Why do people fight over these two games so much? They perfectly compliment one another.
Story
>Involved cinematic story
>Subtle enviromental story
World
>Open world
>Small complex world
Gameplay
>Great multi enemy combat
>Great single enemy combat
Main Character
>Established character
>Create your own character
>>337444263
The gameplay in W3 is shit no matter how you slice it
Bloodborne has better "multi enemy combat" than the Witcher. Everything about the combat is better.
>>337444263
Yet BB is still the better game.
Cum at me, Witcherfags
>>337444263
Human trash from both sides trying to make it worse for everyone else.
Ignore them. Both are fine games.
No one on here even thinks W3 is better than Bloodborne. It goes completely against the gameplay first frame of mind.
>>337444671
Bloodborne lore is non-existent in comparison to the witcher.
>>337444671
story and characters>gameplay
stay mad sonygger
>>337444263
Witcher 3 actually has some good fun gameplay instead of just autistic walking simulator for the COD crowd.
The Witcher is an RPG.
Dark Souls is a slow action game with stats.
>>337444361
...and everything else is worse
>>337445270
Funny you say that because you have more direct influence on quest npcs in bloodborne than in the witcher. You can kill any quest npc you want unlike witcher which is closer to skyrim in that regard.
Do you want to eat placentae?
Yes you do.
>>337445346
What's worse?
>>337444263
because they are the figureheads in an ideological war of clinically retarded people.
>>337444361
>The gameplay in W3 is shit no matter how you slice it
No, because the gameplay is not exclusively the less in depth than BB combat.
>>337445440
That does not make them less or more of an RPG, which BB still is not.
>>337447371
Can you rephrase that?
>>337444597
/thread
