http://www.polygon.com/2016/4/20/11466308/not-a-review-star-fox-zero
>In many ways, Star Fox Zero actually feels like a launch title for the Wii U console, full of half-fleshed-out ideas that don't quite stick. But the Wii U has been out for almost four years now, and I can't help but wonder what happened.
>This isn't a review of Star Fox Zero. Save for very rare, extreme circumstances, Polygon reviews require that a game be completed, or at least a good-faith effort be made to complete it.
Haha holy shit. How will Nintendo recover? Surely not through Wii U and SF0 sales
>>334941139
low tier bait
>>334941139
>Polygon
Into the trash it goes.
>>334941139
>Polygon reviews require that a game be completed, or at least a good-faith effort be made to complete it.
That didn't stop them from giving Sim City a 9.5 on release.
>>334941139
All those comments wishing for Nintendo's death or saying Nintendo games were never good and all on nostalgia because they had PlayStation/Sega.
>>334941139
>direct link to polygon
Get
The
FUCK
OUT
NEOGAF FAGGGOT
>>334941139
>Polygon
>the Wii U has been out for almost 4 years now
What the everloving fuck
>Reviews only matter when they confirm my cognitive bias!
>>334941139
>implying Arthur Gies isn't a very vocal anti-nintendo faggot
>seriously implying this game is unplayable when it has an average 70s score on metacritic
I rarely care about reviews but this is utter bullshit and you damn well know it
>>334941139
>>This isn't a review of Star Fox Zero. Save for very rare, extreme circumstances, Polygon reviews require that a game be completed, or at least a good-faith effort be made to complete it.
Jesus Christ Polygon is full of obnoxious pretentious faggots. How have they not collapsed yet?
>this wii u defense force
>this ad hominem
>Reading that comments section
Good fucking god I hope those people stay contained there
>>334941139
>This isn't a review of Star Fox Zero. Save for very rare, extreme circumstances, Polygon reviews require that a game be completed, or at least a good-faith effort be made to complete it.
So it's not a review and he didn't bother to finish it, this shit is just clickbait.
>>334944605
Haha holy shit.
Is the point of SF it's replayability anyway? Never played it, but that's what I've picked up over the years reading about it. One of thing that people like about 64?
>>334941139
Didn't they review Street Fighter V?
>>334941139
>directly linking to polygon
>linking to polygon at all
>didn't even use pastebin
kill yourself OP. I'm not even reading the text you wrote fuck off
>>334946446
Yeah, this is why the people whining about the difficulty and how it's only three hours long are full of shit. You're supposed to improve your skill with each playthrough.
>>334941139
Why does Nintendo do business with these faggots again?
