>so badly optimised that it makes Quantum Break seems like it was made by the god of programming
>tons of bugs that will never be fixed
>clunky unresponsive control
>same boring uninspired combat like Assassin's Creed except now played in slow motion to please the iPhone generation
>mindless casual dudebros still continue to buy every sequel every year
1.10 patch will fix everything :)
not even trying
>>334492427
this thread will get +100 replies and I can't do shit to stop it
>>334492427
(you)
>>334492427
yeah
>>334492547
>>334492542
>>334492491
Look the from drones are already here to damage control.
>>334492595
>anyone that doesn't agree with me is a fromdrone reeeeee
>>334492662
Agree with what?
There isn't even a single counter argument posted yet.
>>334492427
>60€
>takes 30 hours to complete
>Rest is in DLC
>>334492595 (You)
How many more d'you need, anon?
I dislike the game, but if you're starving for a fish I can throw you a (you) until you find proper bait
>>334492427
>so badly optimised that it makes Quantum Break seems like it was made by the god of programming
so you're poor? good to know
>tons of bugs that will never be fixed
not that many and ds2 got fixed evetually
>clunky unresponsive control
now that's just bs. this is most fluid ds yet
>same boring uninspired combat like Assassin's Creed except now played in slow motion to please the iPhone generation
not worth a reply
>mindless casual dudebros still continue to buy every sequel every year
ok?
>>334492595
>Tell someone that their opinion is shit
>"OHHHHHHH DAMAGE CONTROL!!"
>>334492427Does it run on a toaster?
>>334492996
Laptop, R9 M265X here, it runs.
Barely, like sub-30fps most of the time, but it runs. At least it's not as bad as Dark Souls PC 1.0 was, but neither is it totally toaster friendly like DaS2 was.
>>334492427
I've no problem with the game but the fanbase is really what annoyed me.
When will those retards learn how to post in /vg/ and not spamming this board with 5 threads an hour.
>>334492427
lol
