Is PS4K really real? Like, for real? Meaning not a joke? what the fuck
ps4 can barely handle 1080, what are you on about
>>333136147
It can technically stream 4k, but definitely not run games in 4k.
>>333136365
anything can stream, it's not that impressive
>>333136147
What about PS4K though?
>>333136504
True enough i guess
>>333136074
people don't want to buy expensive consoles
developers don't want to make high definition or high detail assets
development budgets are already through the fucking roof and they can barely manage the performance of one specific performance specification of one console
hardly anybody even has a 4K tv
nobody fucking wants this
do you honestly think it's fucking real?
>>333137147
>nobody fucking wants this
True.
>do you honestly think it's fucking real?
Yes.
>a PlayStation console revision?
>with minor technical improvements?!
S T O P T H E P R E S S E S
Yeah it's real. No one is doubting that anymore.
>>333137147
The funny shit is that everyone was saying the same fucking thing about BluRay. It was a fucking worthless investment as everything was going Digital, and HDvDs had gotten to a place where there was no dicernable difference between the two anyway.
Yet idiots ate up the price tag because Blueray was supposed to be the next big thing.
I wouldn't put it passed Sony to try and push some god-awful 4k system and sell it as the must have.
>>333136074
>>333139268
Anon. Have you ever seen a bluray rip anime vs a stream rip anime? Are you literally retarded?
>>333139268
Bleu-Ray is fucking God tier, neck urself. Also 4k is an objective improvement on 1080p, much like bluray to any other analogue disks
If it does exist, then it'll LITERALLY just be for 4k movie and VR support.
Anybody that thinks that all previous PS4 games will not be playable and that lazy as fuck vidya devs are going to make 4k games which will run flawlessly on a $400 machine is retarded.
FFXV can just about hit 30fps at 720p during battles.
If a console can pull off 4K I'll eat my face.
>>333139409
>There's no 1080p streams of digital downloads.
What in the fuck in wrong with you?
>>333139563
>4k is an objective improvement on 1080p
No one said it wasn't, but these days there's no fucking reason to have it because it's not the industry standard, nor will it be until cable companies go through and upgrade everything to stream 4k.
>>333140224
>There's no 1080p streams of digital downloads.
Thanks for confirming you know nothing. There's 1080p streams...with compression artifacting EVERYWHERE.
>>333139979
Yeah, that's kind of how the latest rumors are going. Mild performance improvements, 4k strims+bleu-rays, jacked up price tag.
>>333139979
I'd understand if they just added HDMI 2.0 but if they beefed up the graphics they've fucked up.
>>333140224
>cable companies
>upgrade everything
They'll repeatedly upgrade in the most profitable areas and it'll never trickle down to 50% of the country like always.
>>333140365
Maybe if you have a shit connection. I stream 1080 on Amazon Prime all fucking day, and there's never artifacts, save for when the stream just starts to give it some buffer time.
But go ahead and continue to justify paying $15-$25 for a magnetized piece of plastic that was obsolete before it hit shelves a decade ago.
>>333140871
Yeah, that's my point. Cable companies aren't going to upgrade shit, so 4k won't be industry standard for a long ass fucking time.
You can't stream 4k reliably on a typical suburban cable connection, regardless of the PS4k being a thing or not.
nice stealth junji ito thread
