>New Call of Duty
>it's more futuristic bullshit
another year, another pass on this fucking franchise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeF3UTkCoxY
>>336256664
What do you want?
WW2 every fucking year?
It's not like this shit is completely impossible, the tech will happen one day.
Hey, Bioshock Dog.
Haven't seen him in forever.
as much as COD sucks, id rather have futuristic than boring WW2 or modern.
>>336258712
its not even the same game anymore.
Look at the first couple call of dutys compared to the last few. They're very differen't, but at the core it's the same game.
This shit is halo. This looks like a space rpg almost
>Haven't played a Call of Duty game since Black Ops 1
>See this shit
What the fuck happened?
On the plus side they've apparently remastered cod 4's campaign and 10 multiplayer maps.
Of course it's more futuristic shit.
You act like they do more than just copy/paste their previous game and add a few different skins/maps.
I wasn't going to be a hater, but this looks cheesy as fuck. It should've been ayys or something.
>>336262701
Wonder how much they'll charge for it if you don't pre-order the new game. Also wondering if it's going to be a standalone or just a DLC for this one.
>>336261837
People asked for innovation and cried about "same modern warfare shit every year".
That's what you get.
CoD is now a full blown sci-fi title.
>>336263420
> It should've been ayys or something.
We will get to that point sooner or later.
There's still a lot of stuff to cover, i bet on of the CoD games will be about time travel or something.
Probably made by 3arc because they seem to like doing complicated mindfuck plot in their games.
>>336261680
CoD1 and 2 are the same
CoD4 to Infinity are the same. The core gameplay hasn't changed since they added sprint.
>>336256664
Blame gun manufacturers going full jew with their licensing.
>'ahorita no joven' intensifies
>>336263691
>There's still a lot of stuff to cover
No there isn't, this weird abomination of early 2000s tacticool shit + f-35-shaped spaceships + human flying saucers shouldn't exist.
>>336263842
Thrusters have changed maneuverability. Future shit is the only way to evolve CoD's gameplay. WW2 shitters want more of the same, they want the game to remain stale.
Every FPS game has the same core gameplay. CoD1 and 4 are the same, 1 and BO3 are very different.
>>336263947
That is not an argument. CoD is still best selling game every year without fail. They essentially have an infinite budget to work with. If they really wanted to, they could go back to modern day or WW2
>>336263947
This is a myth, has always been a myth. EA has never paid licensing (EA started the rumor). But they later corrected their statement.
>>336261680
Them being the same every year was the problem you fucking idiot.
>>336264243
Why not?
>>336264596
Did you see any advanced maneuverability in the trailer? I sure didn't see boosters or wall runs.
I prefer them honestly. Map design got a huge upgrade when it wasn't just running around.
>>336264904
We only saw zero G gameplay. But there are some soldiers jet boosting in the first minute. Time will tell if it has wall run and the like. Hopefully it will.
>>336256664
>it's more futuristic bullshit
what do you people want?
first you bitch about ww2, then you bitch about modern, now youre bitching about future shit
These games used to be about capturing history and old weaponry. I was okay with the modern setting because we were still using weapons and tech that actually exist. A whole lot of the appeal of CoD was how the campaigns attempted to make an arcadey game with cool set pieces and history. Now it's just another game for me to get confused with Titanfall.
>>336263842
>CoD1 and 2 are the same
nigger, you're dumb.
2 started regenerating health and bloody screen, looked very different thanks to a lot of engine changes, and removed additions from original COD's expansion pack like sprint (came in 3/4) and driveable vehicles (which come and go from the series)
Considering how shitty WaW was online I don't trust them to make a WW2 shooter. Plus it wouldn't even be able to compete gameplay wiae with RO2 so there's no point.
>>336265230
Honestly, I wouldn't mind futuristic shit if it wasnt
>evil rogue organization trying to bring down the freedom loving peoples of Earth
>contemporary tech with goofy shit slapped on it
Because from what I know, that's every CoD since MW.
>>336265230
>Call of Duty bringing Halo tech into it is good
People complain about Call of Duty no matter what but there was fuck all wrong with the modern setting.
>>336265902
>RO2
Red Orchestra 2 is a fucking mess, and is a completely different style of game. There's plenty of room for an arcadey ww2 game like CoD used to be, though there is that kickstarter from the Day of Defeat guys so we'll probably get it soon enough anyway.
>>336266084
>there was fuck all wrong with the modern setting.
It was getting stale. At least a future setting can introduce stuff that will change the gameplay.
>People complain CoD is stagnant
>Activision actually learn from Guitar Hero's crash and innovate
>Now people complain its too different
>>336266097
But why play a ww2 game that's arcadey? It will play exactly as if it were a modern shooter which kind of defeats the point in my eyes.
>>336266213
What's innovative about it?
>>336266191
Not Halo dropships. The biggest problem with Ghosts was the awful map design. The gameplay was stale but it wasn't because of the guns or look of the game.
>>336266395
>But why play a ww2 game that's arcadey?
Because it can be fun? How do you think CoD started?
Never bought a CoD and never will but this game actually looks interesting, it'll probably end up being a better Titanfall based on the drones/mechs and shit.
>>336266463
Actually adding in new mechanics, for one.
>>336265230
I always liked world war two
>>336266463
>Basing loadouts around points instead of fixed slots, allowing you to specialise in shit like a single primary weapon or melee
>Fluid wall running, jumping and sliding successfully implemented into multiplayer
>Newer gear and perks that actually do something new
Perhaps its not brand new for the entire genre but Activision are clearly trying to keep things from getting dull without completely changing the game.
>That Space Oddity cover
>>336266191
>It was getting stale
MW1, 2 and 3 were the only modern shooters that were somewhat grounded in reality.
We've already had 4 futuristic games and Infinite marks the 5th.
>>336256664
good choice of music atleast
>>336267321
>MW1, 2 and 3 were the only modern shooters that were somewhat grounded in reality.
And Black Ops 1, but even ignoring that there are a million other fps games set in the modern era. Just like ww2 got boring due to market saturation, so did the modern era. This futuristic settings for casual shooters will get stale too, and it will likely cycle back to ww2, modern setting, vietnam, korea or SOMETHING.
Korea has a huge untapped potential, not just for fps but for any number of genres, and I'd like a Vietnam game where you play as the South Vietnamese and watch them struggle with holding off the commies once America abandons them.
>>336256664
holy fuckballs this trailer..
its like the ABC of "appeal to normalfags 101" and apparently even the fucking trailers for cod are a copy paste from the one that came before at this point
>open with several news reporters on the background with distorted audio
>muh exploshunz
>muh spaceships
>generic metal in the back
>headshots everywhere
and when you think it cant get any worse...
fucking rape of space oddity most likely by a teenage band of hipsters whose faggotry simply cant be put into words
>>336268313
>generic metal in the back
It's rock music anon.
Looks kinda interesting, last one wasn't futuristic enough for me. If they have some creative maps, crazy abilities and replace zombies with aliens, I might buy it. Even though I don't particularly enjoy how CoD plays.
>mfw i am actually considering purchasing this for the remaster of mw
>>336261680
>This shit is halo. This looks like a space rpg almost
lolwut. it's still just chest high high walls, F-35 fighter jets and m16s. it's a very shallow sci-fi setting and the gameplay is still the same modern warfare stuff it's always been.
>>336256664
david bowie didn't die for his song to be remixed and put into a shitty call of duty franchise.
>>336272452
>Commercial artist didn't die for his song to be remixed and put into a commercial, like it already had been done before in life
