Uncharted 4 has the best-looking character models of any game across any platform, this is indisputable
>>337108351
Is that in game?
>>337108436
bullshot youtube video
>The best thing we can say about Naughty Dog nowadays is how good are the graphics.
What went wrong?
>>337108436
all the cutscenes are rendered in real time. the character models and assets are the same. there is no distinguishable difference between screenshots taken in a cutscene and in actual gameplay except for motion capped emotions
i could show a screenshot i took to demonstrate this
>>337108501
not really worth trying to actually talk about the gameplay. i've played it and it's a ton of fun and the levels are much more open and non-linear than past games. but pcucks refuse to believe that the games are anything other than linear cover shooters so it's just not an argument you can have here
>>337108501
>What went wrong?
Give me 15 minutes and I can find a way to blame the jews.
>>337108351
>best-looking character models
Highly depends on who's looking.
>>337108351
They are high textured but move like ass and have no weight. I'm not impressed. The faces are still completely still during action. It's uncanny valley as fuck, but somehow the paycheck made reviewer forgot the word.
>>337108501
Found it.
>Straley
oy vey
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Straley
>young nate has a different model in 4
Why not just use his old one from 3?
>>337108685
Neil Cuckmann was literally born in Israel, so yeah it's the Jews fault.
NEVER EVER
N
E
V
E
R
E
V
E
R
>>337108781
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE6jy78tV78
>>337108351
This character cannot be taken seriously by me,
His voice is the perfect blend of Navaro (Villian from Uncharted 1) and Miller from MGSV, it's similar enough that I can hear both of them at the same time.
>>337108768
Multitude of reasons.
>better animations possible
>new clothing possible
>generally higher quality possible
>refinement of shape language possible
>more specialized texture maps possible
>reusing models quickly makes sequels look less interesting
>the users are arguably paying you to do new models among other things
>>337108693
let me clarify: most detailed and most realistic
>>337108721
do you actually expect expressive face animations for every piece of dialogue in gameplay? do you think that's something worth putting resources into when the camera is going to be behind nate's back anyway?
and a lot of dialogue in-game still uses motion captured expressions along with manually simulated animations. it's not uncanny valley at all: go watch the cutscene with drake and elena playing crash bandicoot and tell me that looks even remotely like uncanny valley.
>>337108768
Because there's a significant time gap between 3's Flashback and 4's?
In 3 he's 14 I think, in 4's flashback he's 11 or 12 I think.
>>337109073
>let me clarify: most detailed and most realistic
Thanks. And I'm glad you specified that this is for the models. As it certainly doesn't apply to the animation.
>>337109172
it absolutely does lol, the animations in this game are the best i've seen in any game to date
>>337109259
Well then I feel sorry for you.
meanwhile in superior japanese games
>>337108465
>Youtube
>Bullshot
Retard.
>>337109514
alright: name a game with better animations. i need a good laugh
pcucks btfo
>>337108668
Cutscene models are ALWAYS a higher poly count than the ones used during actual gameplay. It's been that way for a very long time. Still in-engine but they do have tricks like that
>>337109259
The animations are top tier for the most part but the physics make them look downright clowny in some situations, whenever you're swinging from anything the motion looks so unnatural and hilariously bad
>>337109870
The power of a cellphone processor
>>337109747
>game looks like its 3 years old
>pcucks btfo
???
>>337109870
now i know you're just spouting bullshit. the motion looks perfectly fine, maybe you're playing uncharted 3 instead
>>337109832
this has been proven to be literally false. uncharted 4's character models are the exact same in-game and in cutscenes
>>337108351
Sure it is, now excuse me while I have fun with my wife's daughter, somehow I feel like I shouldn't have bought a big dog
Here's the six million dollar question: did the Uncharted 2 team make it?
>>337110309
>that look
you just KNOW they banged
>>337110238
>this has been proven
>doesn't provide proof
>>337110309
ok what is this and what is the problem
>>337108501
ND has always been "those tech demo guys", their games were always pretty shallow.
>>337110476
You play as Nate's daughter in the epilogue. No one of the good guys die btw
>>337109649
>E3
>not a bullshot video
>>337108351
woah
>>337110692
ok so whats the problem
>>337108351
>2016
>sonyshits still feel the need to start threads with bullshots to pretend they have the best graphics
will this ever stop being a thing?
>>337109073
>do you expect facial animations
Well, Witcher 3 managed it, so yes I do.
look like the last COD or Far Cry.
>>337110898
>great graphics and faces in "Movie - The Videogame"
wew, I'm so overwhelmed by this.
>>337110939
yes but the witcher is actually a game.
and looks good without bullshots
and is actually made by competent developers who released a downgraded version and fixed the downgrade with patches.
>>337108351
Actually according to ND, Order 1886 has best has best model in a game. both cutscenes and gameplay models. Killzone Shadowfall comes second. All 3 studios has their own custom engine
>>337109073
> most detailed and most realistic
This is easily disputable, because these are entirely limited by the hardware, and the PS4 is by no means a power house.
>>337108668
>all the cutscenes are rendered in real time. the character models and assets are the same.
>>337110238
>this has been proven to be literally false.
what is LOD, fuckface
Crysis 3 faces looks better.
>>337108351
That can't be from a game! I guess we know what the Game of the Year is going to be!
Anyone got a picture of that guys face from Crysis 2?
>PCfats finally realize that they just can't compete with the power of Playstation 4
>shota Nate will never look at you like this
Why live?
>>337108351
Witcher 3 has better models but whatever you say sonygger
>>337108351
Except when compared to battlefront. Further proving graphics cant save shit games
>>337108436
Rivaled only by Silent Hill 3.
>It's a /v/ falls for bullshit marketing pics again episode
>>337121782
If he wanted to post a marketing pic, he picked the worst one. I've seen near photo realistic pictures from the game, but that picture just looks like it's from Max Payne 3. Not very impressive compared to the others I've seen.
Crysis 3
>>337121782
You can easily see the gameplay models are just as good bro.
>>337122181
Looks like an unused Half Life 2 promo shot.
Disgusting. Max Payne 3 looks better. Hell so does SH3 and that came out in 2003.
>>337108351
Is this really supposed to amaze me? It still has a VERY clear "I am a realistic video game model" look. Max Payne 3 has the same type of model and it came out years ago.
>>337110692
>No one of the good guys die btw
Did any of the good guys die in Indiana Jones 1-3?
This is supposed to be a modern version of that after all.
>>337122541
>It still has a VERY clear "I am a realistic video game model" look.
It's almost as if it's a video game!
>>337122729
???
Did I ever say it wasn't? I'm saying it still has the look very clearly as opposed to some other screenshots that look almost photorealistic. You're repeating back what I said as if it's an argument against what I said.
>>337122885
It's just a stupid line, video games will never be truly photorealistic, so no shit it looks like a video game model.
>>337122996
I was comparing it to some other screenshots from the game of models that look much closer to photorealistic, so I had to make the distinction between that and this unimpressive, obviously video gamey model. Why that bothers you so much I don't know.
>>337110519
>ND
>tech demo guys
Holy shit no
ubisoft yea
Nd no way
ND uses the closed small maps to fit in more detail for a specific hardware
Sure it looks good but thats allthe tech behind it
The physics and animations are shit
If you want tech demo guys look at Ubisoft with Unity and Division
There is plenty of technology and pushing the limits in those compared to Prerendercharted
>first multiplayer match
>some guy complaining that he spent 50 dollars on uncharted points and they were only for aesthetic stuff
>>337108351
Witcher 3 is better and there are more than five characters.
>>337123962
>Not rainbow six siege
Common man
>>337125030
Siege is also a great game
Not just a tech demo
>>337124946
Those look shitty compared to uc4 now that its out lmao. Is this truly the end of pcfags? All they have left is muh 30 fps
>>337108882
I knew it was a matter of time before you faggots started using that to defend
Fuck off, who the hell listens to maddox
Go back to funnyjunk faggot
>>337108351
Silent Hill 3 had better looking character models.
>>337109140
Nothing to do with that, you're not using PS3 character models in a PS4 game.
>>337123962
>ubisoft yea
Fuck you, Naughty Dog can't even begin to dream about developing anything as good as Ubisoft did during the early 2000's. While ubisoft was making Splinter Cell, Prince of Persia and Beyond Good and Evil, ND was making furfag collect-a-thon platformers.
>>337110391
Came here to post this.
>>337121782
Your logic has no place in a solid sonybrony thread, faghat.
Sony fanbois now vehemently defend the fact that the console is best used for watching movies.
man, how times have changed.
>>337124861
all the faces look basically the same
>>337122181
ill be honest that looks bad
>>337126572
show me
>>337108351
>>337116963
2007
0
0
7
DRAKE HE DIDNU NUFFIN
>>337129521
uncharted get penetrated by african high rate porn actor.
>>337129521
Eh. You have to admit they did a great job with hair in UC4. In Crysis there was only that one chick that had hair and it looked like plastic.
>>337129807
T-The hair
Grasping at straw my dude
>>337129807
Is good joob but nothing that i could see before, is just ok in everything.
>>337129521
To be fair cryengine is like cheating, shit's crazy
>>337130457
how is that grasping? Realistic hair is arguably the toughest thing to make look realistic on character models. The only game I've seen that's done it well so far is Rise of Tomb Raider. Haven't played uncharted 4 yet
>>337130567
uncharted still has better facial models. they have wrinkles that react realistically depending on facial movement and such.
crysis just has a high resolution skin texture. no TECHNOLOGY in the face.
Graphically.
It looks kind of bland to be honest. Venom face in MGSV is less graphically impressive but looks better. Because his design is actually interesting.
>>337130779
Turn on hair works in witcher 3
>inb4
MUH GAMEWORKS FPS DROP
Patches have fixed this, as long as your card is not a shitter it can run easily
>>337131016
Well the physics are realistic but the hair still looks like shit
>>337131016
What this guy said >>337131227
the Pure Hair tech in tomb raider is way better
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrhSVcZF-1I
>>337131227
No it doesn't, I don't know what game you've been playing but it is incredibly realistic.
>>337131879
Have you ever seen someone with gray/white dyed hair in your life? Your pic looks fucking retarded.
>>337132151
Have I ever seen someone with grey/white hair?
Yes, old people and feminists you stupid fuck.
>>337125723
stop trying to start shit faggot jesus christ
>>337131452
>>337132259
If you did you'd know how it looks like, you dumb cunt.
And it definitely doesn't look like your pic, you idiot.
>>337132476
Yet you think hair looks like this
Maybe it looks good when you have a lower resolution to blur everything
>>337132691
What is this pic from? Uncharted?
I don't care about fucking Uncharted, I'm talking about hair from The Witcher 3. And no, it doesn't look realistic
Your pic - that's how short hair looks when it's greasy as fuck. It probably would look like shit if the blur wasn't there.
>all this xcuck fury
love it