Dark Souls 3 PC
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: Dark Souls 3 PC
I-I-I got bad news PC-bros...
suck gameworks.
fake
Seems more or less what one would expect. Around PS4 hardware getting 30 fps with drops. Isn't too bad for a company that can't optimize their way out of a paper bag. And I'm guessing max quality is higher than what the PS4 is running at.
>tfw sli 970
what the fuck
surely my 980 will do better than that
Is the bad news that I can run it at framerate cap?
That's great news, actually.
>bought a $200 GPU less than a year ago
>can't even max out the newest Dark Souls of all things
>consoles are holding back gaming
>wahh why cant my mid range card from 2014 max out a new release
>>333324205
>28 fps on 760
killing myself
>>333324995
>Around PS4 hardware getting 30 fps
>i7 5960 + 32GB ram
around
>>333325156
200$ GPU, that's your problem
>>333324205
>390 isnt on the list
i aint even mad
>>333324205
>falling for this falseflagging
>>333325261
R9 280 OC'd shouldn't be having issues with a graphically shit game as DS3
>>333325228
it's not going to be a cpu intensive game, that doesn't even matter
>>333324205
Shitty Japanese ports
>>333325228
GPU wise. Not sure how much the CPU or ram are affecting the framerate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NH-VBoACE0
how can you explain this shit then
>>333324205
>graphics aren't improving but the fps keeps decreasing
Greatest gaming generation.
>>333324205
So am I good or what?
>>333325192
>my mid range card from 2014 can still break 30fps
not even madand not even going to play this trash
>>333324205
>the only single card setups that will max out DaS3, a fucking console ported game, are flagship cards that cost more than an entire console
>flagship Nvidia cards don't even hit 60 FPS average
What the everlasting fuck am I reading
I don't have a spongebob rare enough for this
frame rate is probally capped at 60. probally something to do with physics.
>>333324995
>7970s hitting the target framerate for the Console version
Yeah, it'll be fine.
Slightly worse looking game at 60fps on older hardware > 30fps cap with dips being literally your only option on console
>>333325337
Still shit
>>333325228
>RAM
>Relevant
lol.
Have to say that i'll be rather salty if I can't even get 60fps maxed out though.
>>333324205
Medium looks exactly the same as max so whatever, dropping the settings to get 60 is an absolute must because souls games play like ass at 30fps
>>333325337
>30 fps with 750 ti
PC STILL WINS
tfw 7870
Game doesnt even look good, da fuck is going on
>>333325476
aren't consoles only able to get up to 20-29 fps as usual?
>>333325752
more like 15-25.
>>333325403
the ps4 gpu is around the 750ti in terms of power, everything else is worse than that setup.
but it runs at 30 fps, not 20
the image is fake as fuck bro
>>333325712
The image is fake man.
>>333324205
What is it with people posting tons of fake bullshit about DS3 performance lately?
>>333324205
Irrelevant, day one patch is coming when the game is released next week.
>>333325868
>>333325928
being this delusional
>>333325640
Considering no 750ti owner has a top end processor like that, it's probably worse.
>>333325640
>tfw 750ti
>>333325956
It isn't fake, but it also doesn't have the day one patch that improves performance.
![15-ways-to-tell-that-a-guy-really-likes-you6[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/YQx4c47.jpg "15-ways-to-tell-that-a-guy-really-likes-you6[1]")
>>333324205
>GEFORCE GTX 750 ti 2 GB - 17 FPS
poorfag piratekeks on suicide watch
>>333326016
Well I got a i5 4440 3.1ghz, so I am the exception to your rule I guess.
>>333325337
are any of those 60 fps cards in the 200-300 dollar range?
>>333326012
>>333326054
But it actually is fake. OP posted the 1440p benchmark.
>>333325712
7870 bro
our card is great
>>333325463
Send help
>>333324205
Where's the R9 390?
>>333326137
You can probably get a 780Ti used for $200
>>333326012
>>333326054
There's a video in the effin thread showing where a guy is running it with a fucking 950.
If the OP is correct a 950 performs just aswell as my 970 strix.
This is the real one for GTX 750 ti users
>Mfw 780 ti still going strong
>>333326246
>used
does this matter?
>>333326054
>>333326253
There's also this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzVttaQVWEg
>mfw I still have a 6850
/v/ you guys told me that I wouldn't be fucked
At least I can still run SOTFS 60fps I guess
>>333326162
>But it actually is fake. OP posted the 1440p benchmark.
No, it isn't fake. Many websites have performance reviews up.
But as I said, they are irrelevant seen as they don't have the day 1 patch.
>>333325337
>780 still chugging along at 60fps
Glad I didn't fall for the AMD meme
>>333324205
>690 outperforming 980
Never trust the jap
>>333326306
>Had 780 Ti since 2013
>Still going strong
>>333325337
This is also on a beast of a PC regarless of GFX cards.
I have a 750ti and I'll probably get 30FPS with low settings.
>>333326285
>that cpu
pointless benchmark
>>333326310
I don't know, does it? You are the one buying it not me.
>>333326421
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B5/dark-souls-iii-test-gpu
no really, how does a Radeon R9 390 stack up?
where's the pic with the potato pc outperforming PS4? lol
>>333325868
It doesn't run at 30 on PS4.
>>333326409
Performance is ok until you get out of Lothric. Performance tanks in the swamp area.
>>333326416
>6850
I envy you.5670
>>333325337
OP status: bootyblasted
Half the frames, twice the asshurt.
>>333326421
Guess the guy in the video I linked has a special 970 that outperforms all other cards then :^)
>>333326770
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkKCn2B5gEM
>>333326016
>thinking a souls game of all things would benefit from either an octo-core or hyper-threading
you will see the same performance from an i5
>>333324205
Do they mention what area this test is done at?
There are insanely dramatic differences
One specific area goes anywhere from 20-40fps on a 980ti, but the vast majority run at 60fps on a 960
>>333326607
Can't read moonrunes
>>333326613
390 performs pretty well (slighty above the 290) but with dayone patch it starts to crash too many times
>>333325337
>tfw bought my PC with a GTX 690 3 years ago, still maxing most things on the market.
>>333326893
The graphics are there and they are in english though.
Nice try, OP.
>>333325261
Nope, fuck you that's solid high mid range
>>333326824
Still a 50 fps average. Unlike OPs pic.
If it's only this area I could live with it until drivers are out.
>expecting good performance out of a fromsoftware game
it's amazing they manage to make games that run at all
>390
I think I'm good.
May upgrade to pascal later this year anyway
>>333326137
I know I got my 970 on sale for $290 about a year ago
>>333324205
>>333325337
THESE ARE NOT FAKE!!!!!
I just found this video, rejoice 750ti bros
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIOnaDvWHDg
seems to be fine even for low tier card, like my 660 (it should be around the 750ti, maybe a little bit faster)
It's ok
>>333326661
It does
Im getting it on console anyway
Fuck your 50 GB installs, From
>>333325337
Why even play it at very high quality?
There's probably very little difference in this dumb fucking game between medium and very high. But I'm sure it's much more taxing on your hardware. I'm willing to bet most cards will be able to do 60fps at medium quality, while still looking much better than console versions(And running at 60fps!).
>>333327023
Don't try to reason with these guys, they also say that the 390 and 970 are mid range and anything below them is garbage
How the fuck is it this unoptimized? There goes playing it on 1440p
Why the fuck are Japanese devs so completely incompetent?
>>333326253
Where is the video senpai
I don't believe you
>>333327292
Did you even read the thread, or did you just see the op and immediately started shitposting
>mfw gtx 960
>>333326875
Those are the 1440p benchmarks. The real 1080p ones are >>333325337
>>333326981
>tfw still maxing games on the market with HD 5870 from 2010
>>333327551
>He fell for the Nvidia Meme
>>333327419
Japanese devs being incompetent is still a valid claim though. They might be able to make fun games but they can't do their job properly. Even if these are the 1440p benchmarks they are still completely unnaceptable.
>>333325338
>>333325337
So a sonycuck was so mad he had to lie? Kind of shows how desperate those cucks are getting
>>333327638
They got me good
>>333327551
You must've done absolutely no research you fucking retarded consumer
The 960 is a horrible deal and a shit card
>>333327719
Just get a 70 or 80 card next time anon.
>>333327689
There is a video just posted right fucking here of a 950 playing the game >50fps majority of the time maxed out.
>>333327689
How many games can do 1440p on VHQ?
Even Witcher 3 couldn't do that shit.
>>333327689
1440P is still a meme.
japanese devs develop for 1080P. is it that hard to understand that? consoles are locked at 1080P, and they won't be entering true 1440P for at least 2 console cycles if ever.
>>333325337
>mfw 770
starting to slip, its all dowhill from here
>>333327863
Are you an actual retard? If they optimized their game properly like any paid "professional" should, 1440p would run fine. Just look at GTAV. It looks great and it also runs great at higher resolutions because they actually fucking optimized it.
>>333324205
>tfw gtx670
fuck bros I don't want to buy a new gpu but this thing isn't cutting it anymore
when's the next series of cards coming out?
>>333327782
Tell me, what should I have bought approximately 10 months ago for about 190 freedom dollars
>tfw gtx 745
>>333328047
Off the top of my head maybe a used 290 from something like gpu shack? Or saved and got something that isn't a literal steaming turd for a little more.
>>333324205
I run on an Intel HD 1.5 GB Graphics Card on a 64-bit i3.
I'm totally fine.
>>333327689
1440p is about 50% more pixels than 1080p. 7970 fps drops about 50%. That's reasonable.
>>333328018
>when's the next series of cards coming out?
June
>>333328136
I just wanna play some fucking games man. Every time you say your card on /v/, it's
>Meme card
>Should have waited for X
>Should have got Y
Apparently a 950 can run the game at nearly 60 fps maxed out. I'm okay lowering a few settings for 60.
>>333328306
What game can a 950 run maxed? Oblivion?
i5 2500k
270x 2GB
8GB RAM
h-how fucked am i /v/?
>>333327968
I might wait another year or so.
Framerate locked...... Why do they even try anymore?
>tfw 750M
Truth be told, i think ill be able to run it decently enough. Even if at minimum settings, as long as it's playable, i'm fine. At least that's what i tell myself.
>Tfw 780 ti
>withFX-6300
I goofed
>>333328136
why are you genuinely enraged by someone elses choice of gpu, are you THAT autistic?
>>333328360
Right here family.
>>333325447
Would you not agree this is good performance for a 950? 1080p, max settings, and doesn't go below 30. and hovers around the 45-55 mark.
I think you just want to be angry and argue.
>>333327995
they did optimize thier game
for 1080P. for them that's the highest resolution that they expect majority of players to play their games at. your also playing at a resolution that requires 50% more pixals at once than what the designed their game around. I doubt they ever even intended it to be played at 1440P. that's why it isn't as well optimized. to them it's like trying to optimize for 8K gamming,
you must be the retard, because you don't seem to understand that.
>>333324205
>mfw I have a 980 Ti
time to upgrade your piece of shit computer, kiddo
>>333328210
I guess I can wait that long
who /notworried/ here
>>333328360
You are a fucking drone, if you want to max every game you play just buy 2 980ti and be done with it, but not everyone can afford or simply wants to buy a card to play a single fucking game at 60fps all maxed out.
Playing the game at 60fps or even 50 on low-ish settings is enough sometimes, buying a card at the price of 400$ to play one game you are interested in (all maxed) is stupid
>>333324205
>dat optimization
Wow they literally just got it to run at 30fps then called it a day?
Bahahhahaha
>Japanese Developers
They couldnt even get their precious Final Fantasy not to run and look like shit compared to western devs
How can a game that looks that shit require such powerful hardware?
I swear that muddy shit texture I see in all the screenshots is like something out of Morrowind--a game which looks like the brown moldy inside of a gas station toilet bowl
>>333328373
youre gud m8, probably just cant play on max if u want 60 fps
>>333327157
upping this since I think many people on here have this card and might be interested in the performance they may get
>>333325337
>mfw my r9 280x still holds right in the middle
>>333325337
>mfw 770 4gb oc
Lewl look at the little guy gooooo
>>333324205
Source?
>>333328826
feels good
>tfw no 60fps on my 660 ti
curse this gay earth
>>333328826
Who /worried/ here?
>>333328672
>commercial gpus
you cant talk shit when you are just a sheepminded pleb
>tfw 660 gtx and an i5
Should I bother upgrading? Is their even much of a difference between medium and high?
>>333328884
He could've gotten a refurb 290 that would still work well for the same or less you stupid nigger
I understand budget constraints I wasn't suggesting to go out and buy a 980ti you stupid cunt
>>333327283
Are you retarded?
Those are mid range. Barely. A 980 Ti would be the entry point for "high end", maybe. High end involves multiple 980 Ti GPUs in SLI or Titans.
>>333329141
>/worried/
had you any hope to begin with
Just wait till Nvidia releases their next cards and fucks over the current new cards in future driver updates
>>333324205
Nice bullshit image bro.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NH-VBoACE0
~40 maxed on a 950
>>333324205
>ever trusting paid benchmarks
my HD6870 is supposed to have 10 fps in everything, yet I play everything in a nice 50-60 fps
this'll be no different
>>333329215
>Have to spend $300 just to get a mid range gpu
lmao pc gaming
>>333329253
So were in the clear for the next year at the least.
>>333329154
>commercial gpus
>tfw 980 ti
>tfw 560ti
I'll be able to run it at minimum settings r-right?
>>333324205
>>333325337
What graphics settings are these being tested with?
I need to know if my 660ti can handle DaS3.
>>333329215
Here's your (you), fucking tryhard ebinbaiter
>>333329352
Blame the devs who can't optimize for shit and just rush games out the door.
Or blame consoles for being pieces of shit that can't run anything above 30 FPS.
Sorry boy, if you want high performance you have to pay for it.
>>333329412
what are you getting at
>>333329483
VHQ aka Max
>>333329495
>facts are bait because they upset me
wew lad
>>333329450
I bought mine beginning of February, so far so good.
>>333329286
>mfw everyone is ignoring this and continues getting baited by shitposters like OP
>all these <18 year olds posting in this thread right now who can't ride daddy's dick enough to earn a decent computer and/or are too fat, ugly, and stupid to get a job
Your suffering is delicious.
>>333329882
Same but 980 Ti SLI. Bought CPU/motherboard about a year ago, though.
>>333327551
that card is good for the price
i had that card and maxed all games at 1080p 60fps (except tomb rider game) (yes also the shitty arkham knight port too, game which 970 and 980 fags were all having a problem with)
now i have 960 sli and max all games at 4k and it's still cheaper than a single 970 in this country
anons who care are either underage or unemployed young adults
>>333328884
>buying a card at the price of 400$ to play one game you are interested in (all maxed) is stupid
This sounds like a personal problem
Personally I've done it twice and it worked out for me because I never buy a card for one game and I always hang on to those cards for at least 3 years unless they fuck up.
Neat
>>333330343
>Mircocenter
I'd kill half my family and sacrifice a goat to live near one. I have to get my stuff from Amazon at buttrape prices.
>>333330412
>that card is good for the price
Meh, not really.
It gets beaten in pretty much every game by equivalently-priced AMD GPUs.
Plus, 128-bit in 2015 is just fucking cancer.
should I bother upgrading?
>>333330876
name one "equivalently-priced" AMD GPU, and i'll let you know the price of it in my country if its available at all.
keep in mind:
9604gb: 510 dollars
970: 1364 dollars
titan: 3615 dollars
>>333329141
>videocard has more ram than your actual system
Cute vintage P4 anon
>>333324205
AMD shills on life support
>>333330672
>1000w
for what purpose
>>333331074
Sorry m8, I didn't realize you lived in a third world shithole.
Carry on.
>>333331074
380 should be the closest in price
>>333330720
I drive almost an hour to get to the closest Microcenter. It's always worth it.
>>333330672
>>333331149
Bought the RM1000I, it's p. good. But I also have a H100i so I have to use Corsair Link anyway.
Way overkill, though. Even my 850W bronze was enough for a 980 Ti SLI.
>>333331149
lol i had a 1kw psu once it was a silverstone and blew up after 4 years
what a turd
>>333331016
660 getting a bit slow the rest of the build is fine.
get a 120-240gb ssd and whack windows10on it
>>333331319
Also it was only $110 so whatever.
>>333325463
>GT 740
>4GB VRAM
nigga what the fuck? why?
>>333331074
>970: 1364 dollars
>>333330412
i'm sure someone will fall for this b8, well done
>>333327968
Except those are maxed settings
Just lower a few settings or one to high and you'd get 60 easily
>>333324205
>my fucking GPU is at the botton of the barrel
jesus fuck i thought mine could still hold up.
What is this. game doesn´t even look that good.
>tfw HD7790
Fucking chinks can't even optimize their shit.
>>333325001
>still running sli in 2016 for gaming purposes
It's like you wan't to get your money wasted.
Except if you got both for a pretty cheap price it's KINDA pointless in comparison to a 980 or 980 Ti i think
>>333331016
do you want to?
>>333331202
its hard anon, importing things myself is illegal too
and being a minority(white) makes it harder
right now im saving to go up to the americas and get fucked in the ass by my boyfriend everyday
>>333331258
its available for 462 dollars, if its a better card, then i guess i got told.
>>333331479
>niggertina
at least you wont hate this country anymore because we'll pay all the debt this month
>>333331569
>everyone in 4chan lives in my country
>>333331387
>get a 120-240gb ssd and whack windows 10 on it
>win10
>willing installing a botnet
>>333331569
>>333331713
whoops sorry sir i wanted to quote >>333331593
>gtx 760
>want to play at 1440p 60fps
will i manage bros?
>>333325640
tfw I have a 750TI
What about my gtx 580 :c
>>333325337
>TFW GTX 970
And you guys made fun of me with your 3.5 meme
>>333331851
You'll likely have to settle for mixing low/medium and high settings
>>333331851
you can do that with any card you want
as long as it supports SLI and you have enough of them
>>333326285
Fucking this >>333326508
I bet the game is even CPU bound with such a low end processor in usage even tho it's a lower mid-range GPU
>>333327968
same here bro
you really don't need to max out all the settings though, most of it looks literally the same if you've checked out any comparison vids
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6xTnRRTunc
>>333331593
>>333331846
whoops sorry sir i wanted to quote >>333331480
>>333331918
Feels good mane.
>>333331851
absolutely not, just be happy if you'll be able to run it at 1080x60
DSFix or is that guy no longer doing them?
Whole lotta shitposting itt. Check this out:
https://youtu.be/0cjE0COuQPs
A 950 and an i5 that only clocks in at 2.9GHz having 40fps as the lowest with 3 settings on high and the rest on max. Drop some stuff down to high/medium and you'll easily hit 60fps and the difference will be negligible.
>>333331290
same, there is a frys alot closer but its full of beans and nogs
>>333332320
does the ps4 run maxed?
>>333330036
at least I have all the time in the world to enjoy my games in under 60fps instead of slaving away making money for the kike overlords every day :^)
>>333331713
Is their much difference between medium and high?
>>333329882
what the fuck, you have all the same parts as me.
>>333325192
>consoles are holding back gaming
Such a horrid true, Xbone and Gaystation 4 dont see more than 24fps...
>>333332050
>not overclocked
>PCI-E 1.1
kek
>>333332320
Sounds good. Might still get a 950 since low end Pascal is a ways off.
>>333332441
it's literally low on just about everything
there's a serious lack of proper water effects
>>333332441
nobody will know until someone does an uncompressed graphics comparison to even confirm it runs at maxed
graphics options are not in console menus
>>333332585
AHAHAHAHAHA
HAAAAAAAAAAA
Polaris is here in two months retard keep cucking yourself though do it
>>333332582
It is OC'd though.
I'm to much of a scrublord to do it without GPUTweak though.
>>333324205
>tfw 980 sli
>>333325640
Xboners and gaystationers be like "human cannot see more than 19-24fps"
>>333332013
Well, that's good to know. Some of those settings I can't even tell what looks different
>>333332320
You're forgetting this is all From Software coding, stop judging it by regular standards.
>>333332441
Probably closer to medium or low.
>>333332679
You're retarded. But please, continue to delude yourself into thinking everyone can/wants to have a 1070/1080. People aren't solely interested in the very high end of the spectrum, mid range cards are popular for a reason.
>>333332679
x50 Pascals are definitely not coming out this year.
>>333326661
>did you try turning it off and on again?
>>333333030
I dont know about you but DS2 was extremely well optimized, not everything they make is blighttown tier.
>>333325868
So... this is the power of the Next Gen
>>333327968
We're almost there bro.
geforce 1000 series was already leaked, will be announced next month and released probably in fall. We'll make it.
win
>>333333247
It was also extremely poor visually and made by an almost completely different team. There are already reports of some area dropping to 45 on 980ti.
>>333332816
>>333332582
What does the @x16 pci-e 1.1 mean that my card is in a 1.1 socket?
If that is the case i've seriously cucked myself.
>>333333784
PCIe 3.0 = 32GB/s, PCIe 2.0 = 16GB/s, PCIe 1.1 = 8GB/s
>>333327172
It's the same size on consoles
>>333329141
who /doubleshiftsfortherestofthemonth/ here
>>333333853
Appearently overclocking your CPU and GPU can cause the program to display it as PCI-E 1.1 for some reason. Pretty sure I don't have any 1.1 ports on my mobo.
>>333334027
It's the slot running at 1.1 speeds, not a 1.1 slot.
am i going to be ok
>tfw gtx 480 and don't even know what the performance will even be
>>333326137
get an AMD R9 290 or 390
they're the same price range as a 970
>>333329087
very nice set up. no troll. OCing that processor, obviously saving for the GPU on your build. i would've came if you had 1080p/10 senpai.
>>333334086
Okay, either way it might be the program doing a faulty read.
Gon check it out right now.
>>333333784
x4 won't bottleneck a 7990 so you're fine.
>>333334001
can you even run HL2?
>>333324205
Ha ha ha. You losers can't stop sucking from's dick and then they shit on you when they're done.
>>333334159
>the ol' amd meme
don't listen to this devilish charlatan
>>333329882
why does your 980 ti only have 2 gigs of vram?
>>333334259
yes but my pc collapses in a puddle of vomit if i try to alt-tab out of source games
>>333324205
>tfw have R9 390
>Benchmarks don't give a crap about it so they don't include it
Should I be afraid?
>>333334310
speccy
will GTX 650 ti BOOST run it?
Bought it years ago and havn't found anything it won't do yet. I'm not a graphics whore.
>>333332897
>"Blinking is what happens when it stutters - that's what it's for"
>Motion blur
>5/5
>>333324205
>1920x1080
Got any benchmarks for proper resolutions and not 2006 shit?
>>333334310
Speccy can only read 2gigs of it.
The card has the standard 6gigs.
>>333334086
Okay, I tried the GPU-Z render test.
Whenever the render test is running it switches to 3.0.
And when the card is idle it goes back to 1.1.
That's what it seems like atleast.
>>333334243
970.
>>333334304
but we are not shitting on from anymore now that we've seen the real 1080p benchmark
>>333325337
now its about shitting on anons who made a bad purchasing decision
>>333325640
>tfw 750ti
STILL DON'T HAVE TO UPGRADE JUST YET SENPAI
>>333324205
>770
This is unacceptable.
>>333325001
My fellow African American.
Feels good, doesn't it?
>>333334540
that is one of the proper resolutions
here's 4k
960 here, should I lock it to 30 maxed out, turn detail down and go 60 or get those 45fps? Won't they fuck up gameplay?
>>333334696
Thank you.
>>333334523
Motion Blur is the worst meme in games.
>>333324205
>Claiming master race
>Spending money on razor trash instead of only on the CPU/GPU
Full fucking pleb.
>>333334770
is it the 4gb card or the 2gb card?
either way you'll be looking at 45+ fps on 1080p
>>333334523
If you can run this at 60fps there's zero need for motion blur.
>>333324205
>tfw you'll turn off vsync, put the shadows on medium and suddenly get 20 fps more
Also I'm pretty sure we'll get a day one dsfix or some shit that'll replace fxaa with something that doesn't look like shit, calm down people.
>>333334885
well it is the master race as long as you're rich
now tell me if you had 30k dollars to spare every month, would you get a 400 dollar console or a 10k dollar computer AND all 400 dollar consoles?
>>333326416
6870 here
>7950
>Can't even get 60 fps
Fuck well I guess 45-50 is better than 30 with dips.
>>333329141
Not really
>900p
>high preset
>2x msaa
all you need for a pc desu senpai
>>333334897
I know, I saw the pic and that is why I asked if 45fps will mess up with gameplay or whatever.
>>333329141
Damn anon...
The Pentium D was a great chip but...
>tfw gtx 460
>>333335080
I have PC, PS4 and 3DSXL. Feels good.
>>333334430
Probably. Should be about the same as the 750 Ti if it has 2GB.
>>333324205
op false flagging wow those are 1440p seetings
why are you that desperate?
>>333335401
i read it wrong then
for me, i've never seen at gameplay issues with jumping framerate on the other dark souls
i know people say it happens, but ive never experienced it
i have had problems in games which their speed are based on framerate, but this isnt one of them
>>333331624
>mfw hd 7790 owner too
just oc that shit and it will run better than the 260x
i have mine at 1200/1700 and it tops at 70°c
>>333324205
I HOPE YOU GET CANCER OYU FLAME BAITING PIECE OF SHIT POSTING THE 1440P SETTINGS AND SAYING ITS 1080P FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ALLLLLLLLLSO FIX THE CAPPPPTCHA YOU FAGGOTS KEKS
>tfw still waiting for new gen of cards to upgrade
>>333335568
kind of my nigga
i played bloodboner for 5555h and then sold it and got a new3dsxl and its consuming more of my time than the pc
but factorio is trying to get me back to pc
>gtx 650
>mfw
>>333335080
Why would I buy a console at all even if I was a millionaire? I play on PC to play games at 60+ FPS on max settings at 1440p or higher.
I'm not going to buy a console that plays games so badly that if my PC ever played a game that bad I'd assume my GPU was dying.
>>333335791
Which one do you have? I have a Sapphire Dual-X.
Also, I'm kind of afraid of doing that becauseWarframe is so poorly optimized standing on the liset doing nothing can burn your PC
>>333325361
>buys a shit card
>its the game i swear!!
>>333336014
don't you want to play the good 2 console exclusives per gen?
i have my ps4 right there with just bloodborne and waiting for last guardian, kindom hearts or ffiv depending on reviews
>>333335535
>The Pentium D was a great chip
Said no one ever, they're basically two P4s glued together. I had one and it was a nice room heater at least
>>333324205
I wasn't exactly expecting 60 fps on my toaster anyway
>>333336109
>justifing low quality code monkeys
I bet you love taking it in the ass and paying 1$ for a different cosmetic reskin/model per week.
>>333324205
At least frame rate seems to be EXTREMELY stable going by this mins and averages
>>333336308
>found the amd shill
>>333336398
>found the nvidia cuckold
OP is a shit, those are the 1440p benchmarks.
>>333336308
Calm down m8, OP's image is b8, it's a 1440p graph with 1080p pasted over it.
Holy shit, such QUALITY renderer design and optimization. At least the actual 1080p >>333325337 results aren't as disgusting.
>>333324205
the land of 970
>>333325337
impossible, the game looks like absolute crap, I refuse to believe it runs this shitty
>>333336470
>he took the bait! look mom!
>>333336592
>not reading the thread.
>>333336668
>xdd mom look, i'm winning this internet fight!
>>333336601
Congratulations. Because you are correct. That's the 1440p graph, the real 1080p one is posted in this thread.
>>333336109
if you can run an amazing looking crisp game on 8k on super ultra at 700fps and the new game looks bad and you cant run it at 7x12 at 20fps then its really the game's fault at that point
you're right saying people complain about optimization too much but look at mgsv, no one complained about that one because it looks amazing and everyone can run it
>>333324205
>GTX 660
Wow, I'm literally on PS4 tier here.
>>333336398
but anon the 280 IS a shit card, even the 380 isn't very good
you should have either saved money and got the 290 or just got a 270
>>333324205
tfw 4gig 660
Looks like AMD has better video memory management.
>>333337016
Apparently you're literally retarded too.
>>333325337
yeey steady 60fps for me :^)
>>333337094
No shit, faggot. Why else would I be on /v/ otherwise?
>>333337016
not really
OP's image is 1440p and thats ultra settings, not low like ps4
this is 1080p >>333325337
next time read at least 3 posts of the thread you fucking mongoloid
>>333337087
Wait, what? 4k doesn't even reach 40 on the R9, how is that better memory management?
>>333337487
Nevermind, that's SLI. Goddamn, why must From be so terrible at coding. The game is no powerhouse.
>>333328572
me too, maybe ill buy a ps4 tomorrow for this one and bloodborne which ive yet to play
>>333325337
>YOU BOUGHT A R9 290 INSTEAD OF A 970 TI
>>333337650
>Not just using onboard graphics
Enjoy your inferior experience.
who /playing with everything minimum/
>>333337087
No, that's the game not needing very much VRAM, and the drivers are just caching some amount extra in case it helps.
I have 970 SLI so no bad news here
>>333337050
I know that feel mate. How fucked are we?
>ever single game released this past year runs faster on amd cards
im glad I didnt pay money for nvidia trash
>>333337838
I'm below minimum.i'm sure the game runs fine if SSAO is off or set to low.
>>333337838
I just hope we get them kick ass miraculous performance mods/tweaks.
>tfw i5 6500 + hd6850
is there even hope 720p?
>>333325337
>280x that I got for $100
>still doing this well
I fucking love this card
>>333325476
Wat
A higher end card is about the same price as a console. Of course once you factor in the rest of the parts it's quite a bit pricier. But PCs arent for kids on a budget.
>>333337024
>270
Absolutely not
Read the thread you morons. OPs pic is bait.
>>333325337
>mfw HD 7800 serise
NOT LIKE THIS
NOT NOW
I WAS GONNA WAIT FOR PASCAL
>>333326461
This so much
Don't have the 780 Ti, but if you know shit bout computers, you should invest in the flagship model so like this anon here, you will not be pressured to upgrade within the next 3-5 years, depending on the games.
>Buy a 980 Ti
>Will run everything on maximum setting for 5 years
>10 year warranty
>If it runs like shit, I will buy another used 980 ti and make them SLI
lmao i have a 960 2gb and i can run Bitcher 3 high-ultra at around 40-50fps @ 1440p. Yet apparently Dork Souls is barely above 30fps @ 1080p.
bravo, it doesn't even fucking look good
>>333338897
40 fps with my 7870 is pretty great for a 4 year old card.
Will probably drop some settings and get 60, it's not like there's much difference with the settings anyway. It's still better than playing it on a console so I don't know what you're memeing about
>>333339048
>lmao i have a 960 2gb and i can run Bitcher 3 high-ultra at around 40-50fps @ 1440p.
why lie?
>dual core won again
>>333340114
As much as Bulldozer was a disappointment, games these days are doing absolutely nothing that should bottleneck them when there are plenty of old games that fared perfectly well on old processors, some of them doing a lot more. Are programmers just that bad now?
>>333339772
no lying necessary, turn down shadows, disable SSAO and at 1440p you don't need anti-aliasing so bam, runs just fine becausejaps cant optimize for shit
>>333325337
Fuck, GTX690 owners are still getting good performance from that old gpu.
The design still gives me boners
>>333341407
There's no way you're getting that kind of performance at 1440p, when the 960 barely reaches that at 1080p
>>333325463
I'm the same as you, i think we can handle it in minimum. Sorry you fell for the gaymin laptop meme bud.
>>333342012
Not a gaming laptop but a hand-me-down desktop. Hoping to improve it in some way but I'm not sure what it needs. I'm pretty new to mustard race so I don't know what it's lacking. All I was told is that the video card was a replacement after his previous card malfunctioned.
>tfw 750ti
>tfw I STILL can enjoy master race dark souls 3
>>333325337
>no 390 of any kind
So am i just gonna asume they get the same result as the 290X?
>>333342234
I'm an idiot, i saw a "M" that wasn't there. Sorry.
>2500k/970 probably gonna last me another year
>it'll have to because I just got laid off
I hope that's not real. I've seen a few crow's feet on my 760, but she hadn't explicitly shown her age until just now.
I mean, From is incompetent when it comes to coding, but shit, I expected a little better than a silky smooth 28 fps. It'll break my heart to have to finally turn down one of the sliders.
>>333327968
>>333328418
>>333332013
>>333333369
Muh 770 niggas right here.
I considered briefly upgrading to a 980ti a little while back, maybe crossfire 390s. Not really the kind of guy that cares about maxing graphics though, I easily don't mind sacrificing settings for higher fps so I'm probably gonna wait till this holiday season to see what wacky shit AMD and nvidia come up with next.
>>333342507
A 2500k/970 combo will last you more than a year so long as you don't demand Ultra/60FPS at all times, and if you just got fired then you're really not in a position to. Suck it up, some anons in here are just under minimum and will probably need to upgrade just for this.
>>333342665
Try reading the thread.
Go ahead. You might be surprised.
>>333325337
Well, OP played me like a damn fiddle. I guess my card isn't as bad off as I thought.
>>333342665
Jesus christ, read the thread
>>333342768
>>333342798
You caught me in mid-reply, actually. Still a little hurt, but it's not as bad.
Sorry I can't read 350 posts in a minute and a half like you apparently can, senpai.
>>333342665
>finally turn down one of the sliders.
SSAO mang. The high settings look very terrible.
>>333324205
>all those newer cards btfo by the 690
what
>falling for the 1080p meme
you can't even see that many pixels
where my 1680x1050 niggas at?
>>333342874
At least try to read a bit before jumping to conclusions. Half the threads on /v/ are shitposts
am i safe?
750ti is cheap, overclocks well, and doesnt require a new power supply
it's great for games without breaking the bank, desu.
>>333324205
>>333325337
hide sonygger threads
ignore sonygger posts
do not reply to sonyggers
>7950
You did good, little buddy. You did good.
>>333338654
>>333325337
>29 avg
>26 min
Granted that's max settings but a 750 is a pretty shitty purchase at this time, unless you plan to only play old ganes
>>333344052
meant for >>333343763
>>333344138
it overclocks very well and is cheap, whats not to like
it works amazing for witcher 3 so im not worried
>>333329087
What the fuck mate.
I feel terribly fucked even with a 4.74ghz g3258 and a gtx970, why did you went with a 980ti knowing its going to bottleneck the shit out of it?
>>333344603
>g3258
>970
Holy shit, literally meme: the build
I hope you're enjoying those bottlenecks
>>333343451
pls help
>>333335904
Is it the 1GB cardlike mine is
>>333329087
I fucking lol'd.
Like a midget with a cannon strapped to their back goddamn man.
who /vhq/ here
>>333331713
South African detected
>>333324205
Dark Souls is terribly optimized. No way around it.
while everyone posting computer shit, can anyone give me their thoughts on this build?
Anything I could replace for a bit more for better performance?
>>333329087
I didn't know they made a 2GB GTX 980 ti
>silky, buttery smooth 28 fps with my GTX760
It'll be like I'm really playing on a console!
>tfw running almost 50fps
Eh, better than consoles.
>>333342234
Replace the GPU and you will be fine the i7 is overkill for games so you are fine there.
>>333348160
>MUH CORES
>meme master
>Asus MoBo
>SEAGATE HDD
>980 , not a 980ti
>SEAGATE HDD
>EVGA 750W
Here.
Drink it all.
>>333348160
>16gb RAM
stopped reading
the "I don't know how computers work" build
>>333348160
>amd cpu
>$100+ mobo
>ssd
>3tb Seagate hdd
>750w psu
End yourself my man
>>333348785
>>333348936
>>333348942
time to end it all
>>333324205
this is typical intentional game unoptimisation
they could make it run great on 3 times weaker cards, but they dont want consoles to fall far behind, so they unoptimise it so it runs like crap on 10 times more powerfull hardware
what time to be alive.
>965m
I don't even know where I stand. I was not expecting to run it at max settings and get 60 fps like I could with SOTFS, but jesus.
Was SOTFS being super optimized a fluke?
w-whats wrong with an asus mobo?
>>333324205
Will my Nvidia GeForce 940m be able to run it? Give me the bad news senpai. Even on low 30 fps would be fine for me
>>333349049
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ZvjHwP
Here, just fill in the gaps.
>>333324205
>caring about performance analysis on a game that doesn't have gameready drivers or a day 1 patch
>>333349621
At least one person humbled me
>>333349049
Ok i am the first poster let me give you some real help.
>AMemeD 8 CORES
You dont need so many fucking cores, no one does. Most old vidya uses 1 core, newest ones tend to use only 2. Only engine that uses more cores is Source 2 and the only game that uses it runs 60fps easily with a 750ti.
>Asus MoBo
Stop, they are "good" but they arent reliable, i Have used Gigabyte mobos all my life (like 20 builds) And i havent had problems with them.
>Seagate HDD.
Please no, Seagate has been shit for decades, their shit has an outstanding failure rate according to backblaze.
Several seagates have died on me over the years.
One couldnt manage the stress of being in a CCTV.
One was used in a POS and the faggot lost its shit.
Other 2 were office low-load builds and they fucked up.
Dont even touch them.
Personal preference is WD black, stay away from the other colors they pack shit like throthing and PARKING HEADS, which murder the HDD.
>980
the 980ti blows it out of the water for a not so big difference, if dosh is the problem go 970.
Benchmarks are your friends.
>EVGA PSU
That family is low-tier chink shit, not the lowest explode on your face chink shit but not a reliable OEM.
If you want EVGA go for the Supernova gold family. Or go full corsair HX/AX
Dont touch the green ones.
>>333349929
With the help of that other guy is this much more acceptable than what I had before?
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/VcGhsY
>>333349929
You missed out things like amd cores in general are much weaker than intel. And games right now are all about performance per core rather than amount of cores
>>333349924
Look dude, just go on logicalincrements.com and find a build tier that suits you, fiddle with it and maybe get some higher/lower parts from other tiers. Once you've done that don't look back. The nice thing about pc building is the variety but you can get caught up in fucking gazillion decisions eg futureproofing. Once you've got it set based on that website I just mentioned go out and buy the parts.
>>333327782
>horrible deal and shit card
>gets literally superior in every way performance to the 380 and to the supposed 960 annihilator 380x
top jej
>>333350517
Yeah forgot about how Intel shits on AMD per core.
Still cant learn how fags go over MUH CORES.
But i am busy right now so i just wanted to type something fast.
>>333350451
>Skylake
>WD blue
STOP
Skylake is hugely overpriced, they dont pack enough difference against the older generations to be so fucking expensive
I've been sitting with a GTX 570 for awhile waiting for a good time to upgrade since I've still been able to play most newer games 40-60 fps.
I was thinking about getting the Strix GTX 970 but it always seems like there's going to be a price drop when newer stuff comes out, and there was that whole 3.5 GB of VRAM fiasco, too.
>>333350731
>Skylake is hugely overpriced
It's a leading die size, it's priced exactly how the market lets it be.
?By all means, buy an outdated chip so you can use outdated RAM as well, just enjoy higher temps and lower overclocking capability die to higher die size and higher TDP
Welp even the worst results are better than what consoles have.
>>333350731
Skylake may be on the pricier side but it's definitely worth it. It fully supports ddr4 and the next generation of intel cpu will be supported on the same motherboard. It has a good upgrade path.
More and more games are taking advantage of cpu overclocks and faster ddr4 ram aswell. Digital foundry made a few videos on this topic.
>>333350757
The 3.5 fiasco is a huge FUCK YOU from Nvidia, but the card is still bretty good.
PC gaming´s future is looking grim as Microsoft is going full jew trying to push GFWL AGAIN for what the 5th time?
Also how they WANT YOU to "upgrade" into their shitbotnet, no more cpu support for other OS than WIN10 , Microsoft pc games are going only to the windows store and i assure you that they will lobby to try to damage steam.
Even if Gaben succesfully makes Vulcan and SteamOS a gaming marvel, normalfags wont switch, if they were stupid enough to go full botnet they are stupid enough to not be able to deal with dual-booting SteamOS.
Microsoft is Abandoning the Xbone and trying to shit on the PC.
Nintendo are doing their thing in their corner at usual, coming out with some good shit sometimes.
Sony is murdering the Market with their jewery and bullshit.
We can only hope that this causes a 1983 style crash and the normalfags go fuck up something else.
How will my sapphire radeon r7 260x fare against my first challenge of this journey
>>333326164
based 7870
>>333327968
4GB 770 here, don't know what to think, I usually get slightly better results that the usual 770 benchmarks so I'm hoping that on high I can stay at 60
>>333325337
33fps
3 more fps than consoles thank you based gaben
![[HorribleSubs] Hackadoll the Animation - 07 [720p].mkv_snapshot_04.37_[2015.11.13_19.34.45].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/5pF0nKB.jpg "[HorribleSubs] Hackadoll the Animation - 07 [720p].mkv snapshot 04.37 [2015.11.13 19.34.45]")
>>333324205
>32GB DDR4
FX-4300
4GB RAM
270X 2GB
Am I good? I don't mind playing on medium or low.
Does anyone know the one website that looks at your current build and offers suggestions for upgrades based on price?
I thought it might have been pc part picker but I don't think it is.
>>333351884
>3 more fps than consoles
>3
Hah
>>333348160
Get an I5 4690k cpu, the amd is a dissapointment.
Get a h100i gtx cooler,the evo 212 is great & all but you can do better.
Swap to a 980ti, the 980 is a waste of money and significantly weaker.
Make sure you research your power supplys, it's the lynchpin of your system and if it blows it's taking a videocard/cpu/motherboard or all the above with it.
Also the ssd is worth it for the boot times alone, don't let any of these fucking plebs tell you otherwise.
>>333324205
>>333329051
>Source
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B5/dark-souls-iii-test-gpu
>>333350893
I haven't seen any 6700 oc'd that could impress me away from a 4790k.
It's splitting hairs at this point.
>>333354883
>Also the ssd is worth it for the boot times alone
Nigga I have a standard wd blue 1tb hdd and my pc fully boots up in under 15 seconds via msi fast boot. I literally turn it on and it takes like 5 seconds to load my login screen and a further ~10 seconds to load all my startup applications.
PASCAL when?
Inb4 amdshills and their irrelevant Polaris shit
>>333324205
What's the bad news? I've got the power to play it at 1620p 60 fps.
>>333354883
Also i missed the seagate drive, like the other anon said seagate is shit, get a western digital black or blue if you must. Also stick with 16 gb of ram but get higher timings 1866 or better. I prefer Kingston hyper x ram myself.
>>333355635
I run an 850 samsung ssd and my shit boots up in 8 seconds. No tweaks or fast boot.
Also game loading is significantly faster than when i had a hdd. There is a noticable difference.
>>333325337
>Using EVGA Refurb GTX 660 SC I bought for 140 bucks three years ago.
>>333356225
Who would pay $150 for a 7 second faster boot time. Also games are so big nowadays you can barely fit more than like 3 or 4 on the a 120gb ssd which is normally the size the cheapest ones come at. Using it for media or production software is understandable but saving a few seconds here and there in 4 games isn't worth $150.
Intel Core i7-5930K 3.5GHz
EVGA GeForce GTX Titan X
32GB RAM
WD Black 4TB
A-am I cool guys?
>>333357052
Honestly for load times i'm seeing a 30 second difference in some games compared to my friend's pc also significantly less pop in texture loading.
Also it is a small diff but i consider it worth it.
>>333357430
What a fuckin tryhard. Come back when you get some shittier parts so I can call you a retard instead.
>>333325156
200 is budget GPU friend. trash if you bought nvidia.
>>333325337
>7950
>40-44
dang
Where were you when Nvidia was performing Miracles™?
the 1440p bench is a little disappointing. Hope driver updates will get me most of the way to 60, maybe with a jew work setting turned down or something
>they bought into the 1080 meme
>they can't enjoy vidya unless it's at an arbitrary resolution
lol
I'm going to play with lowered settings!
I dont get it why is everyone throwing a fit?
consoles are probably 900p@30fps, in order to get 1080p@60fps you need more than twice the performance of a ps4/xbone and to get 1440p@60 fps you need to double that again.
This is pretty in line with the performance of these gpus. A 290x and a 980 are fast but they aren't 4-6 times faster than a 7850
>>333358220
Yeh, I'm with u there. I own a 1440p monitor and a 390. I would have guessed that it would have been enough for Dark Souls 3. But from soft yet again proves how incompetent they are when it comes to optimization
I'll play that shit at 30 fps. Try to stop me.
I'll play that shit on low. Try to stop me.
>>333340945
Why optimize anything?
Console pesants will eat any shit you throw at them, 30 frames and low res shit and say it's good.
Mustard race will spent lots of dosh on hardware so they can get slightly better textures and some AA.
Why put in extra effort when literally everybody eats your shit up?
How is this looking? Mobo, ram and cpu are coming from a friend at a steep discount. Potentially graphics card too but his is a amd fx-9370 4.4ghz, not sure if I should get that off him or get a 970.
>>333359469
>Those prices
Are they somehow balanced against these Australian prices or is my wallet being raped for no reason?
>>333324205
Is this supposed to surprise me? Dark Souls 1 had the worst optimisation/graphics ratio I've ever saw. PS2 tier graphics with performance of the slide show.
>>333359469
AMDs chip offerings are really long in the tooth, can you budget in some more money for an i5 build and a Z170 mobo? Id go that way even if you gotta put a i3 in it now (upgrade it later when you can afford it)
>tfw 970
should i kill myself already?
I can run Dark Souls 2 flawlessly but I guess this time iam fugged
So is there a spec test for DS3 yet?
>>333361282
>980
>720p
>>333361404I knowI know....
>>333326548
It varies honestly. If the owner was competent, and actually took care of their shit. Then you're probably in for a deal. Now if they didn't then you just threw away 200 dollary dodads.
>>333325337
>gtx 670
>40-44fps on ultra settings
>can probably get 60 on medium-high
I'm ok with that.
>>333360869
what the fuck am i looking at here
>>333336014
switched from a shitty laptop on which i made my colonel 100 in bf3 with 23 fps to a ps4. no 20 fps for me. atleast i have 30 now. Bloodborne was the other 50%reason. playing the dlc right know. stay mad pccucks.
>Generations of generations have proven consoles are able to squeeze more out of their systems thanks to all units being the same.
>People are STILL surprised when the requirements for the PC port are much higher than the console specs.
WOOOOOOOOOW
MY PC HAS WAY BETTER SPECS THAN A PS4 AND ONE.
THIS IS BULLSHIT, NO WAY I COULD'VE KNOWN.
>>333362303
Not even that, the 7850 here >>333325337 is doing quite well for 1080p
It's actually a pretty well optimised port considering what it could have been.
I honestly don't know why everyone's flipping out.
>>333362303
It's because software can get better even if the hardware is stagnant. Very little of what they squeeze out is because the units being the same.
>>333326416
>>333335167
Running 6870 and 6850 in crossfire here :^)
>>333362147
My fucking nigga
>>333360958
Same here, we might have to go low for this one.
>>333324205
am i blind? where is my r9 390
>>333365505
It's so shit it's not even on the list :^)
>>333324205
>tfw 970
>niggers kept memeing about muh 3.5
>mfw
You know what's retarded?
People that say a console is $350 and say you have to compare it to a PC for $350.
Consoles are sold at a loss, so they put $15 on top of every game so they break even.
>>333324205
>R9 290 has 8 FPS more than GTX 770
>And people still say that AMD lost.
>>333324205
>tfw my card isn't even on there
I think it's time to upgrade.
>>333366380
Console don't run the games smooth either.
>>333324205
What, that it runs better than on console on almost every card?
>>333366796
>720p up to 30FPS
I don't remember anytime in my life where I had to resort to such eye cancer.
Excluding Diablo II since it ran at 25FPS due to being sprite animated.
And I started playing during the Wolfenstein 3D era.
>tfw fromsoft still cannot into computer
>bought a 970 for a reasonable price last year
>never had a single problem since then
>mfw this
up yours memesters
>>333367073
>never had a single problem
Yes, you only had 0.5 problems.
>>333325001
> Twice the crippled Vram
Fucking why, Are you daft?
>>333365505
rule of thumb: 390 performs like a 290x
>>333366691
>Only have a 670
>Want to upgrade, but want to wait for the Pascal cards coming up
>Will be long done with DS3 by the time they drop
Bah humbug.
>>333367757
A 670 will handle it, just look at the 7850
A 670 should perform about as well as a 950
>tfw 7970
I hope the patch brings it up to 60
>>333326016
That's an extremely stupid comment, sir, unless you know that this game is CPU-bound at with a 750ti.
>>333367881
Just fine isn't 60 FPS constant at highest settings though.
I still have a 660ti and i dont see the point of upgrading. Every game i play runs fine. I was planning to get whatever came out after the 900 series but ill probably wait till whatever comes out after that.
>>333324205
Way to crop out the part that says it's at 1440p
>>333368120
Well yeah if you want that you need twice the performance of the console with some headroom accounting for optimisation and how consoles generally drop below 30fps.
You should have known a 670 wasn't going to cut it when it couldn't even run last gen "enhanced" ports at 60fps
>>333328826
Feels great
Guess it's finally time to buy a new PC in a few years.
>Game runs like shit on PS4 the main console this game was optimized for
>People somehow think their consumer grade casual PCs will be able to run this monster
Face it, if you're not a hardware nerd who spends all his neetbux on the latest graphics cards you ain't gonna play this shit in 60FPS
>>333325337
tfw my 970 was the right call for 1080p.
How fucked am I?
Can someone post a screenshot of the graphics settings available ingame?
can you turn off bloom/hdr and or motion blur etc?
I really dislike most of these effects
>>333368459
Probably like 40fps min
>>333325337
I get the 60 grey but what is the difference between the dark green, light green, red and dark red?
970 = grey + dark green
r9 290 = grey red
whats the deal?
>GTX 970
>45fps
God damn it, I thought that was the recommended card. When does the GTX 1070 come out so I can buy it?
HAHAHAHA pc cucks BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
>m-muh parts adaptbility
hahahahahah fuck you, your machine is shit. just get a pre build steam box or ps4 to play this. i recommend a ps4, that way you can also play bloodborne and demon's souls you fucking faggots
>>333368581
I really gotta check the benchmarks more before i "guess"
Your card in in there and it is indeed 40fps min.
So all the half decent cards can hit 60 fps fine whilst consoles struggle to hold 30?
Where's the bad news?
>>333368251
>last gen "enhanced" ports at 60fps
Except that's not entirely true. I'm mostly saying I'm disappointed with the timing. Getting a 970, 980, or 980ti right now would be a remarkable waste since the new cards in 6 months or so will make them obsolete.
>people actually trust these things
You'll a bunch of stupid faggots
Not gonna be able to run it on my vive (and this program doesn't see my soundcard) but I should be fine.
>>333359385
This.
They simply don't bother anymore.
>>333324205
Why do they even bother with PC. How can they make such ugly games run so fucking bad.
>>333368414
here's a (you)
>>333368943
Why even both with console. How can they make such fuck ugly games run terrible?
>Non ti 560
Kill me
>>333368592
I would like to know this as well.
>>333340114
>mfw 6300
>>333368773
>Except that's not entirely true
Crysis 3
Far Cry 3
Metro last light
Hitman absolution
Battlefield 3
All games the 670 had to lower settings on or play with drops below 60fps at 1080p and all available on 360 or ps3
Thought you are completely correct about the timing. Whether you go with nvidia or AMD, upgrading now is stupid since both have something very substantial on the horizon.
just look at this video guys:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6xTnRRTunc
min settings look pretty good
>being hyped for dark souls 3
ds3 is old news, have you still not beaten it? it was released two weeks ago
>>333369103
the game even looks better with low settings
>1080p
How about stats for proper resolutions?
Yesterday I was playing on a friend's PC and the game was struggling constantly with the framerate.
36-45 fps with a 750 Ti
Wierd thing is the game doesn't give you the choice to lock framerate at 30.
>>333368661
I don't know if this is bait or people are just this retarded?
>>333369271
>750Ti
>struggling with framerate
gee i wonder why
that card didn't get 60 fps on games from like 5 years ago, why would it now
>>333369219
Fucking depth of field.
What if i want to look in the distance?
what if i want to look around at things on the screen?
Can your eyes not focus on things a couple miles away?
>tfw 980Ti master race.
Feels good man
>>333340114
>they fell for the "you need an i7 for gaming" meme
bunch of retards i tell ya.
>>333325337
>900's series
>4 GB
more liek 3.5, amirite guis? :^)
just another game i'll have to disable crossfire for
>>333368592
>>333369040
dark green = 900 series
light green = 700 series
similar thing with the red for 2xx/3xx/7xxx cards
HAAH WAW
>>333369402
this
I fucking hate dof
and FUCK games that dont allow it to be turned off completely and only give you options between low and high, I'm looking at you Fallout 4
>>333324205
>>333325337
>R9 390
>>333325192
>game looks the same as the previous installment which runs perfectly fine maxed out on a gtx 460.
>new installment requires a 400$ gpu to run properly
How is this ok?
Games keep looking the same and run worse and worse and worse.
I bet the game looks the exact same regardless of graphical settings too except for texture resolution
>>333369662
I dunno, Bloodborne looked a lot better than SOTFS and this thing's running on the BB engine
>>333369662
texture settings changes nothing but don't be obtuse, 3 has a lot more geometry in the environment and more particle effects.
Lower SSAO to low and gain 10 frames or more without visual difference.
>>333369379
No shit. My point was that the game doesn't let you choose framerate.
For those who have mediocre graphic cards it's gonna be atrocious to play without a constant framerate.
dof, ambient occlusion and hdr
all OFF plz, thanks
>tfw core duo E8500 and GTX 560Ti
>>333369776
>texture settings changes nothing
What?
>>333370047
look at
>>333369103
>>333370047
on this game specifically. the texture settings on the build they sent out literally did nothing.
>>333325337
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6xTnRRTunc
there;s no difference between low and ultra anyway, except maybe shadow wuality
pcucks who spent >$1k on a rig BTFO
>>333369379
It gets 60fps on dark souls 2 though, which is a 2014 game.
>>333370132
>literally
stop
>>333369460
thanks guy. makes sense now.
>>333370132
That's unacceptable, what about people with very low vram? Are they getting fucked?
Legit curious.
>>333369103
I guess it's fine if the game doesn't look like an absolute mess in the lowest settings, but what about the performance difference between settings?
Is the game playable on low range cards then?
>>333369108
We want to play it in the best quality possible at 60fps rather than on a console where it looks worse than Low graphics settings but at 30fps.
>>333370139
>Takes a screenshot of one of the only two things in the video that don't show a significant difference
That's some fantastic cherry picking there mate. Please tell me more about how you have a desperate need for attention, or glasses.
i'm worried
>>333370453
>>That's unacceptable, what about people with very low vram? Are they getting fucked?
not sure. haven't seen vram charts.
re: performance differences b/w settings on relatively lower end cards here's a 950 chart
>>333370779
I wonder how it'll go with a slightly stronger CPU, like an i7 6700k instead.
>>333371031
i doubt it'll make much of a difference, but we'll just have to wait till it's out in the wild. i'm more worried about reports of framerates <20 on 980s@low in certain late game areas as well as random and non-random (pick any class other than the knight at the start and rest at a bonfire for <15 secs = crash) crashes experienced by some people who got the review builds.
Anyone UFO status?
>>333371328
What site is that?
>>333371328
>People overclocking puts you left on the bell-curve
>>333371407
UserBenchMark.
It's okay.
>>333324205
A GEFORCE GTX 970 4GB 45 fps. Nice. No, rly. Nice. It's okay
>>333371456
Thanks. No surprise on mine, I suppose. I don't go over 1920x1080 at the moment anyways though. I really can't wait for the new pascal cards to come out.
>>333371562
Thats the fake chart you idiot itll do 60 fps
>>333340114
>tfw got a 2600K ages ago and still STRONK
>>333368629
relax bruh the chart is fake as fuck, if a 650 can run this shit on pretty much max 1080p with like 40fps then a 970 will guarantee like 90fps or more with decent cpu
>>333370045
>560 ti
god that card was fucking dog bollocks, most games that game after fucking 2012 ran like dog turd, i couldnt even play bf3 with high settings without frame spasms and dips, good fucking riddance.
>>333348160
get an i7 CPU
you should consider a cheaper and weaker GPU for now which you can later upgrade since new ones are coming soon™ and then sell the one you get now
never get gigabyte btw, they are fucking trash, always inferior cheaper components used and you can often get more features on a mobo at the same price from another manufacturer
otherwise it's ok despite what all these underage meme fucks have responded
>>333349181
>laptop
just count yourself out every time with new games, weeb dweeb
>>333349316
nothing
>>333349929
end yourself, retard
>>333372871
you think that is bad, but you aint never experienced a fucking evga card bruh
>>333372952
>I reply to hours old posts
(you)
>>333372979
I've run nothing but EVGA cards, and they've always been just dandy. What's the deal?
>>333340114
>tfw got a i7 960
Where does that fit? How old is this thing
>>333372979
true I haven't owned any evga products in a long time but gigabyte is seriously awful
>>333373009
kinda hard to reply to them when I was asleep, dumb reply time limit poster
>>333327968
Got me that 4gb edition so im good atleast.. right?
>>333369271
You're supposed to use adaptive v-sync from the control panel
![fcc3247aad[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/kV63OHS.png "fcc3247aad[1]")
