Would you prefer a WW2 Battlefield or futuristic?
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: Would you prefer a WW2 Battlefield or futuristic?
Would you prefer a WW2 Battlefield or futuristic?
Futuristic of course.
There haven't been that many since the 90s and early 00s.
Futuristic. in a futuristic setting the gameplay can be more fast paced and rely on slower projectiles.
>>335934852
Would love to see battlefield 2145
just give me 1943 on PC please
>>335934852
would prefer a 1991/2003 BF
fuck your futuristic and prehistoric bullshit
>>335934852
Neither
>>335935298
it would be 2143 noob
Gimme a fuckin korean war battlefield game so i can relive the footsteps of my grandfather as a tank commander.
They will make 2143 but it will be super fast paced like CoD is now but with vehicles to make it 'still BF' including tons of bloom, wubstep, and filters.
>>335935393
Golly gee where are my manners maybe a bc3
>>335935641
Cod is fast paced? Since when
>>335934852
ORANGE AND BLUE
R
A
N
G
E
A
N
D
B
L
U
E
Gay
It doesn't matter. I just want more thumpers.
>it ain't me starts playing
Hey, I'm a NA BF4 player who is looking for a platoon.
Does anybody here play with a dedicated group that could use a player?
>>335934852
i read that as a WWF Battlefield, and for a moment I was euphoric
>t. Battlefield (no number)
bet its a reboot, and will have the same gameplay focus as battlefront
would be cool if they go all out as "battlefield" goes, like different eras and shit
We're never going back to WW2. Kids these days are too obsessed with fifty trillion fucking weapon attachments. World at War pretty much have to stretch every possible choice to put a CoD4-like system into its game.
2142 was my favourite of the whole series but I don't doubt they'll fuck it up.
>>335934852
>WW2
>futuristic
I don't know which theme I hate more. Current day is the best.
>>335936079
how the fuck do you reboot a multiplayer series that has a new game coming out every year.
>>335934852
ww2 is nice i dont like future coz everything looks toyetic, tacticool and has to have a dubstep EDM soundtrack. Why a Napoleon or Civil War era CoD doesnt exist?
>>335934852
I'm not sure its an exact time setting or whatever but whatever time setting bad company 2 was in.
>>335934852
either is fine as I don't buy EA games
>>335935582
bfbc2 Vietnam dlc?
WW2 setting has always bored me to tears. Futuristic allows for inventive items.
the mass market consumer wants a modern warfare setting
they don't like the futuristic fake guns wall jumping shit, and it shows when you look at how sales dropped when COD started doing that and how Titanfall failed to grab people.
2143 sounds cool to battlefield fans but the average FPS bro gamer won't like it
>>335936415
Hasnt cod been doing futuristic for a while? And theres even doom and halo that are futuristic. Where the fuck do you get your idea of average consumer not liking futuristic from
>>335934852
PURE FUCKING CANCER
>>335936135
Maybe they should make a post apocalyptic one? that way they could have tons of homemade attachments, but not be modern again or future crap. And the guns would be different too, since it would be scavenged rather then tacticool.
>>335936698
Battlefield is about combined arms, doesn't really work that well in this series.
>>335935719
since all the arena shooters died off
>>335936535
look at advanced warfare, it's the worst selling cod
blops 3 cut back on that shit and sales went up
titanfall was a failure literally no one plays it, they were expecting it to contend with cod
>>335936752
they can do a mad max style thing, no reason they can't have trucks with guns welded on there, repurposed police apcs, military grade stuff from a base or they could say a faction rebuilt the vehicles from a old WW2 museum. might be better suited for a spin off like hardline though, yeah.
>>335934852
WW2
But it won't happen because no red dots and homing missiles.
Some alternate history WW2 would be nice though.
>>335936873
What? Black Ops 3 is the most "futuristic" CoD yet. They didn't cut back on shit, they only pushed it further.
>>335934852
wanna see some WW with modern graphic in action
>Underage kiddies who weren't around during the WW2 flood in the 00's memeing these games back into the market
The sad thing is that FZD already confirmed that most AAA companies are working in several cinematic WW2 themed games.
>>335934852
WW2 wouldn't be fun, since the levolution shit is a staple to the series there wouldn't be much they could do
the farthest they should go back is Vietnam
>Medieval Battlefield
Everything would implode.
>>335937313
I was there and I want this flood back
>battlefield
nobody cares about this
its like halo, people play the multiplayer for like a month then go back to CoD
>>335936079
>Multiplayer series that is still going strong
>reboot
>Fabtasy Battlefield
>magic weapons
>huge fireball launchers
>wyverns, gryphons, horses, siege weapons
Imagine
>>335937365
so it'd be that For Honor game pretty much?
>>335934852
I hope they change the name on the reveal
>>335937501
Battlefield is pretty fucking popular on pc
>>335934852
just give me titan mode with big maps and old knife mechanics, do not fucking care about anything else
>>335937512
Hardline was a failure.
didnt they already make a futuristic battlefield?
>>335936612
I like the Republic Commando thing they tried to do in BF4, but it failed because there was just a dedicated shoot button for NPC's instead of individual commands and also the characters sucked ass
Hopefully DICE LA is making this one because they are the only competent team
>>335936415
>Completely ignores HALO which is set 200 years in the future and is one of the most successful FPS's of all time
>>335936752
You could still have tanks and stuff in a Post Apocalyptic game. I remember Josh Sawyer pitched an idea for a Battlefield-like Fallout spinoff called Fallout: Resource Wars
>It would be a game set in the Fallout world's Europe during the Euro-Middle Eastern war that took place there around the 2050s. Focused on team-based multiplayer, the gameplay would be a blend of Motocross Madness pacing, Battlefield: 1942 foot and vehicle combat, and slightly longer-than-CS duration rounds. A salvaging element would be included giving the player the choice of either repairing damaged vehicles/weapons for use in the next round, or scrapping them for parts.
>The plot would involve a crew of soldiers from the Royal Armoured Corps who become stranded in a war-torn anarchistic northern Italy and have to fight their way to the English Channel in quickly degrading vehicles, scavenging replacements, fuel, and weapons as they go.
>>335937660
because it was a spin-off
go ahead and check just how many people are still playing bf4
>>335937660
Hardline was a spin-off
>>335937726
The series has changed a lot since then and the new improvements would be really neat in a futuristic setting
>>335934852
I'd prefer whichever doesn't have a broken as fuck netcode.
>>335937745
>DICE LA
>Competent
Unless the entire team changed when they renamed from Danger Close Gamesyes I'm still fucking mad about what they did to Medal of Honor, I find that very hard to believe.
Vietnam or FULL future. Not semi-future like Call of Duty
Honestly, I would be fine with Battlefield Star Wars if it was actually Battlefield but with Star Wars shit instead of some shitty inbetween like Battlefront
>>335937865
DICE LA is responsible for all BF4 post-launch updates and fixes. They made a borderline unplayable piece of shit into one of the best battlefield games to date
Battlefield: Tiberum wars.
Battlefield: Mass effect
Battlefield: Cowboys and Indians
Battlefield: Steampunk
Battlefield: good company
Battlefield 3: the second one
Battlefield: cold war
>>335937313
I honestly don't mind that.
The issue will be that they're probably going to fuck them up.
gib 2143
>>335936698
This idea.. I like it.
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Mass Effect
Remind that this was almost a thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSy33Cc_96I
>>335938070
you... i like you xD
>>335937525
have one faction be that, the other still military dudes. for scale.
>>335936260
That's the wrong war
>>335937759
Halo sold more on the Universe and Casual multiplayer more than anything
Now 343i has absolutely fucked both of those and MS has to include bundles just to say they sold more than 1mil
>>335936698
They already did it with BF3 Aftermath DLC and they totally blew it aesthetic-wise.
>>335934852
I'd like one that isn't a buggy pile of crap
>>335937313
it has been more than a decade
>>335938095
that could be cool, it's not that like that series has a rep to tarnish.
God, let it be 2142 2
Bring back Titan mode please.
Battlefield: Falklands or Battlefield: WW1 would be interesting.
Basically just huge empty maps with lots of rocks and mountain and shit to hide in and spot enemies/snipe/call in artillery etc.
Or trench warfare, with all matches lasting like 30 seconds when one team captures the machine gun placements and proceeds to mow down everyone as soon as they go over the top.
>>335934852
ww2 with offline bot battles.
>3 installments later
>still can't fight dinosaurs in an Apache Helicopter
fucking when
>>335938264
I never played that dlc but that was immediately after detonation right? maybe if the whole game based around the end of the world it would turn out better. I imagine it let you use all the tools from the base game and that kinda misses the point. like a disease or weather based apocalypse would fit better
Anything that isn't USA vs Russia/China/Germany. These pairings have been run in to the ground.
WW2 games are overdone and overrated
Futuristic games (with lasers and shit) is gay as fuck.
Modern = Near future > World wars > futuristic
>>335938741
>battlefield: Falklands
>the entire game is just Royal Marines chasing down drafted Argentine teenagers and shooting them in the back as they retreated
Wouldn't be very interesting desu, Argentina Vs. Britain was never a fair war
>>335939037
Who else, North Korea or aliens?
>>335934852
>The future of battlefield
>Future
it's gonna be WWI
>>335939147
If they go future they can combine nations into something cool or just make up pmcs or rebel factions. Africa could be used more.
>>335938195
> Battlefield: GATE
Sounds fucking awesome
>>335939236
didn't WW1 have fuck all for vehicles? just those slow "tanks" and little propeller planes.
>>335939114
CS babby detected
I'd prefer it if DICE and EA were to die instead.
What does everyone think the new factions will be? USA and.....
>>335939147
The sky is the fucking limit if they pull some alt history shit. USA vs England in modern times.
Alternatively, South America and Africa never seem to get any real love in these modern military shooters, really any conflict involving people in either could be a good twist.
>>335939441
We need horses.
2143. Fuck ww2 we had enough of them for fucks sake what are you 11 years old that yout can't remember how for YEARS the only shooters were ww2? Medal of Honours? BF 1942? CoD 1235?
And if not 2143 I want to see some future shit. Like fighting on a space station and low g jumping stuff. Shoot a window and motherfuckers fly away or the only sound you hear is from the vibrations your gun does on your suit
>>335939719
>South America and Africa never seem to get any real love in these modern military shooters
Because games set in modern setting tend to strive for authenticity and pitching usa against either would be a fucking joke.
>>335934852
Modern.
>>335939127
They shoulda thought about that before they invaded
It's clearly going to be a future setting. Look at the DLCs; they tell a story. The DLC of 3 led to 4. The DLC of 4 lead to 2142. This could be set sometime before that; BF 2132 anyone?
Settings I would personally really fucking enjoy:
> Post-Apocalyptic
> Ultra far future robot war
> XCOM style alien invasion
> Cold war gone hot
> Hardline: 1972
> Hardline: 1932
>>335937764
This, pretty interesting idea.
>>335939821
the usa doesn't do very well when it isn't alllowed to go all in
>>335934852
I would prefer an actual Battlefield 3 and not that shitty game that they delivered
>>335939821
No one said the US needed to be involved at all.
>>335940043
so play battlefield 4?
The only thing I want for a Battlefield game is for the sniper class to be ditched and replaced with a normal scouting class with carbines.
Sniping is fucking pointless in BF3 and BF4
>>335940160
Also shit
>>335935719
if you want to be technical, advanced warfare
>>335940160
he said an actual battlefield 3 , not another bad company shit sequel
>>335940129
Yeah, nigger warfare would be very interesting
>>335940250
>>335940262
have you even played bf4 after 2014?
>>335940262
Hey, this is a niche
>>335939954
>Hardline type campaign with an actually good setting/cast/writing
>It's just some singleplayer DLC instead of a spinoff
>It's just campy
>>335940043
>>335940236
thank you for the quality post
thankfully we have you to remind us of the games quality
>>335940320
meant for >>335940236
WW2 Africa campaign
>Battlefield
>DICE
>EA
no thanks and you sperglords would do well to ignore it entirely before you shitpost it into a meme and have it sell 20 million copies from people who only ironically like it because memes
Futuristic.
>>335940424
its call of duty shit
>>335940424
Yes
Have you ever played an FPS released before CoD 4?
>>335934852
WW2 on the Eastern Front
I want a Reichstag & surrounding area map aswell with dynamic destruction of various parts of the building
>>335940585
a simple 'no' will do
>>335940273
The customization options would be insane.
if they make a new 2142 ill buy into this shit franchise again
>>335940396
Thanks for the support
If you want I am available for 24/7 support
I am always ready to decide if the game you are playing is shit or not(They probably all are)
did they write 'see the future of battlefield' to throw us of? i hope its world war 2 desu there hasnt been a world war game in 10 years.
>>335940632
have you ever played a battlefield before bad company?
>>335939719
>South America
cod ghosts did it
>>335940630
This is my dream, but i doubt it would happen
>>335940747
Oh sorry I thought we were talking about good games.
>>335940747
Arent these games just a simple deathmatch though, it doesnt really matter who you are playing as or against
>>335940741
you have either never played bf4 or are deliberately shitposting if you think bf4 is a bad battlefield game or in any way similar to cod or bad company
>>335939821
instead of USA just have a "peacekeeper" faction, that way they can be scaled back reasonably.
>>335940963
>battlefield
>scaled back
But that's not what the series is known for, just look at the shitstorm that was Hardline.
>>335940902
Game itself just fine.Maps complete garbage though.
>>335940902
>paying 100$ for one game
>paying for a game that has random cases you can open
>paying for a game that has an option to pay for unlocks
>>335940683
only setting where the stupid silly camos for guns would make sense.
Reminder that of the "new" Battlefield games, BC2 is still the best.
>>335941192
The bad company titles are fucking console cancer kill yourself my man
>>335940902
and you never played battlefield 1942 or bf2 so stfu
>>335941259
Back to mordorhq with you
>>335935921
Atleast use the actual song name you fuck
>>335941303
Where were you when WW2 is pretty much confirmed?
https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/726142382417141760
>>335941303
it's a meme you fucking dip
>>335934852
2143 or nothing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk4wEAO07hM
>>335941493
EA wouldnt be stupid enough to publish a world war game, no one fucking wants that
>>335941493
They wouldn't be invited 1944 Devs to the premiere if it was WWII. DICE is made of decent people, they aren't dicks.
>>335935298
2146
>>335941493
>WW2
>AGAIN
Jesus.
Do you not remember WW2 saturation?
It'd have been better if they just went full creative and made like an alternate history.
Maybe a shooter in a world where the Western Roman Empire never fell.
Or if the Americas colonized Europe instead of the other way around.
Just fucking something new, Jesus.
>>335934852
futuristic
its going to be open world shooter, like the division
>>335941640
a lot of the Battlefield community is rallying for a WWII game. Jackfrags held a massive poll and WWII won by a massive amount.
http://www.strawpoll.me/6459945/r
>>335941640
EVERYONE WANTS THAT YOU FUCKING DIP
RED ORCHESTRA 2 IS GETTING FUCKING BORING
>>335941878
A bunch of literallywhos don't have any say on multimillion dollar business decisions
>>335941906
RO2 being as dead as it is is a pretty good indicator of how much demand there is for a ww2 game outside of some loud autists
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Mass Effect
Not gonna lie, it would be pretty damn fun to play a pvp multiplayer based off of the galaxy at war in ME3, with a single player story tying in to the events in that game.
>>335942046
>Battlefield
>single player
Who gives a shit?
It's only there for autists who can't handle real people.
>>335942001
RO2 was never well known
It was made by a low-budget company that's pretty much only known for Red Orchestra and Killing Floor
>>335942137
It was pretty heavily hyped on release though
>>335941958
>battlefield community
>literally whos
>when DICE LA has done nothing but listen to them for 2 years while fixing BF4
>>335942097
>my meme opinion is why they shouldn't have it
>not playing both
>>335941878
BF, COD, they all say they want to go back to something like a WWII shooter but I guarantee when they get it, they will complain of a ''lack of content, weapons, etc'' and talk about how its the same old generic FPS game with updated graphics. Also people whining about wanting boots on the ground do it because they get their asses handed to them with the arena shooter movements and jumping and they aren't used to it on consoles so they whine.
You know those rumors about the next battlefield being set in WW1?They're true
>>335939719
Was just thinking of UK vs USA. Maybe not Battlefield but some alternate history type game where the British Empire never collapses. Just to even the odds a bit.
>yfw they call it just "Battlefield"
I'll play WWII only under the condition that they keep in flamethrowers that work similar to the Vietnam ones. I know its fucked up but its a game and I need more flamethrowers. Otherwise im hoping for 2143.
The only thing that interested me in a new WWII BF game is NO FUCKING LOCK ON'S
BEEPBEEPBEEPBEEPBEEPBEEP
>>335942237
if you genuinely enjoy the sp of battlefield and call of duty there is something wrong with you
>>335940221
>love sniping at all ranges in BC2
>it fucking sucks in 4
At least the other weapons are pretty fun
World War II not even close. "Future" shit has become incredibly boring and CoD is already doing that this year.
>>335942283
>WW1
>for a BF game
Yeah nah.
It was a shit war for Battlefield.
Would make an amazing singleplayer focused game, but not for BF.
Trench warefare is just shit gameplay.
Its going to be on the eastern front
>>335935110
>slower projectiles
>more fast paced
what did he mean by this?
Futuristic for sure. WW2 is played out.
>>335934852
BF2143 please.With extra bugs not yet known to mankind, obviously
>>335942380
COD has been doing it for 2 years now.
>>335941149
I bought BF4 for about 15€ a few months ago
>>335942046
They wanted to make a Battlefield clone of masseffect at one point
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSy33Cc_96I
>>335942203
By a the fan base perhaps
Normies like battlefield fans probably never even cared
There is little progression in RO2
There are no camos, fancy gun paints, and there's very few vehicles other than 1-2 tanks for each faction and an APC
The game was also extremely bugged upon release
>>335942431
Trust me friend it is true and it is happening. Screencap this post.
>>335942375
Excellent meme, m'good sir! You are a gentleman and a scholar!
>>335941764
>something was overplayed a fucking decade ago and hasn't been touched at all since
>therefor it can never be done again ever
WW2 wasn't any worse than the gritty modern shooter so real that followed it.
>See youtube vid about BF5 announcement
>I WANT RUSH
>I WANT BF3 MAPS
>SMALLER MAPS
>I WANT MAPS MADE FOR RUSH
Kill me
>>335942380
>"Future" shit has become incredibly boring
12 year old detected
Clearly the blue and grey image is zoomed into and it's probably the cover.
>>335942534
Did you watch a Levelcrap video
>>335942534
Rush is a good mode tho
>>335942516
>he enjoys modern military singleplayer
Seek help son
>>335942380
the only good type of shooter is a fantasy/sci fi shooter
I just want BC2 style destruction again.
Shit was based as hell
>>335942678
Another excellent post! I'll bless you (non-religiously) with some 4chan gold! Keep making excellent memes!
>>335935921
> incorrect name for song
But fuckkkkkkkkk that would be good.
>>335942530
>hasn't been touched at all since
>what is red orchestra
dead game because nobody fucking cares about ww2
>>335942654
yeah apparently
>>335942672
BF3's tunnel straight line maps were an abomination. Its ok if it doesn't touch the more important modes but overall its pretty shit.
>>335941571
No shit sherlock, memes aside i dont think alot of people even know the song
Combine both in one game
I'm getting sick of the futuristic cyber-soldier trend thats been going on. All these shooters with drones and exo-suits and retarded shit. Just give me a good war game. Better yet, they could keep it warfare centric but remove the military aspect, that would be very interesting. Like a civil war in a not-so-advanced country.
all these retards hate ww2 probably never even touched 1942
probably a bunch of bc2 spawns
>>335942759
BC2 destruction wouldn't work in a real battlefield game. The match would become really fucking boring when after 10 minutes there was literally nothing left and you would be shot by a tank or jet over and over again as infantry.
>>335942804
Red Orchestra 2 is over five fucking years old, anon.
That's half a goddamn decade, and it's one game.
>>335942583
Modern was done to death and now future has been done to death in the most safe and sterile way possible. Fuck off.
>>335942926
you are aware that the best shooters of all time are all futuristic scifi right
of course you aren't since you're 15 years old who started gaming during the ww2 boom
>>335942893
>I'm getting sick of the futuristic cyber-soldier trend thats been going on.
I think it's better because it allows the devs to be more creative and not be restricted by what is real and what is not.
They can do whatever they want with the gameplay, which should be a priority.
Like the new COD games could actually be good of TTK was a little higher.
What's the point of all that mobility if you're dead in one bullet from a spraygun?
>>335942465
That's true actually but the rumors are that the next will be even FARTHER (3 more years) in to future.
>>335934852
Pseudo-futuristic WW2 setting like the new Wolfenstein
>>335942454
>WW2
>played out more than futuristic
I fail to think of any recent WW2 FPS beyond world at war, and I can name fucking tons of recent futuristic FPS
recent futuristic
Black Ops 2+3, advanced warfare, Titanfall 1+2, UT4, Destiny, halo 5, battlefront
recent ww2???
>>335943132
Thy even know people are getting tired, that's why they are making the COD4 remaster.
>>335943139
black ops 2 wasn't futuristic
Don't care because it'll be the same shit since 3 in maybe a new setting.
>>335943256
People are getting tired of COD, not the futuristic setting.
>>335934852
Fuck futuristic, it's the #1 reason I stopped playing COD with their dumb laser guns and jet pack bullshit. BF4 is probably the last good authentic looking modern warfare FPS for a while to come.
>>335943256
they're making it because they want everyone to forget the fact that they made ghost
>>335943314
poor bait
>>335943475
10-20 years into the future isnt fucking futuristic
>>335943107
im 31 so you can shut the fuck up kid. just because you want future doesnt mean it cant be ww2. you never even played 1942 so stfu kid
>>335943391
modern warfare is fucking boring tho so who cares
futuristic or ww2 are both better
>>335943314
what did he mean by this??
>>335936191
10 minute reloads, that's why
And horrible accuracy
Every hit would be instakill
Fucking blunderbuss
>>335934852
battlefront 2145
>>335943391
insurgency is good too
>>335943314
are you retarded?
>>335936148
this
>>335943550
>kid
>kid
>stfu kid
tfw you realize you're arguing with a literal child
>WW2 with current graphics and advanced effects
>Night maps
>actual commander position
>Well done gun animations done by a higher budget team compared to back then
>64v64 servers
>Planes
>Bombs
>Good looking tanks
I'm cumming
>>335935393
the northern strike expansion already took place in 2143
and they're well past battlefield 3
I want bad company 3.
I'll take 24 player servers if it plays as well ad bc2 did. I put about 350 hours into that game on my 360 god damn it was fun.
>>335943565
>modern warfare is fucking boring
t. casual pussy fuck who starts yelling if he doesn't get a laser guuded smart pistol or a jetpack so he can run away from every engagement
>>335937214
Wolfenstein: the new order
IF THIS ISNT FUCKING 2143 IM GONNA TEAR MY FUCKING FACE OFF.
YOU PLAYED WITH MY GODDAMN HEART WITH THAT LAST EXPANSION OF BF4 SHOWING OFF THE HOVER TANK AND OTHER SHIT.
>>335943765
Might come as a surprise but futuristic shooters existed before titanfall
>>335943681
ok i guess your way more mature then me sure
im still right though. your first bf was bc2 or above. meaning your not a veteran
>>335942446
that the soldiers run faster than the projectiles
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Tiberium Wars.
Would be awesome. Imagine how the maps would look. Start at a spawn and from the distance, you can see glowing fields in the distance with gunfire and explosions occurring in the background.
>>335943851
>video game
>veteran
holy shit this is embarrassing
>>335943550
Check it out everybody, cool guy on the internet. I bet hes a lot of fun at parties.
>>335936612
I hope you posted that image to show how both of those NeoGaf posters are fucking retards and neo-Battlefield babies, never having played BF2/1942.
>>335943919
ok im a cringey nerd but at least bc2 wasnt my first battlefield and get mad when people ask for ww2 game
>>335941060
I meant just for the settings sake, the gameplay would be traditional.
>>335943861
okay, and how does having slow as molasses projectiles make the game faster paced?
>>335944003
>at least bc2 wasnt my first battlefield
i'm beginning to think it was since only someone on full projection mode would use that as a serious argument
>>335944003
So what?
Piss off nerd, those are old and long gone, nobody cares about your old, abandoned games, plus, they're not pandering to you, lol, they're pandering to whatever makes more money, and obviously you're not part of that group.
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Tiberum wars.
I would bust a fucking nut.
KANE LIVES
>>335934852
gimme battle feel 2015/16 and let me fight for russia or ukraine
>>335934852
I would prefer Bad Company 3, but it's not like that's gonna happen any time soon.
They're probably gonna do WWI like the rumors were already suggesting.
>>335934852
Battlefield 2242 please
>>335944056
Have you ever played quake? Rockets are pretty slow but somehow the game manages to be fast
>>335944107
its a fine argument. its a better one then saying bf cant be ww2 because there was already a lot of ww2 games
>>335934852
Somewhere between 1980 - 2004 would be the sweet spot for me. It's modern but not modern enough to enable stupid shit like exoskeletons & rifles with 4 different scopes. WW2 over Futuristic.
>>335944306
Yeah, exoskeletons and futuristic rifles are shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit
>lmao flying soldiers lol XD
FUCK OFF
>>335942446
he wants an arena shooter
>>335944260
quake still isn't as fast paced as the average call of duty where the TTK is about a second
making the projectiles slower makes the game slower, not faster
>>335944246
i am with you bro, although i dont know if they are really going back to ww2. something tells me they arent.
the only way i would enjoy a ww2 game now is if it had the sound design that bc2 and bf4 bring
>>335944432
That depends on your definition of fast paced
COD is more twitchy than actually fast
One of the main problems I have with futurstic shit, aside from le jumpy soldier men are the guns
I don't want to use AK-147X I want to use a fucking AK-47. Every game out there does this, take modern guns, slap some stupid crap on them and rename them. Give me the guns I actually want to use.
>>335943458
I'm surprised they are going to outright ignore Ghosts after that sequel-bait ending.
>>335944462
I meant WW1, not 2. I think CoD and BF have completely abandoned WW2 and aren't looking back, which I don't agree with since I think they can do a great job making those games today. If it goes futuristic...eh, I don't know how to feel about it. I guess if it looked interesting, but not something I would invest my time in.
Ww2 shooter
Similar multiplayer to WAW or cod2
And there should be 32v32 games, with huge maps. 16 people in infantry, 8 Air Force, 8 armored division. Like a real battle. Think of war thunder, but add infantry to the mix.
And there should be a ruse total war like weapon unlock system,
Like low levels start with mg34s, Kar98s, panzer IIs, me109, ect, then higher levels get the mg42s, stgs, panthers, me 262, ect.
And of course I'm suggesting a fucking Wehrmacht campaign. You never get to play as axis because of muh feelings.
>>335944119
>nerd
>lol
Greetings, Reddit.
>>335934852
Fuck futuristic shit, im ready to go back to WW2. But, I would much rather stay in modern times.
>>335944518
Twitch means a game more based on reaction time than mechanical skill
what can possibly be faster than that?
Quake is a slower game than call of duty, and it's better for doing so.
But saying that slow projectiles makes a game fast paced is retarded and wrong.
>muh ww2
Lol
You faggots are almost as pathetic as the arena shooter fags, your genre is dead and buried get over it if people genuinely cared big publishers wouldve made a ww2 game already
>>335944868
I don't understand how you can misunderstand what he said so much.
Clearly the movement in UT or Quake is faster than in CoD. At least 2 and 4, which were the only ones I played in MP.
>>335944771
Dumbass auto correct doesn't know what etc is..
>>335934852
Both, bf needs a break from modern warfare.
>>335942814
Pretending to not know the song IS the meme. Also you are a fag for liking classic rock
>>335944860
Gotta love how we copy pasted half of the nazis shit,
Murica'
>>335945185
Who the fuck do you think you are
>>335945319
Your wife's son
>>335944994
The player movement in quake isn't substantially faster than black ops 3
ans I think you misunderstand, I asked how slower projectiles makes a game faster paced which is a retarded and oxymoronic concept.
if every quake weapon was instant hitscan, the game would be faster.
and for the slight bonus in movement in quake, it takes much longer to kill an enemy player, making it the slower game.
i hate the ignorant cucks that sprout "I HATE FUTURISTIC EXO AND JETPACK SHIT"
yeah we get it and we all hate it, but do some actual research and see that 2142 was boots on ground, then say a 2143 would be cod
>>335945484
you are a nigger
>Battlefield: Red Alert
>Is a hero Shooter
>>335945514
>it takes much longer to kill an enemy player, making it the slower game.
Those to two things do not correlate at all.
>>335943717
>64v64
they tried it with BF4 , server costs would be too high and maps would become shitshows
>>335945579
Aren't most wife's sons?
>>335934852
Battlefield: Earth
Fight aliems and kill dem all
WW(1)
Not the meme world war where 6 million Jews were killed,anti-Semitism should never be mainstream
But seriously I want WW1 trench warfare mustard gas smokin , diarrhoea and dysentery suffering
>>335945773
kill john travolta to win the game
>>335934852
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bydGoAdvmZo
>>335945720
>and maps would become shitshows
It's maps trouble.
another shit pandered down to comfyfie console players.
>>335945880
It would be a cool experience it was REAL. Like how it actually was.
But it's a shame there never can be a true ww1 multiplayer.
Too many bumrushing faggots would always be running around trying to quickscope with the Springfield and nobody would stay in trench or follow a team based strategy.
>>335945717
>game is about killing other players
>in quake you are slower to kill other players
>not the slower game
please explain how it being slower to kill other players makes the game more fast paced?
>>335945970
Ironically hardline had a pretty good theme (not to mention licensed songs) but the game itself was just shit
>>335946272
Some day anon , Some day
Please don't be WW2
>>335946276
>makes the game more fast paced
As I said, those two things don't correlate at all.
Why would they?
What's your favourite Battlefield map?
pic related
>>335946272
>>335946382
WW1 is the epitome of autism in shooting games. No publisher worth a shit is ever going to have one made. Go make a kickstarter.
>>335946473
Strike at Karkand
>>335946473
operation metro is unironically my favourite rush map
>>335945234
The fuck are you talking about?
>>335946473
Harvest day from BC2
That one's pretty good too
Let's have one starting with WWI, followed by WWII and then hypothetic WWIII.
While also including other wars like Vietnam, Korea and Cold War espionage.
I would call it Battlefield World.
>>335946469
how does the entire goal of the game (killing other players) being a slower process not make it a slower game?
speed and time to kill are correlated, and giving me the same wrong answer isn't going to change that.
If it took 200 direct rocket blasts to kill someone in quake instead, it would slow down the entire game.
>>335946272
WW1 would never work as a battlefield game
>Few weapons, mostly rifles and 1 SMG
>Only a few slow-as-fuck tanks
>Poor map variety, mostly trench warfare in muddy no-man's-land
>Extremely limited plane warfare
>Little/no customization
>no edgy dubstep theme
>>335946543
>epitome of autism
You mean that in a good way or a bad ?
You never know on 4chan
>>335946743
>speed and time to kill are correlated,
Absolutely not.
>>335945514
The way to consider it is not in how quickly a player can be killed, but in how fast things keep going.
A game like Battlefield is paced with slow periods of creeping about or holding a position, seldom periods of sprinting through an area, a brief burst of action and then downtime.
An encounter may only last 0.5 seconds and there may not even be a "fight", it's just one guy kills the other before he can react. When you're killed, that's a five or ten or more second period of time (depending on the game) where you are doing nothing, waiting to respawn. When you do get back in, there's often a period of time where you're just traveling to get back to the action.
In an arena game like Quake, the pace is constant and quick at almost all times. You're always on the move, running around to pick up more weapons and stock up on armor across the map. When you get into a fight, you are scrambling to land your shots and evade theirs for a long period of time, moving in excess and with many split second decisions in rapid succession. When you die, you're only out for a few seconds and are instantly back in, opponents right around the corner.
A game with long drawn out fights can be very active for long periods of time while games with quick deaths are often very start-stop.
>>335944712
its not like anyone liked ghost
>>335946654
Take a look at the guys pic related.
Take a look at our helmets, our m60, early jets, take a look at some of our tactics. Bro you lookin?
>>335946272
that sounds boring as fuck
>>335946831
Bad way as far as getting a game made. It's such an incredible niche only the most dedicated would even bother.
>>335946841
Okay, explain why they aren't correlated when the goal of the game is to kill other players.
Why can't we have a sci-fi BF? And I don't mean like 2132.
One where you fight on different planets, using futuristic weapons and vehicles?
But no, people just want the same old shit we had years ago all over again.
>>335946473
Port Valdez has to be my favourite BC2 map because of the based loading music:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKNTX5wkaFU
>>335946967
>explain why
How about you explain why they should be?
Because there is no reason to think that.
>>335946804
I wasn't talking about a battlefield game. A hypothetical game where the gameplay was typical to actual ww1 battles. But it would be slow, hard, and elements like trench foot and rats and artillery and digging tunnels, shit like that
>>335946989
Battlefront could've been really great if it was just a battlefield reskin
But no
Fucking why
>>335946804
>and 1 SMG
At least two LMG and three variation of HMG.
>>335947146
>Fucking why
Because DICE a shit.
>>335947026
>Bad Company 2 beta was 6 years ago
>>335942431
>WW1 was just trench warfare
When will retards who don't know anything about history stop spouting this meme?
>>335946473
maybe controversial because hardline but i love this map
>>335934852
oh boy, can't wait for an another disappointment.
>>335947297
the car chasing gamemode in that map was the fucking best tho
>>335946881
first of all the comparison was between modern call of duty and quake
second of all, more active and drawn out fights =/= speed
the gunplay, and killing are all faster in the average call of duty, the only thing quake does faster is movement and it has less and less of a lead with each faster call of duty game
slightly faster movement doesn't make the game faster when the rest of its elements
(projectiles, time to kill) are both exponentially faster in call of duty
>>335946934
You sound like a cod boy. And that way of thinking is why it hasn't been attempted yet besides verdun or valiant hearts, literally the only two I know of...
If made right, it would be the ultimate war simulator. Gritty and depressing. It would be a single player only experience tho.
>>335934852
WW2 would be pretty good, but kids nowadays wants their scopes and shit. The next battlefield is gonna be pretty bad..
>>335947294
It was literally 90% trench warfare,why are you trying to make out it wasn't?
>>335946919
>our m60
Germans copied parts of Lewis gun in FG-42 in first place. So it's copied copy.
>>335946989
>Why can't we have a sci-fi BF? And I don't mean like 2132.
>One where you fight on different planets, using futuristic weapons and vehicles?
Go and play pic related if you want that then.
>>335947461
Planetside is nothing like battlefield
>>335947072
speed is how fast something can be done
since most of what you'll be doing in an fps is killing other players, how is most of the content being faster paced (projectiles, time to kill) not make call of duty the faster game?
how the hell is the general gameplay being faster not correlated to speed?
>>335947367
i know. i really like hardline because of blood money and hot wire. downtown, riptide, and grow house are some of my favorite BF maps ever.
>>335946473
Metro.
>>335947461
No, that is a shitty MMO grindfest.
A proper Sci-fi BF would be awesome.
>>335947412
>if you dont like this autistic as fuck concept you must play cod
ebin
>>335947419
You mean mg42? Fg was the fallschirmjager one with the mag feeding into the side of the gun.
If it is WW2 then I'll buy it for sure.
>>335947621
>proper Sci-fi BF
Define.
>>335947651
So?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FG_42
>The operating system was derived from that used in the successful Lewis light machine gun with a gas piston-actuated turning-bolt locking mechanism
>>335945970
I didn't realize that BC1 had a theme version I thought it just had the main menu piano.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFpHm8kfVa4
Main menu piano:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4uWbhTXTHg
Bad Company 3 set in the year 2143.
>>335946919
Hey moron, nobody took shit from the Nazis, they were just a German political party. If you mean we took weapons from them the Germans and made them ours? No. Im not sure you know how weapon distribution and arming a military works.
The pic in the post you quoted isnt even an M60, the fucking name was in the filename.
ww2 is definitely not out of the question, since a common strategy is pandering to nostalgia, and it would be really fucking awesome this time.
>>335947629
I can say something similar like that to you too.
Opinions are opinions, and your opinion that it would be boring is just that. An opinion.
>>335947916
>bad company was good
This meme needs to die
It was literally hardline-tier with flat out less content than a real battlefield game
>>335947958
>Hey moron, nobody took shit from the Nazis
TELL THAT TO GEORGE LUCAS
>>335947882
>Define.
A BF game with a sci-fi theme. Think Mass Effect but as a BF game.
>>335934852
Multiple eras at the same time.
>>335947882
Yo...the gas locking system...
Wow you got me m8 the fucking gas system.
Forget everything else I mentioned that you didn't say shit about; FUCK the gas locking system was copied so it's all null and void.
>>335947516
planetside 2 is tho
:^)
>>335934852
So fucking sick of historical shit
>Exhilarating BOLT-ACTION weaponry! Enter a theater of war that you are fucking SICK of seeing! Fire a nugget or a BAR for the TRILLIONTH TIME! Wonder why you aren't just playing RO!
Underage shits who can't remember CoD and MoH wringing ALL of the fun out of the setting
I wish they would just end this decrepit series, but teenagers will continue to buy yearly rehashes.
>>335947958
Yo dickface I know pic related wasn't an m60 I mention pic related, THEN the m60
You jump right to that conclusion boy
And ya argument stank
>>335948193
No, i'm about "proper". BF2142 with walkers and titans was pretty shitty.
>>335948290
Certainly more fun than firing the tacticool M4 for the billionth time. Modern warfare is cancer.
>>335947412
No it sounds fucking stupid and one of the very easy to spot 'fun on paper, garbage in reality' situations.
And considering my favorite game is the original operation flashpoint, your assumption about cod is pretty far from the truth (even though I do enjoy playing it like anyone else from time to time).
>Battlefield: WWI
>Shitters running around with bolt-action rifles and chucking mustard gas everywhere
>Only one tank on the map which the spawn area is constantly camped by
>Horses added as DLC and can only be used on certain maps
I'd rather have a WW2 game instead
>>335948290
I played the early CODs and MOH games since I was a kid that's why I want a decent high-budget modern multiplayer WW2 game not fucking RO which I have 200 hours on. It's boring by now.
>>335948290
But you can say that for any modern shooter.
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Tiberum wars.
>>335947958
That whole first half of your post...
>well, TECHNICALLY!!!!
>>335948076
>bad company was hardline tier
3/10 weak b8
>>335947461
Is that worth playing on the ps4? Im a sucker for a decent fps with vehicles.
>>335934852
It's a hard decision. On one hand a futuristic BF5 is basically what SW:BF should have been. Imagine exosqueleton sprinting, jet packs, crazy vehicles, etc.
On the other a WW2 game lends itself to a more skill based game without heat seeking rockets and the like. A more "pure" experience.
I don't think we'll see this though. Like it or not AAA shooters need constant unlocks and customization and a WW1/WW2 offers none of this. But at the same time DICE must know that their hardcore users want a period game.
I firmly believe that there will be two BF games. The main one being futuristic and the other a more in depth. Both of course will be a $100 each.
>>335948441
Thats cool bro.
>>335948223
>>335946695
You know this wouldn't be a bad idea if the guns were locked to their respective eras based on maps.
>>335942446
>he hasn't played Tribes
Hitting a fast moving target with a slow moving projectile is the most satisfying thing that video games allow.
>>335948695
Check this out
>>335944771
>>335948654
I wouldn't mind if they released a theme expansion like BC2:Vietnam for BF4 and announced that BF5 will be another year or so.
>>335943364
I'm tired of COD's futuristic setting. They manage to make sci-fi boring, with their TACTICOOL BLACK EVERYTHING
>>335944631
So actual projectiles or lasers maybe a rail gun.
>>335948579
Definitely, massive maps, 2000 player limit on each one, perfect for anyone who likes big combat. I usually play as an anti-air tank driver, but you can do whatever you want. Plus it's free, no harm in giving it a go.PSN: SovietSplicer, send me a message if you want someone to teach you the basics
>>335949139
What's that?
>>335949265
Pay2win shit
>>335949367
Oh well...
I don't have a gaming pc anyways :(
>>335948848
never said it's not satisfying, but it's certainly not fast paced to have slower projectiles
>>335949265
P2W shit AND made by some guys that worked in the good Hitman games. So it's terrible in two different ways!
>>335949190
Word. Downloading it right now.
>>335948076
Bad Company 2 had the best multiplayer design and balance in the series.
The core reason why that is was that there were no fucking jets.
With jets out of the picture, map design did not have to consider making large expanses of nothing to accommodate jets. With tighter maps, the landmass could actually be filled with stuff. Combined with less empty space, the class design and some minor mechanics made it so that Medics and "snipers" weren't the overpowered god classes that they are in every other BF.
There's a reason why almost every BF's favorite maps are tight maps without Jets like Karkand, Metro, Berlin. Without jets, the presence of ground vehicles are more pronounced and important, but at the same time they are less able to be abused as long range "artillery" because of the tighter, denser map design, making their use require a lot more skill and awareness.
BC2 gets overwhelming praise that it damn well deserves.
>>335934852
>see the future
It's futuristic garbage. Well at least it saves me some money.
I'll play it 6 months after release when it's 1/2 off and most of the bugs are fixed
>>335949881
>medics weren't god classes
u wot
>>335949367
>>335949682
It's pretty fine and have some good ideas.
>>335941640
>no millennials fucking want that
Fixed that for you pham, and those faggots don't count anyways.
>>335950483
Millennials are as old as 35 years old. Stop using words you don't understand boy
>>335946473
>inb4 Battlefield 4
FloodZone was a fucking masterpiece. Shit was so much fun.
>>335946473
Gulf of Oman you fucking babbies.
>>335950765
Nothing wrong with 4, I actually enjoyed playing it more than 3.
>>335950620
"Millennial" is defined as "anybody younger than me", have you not learned that yet?
>>335951009
>Nothing wrong with 4
Really bad RUSH, bad maps, crybabies which cry.
>>335951009
since 4 is flat out better with more content than 3 why wouldnt you
Best thing about Battlefield Hardline was that the AI did no damage to enemies
TOP KEK
>>335950620
Time for bed, grandpa.
>>335948416
Modern warfare is cancer but at least the advances in technology make things more action packed and interesting
Crawling through the mud with turn of the century technology is fucking BORING, I want LASERS AND SHIT and games that take CREATIVE LIBERTIES with technology, not pandering to underage /k/ shitters whose first platform was the 7th gen and say stupid shit like "lol why hasn't anybody tried to top WaW yet?????"
>>335950765
>he likes levolution over actual destruction
Consider suicide, DICEcuck.
>>335951086
>words mean what i say thy mean
Gen Z baby detected
>>335934852
Back to WW2. They haven't touched it in forever and CoD is doing future plenty.
>>335951110
You think rush on 4 was bad, go and see Bad Company 2 - that shit was unbalanced as fuck
>>335934852
I want Bad Company 3.
I want a campaign that is not a melodrama about americunts fighting durka durka in turdistan or generic terrorist in europoorland. A war against equally matched factions like China vs Russia or China vs America is acceptable, NATO vs Russia, China, and Syria is better yet or just continue with BF3 story.
I don't want special effects that ruin the look of what the engine is capable of with Jew Jew Abrams special light effects, and Michael Bay Rape Lens. I don't want none of the bullshit that they did with Battlefront with eye rape technology so everything looks overly illuminated. I want to see what the fuck I am shooting at.
I just want Bad Company 2 with better graphics but none of the added "realistic" 'next-gen' bullshit.
>Inb4 BF2 faggots or PR cunts
Do you retards honestly believe Dice is willing, much less capable of making the BF2 thunder hit twice, and PR faggots are just delusional if they think they have a voice against millions of casuals. BC3 is as good as BF will ever get under Dice current directives.
>>335946695BattleWorld
>>335934852
>origin
as long as this is a thing I'm not interested
The WW2 FPS is genre that is deader then the arena shooter.
Not even WW2 as the subject of a movie is popular.
Futuristic = more leeway and the ability to make litterally any form of gameplay as long as it's got something to do with a war and guns.
>>335934852
I want DICE to release Frostbite Mod and Map Editor for Battlefield 4 so that the community can finally have what they want in the game and we can have new maps and factions even in the same sort of WWIII setting of BF4.
There is a lot left to experience with the setting of BF4 but DICE fails to understand how to best do it
New factions- skins, weapons, voices, vehicles, weapons
>Bundeswehr
>Royal Marines
>Royal Army
>JSDF
>French Army
>ANZAC Armies
>Canadian Army
>South Korean Army
>North Korean Army
>ISIS
>Syrian Army & Rebels
>maybe just an EU faction for the smaller nations etc
And theres an infinite possibility when it comes to maps, city, desert, ocean. Fucking Reichstag 2019 edition. NEW YORK CITY, the Eastern Coast of the US, London, etc.
And maybe we would finally get proper naval warfare again with a community mod that adds in controlling destroyers, aircraft carriers, submarines, frigates, minelayers, cruisers etc, just like the original BF1942.
That's all I want to see happen. I don't want Battlefield 5 to come out and be another BF4 clone, with the same US faciton vs China/Russia again. And I don't want BF5 to be WWII either because DICE will fuck it up, they've forgotten what made BF1942 so great, and part of that was the mod/map tools.
Honestly though if BF5 is BF4 setting but with FUCKING EU ARMY FINALLY, then I will get it.
I just want my fucking EU armies, I'm sick of playing as US Army/Marines for the past 4 games already.
WHERE'S MY FUCKING LEOPARDS DICE
>>335951487
NO TRADEMARK SIGN DETECTED
BATTLEWORLD™ IS NOW OFFICIAL EA PROPERTY
>>335951169
God you have shitty tastes.
>>335951763
If they do fuck up and make a WW2 shooter, I hope it's an utter flop so they know that the demands of a few people on twitter don't represent their potential playerbase
>>335951763
lol
you have no idea
there are very good ww2 shooters, there's Iron Front: Liberation, theres Red Orchestra 2, there's this mod for Insurgency which is supposed to be very good
>>335951967
Says the guy who wants
>another fucking historical shooter
>>335951772
Why would they allow mods? That cuts into their profits as most of them are bound to be better than the DLCs.
>>335943569
A weapon to surpass metal gear.
>>335951991
Day of Infamy is fun on invasion mode, but it's Source engine so it's all hitscan, and the content is very barebones.
>>335951867
Oh fug that's a fancy tm you got there.
Guess my one shot at fortune was just shot down.
>>335951763
It's not popular because nothing has been made since fucking 2008 besides wolfenstein the game or fury the movie.
And I not talking about saturating the market (because that's the reason why it died off) but definitely needs more games. The new gen will make the popularity surge again. All it takes is one good game
Anyways, the fact that there's threads everyday here bitching about how there's no more ww2 shooters is evidence enough.
>>335951289
>wanting maps to be reduced to rubble without meaning
Its not the levolution, its the clearing buildings, room by room, wading through debris feel.
No matter how much people will meme, BF4 did a superb job with each maps atmosphere and feeling.
>>335952129
Says the guy who wants
>another fucking futuristic shooter with uninspired guns & map design
>>335950008
>1st c4 explodes right next to him and doesn't kill him
>health starts going up like crazy while getting shot from behind
kek
>>335952323
>BF4 did a superb job with each maps atmosphere and feeling
Who cares? It's playing like shit, most decent maps from BF3.
>>335952330
>uninspired
nice pitchfork review
I'm sure that an M1 Garand is much more "inspired" than original sci-fi
dumbass
I'll take anything not modern warfare related.
people complained about over saturation of WW2 titles back in the day and yet it was nothing compared to the amount of modern warfare games out these days.
also remember that there are no WW2 games made with recent game engines.
>>335951772
yea map editor, since DLC no one will ever release a map editor again. Call of Duty had some fun custom maps. But BF3 or 4???
>>335945185
>not liking CCR
pleb taste confirmed
>tfw i can't deal with BF4 anymore because for some reason the tanks are nearly indestructible AND have magic vision that highlight everything AND have magic counter measures that deflect everything
Battlefield 4 is shit, it's always 1 side of tanks+engineer gunners and one side of people shooting 400000 rockets at them dealing minimal damage
>>335952330
Besides all that, there so fucking much of ww2 that's untouched.
Every ww2 game is American soldiers with a few British levels thrown in.
Wehrmacht campaign and Russian defend during Barbarossa campaigns would be fucking tits. Or the Japanese invasion of China.
NOT for the light hearted.
>>335936612
God damn these gaffags are such psuedo intellectual geeks
>>335934946
>Futuristic
>There haven't been that many since the 90s and early 00s.
>Meanwhile most FPS games nowadays just go for the futuristic setting
No, thanks. I'd better get a proper WW2 game. We haven't had that many in the past years, especially a good WW2 fps one.
>>335952992
Russian defense*
>>335937313
>B-but guize! 10+ years ago EVERYBODY made WWII games, so we should never make another game about it again!
How would reviving a dead, decade-old genre be any worse than modern tactical shooter #9467982147 or another 'post-apocalyptic near-future shooter' that's just a reskinned modern tactical shooter.
>>335947239
>youll never hop onto the BC2 beta with friends in the 360 peak days
2143 or 1944
Nothing else will be worth a fuck
>>335953059
I think he was being sarcastic with that
>>335946473
metro/locker
>>335953123
The limitations of last gens.
Boom.
>>335952178
>>335952863
Yeah I know, I'll never get the Battlefield game (maps and mods by the community) that I truly want.
THE ONE FUCKING GAME THAT WOULD BENEFIT MOST FROM MOD AND MAP TOOLS
AND DICE AND EA GO FULL FUCKING GREEDY CUNT BITCHES AND LOCK THE COMMUNITY OUT OF THEM WITH HALF-ASSED EXCUSES, THEY JUST DONT WANT ANYTHING TO CUT INTO THEIR DLC AND PREMIUM BULLSHIT PROFITS
FUCKING BASTARDS RUINED A GOOD SERIES WITH THEIR SHORT-SIGHTED GREED
When I think of all the maps and mods for BF3 and BF4 we never got to see, that never got to be created apart from "wouldn't it be cool if..." thoughs, it makes me so mad.
Few games deserve a map editor as much as Battlefield does. It's a crime that we haven't had one since BF2
>>335953123
They feel threatened the revival of WW2 will kill their precious near-future modern warfare games. They don't want anything fresh coming into the market because they know their favorite overplayed shit theme is already on it's way out and are trying to prolong it as long as possible.
I want world war 2 weapons in a futuristic setting. Bolt action laser weapons. M1 Laser Garand, laser thompsons, all that stuff. Laser Normandy Beach.
>>335953123
I love those excuses. I even remember seeing an interview with some developer and one of the questions was why don't they make a game set in WW2 and the response was there's too many of them in the market.
Like seriously, nigger. There hasn't been a good WW2 game in almost a decade, maybe even more.
>>335953234
Yeah, maybe he was.
>>335953225
>1941 dude, Eastern front
>>335934852
>2143
>competes with call of duty
>1944
>competes with nobody
I'm heavily leaning towards 1944, but that 2143 easter egg..
>>335953225
>2143
Walkers and shit.
>1944
Normandy again, Ardennes DLC.
>>335953432
>Laser Normandy Beach.
Yess
Stop the nazis from completing the laser Holocaust
DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN
DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN
>>335936148
Wait... I can understand not liking the World War 2 setting, but are you saying you didn't/don't like Battlefield 1942?
>>335953473
>1941
>Panthers
>>335953059
all they'd have to do is give me a polished AAA version of the FH mod from 1942 and I'd throw my money at them.
I'd take fucking anything over another modern or slightly futuristic shooter holy shit.
WW2 still has a shit ton of settings that weren't done like Finland vs Soviet,Japanese invaders, and Wermacht defending against Soviets.
Who cares. Post 2142 the new engine they used to appease console tards ruined the series and it was never good again.
>>335953675
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOB4q01VCVg
Still the best version
>inb4 some fag posts the 2142 theme
>>335953739
>Full Air force and navy you can strategically control on top of FPS gameplay
Sigh gaming is so shit now
>>335953368
Also I'm surprised that DICE still never added the Swedish Army into their games, and their vehicles and ships.
They're Swedes after all, where is their patriotism.
All we ever got was the EU Army boosterpack for BF2 and they never again deviated from US Army/Marines afterwards.
Why must DICE be so creatively bankrupt and hostile to allowing modders to bring new life to their games.
>tfw you will never ride the S-tank
>>335953805
Same old shit with a new coat of paint
>>335953821
Not dubstep enough.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRN62IebC04
>>335951772
I wish we get something like this to make other armies like in BF2.
I am so fucking sick of playing murricunts vs russians
>>335953821
Wrong faggot kill yourself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnlA2rCHJHY
>>335953991
Because public don't care 'bout swedish garbage army.
>>335943792
Jin Roh
>>335953991
>>They're Swedes after all, where is their patriotism.being cucks
its not a meme anymore when reality hits
>>335953754
I just picked a random pic nig
>>335953991
Swedes have the complete opposite of patriotism.
>>335953368
I remember when BF2 got free official maps with some updates. And the expansions were quite good too. I wouldn't even mind a BF2/BF2142 remake (like improving graphics and adding more stuff like maps, guns, etc), but I know DICE and EA would fuck it up somehow. And there would be a ton of DLC for it.
I've played all BF games, but I feel like after BC the series isn't the same. BC2 was great as a spin-off, but it wasn't BF anymore and after that it all went downhill.
>>335953368
>>335953991
Frostbite is ridden with 3rd-party technologies and they can't let use everyone use them legally.
>>335951991
I have every idea.
WW2 as the subject for games is done. Name one game set in WW2 that was very popular with the public in the last 15 years.
>>335952314
Saturation of the market is not a one time danger anymore anon. The information age has all but ensured that a subject that is explored enough will have more then enough media of all kinds out there for it.
If there was any kind of demand for a WW2 FPS we would see something anything hinting at it.
We don't. Just in threads like this and a few places online.
Face it. The subject was popular because it was what everyone else was doing and pure momentum. Not love for the subject itself.
>>335954162
Oh, shit, so that's the anime nazi soldier I always see here.
Even tho I'm against animoo I'm gonna have to check that out b
>>335953453
>Bro! I remember one time I saw some guy say there were too many WWII games bro I swear!
[citation needed]
>Like seriously, nigger. There hasn't been a good WW2 game in almost a decade, maybe even more.
That was my exact argument you utter mongoloid, the market is wide open for someone to capitalize on that early 2000's nostalgia and make a great WWII shooter.
Learn to read you fucking double nigger.
>playing BF 1942 first time
>never played a game like that
>pick panzerfaust class since I like rockets
>spawn following guys
>plane comes out of nowhere kills 4 of the guys with me swoops in back to kill me
>just randomly shoot it with rocket launcher miracle shot hits and kills it
Since then I probably put over a thousand hours into BF PC games and essentially ruined my life forever but it was worth it.
>>335954326
>Name one game set in WW2 that was very popular with the public in the last 15 years.
CoD2&3&WaW?
>>335954326
I see it much more than you do then.
Don't stop believing
>>335954456
>WaW
Nah.
>3
Consoles only.
>CoD2
Well, true.
>>335954442
Got eeeem
>>335954051
>I am so fucking sick of playing murricunts vs russians
Yeah I know anon, and I'm a murricun, I'm just sick of driving the Arbams or T-90 over and over.
DICE is stuck in their ways and only the community can deliver interesting and unique new ideas to Battlefield, but DICE refuses to budge on giving up their precious Frostbite editor.
Imagine how crazy it would be if you could have Bundeswehr vs. Royal Marines, or ANZAC vs. China, US Army vs. US Marines, JSDF vs. South Korea etc.
On any map in the game, and on a large variety of maps even if they don't make logical sense, like JSDF fighting Bundeswehr in NYC or something. A little more fucking variety in the maps and factions for fucks sake But no we can't have that because "editor 2 complegx fur MORDOR plebs, okay enjoy DLC, muh artistic vision"
Battlefield 4 still has so much potential left, but its kept locked behind the arbitrary decision to not release any mod or map tools for the community.
>>335954442
Anon, I think you misread my post. I was agreeing with you. I wasn't referring to you as a nigger. I was saying that in general because people always use that excuse of there being too many WW2 games.
And I can't provide the source. All I remember is that I read it last year, but is it so hard to believe? They're avoiding the WW2 setting as a plague and are making up excuses.
>>335954326
>Name one game set in WW2 that was very popular with the public in the last 15 years.
BF 1943 was like the top selling downloadable game of that console era
>>335954587
>Seriously implying WaW wasn't very popular in 2008
Just because hackers killed the online a few years after it's release doesn't mean it wasn't booming with players during it's heyday.
>>335954587
Nah? The fuck u mean nah
South Park had a fucking episode on WAW dude...
It was pretty big
>>335954752
>you now remember how OP the MP40 was in WaW
>>335934852
Autistic
>>335954861
My slavboo tastes only ever let me use the PPSH-41.
>>335953739
maps in old games wont work good in console. all the different verticals in the terrain and level. modern map design has to include controller aiming.
>>335954752
>>335954802
Compare with MW2 or BO2.
>>335934852
WW2, I'm tired of these bullshit FUTURISTIC TECH GUNZ N AMRORS games
>>335954752
I still like to play it. I don't get too many hackers I think most left but the fucking assholes took the game away from us all. It's a husk of what it once briefly was.
If anybody 360 here I'm playing it now. Lmk
>>335934852
Futuristic. This way we can all see president Trump cameos.
>>335934852
I want World War 2 in a futuristic setting.
>>335943996
They are absolutely the worst and it saddens me that this is probably the opinion of the silent majority of modern Battlefield players who only know of Bad Company 2. These are the kinds of people that just play Operation Metro all the time
>>335954986
Mw2 killed everything, that's unfair.
And bo2 came out years after the hackers killed waw
Your argument is invalid
>>335955036
>BLOPS 2
>no mention of Trump
>USS Barack Obama
Fuck that game
>>335955041
Like Wolfenstein New Order?
I want a GOOD what if WW 2 game where you play as the Germans storming the US
>>335955159
I still enjoyed MW2. I feel like it all went to shit with MW3. Wasn't there something wrong with Infinity Ward at the time and they changed members or something, I can't even remember.
>>335955164
Something that doesn't shove EVIL NAZI BADDIES KILLING INNOCENTS AND HORRIBLE EXPERIMENTS GUYS NAZIS BAAAD in my fucking face like a fucking history channel show
I'd really like a game in a world where the Cold War broke out after Cuba.
The US and Russia are nuclear wasteland, now it all comes down to who will win in Germany
>>335955341
If I remember correctly, MW2 was the last game the real Infinity Ward made, and they were jewed out of their paychecks because of shady contract dealings by Activision.
>bad company 3
>in the future
>>335955435
Is there even such a game where Germans aren't portrayed as bad guys in WW2?
>>335955341
>I feel like it all went to shit with MW3
I don't know, but i liked multiplayer. Hardcore with "not deathmatch mode" was a fucking masterpiece.
>>335955341
I loved mdubs
But it killed every single fucking game that was popular when it came out
Halo 3 never recovered from mw2 and died a slow death. I'm still butthurt over that.
>>335954729
>I was agreeing with you
I don't give a shit anon, you posted a smug 50cent .gif, we're mortal enemies now. Also
>dude I remember this one time I watched this video where Tim Schafer and Gaben both took turns sucking off Cliffy B and talking about charging sub fees for Steam dude I swear
>Proof? Source? Bro you know they're all fags who just want money!
Just because the second statement is true, doesn't mean the first one is credible or believable at all without evidence.
>>335955574
No, but the new order made damn sure it to let you know the nazis were ultra evil in the first 2 levels it seems like Jews themselves made the game.
>>335955271
I want an Operation Sea Lion game
I don't care about the autistic historical analysis of why such an invasion would never work, or how Germany didn't have enough landing craft for it blahblahblah
I just want someone with a bit of imagination to make a kickass Operation Sea Lion game where you can play both the Brits and the Nazis.
how about a color scheme that isn't just orange and blue first
>>335955661
>We're mortal enemies now.
Also
>Being this mad
How about you take a break from 4chins, anon? You don't have to believe me, but since you went apeshit on me because of a misunderstanding you just can't let go now.
>>335955574
And fuck every game doesn't have to shove that shit down your throat at every pass. Like we get it by now, we had middle school history class. Give me a damn Wehrmacht campaign already. That's my only gripe about ww2 games.
>>335934852
WW2, Western Front.
>>335955857
I feel you man, people on 4chin take it way too far. I would just stop replying to the man(child)
>>335934852
Nigga I want a fantasy Battlefield.
Just imagine how fucking awesome that would be.
>>335955772
http://www.battlegroundeurope.net/home
>>335955512
Seems like another day at Activision. Thanks for reminding me, anon.
>>335955582
I actuallyenjoyed MW campaignand MW3 was such a disaster. I felt like even the mp wasn't that fun.
>>335955598
I've only got an X360 a few years later after Halo 3 came out, but when I played it the community was still quite active.
>>335956113
How is this different from Heroes & Generals besides being way older and less graphically impressive?
>>335956208
They have a 1/2 europe map, nigga.
>>335934946
This bait was nearly invisible. Have another (You), bro
Am I the only one who enjoys modern BF and wants another based on today?
>>335956308
Reading that you can command a destroyer hooked me on it
This better not turn out to be shit, downloading it now
>>335956325
That bait was obvious as fuck
>>335955857
I'll never let go Anon, my hatred for you is already too deep. If you ever come to my house on Haloween you're only getting the fun-size snickers you fucking piece of shit.
Where the fuck is my human resistance vs. mobile machines of death Battlefield game?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ih_l0vBISOE&feature=youtu.be
>>335946473
Operation Firestorm because I am a sucker for all out combined arms warfare that lets both vehicles and infantry be proficient.
2014 version is a pure masterpiece by my standards.
>>335956350
Of course not. The majority enjoys it, if they didn't it wouldn't sell like hot cakes, but honestly I want them to return to WW2 or make something new.
>>335934852
I don't think there's any interesting you can do with WW2 unless you rewrite history or do an alternate timeline so I'd prefer to see a futuristic setting. Hopefully it's not just modern day weapons but in the future like I've seen other games do because that's just the most wasteful use of a futuristic setting ever.
>>335956350
yes, you're the only person here who despite being a male, does in fact, also crave for penis.
Which is hard considering this is /v/ and homosexuality runs rampant amongst the unwashed masses.
Congratulations, you have achieved the lowest level someone can achieve in /v/, being the only raging faggot in a thread with 185 posters.
>>335956208
persistent world, its a real mmo. step in a bomber in berlin and fly over to any battle or bomb london or paris industry section. kinda like planetside.
graphic is old, yea, but old games are not infested with the spirit of new games (dumbed down to console)
H&G has no persistent world, its just an ordinary mp shooter.
>>335956456
Never reply to me ever again until you've cooled down. I've also heard you like 50 cent, so here's another pic of him.
>>335956661
>has no persistent world,
It does though, even if its hella instanced in a way.
Anyways this WW2OL certainly looks more ambitious than H&G, especially cause they have naval so I'll give it a go
>>335955574
Butgermans were the bad guys
>>335956598
There's whole campaigns that have been untouched tho
Ww2 games focused solely on Americans in Europe and handful of pacific shits
>>335956706
You crossed a fucking line Anon this is personal now, you're not invited to my birthday party.
Yeah that's right, I bet you're rethinking that post now you dirty son of a bitch.
>>335956843
...
>>335955574
every time europe goes to the shitter in any way, germany is in the center of it all.
gee, i wonder why you sausage gobbling faggots are always seen as the bad guys.
Man, I'm tired of all this modern era shit. All these WW2 and modern shooters are getting so boring and generic, I wouldn't be able to stand seeing more.
Why aren't there any good neolithic shooters? It's such an underrated setting, and there are so many great theaters that haven't been explored.
>neanderthals vs. homo sapiens
>ice age battles on glaciers
>fertile crescent throwdownsThis is exactly what WW2fags sound like
And WW2 is just as generic a setting as modern combat, if not more so, there is a veritable mountain of not only videogames about WW2 but other media, that's how it's been for decades, it's overdone shit, get over it
>>335956613
Thanks man but I don't see my "worst /v/ poster" prize. I worked hard for this shit man.
>>335953991
Swedish army is irrelevant on a global level and there is no bloody interest in playing them apart from a select few individuals.
The only other countries that match the requirements for a Battlefield faction are France and Germany since they are the only other nations apart from the 3 super powers on Earth who have a domestic supply for all of their major hardware.
They could release a MoH based game though where you can play as any faction but that would be overly complex.
>>335956613
Don't cut yourself with that edgy post faglord.
>>335957013
Well maybe the other countries should just stop resisting?
>>335956956
What did I tell you about replying to me until you've cooled down? Never do it again, anon.
>>335954456
WW2 is not a draw for FPS's anymore.
It will only sell as a DLC full conversion or as the mode of a gametype.
>>335957076
I want them to release mod tools so that modders can work on individual factions and they are compatible with all maps made.
So you can have infinite number of user made maps, and can play any faction on those maps, against any other faction, even themselves.
>>335957058
>wanting a prize for being the worst
fucking kids these days
>future
2143 confirmed
>>335957165
or maybe you little toddler shits should stop starting world wars over shitty tantrums.
>>335956905
For single player games that'd be cool but in mutliplayer it doesn't add much. I've always found battlefield's campaigns to be terrible so I'm not interested in what they'd do there.
>>335957169
Just fucking stop, the two of you.
>>335957185
Even if they released mod tools for BF4 it's just in million way more complicated than BF2. You never will see much more content.
>>335957383
Alright. The thread is gonna die soon anyways.
>>335957408
Thats the exact excuse DICE used to justify their greed and laziness
Fuck off, they had 3-4 games to deliver any kind of map/mod editor and they fucking refused. DLC and muh Premium shit is more important.
Fuck DICE
>>335953991
FUTURE!!! S-tank is in BF4 though
>it starts
>room goes dark
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnlA2rCHJHY plays
what ever it is, its gonna be casualized garbage anyway
>>335957567
I want the original S-tank though, along with the Visby class corvette and Hamina class patrol boat
>>335957169
You better stop it Anon, or shit's gonna get extremely real for you dawg. I'm talking 'Thanksgiving dinner at my place' real
I know how much you like Honey-roasted ham so you best step off motherfucker
>>335957383
Are you challenging me brah!? You're on some thin fucking ice right now.
>>335934852
WW2 because we have enough futuristic shooters.
>>335957597
I miss the old theme when it was like this.
>>335957206
You still haven't given me my prize.
>>335953991
>swedish army
>all somalian pirates
>>335934852
But anon, its Battlefield1944
>tfw PC never got 1943
>tfw DICE won't make controlling tanks more difficult like rotating the right analog stick to turn the gun left or right & rotating the left analog stick for up & down so they can give the Tank some practical armor without making it overpowered
>>335957917
>Pacific Theater DLC - 5 maps
>Africa Theater DLC- 4 maps
>Italian Theater DLC - 3 maps
>Eastern Front DLC- 5 maps
>Northern France DLC- 4 maps
>buy Battlefield 1944 to get access to all the weapons and vehicles!
*maps sold seperately
>>335958073
>playing FPS with joystick
>>335958073
>tfw DICE won't make controlling heavy tanks by two person: gunner and driver.
Controlling a tank using a joystick is a pain in the ass.
>>335957518
Have you played the free BF4 maps?
It took a small team of professional developers months to complete them and they are still full of small graphics bugs and invisible edges.
I don't think a modder can't do better but I honestly don't see how a modding community is supposed to grow withing a game with such a low lifespan. BF3 got killed when BF4 came along and the only reason why BF4 is still standing is because there is no other game out there to compete with and the has not been any successor released. So we are effectively looking at a 2 to 3 year life span, during that time a moder must learn the tools and finish his project.
WC3 is simple to mod but it peaked around 5-7 years AFTER it was released.
It does not look positive for modding tools for BF.
>>335953991
Sweden has an army?
Less balancing more realism
![nazi_soldiers_by_eco_flex[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/cD1XC9N.jpg "nazi soldiers by eco flex[1]")
![bb9dc21865[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qiORUtv.jpg "bb9dc21865[1]")
