Can someone tell my why /v/ is so bitter about Battlefield 1?
The gameplay is revamped, with 64v64 maps, no more assault medic, and better weapons; and the launch should be better now that DICE got their shit together
>DICE
>good launch
Yeah i'll believe it when I see it.
>>337185606
>Hardline
>Battlefront
>>337185472
I just want a Battlefield, with the map sizes of Bf3. If all we get is a reskinned Battlefront i will bomb those cucks at Dice
>>337186794
It's designed by a different team than the Battlefront team, and already is confirmed to have shit that the Battlefront release doesn't (Server browsers), so I think you're good.
>>337186956
>It's designed by a different team than the Battlefront team
Wasn't battlefront from sweden? Which team is making this game?
>>337185918
Hardline wasn't DICE.
>>337185472
People aren't really bitter. There's shitposting about the nigger, but even that is more just sarcastic /v/ rage. I'm fairly hype because I'm so fucking done with 'near future' and 'future' combat in my FPSs
>>337186956
Got a source on that they're dropping Battle log? I want to believe they're dropping that shit, but I'll believe it when I see it.
Its not 64v64
because WWI is boring as af and there's a reason why History has forgotten it?
>>337187165
For you, here's the lead on this game.
http://www.dice.se/people/lars-gustavsson/
>What did you do 10 years ago?
>I was hard at work with Battlefield 2 as the Lead Designer here at DICE.
It makes me think things are going well there.
>>337187349
For you, here's a source.
https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/730058288411324416
>>337185472
>64v64
Source?
>>337187510
>For you, here's the lead on this game.
What
That doesnt answer the question
There are multiple dice studios
>>337185472
Because /v/ is contrarian as fuck. Mainstream shitting on COD and liking BF1 = /v/ shitting on BF1 and liking COD.
>>337187510
>For you, here's a source.
>https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/730058288411324416
That doesn't confirm that they're dropping battlelog. Battlelog is a server browser.
>>337187349
Theyre dropping battlelog as a forum but the site will still be used as a server browser, see your account unlocks etc
Because they've taken a slow war of attrition that featured prolonged trench warfare and slow, barely maneuverable planes and tanks and turned it into a superfast action fest.
>>337185472
>64vs64
Bullshit.
>tank
>in Versailles
I'm tired of Swedes shitting on Europe
>>337185472
>64v64 maps
I'm gonna call bullshit on that
>>337188112
>>337188064
It would be great from a gameplay perspective, with the extra focus on melee combat and less explosives/automatic weapons it'd be far less of a clusterfuck than 64v64 in modern combat.
>>337185472
>64v64
enjoy your 20v20
>>337187249
Singleplayer - Visceral
Multiplayer- DICE
