Greatest movie tie-in game of all time?
>Half the framerate.
>Music replaced.
>Fewer planets.
>Most of the original guns missing.
>Cutscenes are Oblivion-tier.
No, it's another shitty movie tie-in game to continue the tradition of shitty movie tie-in games.
>>334811436
I think so. The story was rushed, but otherwise it was lots of fun.
>>334811763
It's a reboot sold at 2/3rds a normal games price, not a remake. Of course it's different and has less planets.
>>334811763
>>Half the framerate.
Insomniac only makes 30fps games and complaining about framerate is a shitty meme.
>>Music replaced.
No one cares.
>>Fewer planets.
True but they added new ones and this game has a low-budget so remaking all of them and adding new ones would have been costly.
>>Most of the original guns missing.
They were replaced with new ones and ones from the Future series that are better.
>>Cutscenes are Oblivion-tier.
I don't know what that means. The cutscenes are great.
Yes, greatest movie tie-in game. It's also the GOTY 2016 currently.
>>334811436
It may be.
Doesn't change the fact that it suffered from being a movie tie in though.
>>334812364
>It's okay for a PS2 port to be missing content because it's slightly cheaper.
>>334812525
It's not a PS2 port you fucking retard. That's the collection that's on the PS3 and Vita.
This is a complete remake from the ground up.
I'm having a lot of fun playing it. If some autists want to be upset over dumb shit, go for it.
>>334811436
Best game based on a movie, based on a game.
Well, if you don't like street fighter the movie the games that is.
>>334812653
>This is a complete remake
>Except for the framerate.
>And the music.
>And all the planets.
How exactly is that a "complete" remake again?
>>334812525
It's not a port you console warring faggot
>>334812653
How feels that a ps2 game have more content, performance and better quality, than a game of today?
>>334812831
Loser. Get your shit straight. It's a reboot. Or what they call a reimaging of the first game. It's not going to be made for a purist like you.
>>334812851
A longer production schedule and a bigger budget.
>>334812364
>Music replaced.
>No one cares.
They fucking should.
>>334812851
>Rose tinted glasses
>>334812831
because it isn't the same.
>>334812851
how does it feel shitposting instead of enjoying the goty?
I kind of hope this is a full reboot. Start fresh, you now?
>>334813019
why?
inb4 muh nostalgia
>>334812931
>It's a movie tie-in game.
>Wait no it's a complete remake.
>Wait no it's a reboot.
>Wait no it's a reimaging, whatever that is.
>W-well it's not meant for y-you anyway!
Now who needs to get their shit straight?
Biggest blunder of the year right next to das3.
>>334812935
>>334813026
>>334813073
It's so hard to accept that this isn't better than ps2 version.
better than the original ratchet & clanks series in every way, haters are just trying desperately to hate, probably didnt play it.
>>334813181
(You)
>>334813217
>>334813186
>>334813181
Sad that you're shitposting about a game just because it's on a sony platform.
>>334813217
The only one it's not better then is Up Your Arsenal and none of them are better then that one.
>>334812364
you didn't notice the fucking awful, low budget in-engine cutscenes? where every shot is shot-reverse shot while Ratchet opens and closes his mouth and sometimes moves his eyebrows?
>>334813413
Literally kill yourself you memer.
>>334813181
it can't be all of the above?
is your brain too small to comprehend that?
>>334813462
Christ I thought I was the only one who noticed these. It's really bad.
>>334813462
are you asking if i'm autistic or not? because the answer is no.
>>334813186
XDD
>>334813462
Yeah, those were bad, but they were only like 1/3rd of the cutscenes and they never used it for a major scene only filler stuff like Skid McMarxx and the other hoverboard stuff.
>>334813413
>>334813454
Still defending this? Enjoy your 6 hours game.
>>334813863
*12
>>334813529
Slit your throat shitposter
>>334813940
You're trying really hard to fit in.
>>334813217
It is better quality in cutscenes since there are very few. But I don't gameplay and performance doesn't hold a candle. It was simple game back in the day. The remake has more complicated visuals, enemy reactions, complex weaponry and over all better mechanics. So in performance and gameplay does an out standing job of blowing the first out of the water.
As for content. They took out the levels that weren't fun
Who's gonna see the movie?
>>334814415
It's got some big-name VA behind it but I'm not at all interested in watching. I think the Sly Cooper flick will be better.
>>334815308
>flick
>>>/tv/
>>334813454
>talking shit about going commando and deadlocked
Sonyggers get out.
>>334814415
the french dub is made by french youtubers and not the original guys. i don't want to hear the shitty english dub, i loved the french dub in R&C1-4
>>334814415
>Stallone
wew
>>334815308
The Sly Cooper movie isn't even gonna be made if this isn't succesful. The director said a couple of weeks ago that the Sly Cooper movie doesn't exist but it hopefully will if Ratchet & Clank does well.
>>334815938
This looks like a DreamWorks rip off. Would you really want a sly movie?
>phone auto capitalizes DreamWorks
The game is the best promotion the movie can get. Unlike the tie in song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiDO_sP00uk [Embed]
TIER LIST:
GREAT:
Up Your Arsenal
Crack in Time
Ratchet and Clank PS4
GOOD:
Going Commando
Ratchet and Clank 2002
Deadlocked
Tools of Destruction
Into the Nexus
MEH:
Size Matters
Quest 4 Booty
All 4 One
BAD:
Secret Agent Clank
Q-Force
>>334817082
Switch all4one and qforce
Also secret agent clank was decent for a psp game even though size matters was better
Also add deadlocked to great tier
>>334817402
All 4 One is fun with friends. On your own, it definitely falls into the meh/bad category.
>>334812831
Complete as in completely new, it's not bring ported
>>334813217
The original Ratchet and Clank for PS2 was worse for one huge reason- there was no strafing. Shit was annoying as fuck
>>334811763
Movies are 24 fps
>>334818273
The levels weren't designed like later Ratchets. Fewer and less aggressive enemies, and more platforming. Ratchet 2 without strafing would be hell, but Ratchet 1 plays fine.
So how is the framerate actually? I'm fine with a stable 30.
>>334811436
Yes, but it's not like there's any serious competition
>>334818961
It's a stable 30. It has occasional slowdown, but it's intended slowdown for cinematic moments.
>>334812364
>Insomniac only makes 30fps games
Then why was I playing ACiT at 60fps yesterday?
>>334820771
Crack in Time was their last 60fps game
>>334811436
That's not Spiderman 2 though
>>334821297
Yeah, I loved those long ass races, mediocre combat controls and constant side missions to collect balloons and whatnot. Spiderman 2 is remembered fondly solely for one part of it, an admittedly huge part but one nonetheless, the web swinging.
>>334821287
And it was their last good game.
>>334822171
Until now.
>>334811436
It's the best game of the year so far, so maybe.
>>334822229
Nope. It's a garbage rehash with not even half the charm of the original.
>>334815938
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nbXEKZVonko
![EA's_The_Lord_of_the_Rings-_The_Two_Towers_box[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/FU3llIS.jpg "EA's_The_Lord_of_the_Rings-_The_Two_Towers_box[1].jpg")
>>334811436
Still can't top this
>>334811436
>>334823929
>not this
Are you even trying?
>>334812434
lol
>>334811436
I bought this the other day and been having a great time with it. Also own all the other Ratchet and Clank games and I think this is just as fun.
>>334812364
>Music replaced.
>No one cares.
Fuck you
>>334826052
Not him, but I love the R&C ps2 soundtracks and even I'm not something over it, get over it
>>334811436
>movie tie-in game
it's the other way around retard, they made the shitty movie to get kids hooked on the game series
>>334827165
being a sperg over it*
>>334811436
>Greatest movie tie-in game
Lego Indiana Jonesfuck it...it came out the same year Kingdom of the Crystal Skull didThe Simpsons Game is a close second
>>334814415
>main character gets 5th billing
kek
>>334811436
Fucking hell yeah, bro! This game is the SHIT!
Great game, I played through it 3 times so far.
Pro
>fun gameplay
>decent mod system
>card collecting was fun
Con
>annoying clank missions
>water effects terrible
>no enemy respawnsnigger
>not enough unlockable content
>no gravity or physics effect when you jump on your floating ship. REEEE
>>334812364
You should ignore the shitposters. Oh wait that means ignoring /v/...
>>334828874
Some enemies respawn. Just not nearly enough.
>>334828874
>annoying clank missions
Can't really hold that against the game, those have always been shit. And at least they're not as long as the Crack in Time ones.
>>334823456
Says you.
>>334830285
I've always enjoyed the Clank missions, I miss giant Clank as well. The puzzle elements were nice
>>334830285
But the Crack in Time Clank segments were objectively the best.
>tfw there are invisible and kill walls everywhere
Favorite Galaxy?
Solana (R&C 2002, Up Your Arsenal, Deadlocked, Size Matters, R&C 2016),
Bogon (Going Commando)
or
Polaris(Tools of Destruction, A Crack in Time, Q-Force, All 4 One, Quest For Booty, Into the Nexus)
>>334830543
>5 hours long
>butchered Ratchet's personality
>missing planets
>replaced the god tier soundtrack
Says me.
>>334831601
>5 hours long
It's much longer than that if you actually play the game and don't speed run. Don't even try to say you did in 5 hours on hard, either.
>butchered Ratchet's personality
Ratchet has never had that great a personality to begin with. Even then, he's just more in line with the Future series Ratchet where he was more idealistic before getting weary about heroism.
>missing planets
Because they weren't going for a 1:1 remake, and the worlds that got cut didn't fit into the revamped story.
>replaced the god tier soundtrack
The new soundtrack is just fine. Sure, it'd have been nice to see some remakes of classic tracks, but there have been far worse remake OSTs
>>334832132
>It's much longer than that if you actually play the game and don't speed run. Don't even try to say you did in 5 hours on hard, either.
I didn't speed run, the game is piss easy even on hard. Maybe you're just bad.
>Ratchet has never had that great a personality to begin with. Even then, he's just more in line with the Future series Ratchet where he was more idealistic before getting weary about heroism.
He was a dick in the early games and evolved into more of an hero personality in the later games. They completely threw that away here to be in line with the movie.
>Because they weren't going for a 1:1 remake, and the worlds that got cut didn't fit into the revamped story.
The planet variety was one the best things about the first game. This one is too samey.
>The new soundtrack is just fine. Sure, it'd have been nice to see some remakes of classic tracks, but there have been far worse remake OSTs
I don't feel it, it's just forgettable as fuck.
>>334832623
He was a dick in the 1st game and that's it. He's super professional by the time Going Commando starts.
>>334832623
You clearly did speed run, doing everything in the game takes far more than 5 hours.
And Ratchet was only a dick in the first game, and even then it was a brief bout of wanting revenge for nearly being killed by Qwark. After that, he was all about snappy quips and saving the day. Movie Ratchet is just way more into being a hero, and that's fine since this isn't meant to be the exact same Ratchet.
And the planet variety is fine, they all look different with things to do. Only real downside is that the enemy variety is a bit lacking in terms of special/location specific enemies.
>>334832623
He was a dick for one game, fuck off with this shit. It's not like it was even fun to watch, he was just an asshole, there was barely any development either, it was just "Ok ok, I'll be a hero now". I just played through the first game again recently and the planets are basically just pallatte swaps of each other, vairety is non existent. Play Acit, then go back to 2002, you will see how the planets start to get tedious, there's too many of them and they're too long and there's too much backtracking. Also the soundtrack is fucking garbage fuck off with this meme, it's just beeping and shit, jesus.
>>334833435
Not him but don't diss the soundtrack bruh, just don't the rest you've said I agree to a lesser degree though but still a very fun and enjoyable game and for a first game in the series ifs pretty good
>>334833435
>Also the soundtrack is fucking garbage fuck off with this meme, it's just beeping and shit, jesus.
kys
>>334833435
>>334832623
Honestly, nothing about the soundtracks of R&C were ever that memorable to me. Only songs I distinctly remember are Courtney Gear's song and that Daft Punk-ish song from Tools of Destruction's credits. While nothing was bad, it just sort of all bled together compared to say the soundtracks of the Insomniac Spyro games.
>>334833435
>Also the soundtrack is fucking garbage fuck off with this meme
Never have I seen taste so bad
>>334833931
Turn down the sfx lol
>>334834110
SFX had nothing to do with it, the music just wasn't that memorable to me.
>>334834227
Lol https://youtu.be/D60HTdBckxM
>>334834290
>lol
You need to be 18 to post here, kiddo.
>the soundtrack is bad/forgettable
Getting real tired of this meme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4C-HoHSlB8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwGN-G_wphs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKVrxHEd5Cs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=or_oJaWFwDQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoxA_NAnBu8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdf-GNi-S2Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xFNDFvzNNs
>>334834290
Honestly buddy, this just really doesn't appeal to me. It's decent, good for a game, but as far as music goes it's not what I'd listen to outside of playing a game.
>Sony decides to make a Sony game into a Sony movie
>Don't use Sony Animation for it
What the fuck?
>>334834376
I'm 18 actually
>>334834731
Rainmaker isn't too bad, though. It is made up of people who created Reboot, so it's not like they lack experience.
>>334834873
Reboot was over 20 years ago. All they've made since the barbie direct to DVD movies and Escape From Earth.
>>334834456
That really is forgettable. You could put that in just about any kid's 3D movie and it would fit, albeit be incredibly bland.
Compare that with how unique the music of the original was.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRse865NWPc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW4dPmpEZX0
https://youtu.be/fLkZ-2nGVRg?list=PLVB_eSjmeKzdNFECvbJ4goVouk_-22Z1x
https://youtu.be/D-2JsjT9Qfk?list=PLVB_eSjmeKzdNFECvbJ4goVouk_-22Z1x
https://youtu.be/AaQ6YoqLp-0?list=PLVB_eSjmeKzdNFECvbJ4goVouk_-22Z1x
https://youtu.be/HThIaYGq0m4?list=PLVB_eSjmeKzdNFECvbJ4goVouk_-22Z1x
https://youtu.be/ic9-gMdKZ0I?list=PLVB_eSjmeKzdNFECvbJ4goVouk_-22Z1x
https://youtu.be/K2U0_wiaFyI?list=PLVB_eSjmeKzdNFECvbJ4goVouk_-22Z1x
>>334835343
They have to make money somewhere. And the only reason the Barbie films looks like they do is because they're made on shit budgets and "trying" to emulate the look of the toys.
>>334811436
That would be Spider-Man 2. Only Sonyggers will tell you any different.
>>334835637
>Sonyggers
Nicely memed, boyo
>>334835637
wrong
>>334835421
Veldin, Novalis, Kerwan, and Rilgar are the only tracks anyone remembers from the first game.
The rest is unintelligible technogargle
>>334835838
https://youtu.be/m5wNglCWWcM
Does Qwark steal the show, once again?
>>334836418
Not so much in the game. He is the narrator, and he's not always present during most of the planets where you work with the rangers.
I can imagine he's there more in the film, but that's a given since the film is probably like 90 minutes.
>>334822171
ACiT is the worst of all the mainline games you fucking retard
>>334836779
No, it really wasn't.
>>334836779
Yeah nah
Just finished the challenge hard mode. I love this game. I put in Dark Souls 3 to play, beat the tree, and just went back.
>>334833931
They were still pretty atmospheric and fit the stages. Now we just have generic bland orchestral music.
>>334836418
No and he never stole the show in any of the games.
>>334837438
I didn't find the new music bland at all. If some people don't like it, fine. But it's hardly forgettable or bad.
>>334837707
Kind of does in Up your Arsenal, but that was sort of the point since it was his redemption story.
As for the Future games, I would say he does kind of get forced into the spotlight at times. Like when he hosts Tachyon's arena in ToD and "infiltrates" Nefarious' lair in ACiT. Still, at least they never forced him to be with us in every level outside of those two shoddy spinoff party games.
>>334837720
Fair enough, I respect your opinion.
>>334837707
He does in Up Your Arsenal. It's his story after all.
Wonder if we'll Talwyn again.
I'm hoping they do a proper sequel after this.
>>334813181
It's literally a remake and a reboot. Insomniac said BOTH games are official.
Dumbass.
>>334840706
So it's a Star Trek 2009 kind of deal?
>>334840906
Kind of. The idea is you're reenacting the events of the movie in the game, while the original game is the REAL adventure.
Does feel like a missed opportunity, though. They could have had it that the remake was set between R&C1 and Going Commando, with Qwark hearing about the holofilm and hologame and then ending with him saying "Only some of that happened." And then maybe leading into him telling of the original game proper.
>>334841279
I don't know. I'm kind of hoping they just do a hard reboot. Don;t get me wrong, I enjoyed the Future games. But by the time ACIT ended we had time travel, recurring villains, Ratchet's Lombax ancestry, Clank's background being retconned, multiple galaxies, multiple alternate dimensions and it just started to get out of hand. This is a chance to go back to basis. Just 2 friends saving the galaxy.
Second place behind Spiderman 2.
But yeah, It's pretty great.
>>334841721
They still need to at least conclude Ratchet's homesickness. They kept teasing it in the Future games and even that comic between CiT and ITN. Just let the little bastard reconnect with his people and call it a day.
Also, Clank's background wasn't really retconned, they just gave a clearer reason why he was created. If anything, it just means he has two parents, the machine mom that popped him out, and Orvus.
>>334842198
I always preferred the original set up. Him being a defect and choosing to do great things as opposed to being destined to do so by being a great time lords son just feels better to me. It's the difference between Finn and rey in Force Awakens. One ends up doing great things by choice and circumstance and the other ends up doing great things because of destiny and the force of the universe pushing her there. I prefer the former over the latter.
>>334842593
Eh, he wasn't really destined. I don't think Orvus knew what Drek was up to, since his job was to just maintain time, not oversee or use it to anyone's advantage. Clank is still a defect since he's not big and strong like most other robots, but makes up for it with his smarts and adaptability. Orvus simply dropped him into Solana so he could experience life before being summoned to the Clock, as he wanted his son to make the choice with a clear mind rather than "I MADE you for this, now fucking do it."
QWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRR-
>>334813454
>better then
How's 6th grade?
