Am I the only one here not noting the difference between 30 and 60 fps? Is this framerate thing is just a big scam?
Not alone anon, I'm guessing it's cause of smoother screens or some shit that I don't really care about
I can see the difference, but it's not as big of a deal as people make it out to be.
A game doesn't suddenly become shit because it's running at 30 fps
>>334891879
>>334891879
It seems to be hit or miss with me if I even notice it. But it doesn't effect my enjoyment of the game.
>>334892282
>>334892308
it all makes sense now
Do you play games with a controller?
If yes: you will not notice.
If no: you are autistic.
I love 60 but 30 is just fine
The framerate being stable is much more important than the actual number
>>334891879
there are plenty of equally dumb/blind console gamers, you're not the only one
>>334892435
Yes you are truly an enlightened individual
>>334892282
Both seem exactly the same.
Is something wrong with my screen?
>>334892308
sauce
>>334891879
In turn-based games 30 isn't a big deal, but in action games I can't stand less than 45. Especially if it's twitchy.
Try comparing F-Zero X to GoldenEye, for example. GoldenEye always made me nauseous.
>>334891879
>ITT console fags trying to justify their shitty life decisions.
>>334891879
I used to believe 30fps was a scam, now I win tournaments with Dan Hibiki.
>>334892485
keep getting mad you stupid peasant
>>334892570
>>334892435
I never even owned a console, anons
>>334892506
look at one and use your peripheral vision to see the other one, it's a massive difference
>>334892648
>>334892570
Spot the underage pc fats
>>334891879
There is a huge difference.
>>334892368
This. Desu, nigga, senpai, Familia, onichan.
>>334891879
There's a difference, but is only really relevant for some games. Nothing happens if you chose to pay no mind to it.
>>334891879
You'd have to be blind or used to 30 fps to not see the difference
>yeah well ur a fat fedora pcbabby
well okay then
>>334891879
There's a huge difference, but if you're playing on a screen with a low refresh rate you obviously won't get 60fps even if your PC or console runs it at such.
Is there any difference between 1080p and 360p?
Its a minor graphical difference.
Really as long as your FPS is above 20 you should be able to play any game just as well.
I know because I used to average at 16 FPS before getting a videocard that wasn't ancient and I could still topped the scoreboard a lot.
>>334892703
then you just have poor eyesight or a damaged connection from your eyes to brain.
>>334892924
Not even a close comparison with this and frames.
>>334892939
topping a scoreboard on pug halo servers is not proving your point right faggot
I really can't stand these threads. Mostly because it's just circlejerking by console-apologists.
The reality is that gaming and technology should always strive to be better than what it currently is.
Just because you have meme-vision and can't see inferiority at a glance doesn't mean that an entire industry should stop evolving.
My advice? Conclude existence.
>>334892924
The difference between 720p and 1080p is negligible for the performance 1080p takes.
1. Go to youtube
2. Find video with 1080p quality
3. Find video with 1080p60 quality
4. Note the difference
If you can't tell the difference, you may be retarded
>mfw 60fps
>>334893108
A game looking better and running better doesn't mean the game itself is better.
But go on jacking off to benchmarks like the pc fat you are.
You probably can't tell the difference because you've never seen a proper comparison. There's a webm of Dark Souls 2 that I don't have that shows pretty clearly the difference between the two framerates.
60 fps is definitely smoother, but 30 is still completely playable. Anyone who says otherwise probably confuses 30 fps with even lower framerates.
>>334893047
Why so hostile friend? Are you honestly telling me you lose skill with 30 FPS?
You can still see everything perfectly fine and have the exact same amount of time to react so it should not effect your skill.
>>334892506
If your screen's refresh rate is only 30hz for some reason then you can't see the difference
Otherwise you're fucking blind m8
>>334893360
I never fucking claimed that. I claimed that threads like these poison the minds of retards into believing that taking steps backwards in technology is somehow acceptable.
The game's quality can vary because it's subjective, but technology is objective, and we should never obscure that objectivity behind apologists and corporate cucks.
Especially when it's just blatant rationalization.
>>334891879
https://www.vg247.com/2016/03/23/smite-dev-teases-60fps-for-ps4-and-xbox-one/
>console devs spend time and resources optimizing a game so it could run at 60FPS
>b-but it's scam, no one cares about it
Nice logic as always, /v/
>>334893515
this is what shitters actually believe
>>334893590
>I never fucking claimed that.
Yes you did.
Don't you have more petitions to sign?
>>334893425
A bigger problem than 30/60 FPS if framerate drops anyways.
As long as it's solid at whatever number I don't give a shit. Hell I used to play WoW at a buttery smooth 15 FPS during Vanilla and BC. But I can't fucking stand a game with conatant dips from 30 to the low 20s, or from 60 to below 50.
>>334891879
It's really noticeable in games since you move the camera yourself, but it's also obvious as the sun in any fast-paced movie due to them running at 24 fps
>action scene or quick pan happens
>screen becomes a choppy mess
You can never unsee it
>>334893515
>same amount of time to react so it should not effect your skill.
60 fps is more responsive.
>>334893684
Nah, but I have games to play. That's right, games, plural.
>>334893515
>half the time for input
>half the frames
>same time to react
'no'
>>334893652
Well maybe I am just better at videogames than you then.
I mean if you can't adapt to something so small you must really be bad.
>>334893749
Yeah go enjoy Undertale
>>334891879
>console babies are so far behind they think 60fps matters anymore
144/165hz is the future
So smooth you can literally butter your bread with your graphics.
>>334893778
now you're just being retarded on purpose
>>334893812
At least I can.
>>334893706
>>334893775
If there is a projectile traveling at you and will hit you in 1.5 seconds then it makes no difference how many frames you have. Same with hitscan. The instant you see the guy pointing his gun at you you have the same amount of time to react regardless of your FPS.
>>334893817
B-but anon that framerate is too big for my gpu
>>334894117
You would see them point their weapon at you twice as fast as you would with 30 fps
>>334894139
I bet your GPU can handle a 144 inches frame rate, try it
>>334891879
I can not only tell the difference between 30/45/60/75/120 FPS, but also the difference between a current refresh rate on a monitor. It's all a matter of eyesight and experience.
If you have a keen eye and are used to 60FPS you wont be able to look at 30FPS and think "this is fine".
>>334892308
is this a meme?
can videos really have different framerates on different parts of the screen?
>>334894226
It would still take the same amount of time for them to aim their gun at you and the same amount fo time for you to react. You could argue that an extra 30FPS would give you 0.015 seconds more time to react (assuming the missing frame is the one where they start aiming at you) but that is entirely negligible and your character wouldn't be able to move enough in that frame of time to avoid that attack anyways.
>>334894650
Why wouldn't they, as long as your monitor can display them
>>334894650
Yes and no
The entire video is running at 60 FPS but the lower parts are showing less frames so the 30 FPS would be showing each frame twice and the 15 4 times to simulate lower FPS while actually running at 60.
>>334894903
Those are both making me equally nauseous.
Fucking motion blur
