[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Is it always OK when From Shitware does it?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 163
Thread images: 23
File: 12 fps.webm (2 MB, 720x480) Image search: [Google]
12 fps.webm
2 MB, 720x480
>looks like a PS2 game
>dips down to 30 FPS with my 980 Ti at times

How can you even make such unpolished games? And why does no one criticise it? Ever?

Are we NeoGAF now?

Game is pretty shit in general, btw. A LOT of cheap trial and error and just bad gameplay. Also very monotonous (press dodge button when enemy attacks, hit attack button twice, for 50 hours).
>>
>A LOT of cheap trial and error

Objectively wrong
>>
um runs at at 60fps max settings at all times on my SLI gtx 760s so idk what you're talking about anon :^)
>>
time to upgrade to W10
>>
runs maxed/60 on my 970
fuck off anti FROM brigade.
>>
>>335012046
>>335011886
pirate scum
>>
>>335012046
lmao, I doubt it runs well on that turd
>>
>>335011015

Why dont you post that 980 to with a timestamp?
>>
>>335011015

Runs fine on 1440p with my 390x


:^)
>>
I have a single GTX 780 and it's never dropped below 60
>>
>>335012492

This timestamp that vidya card op

Prove you're not a sonycuck
>>
>>335012492
It drops below 60fps on high with a 970 too and thats unacceptable with those gfx and such shit draw distance

I literally see the walls pop in the detail 15 meters from me
>>
>>335011015
were you even alive when the ps2 was relevant

serious question
>>
>looks like a PS2 game
Name one fucking game from PS2 that look like DaS3.
Enhancing resolution and smothering shit from emulator do not count.
>>
>>335011015

I contend you are a liar who has no 980 Ti
>>
>>335011015
>Looks like a PS2 game

First error anon, PS2 couldn't get anywhere close to what it looks like

>Dips down to 30fps with my 980 Ti

Playing on a 760 and it's fine for me, I hear there was a patch or something that fixed a majority of the performance issues.

>A LOT of cheap trial and error

Not if you're, y'know, anywhere decent at the game, git gud

>Press dodge button when enemy attacks, hit attack button back

This is bad, how?

>And why does no one criticize it?

You must be trolling.

7/10 bait post, made me reply
>>
File: lv6nxih.gif (643 KB, 146x128) Image search: [Google]
lv6nxih.gif
643 KB, 146x128
>>335011015
>>335012368
>>335012467
>>335012580
samefag

runs 60 frames at all times on my 980

here is your (you)
>>
>>335011015
I think it looks like a PS1 game, not a PS2. Early PS1, too.
>>
>>335011015
constant 60fps with my i7 and 960
must be all that drm
>>
>>335011015
>looks like a PS2 game
still better than your mom graphic
>>
>>335012046
maybe its the CPU that changing things then? I've got a 970, and got it at max setting, but it does dip down to the 40's at times

never goes below 30 (unless the game stutters when picking something up, which can be common), but never during combat
>>
>>335011780
>Objectively wrong

objectively true.
It has the most ambushes and bullshit moments of any other game in the series
>>
I have a 970, and i kept getting terrible slow down.

Sub 20fps it ran like shit. I updated my drivers and its better it still gets occasional slow down though.

It shouldnt have this poor performance, but its not like they have ever made a game run well on the PC. So what can you expect from a bunch of weebs.
>>
>>335013130
I have a bit of an overkill cpu, yeah that might do it.
>>
>>335011015
Dark Souls 3 is CPU intensive. Get a better CPU
>>
File: specs.png (40 KB, 775x535) Image search: [Google]
specs.png
40 KB, 775x535
constant 60fps
>>
>>335012772
why did you pirate it you piece of shit
>>
>ops a mad sonygger who plays at sub 20 fps consistently

Kek Typical
>>
Dude I run this game on my GTX550TI 900p@30 FPS. It's a fucking five year old gpu and I can play the game just fine with it.
>>
>>335012815
>>335012815
>have i7 and 960
>still pirating good games
fucking scum
>>
>>335012815
>constant 60fps with my i7 and 960

DF tested it with a 960 paired with an i7 6700k
it drops to mid 40s, late areas are even worse.
Don't spew that
>works on my machine ;^)â„¢
BS

>>335013272
now we call shit multithreaded optmization "CPU intensive"
http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/dark_souls_3_pc_performance_review/6

fuck off
>>
timestamp the 980 ti op

I'd like to believe ya but we have a lot of falseflagging sonyggers these days
>>
>>335011015
780 sli here. Runs smooth as pie but it's a boring as fuck game.
>>
>>335013158
That doesn't make it trail and error
>>
>>335013324
what does pirating have to do with anything?
>>
>>335013419
>steam, leddit, geforce forum etc. filled with stuttering ans fps drops complains

>it must be sonyggers
>>
It makes my poor r9 cry like a bitch
>>
>>335013158
I just beat Pontiff and I don't think I've seen a single bullshit ambush or trap yet
There's a few traps in the catacombs but they're predictable, there's these ninja fags everywhere in the cathedral but you just know where they are, there's mimics everywhere but after you fell for them once you never fall for the m again, and that's about it
>>
>>335011015
Looks fine on my dual-core toaster.
>>
>>335011015
>ps2

N64 at best
>>
>>335011015
what fucking toaster are you playing on holy shit
>>
>>335011015

>Looks like a PS2 game
You haven't seen many PS2 games in your lifetime, have you?
>dips down to 30 FPS with my 980 Ti at times
Come the fuck on, I'm running High on all settings with my 770 and my shit runs smooth as butter.
>>
File: image.jpg (174 KB, 1136x640) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
174 KB, 1136x640
>>335014075

It's a sonycuck

Likely mad his shitstation 4 runs it worse than a budget pc
>>
>>335014187
Is this that guy that was running at 800x600
>>
>>335011015
You are so full of shit
>>
>>335011015
>looks like a PS2 game
You are borderline retarded.
>>
File: Ok9cD6b.png (470 KB, 720x1280) Image search: [Google]
Ok9cD6b.png
470 KB, 720x1280
am i the only one getting constant 60fps with my 3.5gb 970 beast
>>
File: maxresdefault (5).jpg (43 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault (5).jpg
43 KB, 1280x720
>>335011015
>>looks like a PS2 game

Seriously what kind of skewed perspective shit is this? Do you not remember how PS2 games looked?
>>
>>335014535
I also have a 970 and the framerate is all over the place
>>
>>335011015
>42 replied
Well trolled, anon.
>>
>>335013158
Wrong. SoTFS's entire difficulty is based around ambushes and enemies ganking your ass. Kill yourself.
>>
>>335011015
I have a 980ti and I have never dropped below 60fps at 1440p and max settings.
I even deliberately bunched up hundreds of the enemies from the graveyard in cathedral of the deep and started throwing pyromancies around to try and make the framerate drop and it didn't lose a single frame
>>
>>335014580
"It looks like a PS2 game" is the new "It looks like an N64 game"

And it was never an accurate description.
>>
File: 1319112903069.jpg (131 KB, 420x483) Image search: [Google]
1319112903069.jpg
131 KB, 420x483
It sounds like the frame drops are still a thing for some people. Maybe it's a streaming problem? People with good hardware and dramatic framerate dips, how much ram do you have and what do you have the game installed on an HDD or an SSD?

They ever fix that crashing issue?
>>
Used to have drops to 20fps on the memecard, turns out the game requires desktop composition enabled to work properly. Now I get some nasty stutter on autosaves and any online interactions at all like loading new messages and summon signs. Shit needs to be patched.
>>
I don't want to sound like a consolefag but I've been playing a lot of stuff on ps4 lately and not much on PC and I'm actually enjoying myself a lot more because I don't spend all my time peeved about frame drops and stuff. Sure it effects my experience but it's much easier to bear knowing that's just how it is and taking it as it comes.
>>
>>335014923
It was already patched.
>>
>>335011015
>looks like a ps2 game

lol, stopped reading and cringed
>>
>dips down to 30 FPS with my 980 Ti at times
Well it just dip`s to 50 FPS in my 280x, and most of the time it runs at solid 60.
I'm not a fanboy, I had a nvidia card before this one which was god tier and lasted me a lot of years but yeah, this is what you get for going nvidia, mandatory upgrade every year and a half or new drivers will fuck you up.
>>
>>335014983
To get a few extra frames out of cheap cards, yeah. Everyone is suffering from stutters.
>>
The only thing I have an issue with is that the game frame drops and stutters fucking excessively regardless of whether I'm at the lowest settings or the highest. 980.

Seen videos of it on consoles too and it has same problem.

This is absolutely unacceptable for game like this where a single stutter can get you killed. So to answer your question: no it's not okay which is why I refunded the game and pirated it. I'll rebuy it when/if they fix the problems.
>>
>>335012536
This, except I had a stutter or two when loading between zones.
>>
>>335011015
http://www.darksouls.jp/win_spec.html

I am on recommended specs, only with 16gb of ram and running on ssd.
Used to get sutters only at autosaves before the patch, now it's even worse
>>
>>335015025
>nvidia sabotage older cards
This myth has been thoroughly debunked

>https://youtu.be/iZUshOSWQRo
>>
>>335015120
I run the game on 980/4790k, and before the patch the only very minor stutters I've experienced were when I picked up an item for the first time. It doesn't happen at all now, smooth 60FPS everywhere.
>>
find me a ps2 screenshot that looks like that
>>
>>335015232
Which Windows? SSD or HDD?
>>
why did they make the UI so small? can't see shit when i lose HP
>>
>>335015232
The only thing I can think of that would be the cause of the game shitting itself literally every time anything is loaded or saved is the the SSD speed or the CPU. The SSD it's on is 1Gbps so that's not the issue. The CPU is a 2500k at 4.6 which is getting older but I've literally never had a problem with any other game. Not even something like Witcher 3 on max settings minus hairworks.

A game that looks like this should not be stuttering or frame dropping on my setup with hardly any intensive features available. It especially shouldn't be having those issues on fucking low.
>>
>>335015336
Windows 7, regular WD 1TB HDD.
>>
>>335015427
Weird. What about your driver?
>>
>>335011015
its been known that Souls games are technically shit
DS1/2 dropped to unplayable framerate on consoles while looking like a literal pool of mud

but fanboys will gobble everything cause its the only major game series that gives them a good challenge in this age of casual 'cinematic' entertainment
>>
>>335015475
cringe
>>
>>335015474
Latest 980 driver. My whole PC is only half a year old, so the HDD is in a pretty good condition.
>>
>>335015612
I've been trying different combinations with my 4690k and a 970 on a HDD, but I can't get it to run completely smooth online. Guess I'll try fresh 7 again.
>>
>>335012467
I've got a 970 and it's not once dipped below 60 fps and everything is on max.
>>
>>335015612
The point he's trying to make is that the transfer speed of the HDD should be causing you issues compared to someone with an SSD multiple times faster than your drive.
>>
>>335015612
Also, what's your anti-virus, if any?
>>
File: WMLr58e.png (264 KB, 640x409) Image search: [Google]
WMLr58e.png
264 KB, 640x409
>>335013901
>N64

Nah man those are obviously 32X graphics.
>>
>>335011015
>dips down to 30 FPS with my 980 Ti
bullshit my 950 -m- runs it at 720 60fps
>>
Im pretty much 100% sure its the game or the drivers at this point. 670gtx ftw/3770k and i get 10-15 fps on low settings. When i switch to 1600x900 i get 60 fps but when i get to an area with a lot of candles and shit like that it drops again. Everytime i change resolution it runs in 60 for e few minutes amd the drops again. I cant get a stable 60 fps with low settings in fucking 1280x720.
>>
>>335012614
Yes, it does count.

Do you know why?

There is nothing anybody has ever done to any PS2 game to make it look anywhere near this good. Not even Dark Souls 1 good. People just don't actually remember what PS2 games look like.
>>
>30 fps with a 980 ti
>i get consistent 60 fps with a gtx 760

sounds like you need to git gud
>>
>>335015805
>amd the drops again
And then drops again, ffs.
>>
>>335015767
Yeah, nod32 or some shit, I don't know why I even use it.
>>
File: Black_PS2_Editeur_033.jpg (104 KB, 640x478) Image search: [Google]
Black_PS2_Editeur_033.jpg
104 KB, 640x478
Reminder that this is probably the best PS2 could achieve.
>>
>>335011015
>he fell for the nvidia meme
downgrade the drivers to 314.22, recent cards weren't programmed to hold back in that version
>>
>>335015896
MGS3 looked better to be quite honest with you my familia.
>>
>>335011015
be happy thats alot better than the PS4 can achieve where you have around 15-20 fps in every area.
>>
>>335015965
And this is the HD version
>>
>>335011015
r9 390 here

Lowest I get is 45 and my card cost half as much as yours

Good job falling for the Nvidia meme
>>
>>335013158
All the ambushes I've seen so far have been easily handled if you just play smartly and don't charge forward constantly.

I am getting framerate dips on my GTX 760, but it's largely fairly solid.

>(press dodge button when enemy attacks, hit attack button twice, for 50 hours)

You just described every soulsborne game made. Hell, some other anon was complaining that all you do is R1 spam and I've already run across a ton of enemies that poise through normal hits.

So far I'm really digging the fuckton of iframes on dodges. Makes the dodge super useful and allows for generally faster play.
>>
reminder that nvidia planned obsolescence is NOT a meme and installing older drivers/using integrated grafix on laptops almost doubles framerates

inb4 >reddit
they don't have enough nvidia cock up their ass to pretend it isn't true even with facts on the table

https://www.reddit.com/r/darksouls3/comments/4efemc/if_you_are_using_a_500_series_nvidia_card/
>>
>i7 950
>HD 6870
>medium
>60 fps
>1366*768
>on a 32" Bravia
>I'm near-sighted
>it looks gorgeous
Feels good
>>
>>335015937
See
>>335015221
>>
>>335015221
>This myth has been thoroughly debunked
explain people going from silky smooth 10 fps to console 30 by downgrading drivers then
>>
>>335016384
The only fact on the table is that I'm running this game in constant 60FPS on my 980, with the latest drivers. Also, if you can't find any credible sources and have to post shit from reddit, I'd suggest you don't post anything at all.
>>
>>335016417
You wouldn't know what it looks like because you can't fucking see.
>>
>>335016651
reddit users are as credible as you, also tried it myself and my intel integrated actually runs the game better than my 820m
>>
File: 77982.jpg (23 KB, 225x350) Image search: [Google]
77982.jpg
23 KB, 225x350
Whats with all the casual shitteaters on /v/ since of recent? Has summer begun early or never ended? It sure feels more intense.
>>
The game taxes the CPU heavily, thats what you get for spending $600 in the GPU and $200 in the CPU you ignorant cunts
>>
>>335016629
The fact that from software's pc ports are notoriously bad.
I run perfect 60fps with no stutter on the latest drivers. Its just luck of the draw if the game plays nice with your hardware configuration
>>
File: 1435581178853.jpg (21 KB, 471x480) Image search: [Google]
1435581178853.jpg
21 KB, 471x480
>>335016917
/v/ has a ton of casuals man. There was a Deus Ex thread right after a steam sale for the game and a solid majority of the thread was bitching about the game being bad. These people usually get shamed into being quiet but when a major release like this comes out or an older game goes on sale you'll always seem bitching and crying poping up until they eventually drop the game.
>>
This game is almost entirely CPU based.
>>
>>335017108
>. Its just luck of the draw if the game plays nice with your hardware configuration
people are consistently getting better performance with older drivers except from some special snowflakes that apparently are all on /v/ only
>>
>>335011015
>looks like a ps2 game
get your eyes checked, mate
>runs like shit
60fps/1080p on a gtx780 on max. if anything, this game is optimized as hell
>>
>>335015805
What the actual fuck. I just fixed it semi thanks to Reddit. Turned virtual memory to 10000 min 20000 max mb on my harddisk. Also, for some reason geforce experience didnt detect any of my games. I scanned for games and let it optimize ds3. Then i turned lighting and shader to low and now get constant 60 fps even in firelink shrine.
>>
>>335011015
Get a better CPU you cheap shit, or turn off all background programs.
>>
>>335016770
If you're going to try and peddle some tin foil hat tier bullshit at least find an actual decent pc game (in terms of optimisation or quality of the port) to use as evidence.
DaS3 is a turd port and won't run perfectly on any pc that doesn't happen to have the same configuration as the pcs From developed on.

Also I think in your case its memory issue, you don't have enough vram which is slowing the gpu down a lot. Integrated graphics use your main system memory so theres enough space and it runs better
>>
>>335017296
>pre-rebrand 980 is a weak card

Retard.
>>
>>335017186
It takes years to develop a game, the older drivers are probably the ones From optimised for

Also see
>>335017436
>>
File: hi toady.jpg (41 KB, 471x480) Image search: [Google]
hi toady.jpg
41 KB, 471x480
>>335017121
>>
>>335017494
what are you a poorfag? besides OP said it dipped to 30fps on a 980 ti which is impossible its barely dipped 4 frames in my 980.
>>
>>335017494
should be weaker than the OP in theory, asshole. try reading sometime. it's not as hard as everyone says
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-04-21-11-16-27.png (2 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-04-21-11-16-27.png
2 MB, 1920x1080
>>335017186
>>
>>335011015
>(press dodge button when enemy attacks, hit attack button twice
This has been the problem with the whole series. It makes no sense how it's just now coming up.
>>
>>335017528

You just proven his point: From used drivers to make the game, Nvidia released new drivers, now the game runs like shit.

NVIDIA, OF 80% GPU MARKET SHARE, INTENTIONALLY RELEASED A DRIVER, THAT RUNS LIKE SHIT WITH DARK SOULS.

Do you seriously believe it is unimaginable for Nvidia to include so much as a switch to turn off experimental algorithms for games that don't support it? How about making sure the developer actually takes advantage of it instead of swapping the foundation out from under them?
How about the idea they put all that fucking money in doing a good job AMD apparently never has to deal with?
>>
>>335017658
That's on a 480 btw
>>
File: Doucher.jpg (7 KB, 200x172) Image search: [Google]
Doucher.jpg
7 KB, 200x172
>>335017542
God I miss that faggot
>>
>>335017715

No it's clearly an android tablet fucknugget.
Also
>Witcher 3
The game powered by AMD right up till Gameworks, mmk.
>>
>>335011015
>dips down to 30fps on my 980ti at times
I'm not kidding when I say DSR it from 1440p. That fixes everything except texture pop in.
>>
>looks like a PS2 game
can we please let this meme die?
I mean I've even read you fags say that The Witcher 3 "looks like an N64 game".

Either learn how to criticize graphics or don't fucking do it.
If you said "it looks last gen, barely better than Dark Souls II" that's actually still a harsh criticism already, don't be a little faglord who says some modern game "looks like a 3D SNES game xD"
>>
>>335017708
New drivers improve performance in games that aren't a pile of shit console ports.

You're blaming nvidia for From releasing a crippled invalid of a game
>>
>>335017869

You're also seeing no such changes with AMD drivers.
Bazinga.
>>
>>335017863
>If you said "it looks last gen, barely better than Dark Souls II" that's actually still a harsh criticism already
But anon that's an even worse criticism than saying it looks like a PS2 game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-LgsWKWfGE
>>
File: PoPSoT.jpg (75 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
PoPSoT.jpg
75 KB, 1280x720
>>335011015
>Looks like a PS2 game

ok lmao
>>
>>335017774
>proof that newer drivers improve performance in games optimised for pc
i-it doesn't count!!1!

You're just making yourself look silly anon, stop posting while you still have some dignity
>>
File: 1455160756530.gif (911 KB, 227x175) Image search: [Google]
1455160756530.gif
911 KB, 227x175
>>335017708
>meanwhile AMD released drivers a day after release that drastically improved performance
the way it was meant to be played.
>>
>>335017586
>poorfag
How is that relevant, memespouter?

I have a 980 and don't get dips to 30fps but more like 50 which is effectively 30 because of vsync. He was obviously exaggerating.

The fact remains that the game chugs shit on hardware it has no reason to be chugging on.
>>
>>335017959

>Gameworks

Nigga, educate yourself or stop lying. It was all over the news that weren't just review rags.

>>335017869

Nvidia get copies of every game to optimise because they have The Way It's Meant To Be Played program since forever. Yet they OKed that.
And this isn't obviously DaS exclusive, it's every fucking game.
>>
im using a gaming laptop. it is running 60. A GAMING LAPTOP.
>>
>>335017939
That's because amds driver updates do jack shit, the change logs of most of their drivers makes for sad reading
>updated version number
>changed copyright notice from '(c) 2015' to '(c) 2016'
>fixed spelling errors in control panel
>improved performance in games that have already been out for months
>removed herobrine
>>
>>335017121
But Deus Ex HR is better than any Fallout released on HD Consoles
>>
>>335011015
git gud
>>
>>335018170

AMD updates don't need to do jack shit because every game coming out for a little while still is using DX11, which we have done to death.
However not fucking over older cards is a lot better than fucknig over your older cards.
>>
File: fromcontractsbethesda.webm (1 MB, 852x480) Image search: [Google]
fromcontractsbethesda.webm
1 MB, 852x480
does the console version have the same connectivity bugs as the definitive version?
>>
>>335018497
That's not a bug it's the new darkwood grain ring
>>
>>335018497
worse console version laags non stop.
>>
>>335011015

>Are we NeoGAF now?

We're japangaf anon.
if something is japanese, it must be good.
>>
>>335018172
I was talking about the original Deus Ex. There was a bunch of people on /v/ who never played and just got it off of steam, they were bitching non stop about the game.
>>
>>335018170
are you for real? amd improved cpu overhead dramatically over last 5 driver releases
and so you know 390 performs stable 60 fps at 1440p everything max on current driver in ds3, i don't even have stutter everyone complaining about, thanks ssd and 8gb vram
>>
>>335015965

MGS3 is a third person game though, first person shooters need to have better visuals since stuff is right in your face.
>>
>>335018550
I never played das2 and didn't know it didn't have something like the darkwood grain ring, I thought having items that gave you alternative rolling animations was a standard thing in the souls series, come to find out it only ever existed in das1, I really wish they had something like that for das3, I mean I guess there is the dash weapon art but from what I've seen it's only on daggers. I always thought it would be cool if they had a ring or leggings that allow you to do a lung tuck and roll animation like max payne style.
>>
>>335018692
DERETU DIS

NOW
>>
Meanwhile I play the game at 1440p maxed out with ReShade at 60 fps on a GTX 780 TI and i5 4690k @ 4.8ghz. Your rig a shit, OP.
>>
>>335018949
The Carthus rings give your roll different properties. Milkring turns you invisible while rolling and Bloodring grants you additional i-frames at the cost of defense.
>>
File: Untitled.png (38 KB, 681x540) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
38 KB, 681x540
>tfw I can run it on 30 fps without drops
Get fucked OP
>>
>>335019028
I know, they are both horrible imho though. the invisibility one is just flashy and has no realy utility and the i-frame one just destroys your defense, I tried using it for awhile and people were cutting me down in two shakes man, I guess it would be worthwhile if you just dumped into vit.
>>
Overclocked 970 here and an i5 at 4.7GHz. Never drops below 60 fps at max 1080p. I bet people who have fps drops are using AMDead CPUs. There's plenty fx 8320/8350 poorfags who buy high end GPUs and complain about fps drops.
>>
>>335019373
I get a drop every time the game loads anything.

t. 980 [email protected] and M.2 SSD.
>>
>>335019373
i7 2600 and GTX 950 here
Still getting drops pretty steadily to 40-50.

The graphical settings excluding the resolution don't even affect the frame rate, this game's really poorly optimized. I almost wish it offloaded more to CPU like Dark Souls 1 did.
>>
File: 1448193630010.gif (260 KB, 150x113) Image search: [Google]
1448193630010.gif
260 KB, 150x113
>>335019821
>pick up an item
>item appears on the screen and sound plays
>half a second freeze
Same happens every now and then with hitting the enemies or getting hit.

It's driving me fucking insane.
>>
File: 61saG7ZTW0L._SL1000_.jpg (110 KB, 1000x1000) Image search: [Google]
61saG7ZTW0L._SL1000_.jpg
110 KB, 1000x1000
>>335011015
i run dark souls 3 at 1440p maxed on a 980 ti
never seen anything lower than 60
stop speaking out of your ass dipshit
>>
Runs wel on 60/high on my 760
>>
>>335013369
Looks pretty good on 660ti desu, had a bit of chop, like one or two times while loading areas, but otherwise the game looks gorgeous.
>>
>>335019924
>look at item in inventory
>icon doesn't appear for .5-1.5s
I don't know how they fucked up this bad when it's not a new engine they're using or created.
>>
>PS2 games looking that good
Well at least we're the past the looks like an N64 game meme now, progress is progress.
>>
Have been thinking to get a ps4 but also want to hopefully use it to pirate any future games

Is there any chance of a 60fps patch?

Also will I be able to hack a ps4k?
>>
If anyones interested

I have a 970

I play on max setting 1080p and stream. I dont drop below 60.
>>
I'm going to change laptop in the next months, how does it run with a 960m 4gb? Yea, shame on me for laptop gaming
>>
>>335024759
>Is there any chance of a 60fps patch?
lol
>>
>>335011015
Have you ever played a PS2 game?
>>
File: Untitled.png (2 MB, 1900x1036) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
2 MB, 1900x1036
>>335011015

what did you expect
Thread replies: 163
Thread images: 23

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.