why did this look so bad compared to the trailer?

Because it's a compressed jpeg of a youtube video that's at a lower resolution than the game runs.

File: wolnir2.jpg (103KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

103KB, 1280x720px

>>334710227
it doesn't matter if it's a youtube screenshot or not, it looks awful compared to the trailer

File: 1404363560198.jpg (6KB, 173x196px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

6KB, 173x196px

>>334710398
>it doesn't matter if it's a youtube screenshot or not

>>334709968
Because the trailer was purposefully cinematic. In the game, you actually need to look out for gameplay, too, so you need to compromise.

>>334710227
No, it looks like shit compared to the trailer. He just pops up out of nowhere.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (376KB, 1279x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

376KB, 1279x720px

>>334710398
>>334710636
Witcher 3 looks pretty shit too

>>334710770
So? No one was talkng about W3

>>334710521
How is he not right? The model doesn't change, the lighting doesn't change, it objectively looks a lot worse.

>>334710770
So we've established they both look like horseshit, what's your point? That Souls games need to be railed on just as hard as Witcher 3? I'm all for it.

>>334710398
The boss was pretty fun though.

>>334711008
but easy...

>>334711176
Like most gimmick bosses

Massive downgrade.