How accurate is this?
/v/ is not one person so opinions will vary. That said, the majority of that list is worth playing.
>>334757038
I don't see no Supra Mayro Kratt.
>>334757038
Not accurate for modern /v/. IIRC this was made some time in early to mid 2012 in response to reddit's top 100 games of all time poll, which was utter dogshit obviously. If you made it today Souls games and Bloodborne would occupy all of the top 5 since it's literally all this shithole board has talked about ever since the Dark Souls PC port dropped.
>mother 3
Try to be more subtle next.
>>334758820
who said mother 3 was bad?
>>334757038
Almost all of those are good games.
The order is going to be argued but who cares. Point is, those games are worth playing and it's not too bad a list.
>>334757038
A great list if we disregard the order, would be neat if you guys could remake it and make it something like top 120 or 150.
>>334757038
needs more bait
>>334757038
I'm surprised that not only do I agree with the first 7 items on the list, I also agree with the order. However, I would place Homeworld in spot 8, Rome Total War in spot 9, and Super Mario 64 in spot 10.
>>334757038
>No Burnout 3
>No Ace Combat
>No Vigilante 8
This image is a waste of memory on your computer, and whoever made it is a waste of matter.