What went wrong?

>>333186168
>54 critics
>69 critics
>25 critics
It's not over yet, Snake.

>>333186168
>caring about reviews in the lamestream media and arbitrary numbers based on the dumb american education grading system

DARK SOULS 2 CONFIRMED FOR GOTY ALL YEAR EVERY YEAR

HATERS B T F O

BTFO
T
F
O


>B-UT MUH LORE
>MUH LEVEL DESIGN


BEEE TEEEE EFFFFFF OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>333186686
WE DID IT RED- I MEAN /v/

Who cares? I am watching Game Grumps play Dark Souls 3 and that is good enough

>>333186168
All the review numbers end up within 3-4 points of the other titles.

Would that make Dark Souls one of the most consistently well-reviewed series in gaming? Like that is really a badge of honor

>>333186763
no it just means that each game is the same fucking thing

This picture is the best example of why you should never trust ''professional'' reviewers.

Dark Souls 2 should be like a 75 and not a goddamned point higher.

Its because DS2 is the easiest one, meaning the casual faggots that review games professionally were able to get to the end.

>>333186916
bloodborne got a 92
bloodborne casual confirmed

>>333186168
>release same game 5 times
>le epic difficult meme
>reviewer pretends he played it when he didnt but needs to have gamer cred with fuccbois
>writes same review 5 times

Such a fucking joke of a franchise.