Holy shit... what went horribly wrong?
>>334927365
It always looked bad. The graphics are 6th-gen tier and this review just confirms that it was a dated as fuck game that doesn't hold up today. Paying $60 for a Star Fox 64 rehash that can be beaten in a few hours with graphics to match the era too is absurd.
From the E3 trailer I knew this would be shit.
Nintendo is dead, oh well, I'll stick to playing the classics from now on. I'll still give this a go since I pre-ordered it though.
2002 games were pretty dope so I'm getting this.
>>334927723
>SF Zero has 64 graphics
(You)
>>334927723
>>334927365
>we want a new star fox game
>no not star fox adventures
>no this shit is lame too
Pretty damning considering Dan's a huge fan of Star Fox but this game has always looked terrible. Not sure anyone thought it was going to be good other than diehard nintendo fans.
>giant bomb
>>334927365
So it's like a game before everything went to turbojew casual garbage after 2005?
Count me in.
>>334927365
>Giant Bomb
let me guess their issues with the game
>No female option
>no female-only option
>no female cast
>cast is stereotypically macho
>the story isnt the focus of the game
say it out loud with me
TRANSFORMATION
>This is the Star Fox game you've always wanted since 64
>2/5
>>334927365
Stop fucking dotdotdoting you retard, do you have any goddamn idea how fucking stupid you look doing that?
>>334927873
6th-gen means Gamecube, not N64, you complete fucking retard. Learn to read
>>334927365
Is this thread about Star Fox Zero or Giant Bomb?
>>334927984
or you know the game could be garbage like anyone with a brain saw it as
>>334927365
I don't wanna just shit on nintendo, no doubt we will be hving these Star Fox threads for the next few weeks, but I don't understand how anyone couple have honestly been excited for this, everytime they have shown it it has always just looked like a bad on rail shooter.
It never looked challenging, or interesting or engaging an why people were hyped for it I will never know.
I can understand people being hyped for a new Mario or Zelda, I can REALLY understand why people wold be hyped for a new Metroid game, but Star Fox? Really?
inb4
>but reviews don't matter
Which is ironic since nintendorks are the ones who always say their games are good because of their score
>>334927984
Maybe the game is shit and you're just butthurt?
>>334928032
>dotdotdoting
They're called ellipses you fucktard...
>>334927365
Looked pretty bad in gameplay videos so it's probably a legit review this time, but we won't be sure until we see more of the game. That 2002 argument is stupid though.
Holy shit
> If this had been released for the GameCube instead of Star Fox Adventures, I assume that it would have been almost universally praised by fans of the series.
So basically its a good game, a good Star Fox game and everything that the fans have been asking for, but its 2016 so its shit?
>>334927365
Considering the state of modern vidya, a game from 2002 sounds really good right about now.
>>334928183
it doesn't have top of the line graphics so it's bad
>>334927813
this, but i bet it has all the flaws of modern games
The two big new features were the motion controls and the chicken transformation, two things which nobody really asked for.
Miyamoto being adamant on two screens wasn't cutting them any favours either, visually the game looked like dog shit when they showed it off at E3. It's improved since but barely.
>>334927365
>takes the only bad review
>>334928149
Are you an idiot? An ellipse is when the Sun gets between the Earth and the Moon.
I wouldn't believe anything that a modern game "journalist" has to say.
>first review and there's already damage control
Priceless
>>334927993
>with me
You need help.
>>334927365
>>334927723
>>334927751
>>334928104
>>334928070
>>334928105
>>334928249
>>334928274
So this.. is the power..... of the........ wiiu.............
wow.....................
>it's the Star Fox game you wanted in 2002
That's a negative thing? It's all I wanted to hear. Sold.
>This review
>Nintendo finally released the Star Fox game that I thought I wanted, but it leaves me wondering what place Fox McCloud has in today’s gaming landscape.
>>334927365
Dan is a fucking idiot but his reviews are always legit.
What a shame for Star Fox
>>334927897
See OP...
>It's the Star Fox game you wanted... in 2002.
Too little too late. The industry has moved forward a bit since the N64, it's a little sad that Nintendo is rehashing a game from that era with little to no sign of improvement or change.
woah..............the power....of.........miyamoto.............for the players..............
>>334928183
yeah. Games aren't allowed to not "grow up" with you, despite, you know, 99.9% of gamers now not playing your games when you were 12.
First time I see it go so bad on a "professional" review though. That mentality is usually youtuber bread and butter.
>>334928105
Literally no one has ever said this.
>>334927365
fucking stupid. they finally give any fans what they want and now it's "too little too late, i wonder what fox even has to do in todays modern landscape" and then cue contemplative jazz music.
Motherfuckers
>>334928286
>WIIU IS THE BEST SYSTEM EVER BECAUSE JOURNALIST GAVE THEM GOOD SCORES
>journos give a bad score to a Nintendo game
>suddenly they don't matter
You can't make this shit up
it's.....not......FAIR
Got it in the mail today and finished my first playthrough. The game let's you turn off that gimmicky aiming shit but it's often required in order to progress the game and it's frustrating when it's turned off. When it's turned on it never stops feeling gimmicky and there are sections sometimes in which it's way better to play without it.
That game is almost as bad as Command.
What the fuck Nintendo?
>>334928281
You better be joking
>>334927365
>people still had faith in nintendo
Nobody asked for the dual screen bullshit. Fuck you Nintendo.
>a literal Nintendrone that buys amiibo by the bundle gave it a 2/5
Well, thats it i suppose.
This is the last Star Fox we're ever going to get.
>>334927984
>frame drops
>in a subhd low poly on rails shooter
I promise I'm a bigger star fox fan than you are. Eat shit and grow some standards
Uprising and Star Successor are pretty much what Star Fox Zero should have been.
Too bad they had to shove in gimmicks in a piss poor attempt at "innovating" a formula that clearly worked fine before.
Zelda NX will be just as shit too. :)
>>334928468
Reviews really don't matter in the let's play era
>>334928281
Thank you for this post.
>>334927365
First it's Dan Ryckert
Second...the game sucks mate.
>>334928626
No one tells Nintendo what to do! They know what's best for you!
Like:
>Gimmicky meme controls
>Rehashed games
>Regionlocking
>Games that never fall in price
>Worst eshop in the world
>Worst account system in the world that just got updated but is still shit
>>334927897
>Paying full price for an N64 game with updated graphics
>>334928062
Do you even read your own post before shitposting?
>Paying $60 for a Star Fox 64 rehash that can be beaten in a few hours with graphics to match the era too is absurd.
>with graphics to match the era too is absurd.
>with graphics to match the era
>graphics to match the era
Fucking retard.
>>334927723
This.
Just fucking let go.
>>334928494
>they finally give any fans what they want
>>334927915
>Jeff Ghurstman
I still remember making him nuclear level mad by saying he was a fat pos who judged too harshly in comments back when he was with gamespot.
He got so mad he banend me from GS forever and even called me and other people out in videos and articles back in the day haha
He would always pick on the stupidest things like default button/key binds or 'ugly ui' and knock like 2-4 points off the game vs every other reviewer at the time.
>>334927984
This.
He is a absolute retard
>>334928281
Are you serious?
>>334927365
One review from Giant Bomb. Thats it, everyone else is giving it 7 and above
The Star Fox game I wanted in 2002 is the same as the Star Fox game I want now, so that's cool I guess.
>>334928281
This nigga. Tip top baitery-doo
>>334928070
>>334928134
yes, because the past few GiantBomb reviews werent "m-muh genderfluid interactive experience..."
>>334928692Im not even hyped for StarFox, mate
Miyamoto has gone senile. Put him in an old folks home and promote a younger guy.
>>334927984
It could be the shitty controls
>>334927365
Did anyone think this game looked good?
>>334928837
fuck off, i wanted a star fox like the original. It's exactly what this it. Not the countless other directions they tried taking it.
>>334928881
>7
ayyyyyy
>>334927365
>we've reached a point where games are judged solely on superficial elements like graphics and story
Holy fuck, what went so irredeemably wrong?
>>334927365Krystal appears in the ending and joins star fox
i can't think of another game that so completely encapsulates why the wii u has turned out to be the dismal failure that it is.
>>334928281
>>334928991
yea 7, 7/10.
What, you couldn't piece that together yourself?
Maybe you'll get a better star fox rehash on your new mobile console
>>334927365
>these are the people that think vr is salvagable outside anything but porn
>>334929018
Starfox has shit gameplay too kid, it is literally a rail shooter.
>>334928881
Shouldn't /v/ be sucking Giant Bomb's dick then? Everyone on here has said Star Fox Zero was going to be a disaster from the get go.
>2 HOURS LONG
>Controls like shit
>Looks like shit
>Feels like an HD remaster
>2 HOURS LONG
>2 HOURS LONG
HOLY SHIT
Star Fox Zero’s larger issue is that even though the format and gameplay are so similar to Star Fox 64, it feels like the time for this type of game has come and gone. If this had been released for the GameCube instead of Star Fox Adventures, I assume that it would have been almost universally praised by fans of the series. Virtually every element of the 64 entry is intact here. The campaign is largely Arwing-focused and features branching paths and secret exits until the final confrontation with Andross. Completionists can return to levels to collect all of the medals and try to beat their best kill score. Voice actors for the entire team return, and the dialogue features plenty of callbacks for nostalgic fans.
>All of this would have been welcome in the early 2000s, but the years of disappointing follow-ups and the overall progression of industry standards leads to Star Fox Zero having the impact of an HD rerelease rather than a full sequel. Being able to beat the game in 2-3 hours doesn't help, no matter how many branching paths or lackluster challenge missions are included. Even the moment-to-moment action doesn't have anywhere near the impact that it had almost two decades ago, as this limited style of gameplay feels dated in 2016. Nintendo finally released the Star Fox game that I thought I wanted, but it leaves me wondering what place Fox McCloud has in today’s gaming landscape.
>this is what anons are shitposting with
IT'S NOT FUCKING FAIR BROS, SONY CANT WIN AGAIN
>>334927723
NEW Dan doesn't rate games based on how good the graphics look or what tech.
Giants bombs reviews are based on innovations, So it if ts not bring anything new to the table then it gets a low score not that it had outdated graphics from the early 2000s
>>334929018
>Story sucks
>Graphics sucks
>Only thing left is gameplay which is extremely simple and limited
So they're selling 1/3 of a game for full price
>>334927365
nintendo doesn't know how to make games, they haven't since the 1990's
>Nintendrones damage controlling garbage controls
>Nintendrones telling people to "git gud" at a game designed for children that literally has an invincibility mode
>other thread deleted
Kek
>>334927365
The Metascore is up to 69, soon it will be sitting at a good 70.
>>334929130
Looks like it. But then the moment Giant Bomb does something the hivemind doesn't approve of the board will go back to hating them.
>>334929141
Nintendo rehashed something for the 1385th time and you're butthurt because people got bored of playing the same game over and over again.
>the other two Star Fox Zero review threads get deleted
>the b8 thread with the lowest score stays
Top notch job there mods
>>334929018
I can't believe it either anon, I mean HELLO PEOPLE! IT'S 2016 ITS THE GAMEPLAY THAT MATTERS!! Even if the game dips to 20fps despite looking like shit and having the gayest wiiu gimmick and not really adding anything valuable to the formula.
>>334929018
>rail shooter with minimal story
>controller gimmicks ruin the gameplay
They've got to critique something.
>>334928849
Are you illiterate? Jeff didn't review this game.
>>334929018
60 American dollars for a 3 hour game
>>334929018
>>334929018
Its an on rail shooter anon, not even a complex on rail shooter.
>>334929248
Mods are complete shit, what else is new?
The graphics and gameplay are shit even with a half year delay, what the hell was going on with this game, was Nintendo desperate to pad out their weak Wii U release schedule? Guess the only thing I have to look forward to is Zelda now.
>>334928281
have a free (You)
>>334929239
Even the clock that strikes only twelve is right twice a day.
>>334929137
The original star fox is ~1hr long
I don't fucking get nintendo.
Star fox is the kind of shit that you could release countless sequels of, just add new levels and dialogue and shit and you are good, but Nintendo has to fuck it up with new shit gimmicks and "innovation"
>every sfz thread
>muh grafix
everyday I'm reminded that /v/ is dead
What a shame
3 HOURS
>3 HOURS
3 HOURS
>3 HOURS
>>334928281
Ok, you made me smile.
>>334929316
Zelda is going to be NX exclusive.
>mfw I could probably run this game on my phone
>>334928292
There are a few reviews out already, Giant Bomb gave it the lowest score. Most other reviews gave it a 7.
>Dan Ryckert
Literally a retard
>>334929246
>fans want star fox 64
>they get star fox 64
>too little too late
???
>Dan Ryckert
Review discarded.
So now that both Iwata and Miyamoto are dead, who's left in this rotten company?
Jesus christ..
>>334929359
Just be glad Nintendo/Miyamoto hasn't found a way to "innovate" F-Zero yet.
>>334927365
game reviewers continue to bully rail shooters
So wait let me get this straight never having played star fox games
>Fans get exactly what they want
>Game is 3 hours long (for a arcade game this isnt that bad they are designed to be replayed and are addictive)
>Multiplayer
>Well made
It even has the visuals of a late 90's Arcade game right down to the art style i like the way it looks honestly and i dont even own a Wii U
Such a shame it got released on a dead console in 1080p 60fps it would have been a nice little system seller
>>334929269
He is still very much a influence on the site and the reviewers
>>334928819
THE 6TH GEN ERA
ITS A STAR FOX 64 REHASH WITH SIX GEN ERA, are you nintendrones so mad about the terrible review scores thst you forget to have basic reading comprehension?
>>334929369
>Star Fox SNES looked good for the time, played well
>64 looked good for the time, played well
>Assault looked good for the time, played well
>Zero looks worse than Assault and has tacked on gamepad bullshit that wasn't necessary
>>334929391
>>334929428
>getting worked by dirty dan
Already bought it and will play it anyway. Will hope I have fun with it. Probably will.
>>334929380
..and is gonna be the same game that was on the GameCube.
2 HOURS
20 FPS
>>334928149
No, it's "dot dot doting" like how your mom dotes on you. You know? It just shows Dan really cares about writing his reviews!
>>334929380
its going to be cross-gen like TP was
>>334929494
Star Fox 64 wasn't released for the sixth gen retard.
>>334929526
I can taste your tears from here.
>>334927365
Game seems alright for 35$
Game lacks a lot for 60+$
Fucking nintendo get your shit together and stop listening to your retarded marketers who cut budgets
>>334927365
So I just read the review and one of the biggest negatives is the fact that the game is styled and laid out... Like a Star Fox game?
That's supposed to be a negative?
>>334929515
LOL HE'S SUCH A HEEL HE'S REALLY JOBBING IT HAHA WRESTLING HAHA
>>334929445
>no potato
NINTENDO IS FINISHED
>>334929491
Zero doesn't have multiplayer, just a co-op mode where one person steers while the other shoots.
>>334929239
>70 is suddenly good
I thought Nintendofans said that anything below 80 Is a flop, what happened?
>>334927365
>Forced Wii U pad controls
>Beatable in 3 hours even though it has alternative routes
>60 dollary doos.
gee I wonder.
>>334927984
thats polygon
>>334929614
Holy shit...
Based Dirty Dan - I thought his heel gimmick was bad but he's working /v/ marks into a shoot.
>>334929512
And do you think I really give a single fuck about grafix? Literally the only two problems that I see in SFZ threads are about grafix or gamepad controls. I can't say shit about gamepad, it might be bad or reviewers might be fucking horrible just like W101, KIU, etc. but fucking shut the hell up about graphics.
>>334929445
>no potato
What?
Guarantee this'll get shat on because people are too stubborn to tolerate experimental control schemes. It's happened before and it'll happen again. There's just no winning with these people.
2 0 F P S
>>334929635
>I thought /v/ said that anything below 80 Is a flop, what happened?
ftfy
>people complaining about length
Starfox was always short as fuck with multiple paths for multiple play throughs. Not that it makes it ok, but at least know what you're getting into before complaining about it.
>>334929602
also three things killed it for me, Hearing peppy say barrel roll every fucking time he does it, and motion controls.
The fact that the game is called starfox and it has tanks and walkers bugs me as well.
Why not take starfox 2, and add about 60 hours of content.
>>334929491
>Fans get exactly what they want
If you're referring to the vocal minority on the internet that don't even own a Wii U, yes they got what they want. Most people that played 64 moved on years ago, nobody sane waits 2 decades for a game so this game appeals to a small vocal minority only.
>>334929445
I don't understand three of those fucking con points.
the......
power......
of......
miyamoto.........
>>334929623
But thats a true arcade game
i bet if /v/ actually owned a wii u and hadfriendsto play this with it would be a great game.
So what if it looks like a Early Gen 6 game its a nice looking Gen 6 game.
>WAAA BUT MUH GRAPHICS
Seriously there is no pleasing some people and i am a PC gamer who started out with arcades that had what 1024x768 res max but at least the FPS was stable thats my only major gripe with what ive seen of SFZ
reminder
>nintendrones couldn't stop talking about how their 1st party got 80-90's scores during 2013-2014
>now that Nintendo is in damage control mode for 2015-2016, when they put out shit, rushed games that get scores in the 50-70's reviews don't matter
>>334929723
>Experimental control schemes
that's a nice rationalization of shit controls
>>334929647
If what he's saying is true, the game doesn't even have forced gamepad controls outside of the little robot bits. You can apparently just set it so that the gyro doesn't activate at all unless you hold down one of the triggers and ignore it altogether.
So much for all of those faggots whining that you can't turn them off.
>>334929750
>$60
>extremely similar to Star Fox 64 for better and for worse
>has the same length and playtime as a game released in 1997
>same plane, submarine and land sections with no evolution of gameplay
A rehash of a good game is fine, provided it polishes the core formula and still has some interesting new ideas and more content
except
>can be beaten in 2 hours
>exact same progression as 64
>graphics are absolutely awful; remember that Mario Kart 8 and Sm4sh look beautiful so there's no reason for SF0 to look this garbage
Meanwhile
>2011, a full five years earlier
>Kid Icarus Uprising comes out
>25 on rails shooting segments
>25 ground-fighting levels
>huge set of diverse weapons each with random modifiers
>robust multiplayer system
>adjustable difficulty curve from 1.0-9.0, higher difficulties mean better loot
>takes ~20 hours to beat
>is a completely fresh take on the IP
>is on a handheld system
If SF0 was meaty like KI:U literally nobody would be complaining
The best starfox game ever made was okay.
Go play some panzer dragoon, fags.
>>334928281
>when the Sun gets between the Earth and the Moon.
are you an idiot? that's an eclair
>>334929824
this
nintenfriends loved to boast about muh review scores
>>334929470
miyamoto doesn't even remember f-zero exists
but people like to pester him about it so I guess it'll happen eventually
>>334929819
star fox's multiplayer combat was always a huge draw for me
Even though I'm a Nintendo fan, I'm damn glad I cancelled my preorder months ago. Christ they should've done better.
>>334929818
The score steadily rising.
Final score maybe 70+, still bad for nintendo big title though.
>>334929808
>graphics are shit
>it gets really stale since its the same shit
>ending mission is dull and repetitive over difficulty
>short
>meme
there you go retard, it's not every day when you have to hold nintolders hands
>>334929835
Good post, I'm convinced,
>>334929703
No, millions of fucking dollars went into this from a huge corporation that has enough money to buy out all of japan.
It's not even an artistic direction, it's that Nintendo is so incompetent that they can't make a fucking on rails shooter. capcom shat out 2 on rails shooters in 1 year for the wii that looks better than this.
I'd let this lie if the graphics were passable but holy fucking shit chicken mode looks geometrically retarded
I was really excited for this game. Graphics don't really bother me as long as it's a fun game.
Hadn't been following the game too closely because I have other things going on in my life but I'm reading up on it now and it has shitty controls and mandatory dual screen motion controls and that sounds so unappealing that I no longer want to play the game.
I loved the original star fox and 64. I like the idea of just zoning out to a shooter without having to fuck with some complex controls.
10 years from now if I want to revisit this game I'll have forgotten the weird ass controls and have to spend hours just to get used to it again. I haven't played 64 in a couple years but I know I could at least pick it up and play without having a learning curve control wise.
Not saying it's going to be a bad game but it's just not for me.
Seems weird nintendo appears to market itself to a broad audience but then puts up all these barriers to people who just want to play a basic game.
>>334929875
this desu
KI: U wasn't perfect but it was a good, fresh take on the franchise
>>334927365
>even a nintoddler doesnt like it
dead
>>334929795
So basically this is Nintedo's Duke nukem forever?
Ive been waiting for HL3 for over 10 years i doubt they will ever feel the pain i feel for Valve ditching the games market to focus on the most hilarous flops of all time
>SteamOS
>HTC Vive
>Motion Control gimmicks
>Stupid SteamPC's
>>334929943
Wait so it had Dogfighting and they took it out...
-_-
>>334928932
link one review that's like that
>While the GamePad functionality leaves a lot to be desired, it can be almost entirely ignored in most situations. I’d recommend setting the controls to “Motion Control only when pressing ZR,” and focusing on the main screen only.
I'm surprised no one is talking about this after four fucking months of "you can't turn motion controls off!"
>>334927365
>Expecting anything good from what PlatinumGames touches
>>334929819
>But that's a true arcade game
Considering previous games had splitscreen in addition the to main arcade mode and Assault was originally an arcade game which ended up a full game with multiplayer, I'm going to have to say no.
I wonder what Miyamoto is doing right now...
>>334929947
>>334929954
DELETE THIS
>>334929964
Mate, you're literally defending gimmicky imprecise motion controls
I remember getting that 3ds remake and realizing that star fox was only good for its time. Arcade-like games in general have not aged well at all
>i-it's gonna blow ratchet and clank out out the water, y-you'll see!
NINTODDLERS BTFO
>Star Fox Zero’s larger issue is that even though the format and gameplay are so similar to Star Fox 64, it feels like the time for this type of game has come and gone.
>Virtually every element of the 64 entry is intact here. The campaign is largely Arwing-focused and features branching paths and secret exits until the final confrontation with Andross.
How the fuck are those flaws? That sounds exactly what a good Star Fox game should be all about.
>>334929545
Your posts are a diamond dozen.
>Star Fox shills BTFO
>all the shitposters that went autistic at any criticism of the game on /v/ are killing themselves
>>334928281
Calm down Ricky.
>>334930032
Platinum was kicked out for interfering with Miyamoto's vision of remaking Starfox 64
>>334929971
>No, millions of fucking dollars went into this from a huge corporation that has enough money to buy out all of japan.
>all of japan
Do you listen to yourself talk?
>>334929565
I never said it did its literally star fox 64 for the gamecube but 10 years later, despite Assault looking better.
enjoy Star Flop 0/10 though, since shitposting is your last resort to come into terms with the game being a gimmicky rehash
dont get me wrong I wanted a good game, but this game had to be revealed when Nintendo talked about "innovation"
>>334929565
>Being this retarded
>>334929819
>But thats a true arcade game
Never mind the fact that there are billions of different arcade games with different setups, you have to push your personal blog opinion as fact.
>>334927365
Gamekult: 4 out of 10
> no potato
A Mexican website gave it 88
http://www.hobbyconsolas.com/reviews/star-fox-zero-analisis-142080
>>334930117
>R&C IS ONLY 30 FPS HAHAHAHA
>star fox is 20 fps despite looking like shit
>>334930056
He made the game he wanted, so probably nothing much. Nintendo disregard reviews just as much as reviews disregard them.
>Nintendo still trying to force motion controls and split screen gimmicks in games where you need precise controls and focus on one screen at a time
What the fuck were they thinking?
>>334930117
I love Nintendo but even I had more faith in Ratchet & Clank than this.
I feel like Nintendo might get some of their shit together once Miyamoto retires.
>>334930197
>mexican intellectuals
>>334930118
reviewers are retarded
/v/ jumps on anything for a chance to shitpost
more news at 11
it should be common knowledge to avoid /v/ when any game is going to be launched, dunno what happened but somehow /v/ actually gets worse every single year
>>334930131
miyamoto was going to make a new star fox game that was episodic before he received feedback from fans that they wanted the star fox 64 formula. Don't tell lies.
>>334930141
I do, though I don't have text to speech turned on, downsy.
>Give Undertale and Gone Homo 10/10
>Say nothing negative about the orrendous graphics, gameplay elements that were old 20 years ago
>Somehow now its accaptable if i dont like the genre
Man video game journalism is truly joke
>>334929978
>mandatory dual screen motion controls
Apparently they're not actually mandatory after all.
There's an option that sets them to a trigger instead of having them on all the time, so you can just play it like traditional Star Fox.
>>334930117
how does that work? If we are talking about sales you'll have to wait a little more.
>>334930045
Thats sad.
>>334930167
As i said i never even played star fox i just enjoyed watching the butthurt on here.
>>334928183
IT'S 2 0 1 6 COME ON!
>>334930219
They weren't
They stopped thinking in the 90s
>>334930118
Because people expect good new shit after 20 years of waiting
>>334930248
>waaah vee doesn't like rehashed garbage shit board waaaah mommmmyyyy!
@334930283
>tripcode user
post binned
>>334930301
lol
>>334930283
>Giant Bomb
its literally gamespot 2.0
They basically invented the concept of 7.0/10 its ok IGN
Giving this game 2/5 is too harsh,
>reviews matter when posting that metacritic comparison reviews
>use it for years
>it suddenly doesnt matter with the last 5 flops nintendo released
>reviews dont matter for star fox!!
it's sad
>>334930336
note I said any game you fucking retard, I don't blindy suck off a company that doesn't give two shits about me
>>334930281
maybe if you did, you'd realize what you type is fucking retarded.
>>334930118
>it feels like the time for this type of game has come and gone.
Dude that retard wrote this with a straight face. He's giving up to the "it's <current year>" crowd.
>>334930283
western journalists are inherently biased against jap games, but SF0 is still a piece of shit
>>334930217
I wonder if he's going to pull a Gunpei Yokoi and go for a drive. Releasing this is shameful for someone of his stature.
>>334930336
>He ironically typed this thinking it was smart.
Jesus Christ anon
>>334930219
>forcing motion controls and split screen
>this very review confirms that you can actually just turn them off if you want
>>334930409
>WAAAAAHHHHHH MOMMMMEEEEYYY
>>334930086
I'm not defending them, since I haven't played with them yet, and I doubt you have either. But what I'm also not defending is rigid ignorant dumbfucks who immediately hate on a game because it has an experimental control scheme / motion controls. The same fucking shit happens to games I've loved in the past like KI:U and W101 and it's frankly a huge fucking shame to see good games swept under the rug because of complete ignorance. Get some critical thought.
>>334928183
how old do you think the average star fox fan is at this point? he's just the fast guy from smash now
Another Mexican website gave it 86
>Innovative
>Several vehicles and several ways to play
>Created by Platinum
>Story returns to its roots
Bad
>Obsolete graphics
>Contraintuitive
>Short
>>334930423
Perhaps, though it would have to be after you learn what exaggerating is
>>334930283
Are you saying that it looks like shit because it's the artstyle?
>>334930442
You can't completely turn off gyro, just diminish its effect on aiming in certain levels. It's mandatory for others. Quit spreading misinformation or parroting /v/.
>>334930483
http://www.levelup.com/Wii-U/juegos/324857/Star-Fox-Zero/review
>>334930405
Its ok anon they just didnt get paid enough sheckles.
how crap like skyrim and witcher 3 can get good reviews i dont know
on the upside when the NX comes out nintendoshits only have to wait 4 years for games to come out then the console will die.
As typical with nintedoshit
>>334930197
>>334930483
had no idea mexicans were nintendrones
>>334930540
you too
>>334930442
You can't turn them off retard
>>334930301
Why is nintendrone always clinging to sales.
>>334930462
>oh baby let me buy a console and buy it again two years later due to an upgrade that fucks over 40million people, there's literally nothing wrong with this, please fuck my ass oh yes I love it so much, I'll defend you with all my honor
>>334930483
sound about right. I'm part of the people who thing nintendo reviews aren't too harsh, but others are the one getting free passes.
MISHON COMPREE
>sony fans hype up a game. It comes out and its great
>xbox fans hype up a game. It comes out and its average
>nintendo fans hype up a game. It comes out and it's shit
>pc gamers hype up a game. It never comes out
sony wins again
Nintendofags on suicide watch
>>334930648
CUMON!
>>334930662
>sony fans hype up a game. It comes out and its great
wheres the game?
>>334930631
how do you compare a platformer with a rail shooter? What's your metric?
>>334930561
>>334930615
>You can't turn off the gyro
Except, oh wait, you totally fucking can.
>>334929018
Uncharted 2 literally created this trend because of how popular it was with normalfags.
Fuck even my neighbour who's in his 40s and has a kid bought a PS3 for UC2 and cause of that everyone went on the games==movies train to make the prettiest and most pretentious B-list film quality games in existence.
Fuck even ancient shit like Secret of Mana has a better story then 95% of modern games. However the review in the OP sounds like it was writen by a pretentious douchebag who thinks he's so witty that he pretends that good games can't be good because of visuals despite giving garbage, which neither looks or plays good, ike Undertale near perfect scores.
>>334930118
Reviewers have been shitting on every rail shooter released for the last 10 years. They even gave the space harrier rerelease a 7/10 even though its one of the all time great games of the genre.
>>334930715
Bloodborne
mad nintoddler?
>>334930483
>3 hour game
>60 Americans
>86%
Nope. Even if the gameplay is the best thing ever (it's not btw) 3 hours is just unacceptable.
>>334930205
>20fps
>even though Digital Foundry only showed it dropping to low 40
ok
>>334930605
Mexicans are the biggest drones
>>334930717
Control, contents, production value, the love poured in to it.
>>334930285
Are you sure about this because everything I've read says you need to play as a with the dual screens.
If you can play with traditional style controls I'd probably reconsider.
>>334929818
lmao your gay pic is already outdated
>>334930738
>it can be almost entirely ignored in most situations
>t feels like a traditional Star Fox experience outside of the few times it requires you to look down (when controlling a little robot in an effort to hack a panel, for instance)
How about you read the whole thing, you retard?
And it's mandatory for all-range mode bosses.
>>334930320
If you want different new game then get a different new game, don't get a game from established series and then cry because it's like plays like previous games from that same series.
>>334930662
>sony fans hype up a game. It comes out and its great
Just like Knack right?
>>334929616
>>334929715
No potato: No punch.
>reviews matter when posting that metacritic comparison reviews
>use it for years
>it suddenly doesnt matter with the last 5 flops nintendo released
>reviews dont matter for star fox!!
it's sad
>>334930775
oh you mean the easiest souls game with the worst weapon variety and having an average amount of variety compared to the other games locked behind a dlc wall with the horrid netcode that gets fucked over because of ps4 online and constant framedrops everywhere and that DaS3 got the same gameplay formula in it already so it's already the superior choice? Any other game or just that one mediocre one?
>>334930118
It should also be half the price or less, is what I assume he meant.
>>334928281
I can't stop laughing.
I'm at work and I can't stop laughing.
Goddamnit anon.
>>334930775
Sorry, i don't give a shit about that genre.
>>334930715
ratchet and clank? bloodborne? until dawn?
Zelda U better be the best shit ever, the Wii U was such a waste.
