CIVILIZATION 6
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: CIVILIZATION 6
Last thread:
>>337269641
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1bfgARmuGQ
http://store.steampowered.com/app/289070/
http://www.pcgamer.com/civilization-6-everything-you-need-to-know/
The only artistic complaint I even have is the jaggies on the border line.
>>337288674
the lack of detail really kills any kind of rp in the game since there's nothing to rp about it in, who cares about taking over some barren looking land?
Éamon de Valera 4 celtic leader
>>337288674
i just want to say that i love civ and will be purchasing the new one
>>337288981
I care
>>337289094
you can but I don't find it as easy
>>337288981
It's kind of necessary because of city improvements have being stretched all across the map now instead of compacted into one tile.
The colors could be a little less vibrant but that's my only complaint (so far).
If Alexander is in this game again I'm going to commit Sudoku
>>337288674
I kind of wondered what it'd be like if Blizzard made a 4x game.
>>337289210
That's unfortunate for you
>Zulus better be in from the start this time. fucking DLC bullshit
>>337289423
>blizzard invented colors
blizzdrones need to settle down
To the fag from the other thread:
lol what? You think there's a reason Germany historically had a weak navy and England had a great one other than muh magic IRL bonus? Starting position should change your whole style
>>337289631
who are you quoting?
>>337288674
Was the civ franchise sold to the Clash of Clans devs? Everything from the gameplay to the look seems to match.
>>337289380
Who do you want for Greece?
>>337289380
>Hating on the greatest conqueror of the Ancient World
Pleb.
>They will never have the balls to make Hitler leader of Germany
>>337289631
Nah they're a fan favourite so they will be kept as DLC for a good shekeling
>>337288674
seems kinda hard to tell where the hills are. meh I have yield icons up anyway so whatever
>>337289514
bants
>>337288674
Just look at those buildings in the lower pic.
Why are the styles so widley inconsistent?
The city looks asian, but the outlying buildings are a completely different style.
this really doesnt bode well. Shaping up to be one of the ugliest games of our time.
>>337289703
not him but hoping for multiple leaders. and lots of people like Ghandi never actually led their country, so why not Plato as the second Greek leader?
I remember getting V on sale and then installing it and trying to play for a bit before realizing it wasn't that good. Do I need a DLC? I was really into Civ 2 and thought it had a lot of great features and tons of depth. Am I missing something from V? Almost felt like a demo
>>337288674
Hello, i've never fucking ever played a Civ game in my entire life. Civ 5 complete is on sale- should I get it? Is it any good?
>>337288674
so this is a minor graphical improvement of Civ 5, but with more restrictions on buildings?
>>337289697
accidently hit the meme arrow button when typing "Z"
>>337289742
it's such bullshit. last time I had to wait 2 expainsions for my favorite cIv. I also pray that it'll be good from the start this time unlike Civ which needed the other expacs
>>337289867
It's much better but not great with the expansions. Play Civ 4 if you haven't instead
This shits getting aimed at tablets, thats why the graphics are colourful with no fucking detail.
Kind of hope none of the civilizations have bonuses that rely on city states this time around.
Also hope that diplomatic victories aren't the easiest thing in the game to achieve
>>337288674
>We want the mobile audience
>£49.99
>>337289915
yes
>>337289940
>it's such bullshit. last time I had to wait 2 expainsions for my favorite cIv.
>tfw 43 civs in V and still didn't get Girugamesh
>>337288674
so wonders take up tiles now?
>terrible art style that resembles the post-wow norm
>heavily penalizing you for not having certain geographic features in your start
>completely out of touch comments by the devs that show they clearly aren't aware of or refuse to admit civ 4's existence
>preorder now for only $59.99!
Fuck you Firaxis, just let it rest in peace.
>>337289915
Doesn't it have a demo you can download? I think the demo lets you play the first 100 turns if it's still available. You will find out if you want to buy the game in those 100 turns.
>>337289936
>minor graphical improvement
Ha, no
This is a list of civilizations throughout the main series titles.
The constants (in every Vanilla):
America
Aztecs
China
Egypt
England
France
Germany
Greece
India
Japan
Rome
Russia
(Special mention to Persia, which was only missing in the first game.)
I would probably count on all of those making the base game this time as well. The trend of late is also to have some balance and representation for the whole world, so I wouldn't be surprised if Arabia makes its third in a row for a middle east representative. Africa and (native) North America haven't been as consistent (at least, ever since Zulu started showing up in the expansions).
There's always a good chance for an unexpected newcomer, too.
>>337288674
>>337289701
Yh, hope the gameplay isn't made simpler too.
Also the leader screens should be like the ones in V.
https://youtu.be/JEmbdIeJFjI
Which Waifu are you looking forward to in the new game?
pic related
>in4 muh Peter
fuck off Catherine is GOAT
>>337289996
>tfw £26
>>337290037
Yeah and they have terrain restrictions, pyramids require desert, stonehenge requires stone, etc.
I just want strategic view again
>50 fucking quid for a digital game
into the BitTorrent it goes
I do actually like the look of it.
>>337290160
>Yeah and they have terrain restrictions
wtf`: I mean I'm woried but it might be an interesting thing. we'll have to see I guess
>>337289915
Just get Civ4.
>>337290114
i'm not talking about aesthetics, i'm talking about 'graphical improvements' in the sense that they think it's better by adding 12,000 more poly's to everything for no reason at all.
>>337290128
The leader screen in V were GOAT. I have a horrible feeling the leaders are going to be like those in Civ Rev, just to save money on voice acting and detail.
>>337290350
If those different looking tiles aren't resources the "no detail" people are going to look like idiots
>>337289915
Full Civ V is hands down the best Civ. Civ IV faggots will be obnoxious, but they're literally the Melee-fags of the Civ genre. Civ II and V are the pinacles of the genre, with IV as a close third.
Civ V full with mods is GOAT. I have over 2k hours in it, and only 900 hours in Civ IV with mods.
>>337290350
what the fuck is all that shit anon use the writing tool nigga
>>337289996
>$99.95
I hope they fix happiness in VI, it's the reason I never play wide
>>337290129
Peter is better, though. Catherine isn't nearly as good as Stalin/Peter.
Best waifus are Lizzie and Boudicca, obviously.
>>337290595
>mods
Those in no way reflect the quality of the game itself. Civ4 is a near perfection of the 4X genre, able to be played fully competitively with few nations/leaders absolutely useless.
>>337289996
>top sellers list with that price tag and despite how little of the game was actually shown
>>337289727
>they will never have the balls to make a game that will be banned in Germany, one of their biggest markets
Yeah what the fuck is wrong with these assholes?
>>337289996
a kilogram
The base Civilization games have been garbage since IV and this looks to be continuing the trend. Will wait for the expansion + Steam Sale
>>337290350
>Portugal looks like it's making a comeback
>Same with Egypt
>Japan now has England's colors
>Varying terrain heights
Fuck, I'm actually thinking about making my first pre order. I was almost over the edge with Xenoblade Chronicles X, but this might just push me.
is there unit stacking?
>>337289703
denbt collector
>>337288964
jaggies?
>>337289727
Hitler is a lousy choice either way.
>>337290909
White and blue could be any number of countries, Greece is my guess
>>337290947
partial, you can 'add' certain units together
>>337290123
Japan was only in the SNES version of the game, not the original.
>>337290909
Red and white were always Japanese colors.
>Think its kinda close for them to be releasing Civ VI already.
>Realize Civ 5 is 6 years old already.
What the fuck why is everything going so fast?
>>337290947
there are support units (anti-tank with infantry is possible) and you can combine three regular units to make a Corps
does anyone else think that looks like proper shit?
>>337290652
Only if you want that retarded ass Steam controller with it.
>>337290780
Civ V full is near perfection itself. There are only 2 useless Civs. Even "bad" civs like America and France are good enough to run away with a game. The only reason "tiers" exist is because weaker civs usually have more requirements to run away with the game, like a nice salt deposit nearby, or certain map types with a lot of water. Arabia and Mongolia are significantly stronger if it's a Pangaea map, but Denmark and Polynesia are better off with continents/archipelago.
>>337290909
>Digital pre-order
>Buying Vanilla Civ at release
you deserve to be fucked over familia
>>337291132
>not renaming those shitty Aztec cities
>>337291193
>France
>bad
lmao.
>>337289717
>greatest conqueror of the ancient world
he conquered a bunch of places and then died before he could rule any of them. after he died, they all decended into civil war.
if he was a better conqueror he wouldn't have spread himself so thin
>tfw when palace building will come back
>>337291158
so civ 4 is still superior
![CivilizationV_DX112012-03-1913-01-09-28[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GfoK5VI.jpg "CivilizationV DX112012-03-1913-01-09-28[1]")
>>337291132
White border with red innards were England's colors in Civ V. Don't forget England's flag is literally the same color scheme as Japan's.
I JUST WANT A CANADA CIV
Give us back full motion videos for the wonders and victories you shits.
>>337291370
no because stacks were horrible to deal with
>>337291193
That's why Civ V sucks, maps are too small and changing the type changes everything
>>337291397
has canada ever done anything of historical significance
>$59.99 for early access
>$79.99 for updates that turn it into the full game
I'll wait for the GOTY edition. Seriously, fuck modern DLC models up the ass.
>>337291370
>>337290947
No more stacks of death, thank God, but less of the blankets of death. Overall looks better than both Civ IV and V's systems.
>>337290123
>There's always a good chance for an unexpected newcomer, too.
Dark Horse: Newcomer that did not appear in the next game
Civ1 Dark Horse: Everyone returned for Civ2
Civ2 Dark Horse: Sioux
Civ3 Dark Horse: Hatti, Iroquois
Civ4 Dark Horse: Mali, >HRE, Khmer, Native America(Debatable),
Civ5 Dark Horse: Siam, Songhai, Denmark(Debatable), Polynesia, Ethiopia, Huns, Sweden, Assyria, Brazil, Indonesia, Morocco, Poland, Portugal, Shoshone, Venice
Civ5 can't really be judged the same way though.
I am wary after beyond earth, but it looks good.
>>337291193
The civs are far too different for proper balance to exist, though. Civ IV only had unique units and buildings, with the traits and starting techs not necessarily being unique. Though I mentioned that mods should not factor in to the game's quality, the most glaring balance issues are simple to fix with small number edits.
>>337291297
Most of the places lasted under Greek rule for hundreds of hundreds of years. Wouldn't blame him for dying young
>>337291183
Looks to be because of the waves. Makes it seem like they literally dyed the ocean their civ's color just to demarcate their borders.
Why exactly did they replace Stalin with Catherine? It's not like he was the only leader that has done morally questionable things.
What Civ 6 should've been
>civ 5's aesthetics and graphics but improved
>civ 5's combat
>civ 4's diplomacy
>no shitty SJW civ leader choices like Maria of Portugal or Wu Zetian
>rework the shitty warmongering penalty (reduce it by 80%)
>rebalance some of the civs (buff France, Rome, etc)
>remove global happiness. Bring back civ 4's happiness
basically, mix the best aspects of civ 4 and 5.
I'll just wait til there is a complete edition of Civ 6 later on the years so I don't get burned by buying the vanilla game only.
Also am I the only one who loved Civ 3? That game needs some love too.
>>337291597
Because Catherine makes for a good token female. Expect her to be back along with Elizabeth and Boudicca.
>>337291397
It's already done. It's called The British Empire.
tfw I fell for the CIV V meme when it came out and now it's $7
I'll just finish other games and see how this one is after a couple years
>>337291597
stalin was a shit leader
mind you so was catherine
gotta fill that female quota somehow
(peter the great would be the best choice I believe)
>>337291560
That's not a problem, though. Variety is the spice of life. It's why I have over twice as many hours in Civ V as IV. I even modded in Civ IV unique traits to make it even more varied.
>>337291429
you mean stacks were easy to deal with if you built siege weapons and shredded most, to all of a stack down to nothing before counter stacking it
>>337291737
But it doesn't make for very fun or interesting competitive games.
>>337291597
Besides any questionable qualities, Catherine is one of the more notable female candidates. That's really about it.
>>337291597
It's gonna be Putin this time.
>>337291463
I'm not saying that they're legends or anything, but I want some reps for my cpuntry
>>337291463
Burned down the White House.
>>337291597
catherine is fucking cool, stalin was a pencil-pusher who wasn't even a good tyrant
i hope they add peter the great, peter the great was fucking fantastic
>>337291562
i blame him, he got greedy
>>337291293
France is fucking awful. Oh cool, you can get +48 culture in Paris in the fucking ATOMIC ERA. Great ability. They were better in the vanilla Civ V and everything before that. Their UU sucked, too, and their UI was limited hard, but pretty much caries France.
>>337289380
Don't be a plebeian anon
>>337291623
you realize we know none of that info yet right? also Civ V looked like dogshit
JUST
Beyond Earth is still garbage and they're making Civ 6 now?
Hopefully it's not as bad as Civ 5 at launch
>>337291819
>Civ
>Competitive
>When matches take multiple hours and everyone gets bored
Who cares if 1/5th of the Civs will never be used in multiplayer. That's still 80% of them that are useful. I'd rather they have the variance in them because it makes things more interesting andFUN
Reminder that this is a thing.
>>337291981
You misspelled "Civilizations."
>>337292016
They realized they couldn't salvage BE. Shame too because a lot of the concepts were nice and the future had endless potential in terms of building/wonder/unit design.
Civ V makes me fucking puke and VI doesn't look any better.
Gonna stick with II and III because even after all these years, they are still best.
>>337291838
>>337291724
catherine the great was russia's second-greatest tzar after peter. what peter did for industry and technology, she did for art and culture. russia would barely even have a culture if it was not for her. she was also a saucy wench
>>337291981
you seem mad
>>337292114
That was the point. I couldn't think of anything else to do.
>>337292016
BE was a side project being made while the main team led by Ed Beach worked on VI. It was obvious from the beginning it was a low risk venture hoping to raise some extra cash and gauge the market for spin-offs.
>>337291858
That was the English, and that was our shitty 12-year-old building that was pretty small compared to what we have nowadays.
Even then, ol' Andrew Jackson whooped the Brits are New Orleans. It was like the Tribes Assend match between /v/ and R*ddit. A rag tag bunch of furries (natives), gommies (pirates), and nigras (black folk) took out a well regulated and trained militia headed by a general that practiced with his men for months, all headed by Andrew Jackson.
>>337292035
I've played in multiple Pitboss games that have lasted months, even a year. People who actually like strategy games don't get bored because it's not over in 20 minutes. There's no real point to playing single player once you've figured the game out, because the AI is notoriously shit.
>>337291724
>>337291623
I don't know what this obsession is with having only male leaders. I wish there was an option to give all my rival civs female leaders.
Enjoy your cockfest, homofags.
Sweet.
What are the Barbarians like? Can they capture cities? Do they fight you the entire game? Are they actually smart?
>>337291508
>sioux, iroquois, native americans, etc
personally, I'd say having at least one native american tribe is a staple of civ, at least starting from part 2.
The shoshone were a weird fucking choice though considering that there are so many more relevant tribes to choose from.
civ 4 vanilla: mali was the token newcomer.
civ 5 vanilla: Siam was the token newcomer.
I have a feeling Mali will come back, because Mansa Musa is pretty iconic. But I'm like 100% sure that Siam won't come back- the Khmer will probably make a comeback.
>>337291397
a fucking leaf
>>337288674
WTF it looks more cartoonish than Civ V. Civ V looks like a Satellite shot...
>>337292318
If you want a waifu simulator just play DoA
>>337291981
>I ONLY PLAY MATURE GAMES FOR MATURE GAMERS SUCH AS MYSELF
Literally you right now. Now I know how the Nintenkids feel when Sonyggers and Xbots chimp out on them for "kiddy" games when more kids own Playstations or Xboxes than Wiis.
>>337289915
It's a lot of fun with a friend.
Me and my Dad are playing through a game atm, every time I see him we play 20 - 30 turns, having a blast.
I just bought civ 4, how the heck does this thing work? Do I download all 4 of the things in my steam library or what? Which one do I play?
>>337291870
>i hope they add peter the great, peter the great was fucking fantastic
Yeah they've used Catherine and Stalin a lot already so I'd like to see Peter even though I like Catherine.
Only other than Catherine and Stalin they've had is Lenin I think.
>>337292318
Realistically speaking, no civilization has ever had their all time most influential leader be a female.
>>337290038
>>completely out of touch comments by the devs that show they clearly aren't aware of or refuse to admit civ 4's existence
such as?
>>337292409
They went back to Civ IV art style.
>>337290350
the resource near the lighthouse looks like clams
>>337292409
So? I like both of them. Civ V has its flaws, too. I think Civ VI and V both look good, but edge out to VI because of cool details like terrain height and mountain chaining properly.
>>337292472
Launch Beyond the Sword, it lets you play with all the features added in the expacs.
>>337292429
Don't be so mad. He's making a good point.
>>337291429
carpets of doom are far better
face it, civ V is casual garbage not made to handle large scale strategy like the GOAT civ IV
>>337291819
A perfectly balanced competative game is the least interesting or fun game. Every competative game has some level of inbalance to tradeoff diversity.
i like the new stylized art. makes it a lot easier to pick out details
>>337292472
what 4 things? the expansions? Just play the last expansion (Beyond the Sword)
>>337292425
All games should be waifu simulators.
All of them, no exception.
And I want them all wearing next to nothing.
I want to see Wu dressed like a Hong Kong stripper with red and gold thong and nipple tassels.
I want to see Booty-ca dressed in a Celtic loincloth and nothing else.
>>337292691
No he's not. You immature faggots are chimping out because the artstyle isn't mature enough for you. It looks fine. Trees and grasslands tiles could be styled a little bit better, though.
>>337292712
That image was from Vanilla.
VENICE BETTER BE BACK
>>337292574
Civ VI will mark the first time that the geography of your nation influences every aspect of the game, however, from city specialisations to military tactics and research.
Your starting terrain has always been a heavy factor on what your early to mid game plans are going to be. For example, you're probably going to hold off on Masonry until you need it to get other techs if you don't have marble or stone nearby.
>>337292712
NUKE IT. NUKE
>>337292712
in my many games of Civ I've never, ever had a game look like this.
Maybe invading another continent but never on that scale, seems stupid
>>337292550
what they need is multiple leaders. And if you don't have enough history for 2 leaders you shouldn't be in
Appears like they're taking the Endless Legend direction where your city territory expands and you can build additions attached to the city within its range that take up a tile. What is concerning is that this was maintained in EL by having only one city per region, so I'm not sure how tile sharing will work for this in C6. Plus I would like to know just how big a capital could expand now.
>>337292712
"Carpets of doom" are completely unnecessary. You don't need them to win wars easily. In fact, it's easier to just keep a good amount of units around permanently and heal them up rather than spam fodder.
>>337292831
so what? civ VI will have the same problem.
enjoy the tedious micro of a large army until it crashes
should I get it on release or should I wait for expansions to fix it first?
>>337292712
>carpets
>stacks
sounds like a shitty player who cant micro and be efficient... civ v is goat because if you are actually efficient with your micro you never need to carpet or stack. fucking macro-only fag should kill yourself
>>337292803
It's not that it looks "immature" so much as it looks really dull and personally even a bit hard on the eyes. Too bright and flat.
>>337292564
Realistically, no Civ has ever had an immortal God-Emperor that ruled for millennia either.
At the end of the day, these "leaders" are just spiritual avatars for the player to interact with hiveminded civilizations.
>>337290160
they had terrain restrictions before too, colossus needed ocean etc
>>337292712
nobody really does carpets of doom because they're difficult to organize and economically pointless. military in general is a faff in civ v
civ 6 will apparently attempt to balance this better, by allowing you to make formations and move large groups of units at once. that way you can still have 1upt bujt at the same time you can command larger armies. i think it's a good idea.
i hate when people bitch and moan that war isn't the easiest victory type in civ v. guess what faggots it's not the easiest victory type in real life either
>>337292938
>spotted the shitter
have you ever even played civ 4? units like these were not uncommon
>>337292802
If they make Cleopatra black again, Day 1 Pirate
One thing I did hate about Civ 5 was the universal happiness. Your plans for expansion halted when your happiness was in the negative zone, meaning you are stuck with 4 cities for about 2000 in-game years. When I think of civilization, I don't think of one with 4 fucking cities.
>>337292991
Pirate launch, buy the GotY version with all the DLC later.
>>337289380
He's kind of super important to Western Civilization. It'd be ridiculous not to have him.
>>337292626
I think it's a regression to go back to a more cartoonish style. If you want a world simulator, pair it with a realistic style.
>but edge out to VI because of cool details like terrain height and mountain chaining properly.
Civ 5 + terrain height and mountain chaining properly is better
>>337291317
Yes, please.
>>337292973
>>337292712
You know they're bringing back stacks for Civ 6 right?
Limited stacks but it won't be 1UPT anymore.
>>337292802
>I want to see Booty-ca dressed
You're not my negro
>>337293053
>Realistically, no Civ has ever had an immortal God-Emperor that ruled for millennia either.
pic is all of the people complaining about the art style
>>337293063
The Colossus and Great Lighthouse were the only ones. For obvious reasons.
>>337290534
no they are not, the other parts of the landscape still have no detail
>>337291317
>palace building
>and throne room building
>and harem building
>>337292803
Oh, I see now. You're just objectively wrong about things. That's cool.
>>337292973
Civ V BNW doesn't have that problem. It's pretty much impossible to amass that many units unless you're editing units or playing on the lowest difficulty level.
Civ IV Vanilla was garbage to. When people talk about how superior IV was 99% of the time they're refering to BtS
>>337293068
>difficult to organize
my point exactly. 1upt is completely ridiculous implying that you can't fit more than one "division" on 500 km^2
>>337293213
also petra needed desert, neuschwanstein needed mountain, etc.
>>337288674
I hope they let us create our own OC Civ in this one.
but they'll probably leave that to mods
>>337293181
>stacks
Kind of
If you put 3 (I think) of the same unit together they become an "army".
Seems like they are taking the idea from Civ:Revolution on Consoles
>>337288674
looks like shit
back to SMAC
>>337293212
You can't deny it looks like a mobile game. I don't want hyper realistic graphics, but some additional detail on things would be nice.
>>337292964
same, also what can you build on ocean tiles that aren't on a coast?
>>337293316
>It's pretty much impossible to amass that many units unless
another reason it is casual dogshit. shame really
>>337293324
you play civ games for realism?
>>337293117
In vanilla you could spam cities.
In G&K you could spam cities like mad if you got the religion for it
In bnw you could spam cities, but it was dangerous to do so because of the science penalty, but still viable even on deity
>>337293353
Those weren't in Civ4, they're from Civ5, which is a shit game.
>>337291397
I want a Mexico Civ.
Aztec Empire doesnt count
Is Civ 3 the worst civilization?
>>337288674
Can't wait for even more features to be cut down from the next installment.
>>337293026
Same thing people about Civ 4, but NASA made the Blue Marble mod
>>337293443
Civ V with expansions is great and the community disagrees with you. Dunno what to tell you boyo.
>>337293518
That title belongs to Call to Power.
>>337288674
Ehh...looks okay I guess.
I'll get it when it's on PS4 or Xbone.
Let's hope they make Rhodesia the unexpected civ
I wan to play with their special unit: fuckboi commando
>implying /v/ didn't shit on Civ IV nonfuckingstop and called it garbage until V came out
>>337293508
>I want a Mexico Civ.
That would be pretty great, but we're talking about video games here.
>>337293407
hey, whatever they do to make the game not chug on turn 500 gets me hard in the crotch... dont give a single shit about graphics, thing that keeps turning me off from epic length games is that by the mid point turns take upwards of a few minutes to compute before you can even start planning your next turn.
>>337293456
i used to play the series for large scale strategy. shame one its its best aspects has devolved to smartphone-tier gameplay
By allah Sweden better be in from the start this time
>>337292359
Well, the Shoshone weren't actually Firaxis's first pick, but they couldn't get the Pueblo because of the whole "leaders speaking the language" bit - the living Pueblo view it as sacred, and were against its inclusion in a video game. Firaxis respected that, but they still wanted a native faction that wasn't seen as historically aggressive. Enter the Shoshone.
>>337293552
The community is made up of retards that haven't played a proper strategy game in their life. Civ5 is objectively the worst Civ to date.
>>337293460
Still, the universal happiness was stupid, I see why they did it but it shouldn't influence whether you can expand or not without being punished.
This is why I fucking love civ 3, in a regular game, depending on the map size, you had at least 12 cities.
It kind of looks like wonders are going to take up a tile which could be good.
>>337293053
If they're just "avatars" for civilizations, then we should have leaders like Mohammad, Jesus, King Arthur, Zeus, Romulus, Abraham, Crocodile Dundee and Uncle Sam.
>>337289380
>Nice city state you have there
>>337293590best wonders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxBVc2cSFeI
I just want them to release it with all the bells and whistles of the preceding game. Just make is as complete feature wise. I honestly wouldn't mind if they launched it later so long as it's actually complete. I wouldn't want to hold off on playing it because it's an inferior game to the preceding title.
>>337293613
what's with people's obsession with rhodesia? it's a completely failed state
>>337293508
Me too, because I'm going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for that wall. Mark my words.
>>337292564
I think cleopatra is the most recognized egyptian leader. Not saying she was a good leader, I'm just saying she's the most famous with Tut being second.
>>337293552
hmmm don't know what your talking about because alot of people still play IV. Hell even SMAC is still popping
>>337293768
Only because outside factors fucked it in the ass. It was a good fledgling nation cut short by anti-white racists.
Portugal should have their true leader this time instead of that random queen who did nothing
>>337293792
> -15 to Production on all your cities
>>337293823
learn2history
>>337289000
Checked.
But I would add Michael Collins as Irish leader.
UB: Saints and Scholars - generate great writers faster and missionaries are cheaper.
I'd have a flying column as a UU and a either a
Celtic Cross or Round Tower as a tile improvement or
Ceilí Hall or Pub as a UB.
>>337293823
Tutankhamen is the most recognised imo.
>geography actually matters
BASED
>>337293768
White supremacist have a hard on for it.
And the song are cool
Also look at those shorts and then remember how /k/ is one of the gayest boards, now everything makes sense, eh?
I don't understand why in no civ game you can play as the Apache. Seriously, they would make a decent warmongering civ.
>>337293897
I'm not wrong, though.
she is the most recognizable to the lay public
>>337293725
Gilgamesh was from a myth and Ghandi never lead India
>>337293725
>jesus
which nation? israel sure doesnt like him.
>>337293849
Not really, leaving the Commonwealth was fucking retarded and got sanctions from all over, which led into everything else
They were just dumb
>>337293212
I like cartoony aesthetics but that doesn't mean I like them all. OP outright looks like a generic tablet game.
Everything on the ocean tiles looks good though
>>337293943
It's called America.
>>337293883
>+30 gold and 100 culture
>>337293104
They best not put Cleopatra in at all. Ramesses is all you need.
>>337293665
Moving a stack near a city and right clicking it sure is grand strategy.
Look, I agree that Civ4's is the superior game, but you are being too autistic about Civ5. Civ6 is looking to be a compromise that might solve the issues of both games.
>>337292995
you've never played a real strategy game have you son?
>>337294072
But there were multiple native american civs in 5
>>337293713
I think I had like 40-50 cities in my last civ5 game.
Only conquered one of them.
I think it is an okay mechanic, but I'd like local happiness, one city can get unhappy and become inefficient or even non functional and maybe a corruption of bureacracy system tied to having more cities than you can handle.
Corruption system in civ2 didn't work since it was local so it still meant that expanding was always the right decision.
>>337293928
didn't I say Tut? Or is Tut not short for Tutankhamen?
>>337293691
>objectively
Yeah nah. If you care about proper strategy games go jerk off to Paradox grand strategy games.
>>337293826
I never said anything bad about IV. But people who still play it are playing BtS, not the Vanilla version. Firaxis hasn't put out a better civ game since SMAC
>>337293823
>>337293928
Only if you know nothing about history. Ramses II is by far the most well known and powerful pharaoh. No question about it.
>>337294143
>Look, I agree that Civ4's is the superior game
that's all that i ask
>>337294170
oh shit, I done fucked up
>>337294028
Yes we do. We just don't like him as much as christians.
>>337288674
Might as well be a mobile game now.
>>337293925
As long as his leader screen has him speaking Irish instead of English. It's what he would have wanted.
>>337294146
>you've never played a real strategy game have you son?
says the person who's apparent default macro is to carpet spam fodder troops...
>>337288674
Sean Bean?
>>337293823
She wasn't even the best female ruler
Ramses II is by far the most prolific pharaoh, by miles and miles
>>337294207
>Only if you know nothing about history.
which is the point.
>>337293823
lol no. google ramses the great
>>337292138
just play SMAC better in every way
>>337291397
A FUCKING LEAF M8
TRUDEAU 2015
SHOLDER TO SHOLDER
>>337294357
seriously, what other civs have you played?
>>337294398
She's the most recognizable to the general public though, like how everyone knows who Caesar is even though they know nothing about Roman history
will they let you play as the man in gauze
Is the Deluxe something that includes any DLC released or is it like one of those absolutely gay editions that only cover 1 year of releases before you have to buy more?
>>337294392
That's what I thought, but haven't seen confirmation. Would be a great choice for narrator (last guy was shit compared to Spock)
>>337294410
Well if that's the case, might as well have Bill Clinton as the leader of Egypt.
We don't all have to be stupid like you.
>>337294570
the latter
>>337294570
>s the Deluxe something that includes any DLC released
Nope.
It's just some gay bonus shit like special Civ or other non sense.
>>337291397
couldn't you play as the Huron or Iroquois natives in a civ game?
>>337294198
Grand Strategy is not the only type of strategy. 4x is a fine genre, or was before its decline.
>>337294557
Yeah, but who gives a shit? They had Augustus in Civ 5 as the Roman leader as well, they're not catering to the biggest retards
>>337294420
people know who cleopatra is without googling though. Yeah ramses was great, but he isn't mentioned very much in media.
Besides his love for slabs being returned and his skill at cursing
>>337294616
I don't like his accent. I'd rather they get William Shatner.
>>337294616
>but haven't seen confirmation
https://twitter.com/CivGame/status/730436299119693831
>>337288674
It wil not have Leonard Nemoy.
Watch, they're going to pull some ultra retard PC move like make Obama the leader of America
>>337294526
all of them, as if that matters... how does this prove you are not a retard with the worst strategy ever?
>>337294557
Who doesn't know Ramses? I mean, I can understand if you don't know his reign, appearance or entire name even, but everyone's at least heard of Ramses the Great.
>>337293508
Wasn't Mexico a colony until the late 1880's?
Pretty sure you have an even shorter independance than the US
>>337294840
I wouldn't even dare touch Civ 6 if that happened.
desu I just want some youtube sloot to asmr the tech announcements to me
>2 units per tile
>>337294628
>>337294740
the original point was that no civilization has ever had their most famous leader be female, not that cleopatra was great or should be in civ
>>337290368
CIV5 > CIV4 t.bh
I do understand that CIV4 is less "casual", but if I feel like playing a less casual game than I might as well play a Paradox game. Civ5 feels more like a board game than Civ4, and that is the reason I like to play CIV in the first place.
>>337294840
I don't think so.
Latest they'll do is Bill Clinton I imagine.
>>337294840
Nah I doubt that. Making Ramesses look like a sub-Saharan African is possible though.
>>337294616
Doesn't prove the game will be narrated by him. Civ 5's debut trailer was narrated by a bunch of actors like Keith David and Richard McGonagle, but the actual game anrrator was different.
>>337294884
and?
why is america in the game if it was also a colony?
>>337292564
You could make a pretty decent case for England
So did beyond earth become good with expansions, or is it still shithouse.
>>337294782
And Hitler is by far the most mentioned leader of Germany, yet Bismark was the leader in Civ V.
>>337294860
you gonna stand there and tell me, HONESTLY tell me, civ 5 is goat
>>337294870
the only time I've ever heard about Ramses without researching egyptian history on my own was from courage the cowardly dog. Cleopatra was far more sell-able as an icon to the west
>England: Elizabeth
>France: Joan
>Spain: Isabel
>Scandinavia: Margaret
>Italy: Mathilda
>Russia: Catherine
>Byzantium: Theodora
>China: Wu
>the rest are brown civs led by men
Who's ready for this?
Essential Civ V mods for maxium fun?
>>337294904
>Muh deathstacks
>Still can't handle having to actually plan his armies placement
6 years now and you civ4 children still can't get good.
>>337294929
Queen Elizabeth and Victoria for England
Isabella for Spain
Also other than Civ Revolution ( shitty game for consoles, not a true civ game) and Civ 2 maybe, why don't they have Saladin representing Arabia? He would be perfect.
>>337294904
Wrong, you can create corps and armies and maybe even put a support unit to your army, so that would make 4, but 3 is the minimum confirmed.
>>337295070
>wage war to get my own harem
I'm okay with this
>>337295048
which is fine, I wasn't arguing that the most mentioned leader of a civilization should be in the civ games
>>337295054
yeah, you have yet to produce a counterpoint that isnt "muh stacking"
only retards who cant macro have to stack or carpet.
>>337294798
Why not?
Hopefully they get someone as ethereal as Nimoy for the tech narration. The guy they used for CiV was dogshit. Nothing sounded majestic and his voice was more gravelly than that asshole from Metal Gear Solid.
>Catherine
fine, you could argue for peter or stalin but I think any of them is fine
>Theodora
biggest fucking diversity meme why not her husband Justinian who was actually the emperor or Constantine who literally made Christianity the state religion?
>Isabella
fine, she would be the leader I chose if I made the game
>Boudicca
fine, I guess, the celts are a bit of a meme nation to begin with
>Elizabeth
i would have chosen victoria desu senpai
>dido
complete meme option, hannibal would have been better
>maria
who this white bitch, moortugal's true leader forever and always is alberto barbosa
>maria theresa
fine
>wu zetian
terrible choice desu
>>337295103
oh yeah, them too.
For some reason I totally forgot about britain's longest reigning monarch
>>337295036
Aside from being the host nation of the game's developers, it was a colony for a very short time and as a country has much more historical significance than independant Mexico ever has.
Mexico was a colony for most of its existence and as it's own civlization has existed for less time than America.
>>337295105
>Saladin
>Arabia
I agree he'd be great though
>>337295105
because he was a filthy Kurd and was in Civ IV anyway
>>337295041
Debatable.
>>337295105
Because he was a k*rd
>>337295094
You just had to bombard cities, it was not difficult at all
>>337295187
>civ 5 goat
lol jesus i give up
>>337293508
>I want a Mexico Civ.
spcial ability. Pay for construction projects in other civs for a one time relation bonus with that civ and +1population in all your cities
>>337295036
>why is america in the game
>>337295342
Well yeah, but that goes for any "best leader" conversation ever unless you're a one-trick pony like the Netherlands or something
>>337295289
>i would have chosen victoria desu senpai
God how wonderfully OP the modded Great Britain with Victoria is
>>337291597
Stalin isn't even Russian
>>337293508
Wouldn't mind Mexico if we drop the Aztecs and keep the Maya or Inca
>>337295070
I don't mind having some gender balance in the game, but those are not even close to being the greatest leaders of their own civilizations.
It looks like a fucking mobile game. I bet this thread is chock full of retards that can't put two and two together defending it.
If they're making the game visually appealing to the fucktard mobile audience, who do you think they're going to try to appeal to with the rest of the game?
>>337295105
>nothing
>everything
What did he mean by this?
>>337295070
>scandinavia
So is it Denmark or Sweden? No way it can be both. That's like saying China and Mongolia should be the same civ.
i'm just scared that they'll ruin this game with more pc bull like what started in Civ 5. They clearly had a quota for women leaders because more than half of those women they chose to represent civilizations were minor footnotes in history with no appreciable accomplishments besides being a woman.
>>337295465
Neither was Catherine.
>>337295275
He also read fast and sounded drunk
>tfw count chocula
So guys i just started Civ 5
What does production (or whatever the orange hammer icon is) and food do? I thought food was needed to produce unit and shit but it only consumes gold or turns instead
Also is there any way that i can 'win' without tearing any towns apart?
India's new special ability:
Replace aqueducts with ________
>>337291463
Not as much historically, but as of right now we're one of the top world leaders.
We also dissolved the Suez Crisis.
If they had Angela Merkel Representing Germany, unlikely, I'm fucking done.
>>337295617
Kalmar Union I assume.
For a time Denmark, Sweden(and finland) and Norway were all ruled by Margareta I.
HRE was a thing in Civ4, Vikings have been a thing, Polynesia, Celts.
So it's not that strange.
At this point Civ is becoming the CoD of 4x games
>no longer useful integration of Civilopedia
>mechanics hardly change from sequel to sequel
>diplomacy always a shit, no improvement over time
>rehashing the same game with better graphics at a higher & higher rate
>>337295289
Nailed every single point tbqhfam
>>337294091
>>+30 gold and 100 culture
>>337295070
Spain's should be Charles V instead of Isabel.
>>337295819
>>mechanics hardly change from sequel to sequel
Cities will take up more than 1 tile in civ6.
Civ5 went with 1upt and hexes.
You're talking shit.
>>337295070
>France: Joan
I would not object to adding more 16 y/o qt conquerors
not sure if I like the one thing per tile stuff
does this version have roads?
I miss having shittons of workers building roads in pretty much every tile
>mexico
>rhodesia
>>hre
>italy
>mughals
>timur
>gauls
why not these peoples in the game?
>>337295795
why are there so many people spouting ridiculously retarded doom scenarios in these threads
>>337295748
you use food to build wonders, you eat the hammers
>>337289915
I'm yet to find a game with better player replay value.
>>337295748
All of the questions you asked are answerable by the own game's tutorial and hint system
You can't be this retarded
>>337295992
>rhodesia
this meme needs to stop
for the others it's mostly that their topographical locations are taken by other civilizations or that they just weren't as interesting to the devs
>>337290129
Montezuma is the All-Leader.
>>337295992
>>gauls
celts
>mughals
>timur
these could be neat
>>hre
was in civ4
>>337295672
Catherine was the Russian Czarina although ethnically German, Stalin was a Georgian General Secretary of the Soviet Union.
Soviet Union ≠ Russia
>>337294570
>>337294639
>>337294673
All the contents are listed on the store page. Maybe not in detail, but there will be four post-launch DLC packages with new Civs, leaders, maps and scenarios that the digital deluxe price pays for.
Probably a similar scale to the DLC countries for Civ V - new civ(s) come with a custom scenario based around them and maybe some thematic maps.
#SHOTS #FIRED
>>337288674
Shit looks like clash of clans
>>337288674
all i fucking want from civ is to either
A) give me a couple of options for leders of each nation
B) Add support for creating a leader/loading screen story/dialogue
C) both A and B
>>337295781
>but as of right now we're one of the top world leader
a fucking leaf
>>337296275
Actually I'm not sure I care about the art anymore, the fact that cities take up more than 1 tile makes me intrigued.
>>337296275
>IT'S JUST A BETA
>>337295992
>mughals
IT'S A TRAP
>>337295996
They definitely added some irrelevant women last time. The worst I'm expecting is Egyptians being Black
this ruined the whole trailer for me
>>337295992
>>mexico
Hasn't done anything of significance since it stopped being a spanish colony. Same reason why the Romans are in the game over Italy.
Cao Cao when?
>>337296197
bugger off, the USSR was clearly the successor state to the russian empire.
catherine always goes Order in the modern era
>>337296597
>Not this guy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qin_Shi_Huang
>>337295026
Canada wasn't even a country then, it was Britain that won that war... For Britain...
>>337296275
God, now they're going to water down the colors and make everything look like London in October.
Hope the Egyptians actually look African this time and not like arabs
>>337296739
>Canada wasn't even a country then
And people still think Canada belongs in Civ because?
>>337296592
Then why is Polynesia or Denmark or Korea in the game
>>337296765
>>337296765
my only complaint is that it's all Christmas Trees, but could be based on the terrain the trees are on
>>337296765
Just realized that I want to play with a modded warmongerer Janeway.
>>337288674
That art style sucks
That is all
I like the art
>Cities will take up more than 1 tile in civ6
It still doesn't change the gameplay much. Cities already visually looked like they took up more than one tile, they just made it so the tiles are actually occupied this time.
>Civ5 went with 1upt and hexes
>1upt
And they had to do this or else it would just be another sequel of deathstacks. Still not a smart change.
>hexes
Wow, so instead of just running in any direction I can also wallrun & grapple-hook now?It doesn't change the game.
>You're talking shitThat never changes.I'm just sick of everything being sequel after sequel after sequel
>>337296892
It doesn't nor does "America".
>>337296905
You're really kidding yourself if you think the Danes are on the same level as Mexicans in terms of historical significance
>>337296864
Augustus and Alex better be blond
>>337296576
why the fuck would they randomly do that now
>>337296579
>literally censored art
WEW
>>337297073
blackwashing
>>337288674
>graphics going back to Civ IV days
So this is the power of the PC mustard race
>>337296905
Denmark is pretty notable, one of the oldest continous nations, longest continous use of a national flag, science, decent gains in the region in the medieval era, colonies later on.
and vikings
Cool, but did they actually spend the last 6 years optimizing their code and logic so the game doesn't slow to a fucking crawl during the expected length of a typical unmodded match?
I swear to christ it better support x64 architecture.
>>337297115
you're not answering the question, just furthering your paranoid delusions
stop that shit
>>337297049
Not him but that depends on where you live desu
>>337297049
>had a brief stint with the whole viking thing
>has progressively lost more and more territory over the last 1000 years
>>337296723
>Qin_Shi_Huang
was in CIV 4 if you're interested
>>337296723
He was in Civ IV dumb-dumb.
>>337297030
>current world superpower
>doesn't belong in a civ game
Keep telling yourself that
>>337297180
This is Cleopatra who was Greek
>>337296905
The game already has the Atzecs. The people that actually had an empire in the area that is now modern day mexico.
The only significant thing mexico ever did was lose half of its territory to the USA.
>>337289727
> Thousand year Reich
> lasts 12 years
CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP
>>337296579
There isnt even a legal or rating reason to to this. Art this famous falls outside of both.
They are literally just scared of soccer moms and sjw.
>>337297025
>I'm just sick of everything being sequel after sequel after sequel
what do you want then? how would you like the new Civ game to be?
>>337295992
>no vietnam
>no argentina
>no bulgaria or yugoslavia or one of the balkan nations
>>337295802
I love how they were so desperate to cram women in they put fictional or irrelevant women (Dido, Boudicca, Wu) in V but didn't put actually important women like Margaret.
>>337297025
>It still doesn't change the gameplay much.
It will because it's not just going to be aesthetic, you literally won't be able to build the Pyramids without desert tiles, or Stonehenge without stone.
They can also be pillaged and raided instead of attacking the city proper now. I'm just wondering how it will work if ALL city improvements for ALL cities are now spread all over the goddamn map.
They're also making it so your terrain determines what bonuses you'll receive for research. If you're more landlocked, you'll have a harder time focusing on naval research, etc.
>>1UPt
Units can now be combined to make bigger armies.
>>337297195
The only people who think Mexico belongs in civ are mexicans. They're less historically relavent than Korea and Polynesia
>>337297205
>had a brief stint with the whole viking thing
That alone merrits inclusion in Civ over fucking Mexico.
>>337297314
Her skin is so dark, I thought she wasn't wearing a bra, just a strip of trim across her nipples.
>>337297321
>half
they did better than the shoshone or iroquois then
>>337297314
>implying that the greeks weren't sub-saharan black african kangs
>>337297314
she's supposed to look middle eastern like most depictions of her, ever
did you complain about kamehameha being too white too
Civ6 is 200% SIT BACK AND WAIT.
Firaxis has seemingly lost all talent or sense with Civ series, and rely entirely on the name recognition these days. Civ5 had unfortunate design decisions, then Firaxis charged full price for a Civ5 reskin Beyond Earth which should've been a $20-$30 xpac for Civ5 considering it was the same fucking game, except dumbed back down back to Vanilla Civ5 level (or maybe even less).
Amplitude with their Endless games, Stardock with their games, now even Paradox is getting into the 4x market out of their GSG niche--Firaxis can't half-ass it anymore yet I have a bad feeling Civ6 is going to be quarter-assed.
>Mexicans actually think thye're more important or worthy to be in a Civ game than literally any European nation
Even Romania is a better pick for Civ than Mexico. Just stick with Aztecs
>>337292802
Civilization Online already does this :D
>districts in cities
They LITERALLY ripped this off of Endless Legends.
>>337297435
Polynesia isn't even a fucking country, it's a collection of people who live on islands separated by a vast amount of ocean without a singular government.
>>337297435
Depends on where you live desu
>>337297426
tito would be pretty sick imo
>>337296905
Polynesia- because they add a shitload of flavor and variety. Also, their Hawaiian theme music is god tier
Denmark. Because Vikings and shit. And huge influence on England
Korea. Because turtle ships and shit. And they were powerful in the past (Kogurea) and have many military victories over Japan and China
>>337291397
Reminder that Canada's head of state is still the fucking Queen of England.
>>337297537
>she's supposed to look middle eastern like most depictions of her, ever
Not him but she was literally pure greek with I think one italian ancestor. her famoily practiced incest. just look up her family tree
>>337297314
>this cartoonish phone game representation is relevant to the new Civ game
come on, Alexander and Caesar didn't look like that either
>>337297313
Well, see and that's where I would like to see an entirely different game play mechanic. A civilisation starts united, be it Rome, Egypt, Nubia, or Whatever. As you develop technologically and socially through the ages, the civilisation fractures and you end up carving your part out along with the other fragments of the original civilisation. Like you divide the civ you've built and run a fragment of it.
Canada, Britain, Murka, or so many others in the days of Ancient Egypt is retardation.
They need to increase the wonder failing gold by ~5x, 146 gold is nothing for being 1 turn away from the pyramids and shit
>literally only the amerifat trailer had censored boobs
LOL
>>337297706
who gives a fuck? nothing in Civ Rev looks like the actual people, it's just the generic cartoon versions of the historical figures you always see
>>337296905
Korea has been around since the BC era. Do you really think Mexico has more history than Korea?
>>337297537
she's black and dreadlocked despite being Greek of the line of Ptolemy (and married Brother to Sister mostly)
>>337297549
I would think that the Aztec and Mayans pretty much cover it.
>>337297537
kamehameha wasn't white though?
>>337294312
Wow, is crucifixion is how you show you like people, that explains what you're doing to the Palestinians.
>>337297629
>Polynesia isn't even a fucking country
The game is called Civilization VI not Nation-State VI
>>337297639
It doesn't matter where you live. The only people who think Mexico belongs in civ are mexicans. They're less historically relavent than Korea and Polynesia
>>337297429
I'm more pissed they actually mismatched the name and leader for Sweden and never bothered correcting it.
>>337297890
he was way whiter in Civ 5 than his historical counterpart
>>337291670
I don't know why Civ III gets so much hate
>>337297997
They're all evil white males and there's no such thing as an ethnic swede so it's totally irrelevant ;)
>>337297789
well than anon claimed there was no reason to worry about them going full SJW's with the leaders. whichthey have done several times before
>>337297819
yes, did you notice Alexander to the right there looking like Prince Charming and Victoria like a Pixar character? it might not be aiming for accurate representations there
>>337297714
Having the Aztecs and India in the days of Ancient Rome or Egypt is equal retardation. It's pretty much impossible to have every civ from the same era without drastically cutting down on the number of playable civs.
Lumping in Canada and Mexico in with the United States and Britian is completely disingenous.
>>337297426
vietnam bonus
>gain 10% combat strength for every tech you are behind your enemy
argentina bonus
>attacking those little one tile island cities that the ai settles gives you happiness
Change the Celts to the Gauls& Gaels
>>337291981
>&Knuckles
maximum keks
>>337298101
>it's accurate
>proves it's not accurate
>i-it's not supposed to be accurate
>>337297549
>not realizing the appeal of the game is to play alternative history to make shit happen like Argentina win WW1 against Egypt.
>not wanting every country to be represented for full immersion and full global map scenarios
>>337297714
that's exactly what the Rhyes and Fall of civilizations mod does in CIV 4 look it up. pretty interesting to see new nations popping up here and there and old ones collapsing
>cities are going to take up entire regions now
So does that mean they're going to knock it off with these tiny ass maps and give us some actual large worlds?
>>337298267
It's too railroaded, the Revolutions mod does it more naturally
>>337298308
I would honestly be fine with them making the worlds fuckhueg and increasing the base movement from 2 to 3
>>337298092
of what, making some women leaders? there's a fuckton of bad leader choices in the series just by pure influence, but they're not chosen for that
it's a game and they want a diverse cast of personalities and nationalities, so you get Maria I (the Mad) instead of II because it's more fun
it's not SJW pandering or whatever, it's just for variety's sake
>>337297569
As usual Asians do it better.
Why can't we have a waifu Civ like this in the West?
>>337298308
Problem with 5 was because of the script you couldn't even mod in bigger maps
>>337298245
>>not realizing the appeal of the game is to play alternative history to make shit happen like Argentina win WW1 against Egypt.
mods
>>337298245
>>not wanting every country to be represented for full immersion and full global map scenarios
sure I want that btu they won't add ecery counry,it'd be a clusterfuck so Mexico is never and should never be in the official games cuz it's irrelevant.
Brazil was a good pick for South America
>>337297997
Yep that was pretty disappointing and I expected nothing.
>>337291397
Maybe when Canada becomes a civilization.
>>337298236
what? i never said it was supposed to be accurate, bumblefuck
>>337298003
damn, you're right. he looks totally white with some polynesian features.
I'm surprised people weren't more upset about that
>>337291397
Canada bonus
>If you lose your starting settler to barbarians you win
>art style
True patricians play in strategic mode. If the art style means this can run well on low end pc's and laptops, then it's fine.
>>337298541
they weren't because in general people are a whole lot less upset than /v/ likes to yell and scream about in civ threads
>>337288674
>that artstyle
"... out on xbox, ps4, and pc"
>>337298372
>of what
Making Cleo Black. Some women leaders who are literal who's or made up
>>337289940
>accidently hit the meme arrow button when typing "Z"
it's like telling "i accidently land in america wheil going to india"
>>337296905
Pablo, please.
>>337297415>I'm sick of sequels
>Then how do you want the sequel to be?I'm just shitting shit up because bored.
>>337298703
did you even read the rest of the post
also CivRev is a fucking phone game, not a mainline Civ game
>>337298308
so are the cities actually going to take up more surrounding tiles, or are they just using them differently?
is Beyond Earth worth checking before this?
i like sci-fi stuff so Endless Legend didnt click for me
>>337298141
I was thinking regionally, say the Goths, the Celts, Egyptians, Greco Romans, Chinese, etc.
Ancient civs that allow you to build your way to the Civ you want.
Hell, they don't even have to be real civs. It's always been one of my beefs that from 5000BC to 2000AD the world doesn't change much in any Civ game. It needs way more turmoil and general vicissitude.
Eras should cause splits, internal strife should matter in your civ, all this is, it taking your Football team to the World Cup, it could be way better.
>>337298665
"and ps2"
>>337298814
>did you even read the rest of the post
nope stopped almost instantly
>>337293053
I really hate the leader thing civ does, leaders should be more like civ 5s great people
>>337298889
No.
>>337298763
guess me and Columbus has something in common then
>>337298812
so you want the series to die with Beyond Earth?
I'm fine with the art directionbecause i have a toaster and it looks like it will run on it
I'm fine with them including female leaders for diversity's sake.
I just don't want them to change the leader's race to something the weren't.
>>337297429
>be irrelevant celt
>tfw doomed to always be represented by grll power failure woman boudicca
>>337298889
Just to play it once
>>337298889
no, beyond earth is fucking terrible
Endless Space is just endless legend but more scifi
are there any other strategy games that span the entire history of the world?
Empire Earth comes to mind but thats a dead game now
>>337298912
your loss, keep thinking a game that has "Saladin of the Arabs" and caters to absolute retards is relevant, though
>>337298889
beyond earth is pure garbage, play stellaris if you want scifi 4x, it's slightly less garbage.
IF THEY DON'T ALLOW US TO BUILD CANALS THIS GAME I'M GONNA FLIP!!!!
>>337299042
No, don't play it.
Even if money is not a factor, you will probably regret the time you spent doing a single playthrough of Beyond Earth.
>>337299130
Being able to modify the terrain would be great.
Varied elevations and such.
Would be so cool if you could have ravine inland, and then be able to connect those with the oceans once you have explosions and make a panama canal.
We won't get that though.
I know.
>>337298889
I liked it cause I'm a sucker for sci-fi setting. But there absolutely no depth to the game. Could ''only'' play it for 100 hours before I got bored, where as civ V I never got bored with 500 hours
>>337299313
panama canal.wonder would be great. maybe suez aswell
>>337299313
i would probably end up sinking the entire country of mexico
>>337296275
>>337298910
>>337298665
I guess it's kind of Firaxis' fault. If they never released the Civ Revolutions titles and made Civ 5 go for some pseudo-realistic topographical scheme, Civ 6 would actually look more like a natural sequel to Civ 4.
>>337298889
If the setting was your only issue with Endless Legend, try Endless Space.
>>337299117
Don't get Stellaris yet. It still needs a few DLCs to be worth playing.
>>337297997
Who cares about sweden?
When will they allow us to colonize Mars and the moon? would be awesome to fight wars over other planets
I only have one question: will it still take forever to move an army around?
>>337297714
That had a component sort of like that in IV where if it was late game and you had a lot of land on other continents it would ask if you wanted to give up that land to save money or something. If you accepted that became some random civ run by an ai that hadn't been used in the game yet.
Barbarians should become terrorists in the modern era tbqh
>>337299625
no it's called "civilization" not "science fiction"
dont mention xcoms and robots
>>337299787
no it's called "civilization" not "modern era"
might as well stay in the cave age forever
>>337288674
>Another game who you can see is going to be a simplistic piece of shit just by the screenshots.
>People are still going to pre-order and defend this.
I hope this industry crash and burn.
>>337299708
their name should change through the eras desu
barbarians (ancient/classical) > outlaws (medieval/renaissance) > revolutionaries (industrial/modern) > terrorists (atomic onwards)
>>337299787
so? we can get to the moon and mars today. why not extend it a bit, I'm not saying have aliens and shit I'm just ayoing late game colonization could be fun
>>337297819
Is it pronounced...Puh-tole-em-ee?
So where's the leader list?
>>337300058
US confirmed day 1 dlc
>>337299008
>irrelevant celt
>sacking rome is irrelevant
>who is Brennos
will hitler be in this?
>>337295289
all 100% fair except for China IMO
China has waaaaay too many choices. Wu Zetian is actually pretty legit, like it's clear it was chosen for diversity quota but she is definitely in top 10 most important chinese leaders (if you could even measure such a thing).
Honestly, only Dido and Theodora are complete shit options honestly. Wouldn't be so bad if it was in Civ IV with the multiple leaders, but yeah.
Honestly, I think there is an incentive for diversity as long as it was limited. If I was stuck between Catherine and Peter and someone chimed in "Well, we need more women leaders" then I would take that as a plus. Catherine is legit.
>>337299951
yeah good luck colonizing a planet where you can't even breathe the air let alone grow food
>>337295047
I enjoyed it post expansion - I'm going to give it a try now with expansions - it's a fun game. It's not as complex as civ 5 but WAAAY more entertaining - with civ 5 I was stuck because of complexity and trying hard to advance, with beyond earth I was stuck for the narrative and the amount of fun.
>>337300049
kinda silent "P"....Tholemy
>>337299983
Outlaw sounds like its from the wild west. Bandit would be better desu.
>>337299953
it already looks like the gameplay will be considerably deeper than civ 5
I do dislike the whismyland art style of the new civ games though
>>337300151
I was talking about me personally
>>337300049
just tolemy
>>337296765
Kate Mulgrew as Narrator Y/N?
>>337300314
Just like CIV 5 looked deeper than CIV IV?
>>337300182
or you could just not do the stupid immortal leader bullshit and instead have leaders work like great people, or have births marriages and deaths
>>337297314
Greeks can be quite olive skinned. She could totally pass as a Greek/Sicilian/Spaniard.
>>337300265
outlaw is a term from ancient rome, and is used in the magna carta as someone who lives outside the law
>>337300049
Puh-Tole-Meem
>>337300182
Maria or whatever for Poortugal was complete shit. they had way more important rulers
>>337299002
>so you want the series to die with Beyond Earth?I want me to die.
But more than anything I don't like how they're recycling the same name into different games. Sure, the differences between sequels may vary (from the differences between Civs to the differences between retro Fallouts & Fallouts 3+), but really, in the end it's for brand recognition.
Why not make a whole new concept for a 4x game? Off the top of my head:
>Civ series is about rewriting history
>make a new game where the gameplay is LITERALLY rewriting history
>game starts off like civ but advances to future tech really fast
>among techs is chronomanipulation
>gain ability to go to the past to re-attempt certain periods for better/worse outcomes
>gain ability to outright send futuretech units to steamroll shit in the past
>your fucking shit up in the past has adverse effects on your people
>they either worship units you send as gods, all but abandoning research, or freak the fuck out at this wizardry, sparking rebellions
>meanwhile terminators are coming from the future beyond yours to fuck your shit up
>have to take steps to prevent skynet
>players duking it out on multiple timelines of the same map
There are obviously a lot of details to iron out but hell I'm not a ~180-man developer studio that is part of a billion-dollar industry. Get fucking creative!
>>337300323
You're not a celt. Go cling to another desperate identity.
>>337300195
yea guess we'll be stuck here on earth forever :^)
>>337296275
>game is 5 months to release
>only thing they've even shown is screenshots
>"dude it's wip don't judge"
lol
>>337300547
>live in "celtic nation"
>speak a celtic language
By civ's standard I am. :^)
>>337288674
is the AI going to be complete shit this time too?
>>337300542
>I want me to die.
jesus anon cheer up. you're making me worried, hope things get better for you
>>337300542
>>gain ability to go to the past to re-attempt certain periods for better/worse outcomes
>>gain ability to outright send futuretech units to steamroll shit in the past
>>your fucking shit up in the past has adverse effects on your people
>>they either worship units you send as gods, all but abandoning research, or freak the fuck out at this wizardry, sparking rebellions
>>meanwhile terminators are coming from the future beyond yours to fuck your shit up
>>have to take steps to prevent skynet
dounds interesting at least, yeah it's definately something new
>>337300542
that sounds stupid as fuck
throwing random ideas against the wall isn't being 'creative'
If there's one thing I want changed in civ 6 it's how religions are founded. I just tried to start up a new game and just rage quit when 3 pantheons had been founded within 20 turns of the game starting. That, and I'd really like an option to make the earth style map have a historically accurate start point for civs.
I've always though that one of Japan's abilities should have been "Can always found a pantheon" and "always benefits from pantheon regardless of dominant religion"
They better make the AI not fucking flat out cheat in this one
>mfw deity ai's start a whole era and city ahead of you
New bread:
>>337301280
>>337300895
Neither is shitting out the same crap over and over again while incrementing Roman numerals appended to it.
>>337301258
does it look like they're putting more effort in making their games to you?
>>337301258
You really expect Firaxis to create an AI who intelligence scales with diffficulty while remaining challenging and not instantly cheeseable? lol
>>337296275
This is over 140 characters. Fake as fuck.
>>337300810
THIS THREAD DIES WITH MEEEEEEEEEE
>>337301528
They should release an expert AI expansion after the game has been out for a while and the strategic metagame has solidified and they can program the AI with the best strategies but I'd probably be the only person who would buy it
>>337300965
Japans ability should be to build an anime studio which increases culture and happiness but lowers population growth
