities.
>>337597010
>Also, I never feel powerful or at least strong.
Maybe you should git better? People solo the game on Path of the Damned.
>>337597445
>Implying druid storms aren't broken
