New Retroahoy video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OipJYWhMi3k
Feels good man
>hour long
It's all filler, right? I think a person who hasn't played Quake is better off playing it rather than listening to this.
Loved the polygonized Carmack at 2:27
>>337572918
No, it isn't.
>>337572918
>retroyahoy
>filler
Mah boy, retroahoy analyse EVERYTHING: the weapons, the development story, the enemies, the guns, to level design. Everything from each game of the series.
>>337573627
Even that looks smug.
>>337573759
it's not 'analysis' he's literally just stating things about the game you would know from playing it
kind of wonder what the point in the video is
>>337572754
>Listening to game design observations from a fucking youtuber
eyy yo wens the next sequilitis comin out :^)
Saw it last night.
I think Ahoy outdid himself, as even Doom's video he did recently is not as good. The graphics, presentation and research he did for this one is phenomenal. I never knew about the Quake references in Commander Keen, for example.
The video also deals with Quake's legacy and makes you think about the new game that came out yesterday, is it DOOM, is it Quake, does it matter?
P. good.
>>337574571
>https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/genetic
1/10
>>337574918
>goes straight for the logical fallacies
I don't know what I was expecting, thinking that RetroAhoy's fans would be any less pretentious as he is.
>>337574571
A very well presented youtuber with a sexy voice rather.
>>337574571
Yeah clearly having a Youtube channel automatically means you can't know anything about game design.
>>337576265
It's a good indicator, not to mention this fuckface is a perfectly good example of that point
>>337575148
>Insulting based on osmoenes taste
this guy is the whole package
