is there anything wrong with this pose?
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: is there anything wrong with this pose?
is there anything wrong with this pose?
its boring
>>334153576
nope.
>>334153576
Makes it look like someone just told her she's got something on her back.
>>334153576
she's proud of her ass. i can respect that. males show off their muscles and it's called "personality," but a female proud of her body? "Totally unnecessary!"
>>334153576
inciting anal rape
It makes my wife's gay son sexually confused
>>334153576
does that look like the pose of a woman who is 95% full of spunk? didn't think so, shitlord
Doesn't highlight her ass enough, hope it's changed
>>334153576
Sexuality is wrong UGHHHHHHH
>>334153970
Why does first post always get it right. New pose is better than all her other ones and is sexier than the one they removed.It's still not really sexy, but it's more than it used to.
>>334153576
she doesnt look like a man, which according to 3rd wave feminists all women should look like men
>>334155447
whats a 3rd wave feminist?
Fixed.
>>334156834
wow what a baahabibat
>>334156834
halal/10
>>334159138
Whoops saved.
>>334159138
>>334159138
Yes she is fat.
>>334159138
THICK
H
I
C
K
>>334159395
And a chink.
Why do feminists complain about shit like this and then do slutwalks to show that they can dress how they want without being judged? How the hell does that make any sense?
>>334153970
This guy got it right.
Not only is the new pose more interesting, it's also more sexual, and I love it for that.
>>334153576You can't refute this
>>334159138
Fixed
>>334159138
>>334159372
>>334159462
>women
>sense
>pragmatism
>brain
>>334159569
Where can i buy these?
>>334159458
Except chinks don't look like that.
>>334159569
she taps them like how mario jumps on goombas
>>334159504
>take the lazy way out when posing your characters! Keep it flat and stiff, no dynamic poses!
You can always count on Dobson.
Plus she totally changes height from the first panel to the second.
>>334156834
I find full body burka hot and I ain't ashamed of it
>>334159138
is there a nude model for D.Va?
>>334159673
Fuck off, raghead.
>>334159686
I don't know why this keeps getting posted (probably americans) but there's nothing appetizing about having fucking bagels for a pancake.
>>334159138
source?
>>334159138
... this is porn, right? Not a real image?
>>334159686
HNNGGGGGGG THICKER
>>334159868
>projecting faces on food because of your sexual frustration
>jannies delete cutie pudgemonster
Confirmed for Irishmen.
>>334159779
>bagel
Please kill yourself, you fucking uneducated, imbecile.
>>334159504
She is posing, retard
>>334160091
And faggots. What's their fucking problem? It wasn't even pornographic
>>334159462
Because feminists aren't a hivemind that all share the same beliefs. There are varying levels of feminism
>>334160280
>>334160280
>you're forced to eat it afterwards
>you feel the hot butter/jizz mixture going down your throat
>>334160117
>uneducated, imbecile.
Oh the irony.
>>334154087
> males show off their muscles and it's called "personality,
It's called either a) catering to a white male power fantasy endorsed by the fitness industry, b) catering to the sexual fantasies of gay men
>but a female proud of her body? "Totally unnecessary!"
Being proud of your body != I have sexual assets that conform to the fantasies of a specific demographic of men in their 20s - 40s
>>334159462
Different groups calling themselves the same thing.
One woman might call herself a feminist because she wants everyone to have equal right and opportunity, and promote autonomy of the individual, even celebrating women wanting to be housewives.
Another woman also calls herself a feminist while claiming that the previous woman isn't a true feminist, and that she's a traitor to her gender. These are the kinds of people that say all sex involving males is rape, that want to get rid of the concept of family, and basically want to subjugate and destroy masculinity.
>>334160564
why would you type out so much when you can easily summarize your post?
>people who are more attractive than me shouldn't allowed to be seen!
>>334160531
Yes indeed. It's also pretty sad you can't tell the difference between a scone/bagel and a soufflé.
>>334160564
So if I have sexual assets that conform to the fantasies of a specific demographic of men in their 20s - 40s then I can't be proud of my body?
What about actress and models?
>>334160564
>you're not a real gamer unless you play derivative pixel shit indie games
this hurts to read
>>334160608
why would you type out so much when you can easily summarize your post?
>people who don't conform to my beauty standards shouldn't be allowed to be seen!
what's with the australian pricing for this game
it's kinda fucked desu
>>334160449
> you start jerking off to the thought
> he sees it
> gets on table to cum on your face
>>334160740
>he's still posting
>>334160564
>that picture
>>334160740
>That feel when you grew out of your nice guy phase unlike these 30 year old numale virgins
surely a woman will sleep with you after you've dedicated so much time and effort to protecting them on the internet
>>334156834
is that the german edition of overwatch?
>>334160564
believe it or not tumblerette there are men who like to be dominated by strong women like Zarya which do exist in this overwatch game, Tracer is suppose to be Captain America, probably a thumbs up pose like Cammy does in SF would of got the fans up and yelling rip off.
>>334159504
Women do that in real life Dobson you fucking BEAR FUCKER, go and pander to some SJWs to support your "realistic" cause.
>>334160564
Sex sells and since men have most of the money, you do the math
>man I HATE SJWs SO MUCH, they constantly make a big deal out of NOTHING!
>this is only one of 50 threads we'll have about Tracer's ass today on /v/, all of which will pass 400 posts
You hate SJWs because you hate yourselves.
It doesn’t fit her character.
>>334160630
All I'm saying is that the resemblance between the two foods don't mke it appealing unless you're a sick fuck who gets a perverse sexual thrill from fantasizing about sticking their dick in it.
>>334161005
more like i hate them because they're taking a fat shit in my hobby
>>334161005
No one is exempt from scrutiny. Including SJWs
>>334160280
Why?
>>334160630
You should reread his post.
>>334160873
>there are men who like to be dominated by strong women like Zarya
Believe it or not, there are also people who have fantasies involving zarya where neither party gets crushed or degraded.
>>334160449
>not making him eat it while you're pounding his ass
Nigga you gay.
>>334161123
There is a difference between shoving opinions down peoples fault....
And people in positions of 'power' listening to one side or the other. /v/ can spout all it wants, but the louder a group, the more likely it'll get what it wants.
You can't feed a baby if it's not making a noise, even if it's hungry. You go and feed a baby that's screaming it's head off nonstop though.
>>334161170I'm not one of those people.
>>334161123
>Artists who actively support people who shit on freedom of expression
Is there a worse human being?
>>334161170
Well done captain obvious, you have a pure innocent mind. Now go and play with your fucking fairies and unicorns and let us be. Fucking Twat.
>>334161238
If you're comparing yourself to a baby, you're not really paying yourself a compliment.
>>334160848
>british character
>where britain is filled with sharia zones and a shitty nanny state
you had everything set up and youblew it up
>>334160564
This has got to be a joke.
>>334161238
If that's your analogy you've clearly never worked with babies.
>>334161486
were having this conversation aren't we?
>>334161315
>>334161486
>/v/ - NO ANALOGIES ALLOWED
>>334161486
Incorrect, but thanks anyway. You don't ignore a baby that's crying. This meme of "oh ignore it or it'll just do it anyway" has to stop. A baby cries for one reason or another. So you don't just ignore it.
>>334161315
I'm comparing both sides to babies, actually. Just the side that the image claims /v/ is on isn't crying loud enough to get attention. SJW are. I don't care about either side. I'd like it if things were catered to me, who the fuck wouldn't? But I'm not going to stop shit from happening.
>>334161535
nigga if a baby's screaming its head off it's likely very belligerent and will slap most of the shit you put in its face away for a few tries, and then a lot of it'll dribble down its stupid baby chin until its calmed down enough to eat. A calm, hungry baby is easy to work with. Either way, you hit the nail on the head on one point: Both sides are babbies
>>334161616
see
>>334161628
I argue that you can feed a calm hungry baby, and in fact cannot feed a screaming baby because in all reality the baby's screaming and it doesn't fucking know why.
>>334153576
No, people bitching for the sake of it.
So I haven't been following. How did people react to the new pose?
>>334161757
Everyone acted like their faction won and the opposing faction lost. Blizzard sat back and smiled about making everyone happy. In reality both sides are still mad at nothing and happy about nothing.
>>334161616
>I'm comparing both sides to babies, actually.
Well, that's certainly true, can't argue with that. Both sides even behave similarly, really, screaming buzzwords all the time (SHITLORD vs. KEK, etc.)
>>334161842
I have a hard time believing SJWs would be happy with the new pose after people pointed out it's taken straight from a pin-up poster.
In any case, the new pose pleases my dick so I don't care.
>>334161721
That is probably a better analogy.
>Baby is making a noise, but isn't going mental
>parent comes
>feeds baby
>baby goes to sleep, content
>Baby is making a fucking racket, is going mental
>try to feed it
>it just pukes in your face, shits in it's diaper until it dribbles and overflows onto your neck and down your top
>keep trying to feed the baby but nothing is stopping it
>eventually do so
>baby is quiet while it's happening
>finishes
>then starts screaming again cause the milk was slightly too cold or hot, has a shitty diaper, puke all around it's mouth and snot coming out of it's nose
>so you try and fix those things
>it carries on
Former is /v/, latter is SJW. Nothing seems to please them. For /v/? You can release total dross like DOAX3 and they lap it up, even paying extortionate import fees to play it.
>>334161913
50s pinups are empowering to SJWs for some bizarre reason. It's "classy AND sexy". I couldn't make this shit up.
>>334161842I like the change
>>334161947
But where are the extortionate fees in your analogy! I need humorous imagery for your stance to make sense for I am a simpleton.
>>334161757
Like this.
>>334159569
I want to fuck those cakes.
>>334162047
Fucking hilarious.
>>334162047
>doesn't realize its a pin up pose
>discovers it is
>Acts offended
average libtard
>>334162047
>the new pose is fine
>WHY IS IT STILL A PIN UP
top kek
>>334162036
The milk cost $150 in the first set of humour chevrons.
>>334153576
Here's the deal:
The complaint was not made by some radical feminist group, but by the beta testers. The issue was that this one character was being portrayed as simply another sex symbol when her personality clashes with that idea.
In fact, Widowmaker is a highly-sexualized character, but there hasn't been an uproar regarding her poses or clothing. The reason: she is a femme fatale, which completely matches her design.
Look, I'm not saying that we need to censor every female character in video games. However, we cannot ignore the fact that female characters in video games have mostly pigeonholed into very specific, and many times degrading, stereotypes. The industry has evolved a bit, but giving a female character a unique personality, but then dressing them ALL as over-sexualized fantasy dolls is upsetting.
Femme fatale = Sexy femme fatale
Spunky = Sexy spunky
Nerdy = Sexy nerdy
Proper = Sexy, closeted dominatrix
Can you see the problem? Again, the goal isn't to censor female characters, but to give them the same diversity as their male counterparts.
I mean, ffs, the biggest male video game icon is a fat Italian plumber in overalls. Try to think of the top female video game characters that haven't been sexualized in their respective games. You'll probably think of one eventually, but how long did that take? How many times did you think of one (i.e. Samus from Metroid), and say to yourself, "That one counts... no wait, nevermind."
And that's the problem, and this pose highlights the problem exceedingly well.
>>334162047
I bet he edited it later.
>>334161757
Someone said the pose was just lewd for pandering to boys rather than a pose that would be natural for Tracer's character. Blizzard agreed. This sent antiSJWs and 8gag faGGots and so on into a chimp-out frenzy as they started revving up their meme machines to cry about Tracer being put in a burka and so on.
Then the new pose came out and it was still pretty sexy, but more in character for Tracer. Why antiSJWs thought Blizzard were going to somehow delete Tracer's ass is a mystery. And so just because you can still see evidence of her ass existing, antiSJWs claimed a victory.
>>334162149
I think you oversee the fact that female models solely exist as bonder inducing eyecandy because the majority of "gamers" is still male and most of them are around 12~16 years old.
>>334162149
>wasting your thyme typing that up on /v/
Look buddy, I agree with you, but the only responses you'll get will be ad hominem trash, e.g. (ISRAEL!!! SJW!!!)
>>334162149
If "Sexy X" is the problem, why not make Tracer fuck ugly? Or any of them for that matter?
Is it because humanity as a whole is shallow and don't want to waste their entertainment time looking at hideous fucking caricatures of humans doing outlandish shit? Holy fuck it's like the companies want to make money.
>>334162047
>I swear the amount of backlash to a developer showing even an inkling of "maybe we shouldn't sexualize the female figure at every opportunity..." gets completely shit on.
This is hurting my head.
>>334153576
That ass isn't in my face that's wrong.
>>334162149
>a character can't be sexy because i dont want her to be
lol
>>334162185
Oh no, I got the original story, that was impossible to miss.
It's easy to understand why people reacted the way they did considering how Jeff Kaplan responded. But really, if people had known beforehand how much stupid shit Kaplan says on a near-daily basis, they probably wouldn't overreact like that.
Especially if you've followed Blizzard in the past, you'd know this isn't the first time they'd censor something because of a single offended idiot. Ji Firepaw comes to mind.
>>334162269
>the majority of gamers is male
That's wrong.
Also, the issue isn't around what the majority is, but rather shaping games and the industry to be more inviting to people ther than male teenagers.
>>334159504
Anybody else does the 2nd one? I find stick my ads out like that but it's still out.
>>334162185
Again, for the millionth time, the complaint wasn't the removal of the pose.
The complaint was:
1. It took 11 hours for a fucking reason from the Devs
but mainly
2. The fact ONE SINGLE PERSON. ONE SINGLE FORUM POST. Could alter the fucking development of a AAA game. Despite the HUNDREDS of people who disagreed with the person, Blizzard still caved in. That was the complaint. They said they wanted all players to feel "strong" and "comfortable". Then released some dross about "not caving in to peoples pressure and we have other poses ready".
My guess? They just put a Patch/DLC pose in, which was sexy, to make it A-OK. They please the SJW who said it wasn't in character and they pleased the others with ass.
So, tl;dr the complaint was Blizzard gave in to a single persons opinion, despite hundreds of people disagreeing with said person. No poll, no question, no research. 24 hours after post is made, the pose is gone.
>>334162149
>he's trying to make a point on /v/ without just greentexting, shitposting, or using a reactionimage while using ad hominem
You came to the wrong place
>>334162149
>The issue was that this one character was being portrayed as simply another sex symbol when her personality clashes with that idea.
>her personality
She's not real. Her personality can be anything. You don't get to decide how an imaginary person should behave because you are not the creator.
>>334160740
Shit, I'd wear that Affleck t-shirt
>>334162149
Except most male videogame characters are also sexualized. I dare you to name one (that isn't chibi like Mario) who isn't either handsome, muscled, or baring skin. Good luck. The difference is, women are fucking hypocrites (particularly so tumblrinas and sjws) and have literally never complained about sexualized men. But Tracer gets a pose that isn't even sexual at all or revealing (it's her outfit) and people throw a fit because god forbid, we see the outline of a female butt in a game, but blowing people's heads off is a-okay.
It's fucking fantasy. Who the fuck cares if it's realistic, demeaning, sexualized or whatever the fuck? IT'S FUCKING FANTASY.
Fucking people these days, I swear to god. I honestly don't want to see what it'll be like in 10 years, because I know it'll be much worse than what it is now.
>>334153576
The ass is too small.
>>334160740
I wonder if TIIIIIIIIIITS is any good.
>>334162451
>That's wrong.
I don't include "gamurgirls" who play candy crush the whole and the first 15 minutes of any Zelda title.
>Also, the issue isn't around what the majority is, but rather shaping games and the industry to be more inviting to people ther than male teenagers.
Casualization of the AAA-titles wasn't enough you think?
>>334153576
her legs are way too long
>>334160740
This picture is missing something. It's missing the black guy that tried to be friends with all of them but then he gets kicked out and shunned.
>>334162663
I grew up playing pong which had almost no gameplay whatsoever. If I can play that and be considered a video game player, people can fuck around with games on their phones and be considered one too. You've got to start somewhere.
>>334162610
>But Tracer gets a pose that isn't even sexual at all or revealing (it's her outfit) and people throw a fit
You're seriously more mad than any of these so-called "fit-throwers"
I mean damn, look at how mad your post is
>>334156834
fun story
was in germany last week, and i see this muslim chick with her head scarf or what ever
only eyes and bit of face visible
but her body? Some semi transparent dress, while she rocks a fucking 10/10 body with big tits and big muscular ass and tights and cut abs, what a hotie
and im like, its this shit ironic or does she seriously think she looks fine?
wanted to ask but she didnts speak english so i will never know
she doesn't have a thick enough ass for it to matter
>>334162149
>The industry has evolved a bit
Fuck off if anything it's degrading
>>334162792
Get the fuck out.
>>334162671
For a white person yeah
It's the future though they probably got some fucking gene manipulation shit so they gave whites the long leg gene from blacks
>>334162835
>being a thickfag
Kill yourself, my main man. Use this gun.
>>334153970
>it's boring
AND the new one is much better.
>>334162543
I bet you liked BvS too faggot.
>>334156834
This is literally why nobody will cater to you, you fucking overreacting retards
>>334162970
>gun porn.jpg
>no porn
>>334162970
FUCKING TRIGGERED
>>334153576
ITS LITERALLY 2016 UGHHHHHH LITERALLY 2016 YOU BIGOT
>>334162149
Are you saying sexy is bad?
Are you saying sexy women don't deserve representation?
That'ssexyism.
>>334162149
I see a couple problems here, though.
First, Tracer is sexy spunky to begin with, and the pose in OP doesn't change that. You'd have to get rid of her skin-tight outfit.
Secondly, a pose is an expression of an individual, and I don't see why an individual can't want herself to appear sexy sometimes; that doesn't make her inherently a sex-object. Variety is the spice of life.
>>334162801
How dare anyone be mad at people who are advocating and often accomplishing censorship of videogames.
>>334163221
This. Women dress up sexy and put on make-up mostly to feel sexy and good about themselves. Feminazicunts will never understand though because they're upset about being ugly so make-up and shit won't fix that, but they'll hate on people who can.
>>334162451
Okay then, the majority of gamers that this game specifically is targeted toward are male teenagers-twentysomethings
>>334163221
Right. To say a female character can NEVER appear sexy is itself female oppression.
All I care about is the black guy,what does he do.
>>334163403
feminazis in a nutshell:
we're ugly and we're upset that people would rather see attractive people than ugly people.
>>334163131
>Are you saying sexy is bad?
I don't know how you could read that from the post unless you were absolutely braindead
>>334162792
>I grew up playing pong
No you didn't
>which had almost no gameplay whatsoever
Yeah you definitely didn't
>>334163293
Changes =/= censorship
Should people not have complained when they didn't like the ending of Mass Effect 3? Were they pushing for censorship? Get a grip, faggot.
>>334162854
You mean for a human being. Blizzard has an exaggerated art style.
If you could show me a picture of an actual person with legs that long, I'd be very interested.
>>334163523
>No you didn't
You can rewrite history?
>Yeah you definitely didn't
You're delusional. Pressing up or down is rudimentary gameplay. What you're thinking is strategy which is not the same thing.
>>334163442
He speeds around and buffs/heals people.
He's probably the most fun support.
>>334163564
Using the word Changes in place doesn't absolve something of being censorship, if you are hiding something because it might offend people, you are censoring, regardless of context, who made the decision, etc.
eg. the people who wanted Gone Home removed from Steam.
Man, GamerGate really ruined this place. It brought the worst of /pol/ and /tumblr/ here and these people just won't go away.
>>334163668
>You can rewrite history?
I can easily see that you're lying, I don't need to rewrite anything.
>More buttons=more gameplay
Oh so phone games have no gameplay since they don't use any buttons.
>>334161170
You want a fucking cookie or something? Fuck off retard
>>334163741
8gag died so they all came crawling back. I'll never forget the beautiful 2 weeks or so here when the kids ran off on their exodus and we all got to talk about videogames instead of obsessive over twitter screencaps and constant shitflinging.
>>334163741
This, you can't talk about a game without /pol/ bitching about how the black guy in it was put in because of the Jewish Conspiracy, and then Tumble complains about the girl wearing a bikini. I bet they don't even play vidya.
>>334159504
I've actually had 'male gaze' used in a sentence against me.
As part of an actual argument.
That's perplexing to me. Isn't the use of that kind of term like an immediate admission of bigotry? "I am a tribalistic sexist fuck. One gaze is EVILER than another."
How have we let shit slide this far?
>>334164030
You think that's bad?
https://forum.starmen.net/forum/Games/Mother2/EarthBound-s-Misogyny
Why is it okay when women have absolutely no interest in a male character until they're sexually objectified, but men are scum when a female character they already like is presented in a mildly sensual pose?
>>334156531
the current generation of feminists.
1st wave was woman's suffragists, 2nd wave were bra burners.
>>334163768
>only young people lurk /v/
Now you're on about buttons which has nothing to do with gameplay. Are you really confused as to what gameplay actually is?
Ask someone who is /in/ something about the game
>>334164184
how mediocre is it
>>334164102
tl;dr please
I don't have the time to read all that.
>>334153576
You never expose your back to the enemy?
Shit, even a retard like faggot op should know that basic rule.
>>334164102
what a faggot
>>334164231
There's only one female party member, and that's misogynistic.
>>334164102
THE GAME CAME OUT IN 1995 BEFORE ANY OF THIS BULLSHIT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>334164231
basicallydespite that all playable characters are stereotypes, the fact that Paula is the only girl makes it misogynistic as male players have more options to relate toeven though its pointed out that Ness, Jeff, and Poo are bad caricatures.
>>334164310
it's a victory pose, they're dead
>>334164179
>I'm not obviously lying to make a non-point, he just thinks everyone's really young!
You were the first person to dictate that only moving up or down is rudimentary gameplay, by that logic, not even being able to press up or down at all is nonexistent gameplay.
Pretty simple to understand.
If you actually played Pong you'd know full well what the difference between it and Candy Crush is, Candy Crush requires luck, Pong requires you to play well, despite your mediocre attempt at disparaging "strategy" as we all know, gameplay is not encompassed by the amount of actions you can take but rather how you can use those actions, including what you called "strategy" (of which Pong requires none, by the way)
>>334160564
>You didn't reply for 18 minutes you're not a real gamer!
>>334164227
It's good but it's only 6v6. You can't have mad fun with 12v12 or whatever.
>>334159504
shouldn't you be busy starving to death dobson?
>>334162149
>The complaint was not made by some radical feminist group, but by the beta testers
It was a complaint made by A SINGLE forum user, who said, and I quote:
>I have a young daughter that everyday when I wake up wants to watch the recall trailer again. She knows who tracer is, and as she grows up, she can grow up alongside these characters.
>What I'm asking is that as you continue to add to the overwatch cast and investment elements, you double down on your commitment to create strong female characters. You've been doing a good job so far, but shipping with a tracer pose like this undermines so much of the good you've already done.
http://us.battle.net/forums/en/overwatch/topic/20743015583?page=1
Stop lying please, fagola.
>>334164102
world war 3 when?
>>334160740
>life size Power Girl
>insinuating PG is sexist
>>334153576
Yeah, she has no ass
Oh boy... where to begin
>>334162269
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i08CVkBxvBM
>>334162318
Glad to see someone understands. Thanks.
>>334162350
I always love the "extreme opposite end" arguments. Yes, majority of the time you need characters that are physically appealing, but physically appealing does not mean they have to sexualized.
>>334162526
Yeah, I was bored with /b/
>>334162409
Straw man, bud.
>>334162534
Seriously, you're a moron.
>>334162610
How about 5: Gordon Freeman, Link, Master Chief, Scorpion, Agent 47. But again, the point is that the males have a variety while females are mostly pigeonholed. I agree there are plenty of sexualized male characters (Kratos, Duke Nukem, Dante) as well, but the problem isn't nearly as bad as it is with female characters. Also, you are confusing appealing with over-sexualized, which I addressed previously.
>>334162840
"We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas." I fail to see the point of your comment.
>>334164845
DELETE THAT POST!
WHY IS THE PPG REBOOT SUCH SHIT?! REEEEEEEEE!
>>334164962
it's degrading we have plenty PLENTY of no sexualized female characters but all of a sudden people are caring more and more about sex appeal. It's degrading with each passing year. Soon we're going to have faggots like you say how Samus before other M was sexist and other new age radical left ideas make everything worse
>>334164653
It takes one spark to start a fire. The argument would not have gained traction is people did not agree with the statement.
Are you arguing that it wasn't an outcry because many people did not simultaneously come to the same conclusion without conversing with one another? Hate to break it to you bud, but the vast majority of the time opinions are made because of what people hear from others and agree or disagree with them. You're really grasping at straws with that one.
>>334165276
"I want equality, but only if it doesn't involve taking away something I have or want."
>>334164962
>let me reply to 8 posts at once, my opinion on an anonimous image board matters!
>>334165546
The existence of FICTIONAL characters does not harm real world equality period no matter how much you believe it does.
Men can be just as sexualized as women in fiction fuck women have an entire book genre that does just that. However it's existence doesn't affect male equality because the people who are sexualized are fictional
>>334165276
anon if you think that sex and being sexy is degrading then the problem lies with you. I suggest a visit to a sexologist
>>334165276
inb4
>that one charcter
>not sexualized
>>334165762
>>334165276
fuck I replied to wrong anon. Sorry
>>334165407
Your statement was slanting it as if the entire beta testing community was finding it to be an issue- "the complaint was not made by some radical feminist group, but *by the beta testers*". I was correcting that. Obviously multiple people can have a complaint at the same time. However, looking at that thread, the people making the complaints were in a stark minority out of the testers. That's what I was pointing out. Not "grasping for straws", but calling out bullshit.
>>334165757
I feel affected. I want them to fetishize me and not just stupid words scribbled on a page by another dumb girl. Why do I have to be marginalized so they can get their socks off? (Writer's note: the vagina may sometimes be euphemistically considered a "flesh sock".)
>>334153576
TRACER IS A CUTE GIRL AND I WNAT A GIRL LIKE HER TO BE MY GF AND MARRY HER
TFW NO GF
>>334165757
Yep, because no work of fiction has EVER had any real world consequences.
>>334166150
*maximum over-tipping*
>>334160564
>that pic
I almost feel bad for women sometimes
>>334166150
The bible is a consequence of religion, not the origin.
>>334162149
1. you're not Tracer's creator to tell what she should or should not be.
2. she doesn't exist.
3. sex, sexy, butts and sexy butts: nothing wrong with these.
People that complained about this shit for any reason are wrong. Plain and simple like that.
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS NON-REAL THING SEXY!
Just watch me.
Reminder that the new pose is much more interesting AND sexy.
The removal of the old pose was poorly timed and communicated. It wasn't "pandering to SJWs". It was getting rid of a boring pose.
The new pose has much more personality and highlights her ass way more. It's both hot and fits very well with her personality. If it was about pandering to feminists the new pose wouldn't literally be based off a pinup.
What did he mean by this?
>>334166150
What are you some kind of queer?
>>334160564
surely this is an elaborate fake... surely...
i can never believe how fucking cucked some men are
>>334164102
I think that's bad but I think my original complaint is worse because it's a little more-encompassing.
>>334162176
he fucked deleted everything
>>334166341
Seriously, what the fuck is he attempting to say here?
>>334165893
Ummm.... no. You're attempting to degrade the argument with semantics, implying my orginal position suggested ALL of the beta testers. My argument was that there were many of the beta testers that did not agree with the pose. If you want, I'll concede that very minor point and say I should have eliminated the word "the" before I said beta testers.
However, in contrast, you suggested it was ONLY ONE, which is factually wrong.
So yeah, I consider your position grasping at straws when you attempt to argue minor semantics. I'll give you half a cookie for trying though.
>>334153576
It's gross and icky and ...ugh. I literally can't.
I'm glad Blizzard did the right thing and listened to their REAL fans.
>>334166527
I think he means that removing the pose is a fair concession for not being raped as often.
>>334166663
protip, if you ever get mad at retarded, ugly feminists, you lose.
>>334166728
that's some nice kafkatrapping
>>334166806
that's some nice cuckkatrapping
>>334153576
There's nothing wrong anon ~
>>334166894
Go to bed, Timmy. The adults are talking now.
>>334166308
OVERSIMPLIFICATION IS ALWAYS THE ANSWER!!!
>>334153576
It's problematic.
>>334166663
I want to be in an open relationship with that.
>>334166958
not always
but usually the simplest answer is the correct one.
>>334166259
how much smarter was lex than the guerilla?
>>334167017
Usually =/= always
>>334167140
Yeah no shit. I just said that. Thank you.
>>334166150
>It's the book that no one reads that's the problem
>Not the people that run the churches
>Not the political/historical stuff that happened
>It's the book's fault
>>334153576
Why are her shoes so dirty?
>>334159616
Japan
>>334166958
LET'S MAKE A HUGE CLUSTERFUCK OUT OF A FUCKING STUPID, INOCUOUS AS FUCK THING! THAT'LL SOLVE EVERETHENGE!
>>334166150
That shit happened before modern day equality and the human race was incredibly ignorant then.
Current year is way more logical than they were in 1095
>>334153576
Yes, shes not wearing a burka.
>>334162149
Here's the deal:
The new pose is a verbatim copy of a 1950's pin-up art.
Now, people liked the new pose until some witty folks found out it was a pin-up pose. And now it's problematic again.
Face it, it has nothing to do with "not fitting the character". Prude faggots just don't want any 'problematic' things in their kid-friendly M-rated games.
>>334167223
Are you a pseudo intellectual ?
Without the bible, it wouldn't have nearly been as potent at converting people. Just the teachings alone couldn't have redecorated so many religions.
>>334167009
where can i get one?
>>334166578
>One person makes a post on a forum saying the pose is sexy
>few people hop in and minorly agreeing
>SO MANY BETA TESTERS OFFENDED
Go find me the original thread anon
>>334167445
So if you trawl through the internet you can find people who don't like a thing. Big whoop, who fucking cares? Why does /v/ have to obsess over the opinions of a handful of idiots? You're just giving them a voice.
I and many other people would never ever hear about someone being mad about a pinup pose if faggots here didn't go looking for the 10 people who don't like it only to screencap it and bring it back here.
Hell, everyone already knows that the vast majority of SJWs are happy with the change. AND YET dumb kids who just HAVE to stay mad (while accusing SJWs of never being happy and needing to be outraged) go find some people who don't like the new pose.
>>334162047
kek'd
>>334167728
Shhh... go back to your room son. The adults are talking.
>>334167728
people didn't agree
>>334167740
This.
>pose changes
>10,000 sjws like it
>5 don't
>8gag fedoralords screencap those 5 people and claim sjws can never be happy
Meanwhile waifufags finally got the Fatal Frame localization they begged for months for, but without some panties and they sperged out for weeks. But god forbid /v/ acknowledged how unreasonable, childish and demanding they are. Nope, that's just a sjw trait of course.
Pissbabies really embarassed themselves this time.
>>334162149
>""beta"" testers
there's your problem
>>334167504
>The bible is the origin of christianism
>Not the other way around
The writing of the bible was inevitable. Also, if it were not catholicism to dominate europe during those times, it would have been another thing.
>>334168074
I find the word pissbabies hilarious. It sounds like an insult a three year old would come up with. It's possibly the least insulting insult I've ever heard in my life.
>"this pose is sexist!"
>Blizzard's beta testers
Never have testers been so beta.
http://rule34hentai.net/post/view/155771#search=Mei_%28Overwatch%29
http://rule34hentai.net/post/list/D.VA/1
It's D.VA and Mei fap time.
>someone says they don't like Tracer's pose
>Blizzard agree with his point and say they're going to alter it
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE THE SJWs CENSORSHIP IT'S CULTURAL MARXISM FUCKING NUMALE KEKS FAT FEMINAZI DYKES SLIPPERY SLOPE SHARIA LAW IS NOW IN EFFECT BASED MILO WAS RIGHT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>it's changed slightly, still sexy and a better pose
>everyone is pleased and there was no reason to be mad
>SJWs BTFOOOOOO xD HAHA I CAN STILL SEE HER ASS NICE TRY AHMED RRREEEEEEEEEE
>>334168213
I also like "yucky" and "gross."
words I haven't heard since I left junior school suddenly being thrown around by people supposedly saving the world via their internet blogs.
>>334165276
>Lyn from Fire Emblem 7
I don't know if I can give you that one.
>>334168389
>http://rule34hentai.net/post/list/D.VA/1
there isn't enough d.va porn
>>334168452
>people supposedly saving the world via their internet blogs
Please do not insult gamergate
Is DVa the Marie Rose of Overwatch? Her fanboys seem to be the absolute worst part of the fandom.
Can anyone tell me why whiners and complainers started to get so much power in the western world? Didn't you guys used to make fun of soccer moms and religious nuts and prudes in your culture? What happened?
>>334168692
How can anyone complain about whiners and complainers on /v/? Take a look around ffs
>>334166578
>Ummm.... no.
>I'll give you half a cookie for trying
Dismissive onomatopoeia and shitty tumblr memes, what an enormous contribution to the thread.
The only arguments with my post against yours from the beginning have been that (1) the statement "the beta testers" is making it sound like the entire cohort of beta testers had an issue with Tracer's design, and (2) "The issue was that this one character was being portrayed as simply another sex symbol when her personality clashes with that idea" when one of the issues brought up by the particular person was that it wasn't a good character for his daughter to have as an idol.
Anyway I get the feeling I'm being baited.
>>334168692
I love how, despite overwhelming evidence, you still refuse to believe that this is what Blizzard wanted for their game.
Get the fuck over yourself. If the "whiners and complainers" are the ones with the power, it's because they are the ones who are making the games.
>>334168692
In the 90s, both guys and girls liked confident female characters and other "SJW shit"
During the 00s, after 9/11, all media got more conservative. It wasn't commented on, because it happened naturally. I'm sure you all noticed that media in the 00s really wasn't nearly as FUN as it was in the 90s or 80s. And also, during that time the news was always so serious that nobody would think of making as issue out of the portrayal of characters in fucking videogames of all things. But now things are calm again and people are ready for less conservative media again.
Problem is nowadays there's a whole lot of young people who literally grew up in the conservative years and never experienced those fun decades, and to them, this rise of "the liberal menace" is a threat, something scary and new, something that will ruin all "their" games, TV shows, and movies. The majority of active anti-SJWs are actually under 20.
Don't forget, there are people on 4chan who genuinely seem to think that there was no media ever made that appealed to liberals before tumblr showed up. How they'd react to older Star Trek episodes, I'd love to know.
>>334168664
Best girl in the series? Yes.
>>334168547
>gamergate says "yucky" and "gross" frequently
Are you okay sjw-kun?
Bros, how do we remove butts from videogames?
Is there a petition I can sign? And do we have to do it one publisher at a time? This is gonna take forever! Can we petition the government to issue a blanket ban on ass shots across all games?
This is serious.
I'm concerned about how exposure to this imagery will affect mygirlfriend's sons from a previous relationship.
>>334168829
You're arguments are so incredibly flawed I don't feel like wasting my time. These issues have already been previously addressed, so I won't even bother with a copy and paste here.
Go to bed son. Mom and I still love you xoxo
>>334160740
I like how that one neckbeard with the ponytail that posted his face here ended up becoming an icon.
>>334169415
Which one? The guy covered in acne who became a meme?
>>334162149
>The issue was that this one character was being portrayed as simply another sex symbol when her personality clashes with that idea.
How does one pose equal someone being portrayed as a sex symbol?
>>334169761
Yes.
>>334160564
I should really screencap your post and call it sjwbabby1.png, but i just don't have enough autism in me to match you anon. Keep that gg folder going son.
>people are STILL pretending SJWs are mad about Tracer's ass existing when they're all pleased with the new pose aside from 1 or 2 retards
Why? Are you really that desperate for a boogeyman?
>>334153576
It makes my dick hurt
The new one makes my dick hurt even more
>>334169393
>literally posting the ARE YOU KIDDING ME??? argument
>>334161005
Looks like it's coming true, again.
>>334169393
>complete with the quintessential tumblr meme
The jig's up. Why do you lower the quality of 4chan by pretending to be a sex-hating SJW, anon? Why don't you just make some quality posts? You're only shitting in your own nest.
>>334162149
The only women who have a problem with Overwatch are fat, ugly as fuck women who are mentally unstable and covered in shitty piercings. Women who take care of themselves like the look of the women and believe its sexy. Look at everything women fucking do - its to show off their bodies and lately its even more sexually loud with the micro-bikinis and twerking and shit like that.
Any women who hates the poses and looks are just jealous fatties.
>>334170189
I kind of feel bad for this guy. He's in the video for all of two seconds and he became the meme. Then again, he's a dipshit.
I don't understand the "It doesn't go with her personality" argument. Every man and woman has the right to feel sexy regardless of their personality.
It comes with the territory of being a sexual creature.
>>334170420
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvfhmhITkYY
>>334170189
So this is /v/?
>>334170420
Wasnt he the guy who said "your a fucking white male!"? Because that automatically makes him deserve it.
>>334170438
Oh no it's been made for today's children instead of manchildren, how terrible.
This exact same thing showed up in Futurama as well, by the way
>>334170713
Today's children suck
>>334170619
Yeah.
"ARE YOU KIDDING ME!? YOU'RE A FUCKING WHITE MALE!" - A fucking white male, 2016
>>334160736
>Cities: Skylines is a pixel game
Found the fake gamer guys.
>>334160564
Because it can only be fantasies for straight men or gay men. Never for women, right? I'm not sure if you realize the bias in your statement. And why it instantly invalidates itself.
>>334170619
Nah, that's the other guy. Carl the Cuck is the one who says "are you kidding me" when someone asks him to explain how Trump is like Hitler.
Damn dude, gotta study up on your memes.
>>334170863
So if a white woman told another white woman to shut the fuck up for being stupid, you'd think that was dumb too, right?
>>334171315
Trump isn't like Hitler at all. Hitler was an intelligent man.
>>334168909
I do not think that is true. Liberals are so anti sex it is crazy
>>334156834
Now she's a real British character
>>334168340
kek'd
>>334171804
>So if a white woman told another white woman to shut the fuck up for being a white woman, you'd think that was dumb too, right?
That's what you actually mean.
>>334171970
God damn you can tell 8gag is back
How old are you? Seriously? Nobody over 18 could be this fucking dense.
>>334159489
>it's also more sexual
most wrong post of the year
>>334172185
>ARE YOU KIDDING ME???
>>334153576
its rape
>>334172185
All your posts are lazy bait m8
Low effort
>>334172428
>The earth is flat and NASA are lying about it
Are you kidding me?
>LOL ARE YOU KIDDING ME??? xD
Nice try.
>>334160740
>the one guy with robin instead of PG
it's the little things
No.
>>334171970
Basically proving his point right, good job m8
>>334172923
>>334172428
Keep memeing, it really helps make me feel like an idiot for calling you underage
>>334172816
No, no, seriously. ARE you (yourself), KIDDING, ME?
>>334173349
xD Nice meme /b/ro
>>334164718
>sexiest
Ftfy
>>334173183
Make a point with valid discussion or enjoy the memes.
>>334168909
>it's okay to oppress and marginalize people when me and my friends do it
>>334169772
She's posing in the middle of nowhere, just for the player, don't try to sell that as character development.
>>334173548
You bet it is
#JeSuisMilo
>>334170259
Ad-hominem : the post
>>334173640
I'm part of gamergate because I pointed out how you were wrong?
>>334172816
>have no argument
>people point out that you have no argument
>"YEAH WELL I DON'T NEED TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT CUZ UR DUMBER THAN A FLAT EARTHER XD"
Just admit that you have nothing, dude. You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.
>>334173730
Nah he actually meant it
>>334173548
What?
>>334168909
>old star trek
lol kids think TNG is old star trek.
Kirk whored his way across the galaxy and did whatever the fuck he wanted. Moral lessons were ignored whenever it was convenient.
>>334173832
everybody freaked out when GG started on twitter, but people are mostly ok when the Liberal crowd starts doing it
I'm not even trying to sound like a conservative, it just happens all the time
>>334173548
I don't actually know if you were meant to reply to me because I cannot figure out how you'd infer that was my point.
>>334173873
TNG started in the 80s, it's pretty damn old. Unless you're in your 60s or something.
Also original Star Trek was the MOST SJW thing ever broadcast when it came out. Your point, if there was one, is dumb as shit.
>>334168909
Millennials think old star trek is racist and sexist despite being the first major tv show with interracial kissing
>>334173548
>>334173921
>it's not okay to disagree with other people
Ah, now I understand
>>334174078
No they don't.
Are you referring to that one webcomic that some idiot made without having seen the original show and SJWs called him out on being a retard?
>>334173792
Poe's law in action.
>>334174078
I love how often people on /v/ complain about millenials
How is it any different from YOU'RE A WHITE MALE?
Are you seriously telling me you're NOT a millenial?
>>334174210
>google star trek is sexist
>loads of articles saying it was
k
>>334162534
is that picture from anything? It looks vaguely familiar.
>>334159504
Dobson. Dobson! We got Dobson here!
See, nobody cares. Nice hat.
>>334173596
Every character has poses just for the player. Why does this one pose in particular transform her into a sex symbol.
>>334173873
Star Trek aired during the height of the Cold War. It had a Russian crewman and took place in a socialist utopia.
>>334153576
Too much clothing
>>334170515
I didn't see Chibi as the type to be a Trump supporter.Then again, he did do a nice Trump
>>334168909
Good post, anon. It's a pity all you're gonna get is flack from the kiddies though.
>>334168389
>not filerting by futa
>>334153576
its erotic and problematic
>>334174395
Well that quickly went from amusing, to hilarious, to sad, to even more sad, to even start to worry about the guy suiciding or something.
But then I remember the Quiet comic and start to feel amused again.
>>334174073
>Also original Star Trek was the MOST SJW thing ever broadcast when it came out.
By most SJW thing do you mean it had strong, capable characters who happened to be women, or that the show went out of it's way to showcase that these stronger, capable characters were in fact women?
>>334175126
>futa
Couch fetishes are disgusting u weirdo.
>>334175621
Let's just skip straight to whatever dumb fucking point you want to make instead of asking a question you have interest in the answer to
>>334168909
The truth is, there's very little overlap between confident female characters and SJW shit.
Intersectional feminism is a cult of victimhood. It segregates, marginalises, disempowers, propagandises and sows seeds of resentment between the genders, and other prescribed groups. It does all the things it purports to be against.
Self-made women don't need the crutch of a failed ideology to be successful.
>>334175773
I'm generally curious. Did the show ever go out of it's way to spell out that some of the strong, capable characters were women, or was it never brought up?
>>334175905
THIS!
Feminism is cancer! #JeSuisMilo
>>334153576
yes, it offends me
>>334175959
Did Overwatch?
>>334159782
gross butt implant, will you fuck off already?
>>334159868
keked
>>334176134
Feminism is cancer, but I don't know why you're using a hashtag used to describe metadata on 4chan.
>>334161005
I'm just here for the ass, man
My junk praises God for Overwatch
I don't quite understand why this was considered sexual. She's ugly as fuck.
Were the people that complained just trying to flatter themselves?
>>334175959
well no because it was ethnic minorities, not women. Star trek was purposefully set in a future where race was no longer an issue, and at the time that was a pretty radical concept for a lot of people. However, it was fairly sexist, although they did have an episode about a female captain who hated kirk because she got passed over for the promotion he got because she was a woman. But mostly it's just Gene Roddenberry giving his girlfriends speaking roles so they'll do stuff to him.
>>334176352
>hilareous post calling xme out on xmy bluff
Hahah!! good 1 XD u sure got me!!
>>334166150
Wrong book phamalam
>>334176476
Are you okay?
>>334176202
No, but much of the "journalism" surrounding the game did.
>no thick, bottom heavy black girl characters
>no wide hipped dragoness characters
>no whale characters
>no Rosee Divine proportioned characters
>>334159138
She's a fat fuck. Why does 4chan now have a fetish for fat people.
>>334176439
>She's ugly as fuck.
Truth to be told, she really is cute. I want her sucking my junk while looking me up with those eyes.
>>334161050
>video games are his hobby
Lol
>>334162149
>dressing them ALL as over-sexualized fantasy dolls is upsetting.
but what about the landwhale, mei
you can't argue that shapeless blob is oversexulised
>>334159504
But I see girls bend over like that all the time.
>>334176561
So what? Who gives a shit about clickbait? Getting mad about it is pathetic
>>334176773
yes but when is dobson ever gonna see that outside a porno. His whole conception of female behavior is predicated on the body language of women who want nothing to do with him.
>>334175621
It had the first televised interracial kiss. That's very progressive for a scifi.
>>334176561
THIS!
Remember, gaming "journalism" is more important than gaming itself!
Remember to ALWAYS put "journalism" in quotation marks, comrades.
THE FIRE RISES!
>>334175621
>actually trying to spin some wild cognitive dissonance that Star Trek wasn't progressive and liberal
Just stop, jesus christ. They made it as SJW as censors would allow. They'd have gone further if they could.
>>334166150
>work of fiction
gb2 r/atheism
>>334177123
Oh hi GamerGhazi. Here on another raid in an attempt to make GG a swear word on 4chan?
>>334177592
>if GG ever looks stupid it's a false flag
Anon...
>>334177592
>worrying about gamergate's reputation on 4chan
>thinking there's a ghazi raid
>defending gamergate's honour
But let me guess, you're totally NOT in GG and NEVER WERE ;^)
>>334177263
I wasn't trying to imply that Stark Trek wasn't progressive and liberal, but that the show never made a habit of pointing out just how progressive and liberal it was. The show never shoved it in your face that this minority character was a strong, capable MINORITY character. I don't see this "anti sjw reaction" when there are good characters who happened to be women or part of a minority, I only see it when it's being crammed down our throats by "journalists" that these good characters are women or part of a minority. And honestly it is annoying.
>>334177592
If you don't think GG is capable of looking cringeworthy I suggest you search for Vivian James on deviantart, or go look at the current member's activities on 8gag, or even KiA. You won't believe how sad these autists are.
>>334177981
>The show never shoved it in your face
You never watched it, okay got it.
As long as you hold onto your hateboner for clickbait blogs, who gives a shit, right?
>>334177772
Try and tell me the last three posts
>>334177123
>>334176134
>>334173640
weren't sarcastic falseflagging.
>>334178023
I agree there are shitty/cringeworthy people associated with GG. However I'm also pointing out that the person I replied to is clearly pretending to be one.
>>334177887
>worrying about gamergate's reputation on 4chan
>thinking there's a ghazi raid
>defending gamergate's honour
Let me fix that for you into what I'm actually doing
>Pointing out a reasonably obvious false flag
It's fine for you people to say "please go /pol/" but it's not fine for me to say "please go r/gamerghazi"
?
>>334177772
>I've seen this place go from a ghost town to one of the most popular websites in the US
>most popular websites in the US
Who is that guy kidding? 8ch is dead on all of their boards except /pol/ and /v/ and nowhere near the amount of population that Reddit or Tumblr has.
>>334178292
>sarcastic falseflagging
That's called a joke, Anon.
Falseflagging is falseflagging.
"Sarcastic falseflagging" is called joking. And you got triggered because you're literally a faGGot. You took the bait and got mad, good job.
>>334178104
At the very least, do you understand how people could possibly find it annoying when a character's gender or ethnicity is being showcased as the most important characteristic of a character?
>>334178292
THIS! Stop censoring us! If we want to say go to gamerghazi we WILL you fucking cultural marxists!
>>334177981
Nigga, TOS Star Trek was definitely in your face about its progressiveness. There's a scene where someone calls Uhura a "nigress" and Kirk says "we don't judge here". They made it a point that it was the first television show to show an interracial kiss.
There's a whole fucking episode about an alien species where some members are white on the left, black on the right and some are the opposite. They kill each other over this fact and Kirk's like "you guys still look the same tho" and the aliens still kill each other over it at the end.
>>334178592
If you want to stick your head into the toilet of clickbait blogs, don't complain about getting shit in your mouth.
If you were just looking forward to Overwatch like a normal person and not obsessing over the drama around it that only involves losers who live online and get mad over nothing, there wouldn't be a problem. It's your own goddamn fault.
>>334178592
Get a fucking life
Sorry, that's all I have left at this point
Enjoy being mad about things nobodies write about online that you don't have to care about unless you choose to
>>334176558
Poor guy is having an aneurysm
>>334160740
>mixing together Fightingfags, Mass Effect shitters, and comicbros under one banner
These guys know so little about what they draw about it's actuallycomic.
>>334178520
Falseflagging could either be bait or seriously politically motivated, I'm not a mind reader. Either way I'm going to assume the latter and tell the anon to fuck off.
>>334161015
What if you just like fluffy, yeast-risen pancakes?
>>334162813
I had the same thought last week when I saw a Muslim woman who clearly put a lot of effort into her makeup.
Not that I'm complaining but if you are trying, and succeeding, at looking very pretty doesn't that defeat the point of the burka?
>>334169415
They look more like Comic Book Guys.
>>334162970
>gun porn.jpg
>fudded milspec abortion
>>334164102
>Women are special and perfect and need to be represented in everything!
>No I can't relate to children on an adventure, you sexist cis pig!
Are these people even human?
>>334159138
>>334159686
>>334159868
>>334159569
>Americans so obsessed with food they think it's ok to stick their dick into it.
>>334169415
fucking newfags
>>334179326
its sad that GG became the same thing as SJWs but reversed
instead of reevaluating the power imbalance in favor of journos (who dont even give a shit about their ideology, btw, it just makes them more money through various outcomes), they engaged in the same fucking trash that they hate social justice for.what is your magical realm, anon? does it involve big girls?
>>334180274
It involves piss.He's the Whizzard.
Doesn't Work:
>treat women with no respect
>spout feminist stuff
>spout MRA/GG stuff
>women don't want to be near you, think you're either sucking up or harrassing them, you don't get sex and they think you're a bad person.
Works:
>treat women with respect as you would any person
>don't spout feminist stuff
>don't spout MRA/GG stuff
>they like you and have sex/relationships with you and think you're a good guy
Not hard to grasp.
>>334160740
>Literally EVERYONE that goes to comic book stores look like the simpsons comic book store guy.
Makes sense because the artist is uncreative as fuck and has no idea what he's talking about.
>>334168909
I can think of quite a few fun shows from the 90s that would be whined to hell and back by the current liberal trends. The liberalism of the 80s and 90s and the millennial liberalism of today aren't the same anon.
>>334180398
I know what the comic is
I'm asking about what sort of weird fetishes YOU have
>>334180615
The main difference was that the 90s were about laughing at authority. Liberals were the main ones that did this.
Now the liberals want to be the authority they historically despised.
t. liberal.
>>334179693
Oh mama thats a sexy eraser
>>334180615
>>334180901
The 90's were problematic.
Why are people still talking about this when the new pose is pretty much the same?
>>334180586
why is the deadspace guy featured as white? he's black
>>334161253
There literally isn't. There are points that they're objectively wrong on. There isn't a "middleground" in this debate.
>>334181603
>>334176489
Nice try christcuck
>>334182205
Why is Chuck Greene's hair brown when it's actually dirty blonde?
POST MORE THICK
>>334161005
We've passed 400 posts, new thread is almost here! But remember everyone, it's the SJWs who make a huge deal out of everything, not us.
>>334183402
>Koran literally says to behead those that betray Islam and that it's okay to fuck 6 year-olds
>The Bible literally says to love the sinner but hate the sin and that being a degenerate is wrong
Most of the world really isn't okay with the kind of shit that Muslims do. You're just gonna have to deal with that. Maybe if Muslims actually conquered Europe instead of getting the shit kicked out of them by a bunch of Germans and Frenchies, their shit would be the norm. But they didn't because they're garbage.
>>334184105
>show your cheek to your enemy like the cuck you are
vs
>spread your religion and only value your people
Guess who stands in the end, christcuck
>>334153576
it isnt the new pose
>>334159779
I believe these are made by japs, because you make pankakes this way with a rice cooker.
>>334181603
Are you a boy or girl?
>>334170515
The neck guy reminds me of Marc Marquez for some reason.
>>334153576
There isn't, but the new one is better.
>>334184562
Poland
>>334159504
Does Dobson ever do comics that aren't just him throwing his two cents into a non-issue?
>>334179872
>not being a decadent degenerate
Why even live?
>>334153576
It looks really low quality and doesn't really fit the characters energetic personality. The new one is 100x better.
>>334184562
You wouldn't be standing in the end. Since you're not a true Muslim that goes out and beheads infidels and heathens. You're probably gonna get beheaded first for betraying your people and to an example for all the other Muslims.
Your will and conviction isn't strong enough to be a true servant of Allah.
And I'd much rather be a devoted Christcuck than an undevoted Cucklim.
>>334181603
Damn, what movie were they watching that encompasses nigh all forms of bigotry?
>>334187368Ace Ventura
>>334182205
Isaac isn't black, is he? I thought he was white. The one English guy you play as in the DLC of DS2 was darker, though. Couldn't tell exactly what he was.
>>334183534
That bothered me. At least pay some attention to detail in there.
>>334164962
>>334162149
A good poster. Even if you don't agree with what he's saying (for the record, I do), you should understand that if all posts were of this quality and this thought out then /v/ would be a much, much better place.
>>334187804
This just reeks of butthurt. The one where (s)he breaks their neck is a funnier edit.
>>334188034
shut up FEMINIST stop telling me what to THINK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you dumb FEMINIST !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She's a pilot, and now she does a pose that is reminiscent of those drawings of women that they had on the side of planes in WW2.
So the new pose fits her character.
>>334162149
are you saying all women of all types arent sexy?
are you fucking retarded? theres nothing wrong with a sexy nerdy girl or sexy proper girl or sexy fat girl, all girls are sexy and for you to say they shouldn't be sexy because your some fat hair hambeast in real life is bullshit
get a life, and or just do the world a favor and kill yourself you self righteous safe space retarded sjw feminazi idiot retard, fuck off already, nobody likes you
dont bother replying to this, pic related is your only reply deep down no matter what you type, fucking unplug your internet and leave it unplugged
>anything wrong
Yes, I still don't have a spunky tomboy gf with short hair and freckles.
>>334171918
either you pro or anti trump the fact remanis that trump is intelligent too.
>>334180274
>eevaluating the power imbalance in favor of journos
This is not a thing. If you're surprised that corrupt rag "gaming" magazines turned into corrupt clickbait adfests, you deserve what you got. Just buy the games you like and pay any mind to the literal shills.
>what is your magical realm, anon?
see
>>334180274
>>334180856/ss/, femdom, furries, impregnation, mindbreak, incest, cuntboys, THICK
>>334184105
The God of the Bible literally cuckolded a guy by raping his 13-year-old virgin wife. If you follow God's example, you are a degenerate.
>>334181603
post the edit where they fucked up her face even harder
>>334189169
trump is not smart, just like you
>>334159504
Stupid fucking bear. I don't know what it is, but it infuriates me in every comic this guy draws. Acting like he isn't a fat piece of shit.
>>334188568
>>334188765
Screencapped because I hate tripfags.
>>334162149
Widowmaker's current personality is the result of brainwashing. You're practically a rapist if you think sexualizing her is at all okay.
>Widowmaker is hypnotized into acting sexy
You people think this is fine.
>Tracer willingly acts sexy
You people think this is evil.
Explain yourself. To me, it seems like the advocates of so-called social justice are simply terrified of women having sexualities. You're stating that good women are supposed to be "pure" and "innocent" and only evil characters can be sexy. Fuck men like you, and fuck what you're doing to impressionable girls.
>>334190254
>Widowmaker is hypnotized into acting sexy
>>334190190
>I, "Don't hate just inflate" Dobson, am comparable to Leonardo Fucking Da Vinci
>>334190440
Read her Wiki page. She was a loving wife who was kidnapped, mentally broken, and hypnotized into assassinating her husband. She's essentially a hentai character. Apparently, that's the kind of character SJWs are okay with sexualizing.
>>334160564
>>334160740
>>334161123
>>334164962
>>334168396
>>334168909
>>334173640
>>334176134
>>334177123
>>334177772
>>334178665
Remember /v/, this is what samefagging SJW shills look like.
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/filename/ggbabbys3.png%20/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/filename/ggbabbys.jpg/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/image/foJc_Aoepn2CkgcUag2jMw/
https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/image/FvPp1soudNlP5ABO1VVEhQ/
https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/text/%22In%20the%2090s%2C%20both%20guys%20and%20girls%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/image/ytAzbc9im5oQXAvtFwM8lg/
https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/image/_XuEv7oY_D02mV6QKoQgIw/
https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/image/rlSo56JURB6QQc1eEAAAsg/
https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/image/74YZvjHHiyflIXhIE-HgEg/
https://boards.fireden.net/_/search/image/MOHFb_E-GQlOdxnqEKp8ZA/
>>334190913
>SJW shill
>Not someone just baiting the shit out of youIt worked
>>334191095
No anon, it's called political propaganda. They do this on every website, including 4chan since the anonymity, light moderation, and ephemerous nature of the board (making it easy to repost the same shill posts in every new thread while claiming they're original) makes it easy.
Calling it "baiting" and "trolling" is just the way you have to cope with the fact that your board is being used for social engineering.
>>334191060
Noice.
The futuristic looking crocs ruin the character for me.
Crocs are for faggots
>>334160740
There's something like 2-3 times as many fat white guys in this picture as there are diverse men/women/whatever outside. Is it not better to cater to them than it would be to shut them out in favor of a hypothetical 'new audience' who, let's face it, doesn't care enough to support your product (pic related) It's basic business.
I don't know who the dumbass who keeps making these awful comics is, but he's the absolute worst at delivering a consistent point.
>>334191348
yep you say a thing against feminism usually the thread is closed
>>334191348
This is a really funny image because it implies white feminists care at all about nonwhite feminists.
>>334191684
>Their sales have been dwindling further and further for years and no amount of rebooting or movie/game adaptation has done anything to stop it.
Gonna play doubles advocate here but this is just untrue. Shit's on the rise all across the board and even to the smaller companies.
>>334191934
Only select comics, shit like fucking Squirrel Girl or Fem Thor? Nope.
Of course comics such as Deadpool and Avengers are always going to sell decently well, but majority are selling like utter shit.
>>334191348
Jesus christ, get a grip
>>334192384
Fem Thor is actually selling more than God of Thunder was doing prior to this. Marvel works on the rule of "People buy shit if they are angry". Don't know why, but that's just the way it is and why Spider-man consistently gets shit on for years. People love to be angryThen again, that's basically what /v/ is for.
>>334191348
But no anon! It must totally be bait! It couldn't possibly be anything else!
/pol/ is frequently accused of spreading propaganda on other boards, but SJWs, on the other hand, would do no such thing! You're silly for suggesting that!
>>334191348
I almost wrote a reply about why you're a massive retard, then I realised you're just the falseflagging baiter again.
Really good, though. 9/10. I almost thought your autistic paranoid fedorapost was genuine.
>>334176743
>Not wanting to bang a thick chick from behind as hard as you can and watch those waves. More cushion for the pushing.
Ur a faggot.
>>334160740
>/v/ the store
>>334192576
>even though every second thread on /v/ is filled to the brim with anti-SJW posts, /pol/babies insist that SJWs are here and brainwashing everyone into agreeing with them
Is there a name for this form of insanity? A handful of posts making fun of GG autism does not mean you are being brainwashed into becoming a numale cuckold or whatever.
But of course me saying that will just make you dig your heels further into the ground. Me trying to reason with you is just more proof that they're here and coming for your thoughts, isn't it?
Enjoy your life spent jumping at shadows, you sad prick.
>>334159372
>>334159569
>>334159616
I think those are this:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVvPOE-C7AE
>>334191684
>That's for saying "feminist" like it's a four letter word
wut?
>>334168909
How much did the world REALLY change after 9/11, though, aside from people seeing Middle-Easterners as "funny Aladdin people who sell you fake watches" to "bloodthirsty bomb-lovers," and a rise in airport security?
I was 10 years old on 9/11, so besides Nickelodeon, Pokemon, Fruitopia and tie-dye shirts, I'm a bit ignorant on what "the good old days" were.
>>334192576
The funny part is that the "/pol/" boogeymaning was started by SJWs. They started calling anyone who said anything politically incorrect or criticized SJWs on 4chan "/pol/" so they could contain "hate speech" on one board (divide and conquer).
Then newfags come in, they see people calling anyone who hurts their feelings "/pol/" so they just mindlessly repeat it until the board is full of SJWs and people think it's completely normal.
Another form of social engineering. Although it doesn't help that people from /pol/ sometimes do leak on other boards.
>>334193000
In the comic, there's a fat SJW character who writes fanfiction about a female Thor, and this is one of the things she rants about.
/pol/tards didn't even read the fucking comic.
>>334193139
But I don't get the four letter word part. Is she saying "That's for saying "feminist" like it means "cunt""?
In that case, "That's for saying "feminist" like it's an insult" would have made a lot more sense. The former implies that all four letter words are bad.
>>334192924
I'm agreeing with you, idiot! Are you fucking paranoid or something? And you call me the stupid pissbabby! Incapable of reading a simple post? Go hang your head in shame.
>>334191348
is that a reference to 1984
>>334193357
>"That's for saying "feminist" like it's an insult"
Yes, that's what it means.
>comic book writing sucks
Nothing new there.
>>334159504He's kinda right, though. At least, not for drawers that high. Lower drawers, yeah.
inb4 Hi, Dobson.
>>334193683
I bet you just read it for your English class, right?Or will that be next year?
>>334193139
Sauce?
>>334190474
Where does he say that?
>>334191348
Just laugh and mock them, regardless of whether they're getting paid pennies for it or doing it because they actually believe their liberal shit.
>>334192924
What do you call this then? >>334190913
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22those%20are%20CLEARLY%20false%20flags%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22why%20are%20so%20many%20people%20terrified%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22Tell%20me%20more%20about%20how%20GamerGate%20doesn't%20harass%20people.%20%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22fuck%20free%20speech%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22more%20pol%20shit%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22You%20need%20to%20convince%20the%20middleman%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22You%20could%20tell%20me%20how%20evil%20the%20sjws%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22waifushit%20and%20otaku%20pandering%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22the%20amount%20of%20times%20people%20in%20the%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22you%20say%20no%20you're%20a%20sjw%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22now%20full%20of%20republicans%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22censorship%20it's%20capitalism%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22all%20we%20want%20is%20politics%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22this%20is%20why%20the%20idiotic%20gamer%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%228gag%20came%20back%20because%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/filename/reddit%20is%20the/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22screaming%20butthurt%20tumblrinas%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22lost%20without%20their%20bubble%22/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22i%20mean%20how%20do%20you%20look%20at%22/
https://foolz.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22Everything%20posted%20on%20GamerGhazi%20is%20perfectly%20reasonable.%20%22/
https://foolz.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22gamergate%20tried%20to%20kill%20my%20friend%22/
Her butt looks sort of flat.
>>334194771
Honestly, that's what fit white girl asses look like.
>>334194592
This is sad. And I don't mean you having all these links, that's great, but that these lowlifes actually post this day in day out trying to change anons' minds. They're even lower than the most autistic NEET /v/irgin.
>>334153576
only blizzard making some srious damage control
>>334189597
>13-year-old
She was more like 15 years old which was the legal age at that time. The Jap's have their age of consent at 13 so I don't know what point you're trying to make there is.
>rape
Just because you say something, doesn't mean it's true.
>cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck
You can stop now. I get it, you're really cool because you use the word that the other cool people on the site use.
Sorry that the Bible doesn't give you permission to be a degenerate.
>>334194592
Dedicated trolls. They've been around for ages, they're just getting called a different name now.
i want sjws and ggers to leave /v/
>>334195161
>w-we're just trolling!
See: >>334191348
>>334194592
Someone is baiting you and you're taking it.
Again, if you can take your tinfoil hat off for a second, you'd see that whoever is doing that is just getting a rise out of autists. I mean fuck, most of it is just GG bait. Who cares?
The fact that you equate this stuff with some sort of political agenda in disguise speaks volumes about how far off the deep end you are and nothing else.
>>334194592
Compiling that list is way more sad and pathetic than anyone just copypasting some bait. How many more antiSJW images do you have on your harddrive, Anon? Sad 8gag died?
She has pants on
>>334195785
>The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing was convincing the world he didn't exist
>>334195935
>pathetic
>tinfoil
>GG
>8gag
>/pol/
>fedora
>autist
>KiA
Always the same buzzwords with you faggots.
>>334153576
It's not sexy enough.
>>334184853
That's more like it!
>>334196095
We posting reddit screencaps now?
>>334196292
I only used two of those. C'mon Anon, it's no fun arguing on /v/ if you're that stupid.
>>334196436
I think this is just more of a problem with /v/s general attitude that attracts people like this. Shit memes and such.
>>334196436
can't say i'm surprised after threads like these
>>334161005
Over 500 now. But we're not like those crybaby faggots who make mountains out of molehills. Nope.
>>334159504
The elbow only moves up and down silly bear
>>334196436
I'm 26 and shitpost from work.This really isn't how I thought my life was going to turn out.
>>334196657
The real appeal of /v/ for dumb kids is nobody here ever has to discuss or think about anything. Look at this thread. How many posts are someone making a point? How many posts are even about OP? But how many are someone accusing someone else of being either /pol/ or SJW, or some equally worthless shitpost. How much of this thread is worth anything at all? How many posts look like the poster took more than 2 seconds deciding what to say?
On /v/ nobody has to think about anything. Just skim a post, decide what meme to throw at them, and post it. The end. One person in this thread thought he'd try and discuss the actual topic at hand, >>334162149, and it was a waste of time.
This suits kids fine because it means kids won't have their dumb ideas challenged, so they'll never feel stupid. There's no debate here, only shitposting. Whatever you believed when you came in, you think the exact same thing when you go. Only you're a little more pissed off and maybe would like to fuck a pancake.
>>334197148
Hello fellow workposter, I too am shitposting from work.
>>334197227
I'll be honest, I mostly come to /v/ for LOL threads and to gather doujin links and names for fapping when I get home.
>>334197384
Are you me? I have a notepad on my phone specifically for sadpanda links that I save for later.
>>334197384
>>334197528
Is that all you do with your time? You guys sound like you're the real sad pandas.
>>334197195
10/10 post desu
>>334197195
>and it was a waste of time.
SJW posts don't deserve any consideration, arguing with them is just a waste of time. People are tired of doing that especially after all these years, it never amounts to anything.
And mostly It's all pseudo-intellectual retardation to justify pushing an agenda. They don't actually really feel a certain way, they see something that aligns or doesn't align with their politics and then go from there to make up arguments to justify changes.
Also this wasn't about beta testers.
>>334170619
No that's the other guy, Aids Skrillex.
>>334197829
>upvote
>desu
Hello Rebbit.
>>334197384
>>334197528
Guys you sound like you have it worse than fucking hikki NEETS. Please hang in there.
>>334197824
Things don't just finish immediately. One monitor has my work and the other has 4chan for when I'm waiting. My coworkers do the sameexcept one posts on 8ch.
![kirkuhura[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Dop7A3c.jpg "kirkuhura[1]")
