ITT: piece of shit ports.
>>335017753
Whats shit about it? Not doubting you, just curious. I know about how shit the Silent Hill HD ports are, does this suffer the same fate?
>Horribly boring games remain boring, due to the ports of those snorefests adding nothing
Not sure what people were expecting.
>>335017753
I want to get this, what is bad about it?
>>335017753
The original SoTC was shit unless you love sub-30fps gaming.
>>335017931
Also this.
>>335017931
PAL version with less responsove controls.
>>335017806
The Colossi are bugged and move twice as faster which makes hard time attack near impossible.
ICO seemed pretty okay, haven't played the original.
>>335017753
had a top of the line PC at the time of release
it barely ran
thats why GTA V was delayed for the PC.
>>335018201
git gud
>>335017931
Shit taste : the post
>>335017937
Harder to get a stable grip on the colossi so you constantly were slipping off. it made the game way more difficult and frustrating
and also messed up some draw distance stuff so the bridge looks fucked up from a distance
I still enjoyed the port and it was nice playing it at a framerate higher than the """"cinematic"""" fps of the original.
>>335018216
I replayed it recently and it ran worse than V for me.
>>335018368
Part of the complaint is that the games which were eye candy on the PS2, have obviously dated graphics. Considering graphics were the only thing they had going for them...
>>335018434
>draw distance
It's impossible to be worse than the original, no way.
>>335018832
Dont treat your opinion like a fact moron, Ico was never technically impressive but it was praised for its artistic experience.
>>335018201
>hard time attack near impossible
Git gud
I done it and never played the original.
Just gotta use the stuff to collect the lizards and apples and climb the garden for a platinum
>>335018216
Because gta games are primarily console games, then ported to pc in fact R* are console devs, despite gta1 being a pc game originally
>>335017753
never played the original but I enjoyed SOTC HD. What's wrong with it?
>>335018201
Git better.
>>335017753
>No lighting engine at release
>No mouse support
>Cutscenes compressed FMV taken from PS2 version's realtime cutscenes
>Shitty resolutions, aspect ratio stretches
>>335017753
>>335018201
>move twice as faster
Because it's now 60fps.
>>335019631
Americans are salty because the HD is based on the harder PAL version.
>>335021637
also that fucking ps2 controller buttons in QTE
fuck this port
>>335018216
I still run V better than this, but I recently managed to get it running at a pretty stable 60 fps. It's good being able to play it again.
>>335022189
Timing game mechanics on the fps is pretty shit design though
>>335022519
Was the last time Capcom ever got money from me.
>>335022672
If it's supposed to run on just one console, it's fine design, just shit coding. The fact that they didn't go and fix it is shit design and shit coding.
>>335018084
Wait what? Ico and SotC both ran at PAL60.
>>335024003
I'm sure they miss it
>>335021813
(you)
>>335021637
Both that and Killer7 are perfectly playable.
>>335024736
Oh, it's the PC version, my bad.
>>335024656
>nintentoddler is this mad
I actually only played Ico, then lost interest in SotC after the first Colossi
>>335024656
I played SotC and thought it was boring as hell. I don't care if I didn't "get it" but the world was drab, bland and lifeless. Also I can see the big TWEEST coming from the beginning of the game (he gets screwed over and it's all sad and you cry etc.) the one thing I liked are the colossi, even if the fights themselves weren't that impressive I liked the designs and how unique most of them were.
Is Ico any better? I've heard that game being very artsy too.
>>335018308
>>335019418
>>335020214
To all those saying git gud, that anon does have a point. I got the platinum for the game but the higher fps of this port actually means that when the colossi shake, Wander is stun locked for much longer as the game reads every movement rather than skipping out of frames.
Basically for the time trials the times are kept the same as the original when it should have been adjusted to account for this.
The game itself is wonderful in HD when you don't have to worry about any time constraints.
>>335024945
Yeah, original RE4 PC was downright terrible.
>>335027113
That's not really the twist but ok. SotC to me was just seeing what the next one was like. The fights themselves aren't hard but there's just such a nice variety to them that you want to push on. The world itself was beautifully put together as well despite it being empty. I feel like being empty is the point though.
I do prefer Ico but it's not for everyone. Combat isn't very good but it's more of a puzzler. I enjoyed the feeling of being able to see part of the castle I'd been to before from vista's later in the game. Similar to how Demon's Souls made me feel. Also being able to see the land as your goal in the distance but never quite being able to reach it gives it a great sense of dread and hopelessness.
Remember me?
>>335018434
>Harder to get a stable grip on the colossi so you constantly were slipping off. it made the game way more difficult and frustrating
This is actually how it was in the Japan and Europe version. US got the babby edition, but the remaster uses the same system as the original
>>335029473
Actually want to know about this.
Recent (as in the past few years) plat the PS3 version (god help me) and it felt really solid. What's up with the PC port aside from it being from the PS3?
>>335027113
>Also I can see the big TWEEST coming from the beginning of the game (he gets screwed over and it's all sad and you cry etc.)
Well, Dormin tells you that at the beginning of the game
>>335018434
Really? I never noticed any problems keeping grip on any of them, and I played through the game twice.
>>335029893
Only really noticeable on a few colossi on the harder time attacks. When you can take breathers the games perfectly playable.
AGGRO
