Do you think it's okay to represent fetishes in a children's game?
>>337349368
I don't think sexuality is an entirely corrupting concept, and children these days are more in tune with their sexuality than they have been in a century.
Mostly due to parental negligence, rather than any education or change in social norms -- but still.
There's no reason to distance sexual themes from the media children enjoy other than to appease more restrictive parenting styles.
Ali is her Altaria isn't it?
It's supposed to be a pokemon's way of doing an autograph if they can't write
Why do you retards make everything out to be some fetish?This is from someone who actually DOES want Ali to step on me.
>>337350747
I fully endorsed your post, until I read the spoiler. To each their own I suppose
>>337350747
Good taste.
>>337350747
It's a bird. You can buy a bird to stand on your shoulder, Anon.
>>337349368
Only if it unintentional
>>337349869
I agree.
America's on that though, finally 3 year olds girls can twerk on YouTube and Instagram to their heart's content.
Why is it a 'children's game'?
Did it say so on its box?
Were the devs targeting only children when they were making the game?
Are you sure grown ups won't like it?
>>337349368
It will go right over their heads, and then understand it on the replay when they're teenagers.
I don't see a problem, as long as it's not too obvious.
>>337351453
anon, it's ok if you like it and are an adult. Just know that objectively it is a game that GameFreak tailored for children
>>337349368
How did you change May's headband to blue?
>>337349368
i don't know why pokemon refers to footprints when it would be more appropriate to refer to them as paw prints. only a few pokemon actually have "feet", many more have paws, fins or nothing at all.
>>337352953
That's why. Pokemon don't have any specific paws or fins or anything: so they use the generic term, feet. Paws are also feet.
Only if said fetish isn't shit-tier.
