>IN APP PURCHASES
>TIPPING
POKEMON IS DEAD
>>332449086
Are you high? What the fuck did you expect?
>>332449086
You should always expect in-app purchases in 'free' mobile games.
>>332449086
this news does not warrant all caps
iap's in mobile games is up there with wet water competing for the most obvious things in the world.
anyways I only give a shit about this if you can transfer pokemon from GO into the actual games.
>In-app purchases
>Ever not in a mobile game
I'll applaud the one person who can introduce one, one sole mobile game where no in-app purchases are nowhere to be found.
And I thought we only had access to the beta version of that shit, which is Japan exclusive at this point. Who knows if they didn't limit the Pokedex so people wouldn't leak shit.
>>332449086
>only 151
dropped
babbie first money printer?
>>332449909
Ridiculous Fishing
bunch of sudoku games, bunch of solitaire games
I want my applause. vocaroo it.
Is this your first time learning about mobile games OP?
>>332449919
>favorite pokemon is from gen 1
>having only the first 151 means mine has a better chance of getting in
I'm satisfied.
If it's anything like Ingress, they will listen to player feedback and update accordingly
>>332450079
Ridiculous Fishing is pretty fucking fun.
>>332450295
It sure fucking is, probably the best mobile has to offer.
>>332449086
>genwunner: the game
Gross
>>332449086
Was it to hard just to recreate the mainline games in augmented reality form?
I was literally only interested in building a team from local Pokemon and passing time on the bus battling random people.
>stupid millennial suchanerds scammed out of their money
>>332450417
>genwunner meme
TPCi will never give a shit about your favorite gen. get over it.
>>332450580
Manchildren, everyone
>>332450417
Honestly as a genwunner I'm pretty disappoint.
>He didn't expect a renown franchise to be be jew as fuck in a mobile game
kek
porn of Paula would be nice
>>332450660
Nice try. Normies only like gen 1. It's the whole reason GO only has the original 151
>>332449086
Seriously? Only the original 151?
Who the fuck thought that was a good idea?
I thought we were getting something like an ARG battle simulator sort of deal, not some memetastic capture mini game.
Fuck.
>>332449909
Where is my applause faggot?
I'm more miffed that it's just Ingress with a pokemon theme.
>Ingress has "portals" at major landmarks irl
>you install an item on a portal to claim it for your faction
>you can attack enemy-owned portals
>Pokemon GO has gyms at major landmarks irl
>you "install" pokemon at gyms to claim them for your faction
>you can attack enemy-owned gyms
and you can't even battle wild pokemon? you just throw pokeballs at them until they're caught?
I cannot believe these clowns were handed such an enormous franchise and are fucking it up this badly.
>>332449086
>being surprised about a mobile game having in-app purchases
Is it 2009 again? Have I traveled back in time?
>>332450079
>>332451106
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0AIafkE4ELzIt sounds like I'm fapping, but I ain't. I think the mic's fucked up. The only one I have is from these really old headphones.
>>332449909
XCOM on Mobile has no microtransactions, but that's because you buy the whole game from the store, no free version
>>332451296
Good, I appreciate it, thanks.
>>332450417
Actually it's not full Genwun.
They still kept Fairy Type and moves. See Moonblast there?
So it appeals to precisely nobody.
If this exists and is successful, is there any reason for TPC to make new Pokemon games?
Sick source OP
>>332451183
>made by Ingress devs
>why is it Ingress with a Pokemon theme?
The video game industry is nothing but whale hunting at this point.
>>332451482
Yeah, because they still make tons of money? Why would they stop making money?
>>332451536
>a dev can only make the same game over and over again until the end of time
>only the first 151
That's so boring. guess they don't want to scare normies.
>>332450295
too bad it's short as fuck and has no replay value once you buy all gear
>>332451639
What is Nintendo?
>Post YFW this will be a huge success
>Post YFW Nintendo will abandone the console and handheld market, and they will go exclusively mobile.
>>332449086
What concerns me more is there are people here that are actually excited for a shitty mobile app.
>>332449086
THIS JUST IN
POKEMON GO WILL HAVE TOUCH SCREEN CONTROLS.
DROPPED
>>332451183
>I cannot believe these clowns were handed such an enormous franchise and are fucking it up this badly.
So fucking this.
Its not that the game is bad that upsets me, heck i havent enjoyed the last two or three Pokemon main games. Its the dam wasted potential Pokemon Go turned out to be.
>nintendo does something bad
>point it out
>WHAT DID YOU EXPECT LOL DUMBASS
>>332451720
>Sony and Microsoft are building PCs instead of consoles
>Nintendo is going mobile
How did this happen so fast? I can't believe consoles went from being a huge seller to completely dead in just a couple of months.
>>332451720
Those are some big words
>>332451716
A company that doesn't do that.
>>332451775
WHAT? Touch screen controls? On a phone game? Well that's just completely unacceptable. Could you please direct me to the developer's forums so that I can inform them that they have offended me and thus must completely change their game to suit my needs and mine alone?
In the past when Nintendo has done Microtransactions, they set a limiter system, where the maximum amount you could spend on Microtransactions was around thirty to 40 bucks. After which, you couldn't buy any more stuff.
So you could get an edge, but you couldn't pour money away like crazy.
>>332449909
Pixel Dungeon faggot.
>>332451897
according to literally every thread even remotely related to Nintendo, yes, they do exactly that.
>>332451802
These are the retards that constantly get encouraged here.
>>332451802
Yeah. I mean nothing about any of this is surprising. Definitely not worth shouting about.
>>332451925
They did? I haven't followed any of Nintendo's free to play games, are they all like this or is it just a few specific cases? The only free game of theirs I've played is Pokemon Shuffle, and I never felt a need to spend any real money on it.
>>332449086
poorfags btfo
>>332451891
For you
>>332449086
>In app purchases plus tip
>>332449086
>expecting anything less
its mobiletrash of course its gonna have micro transactions
>>332452258
kek was just thinking this
>>332452118
Pokemon Rumble World. You can spend 30$ max then its locks you out of buying gems, and gifts you an item that gives you gems every day or something.
>>332449086
Not as excited anymore.
But I didn't have high hopes to begin with.
Apps are all about microtransactions
>>332452258
>beats gym
>"WHERES MY TIP YOU SHITFACE"
bravo nintendo
>>332452027
nintendo is guilty of samey sequels, but they still have a wide variety of games in their catalog that actually differ from each other. traditional mario, paper mario, zelda, smash, fire emblem, pokemon, splatoon.
they don't take the mario kart framework and just put fire emblem assets in it and then release it as a new series called fire emblem kart, which is basically how niantic is handling pokemon go
>>332452523
>Nintendo
>>332452459
huh, that's a pretty reasonable way to do a free to play game.
>>332449909
connect 3
FREE
NO ADS
NO IN-APP PURCHASE
LITERALLY NO STRINGS ATTACHED
beat that.
>>332452801
I meant match 3
>>332451720
Truth be told, there is nothing inherently wrong with mobile gaming.
The main issue, is that the freemium model is beating everything else, any other games that do not follow this model have very little exposure, and thus mobile gamers are pretty much forced into being cucked out of their money by freemium games, because their friends are playing the same thing.
Now, if we could find a way to balance monetization and the more traditional, and complex game structure, mobile gaming could really take off.
The big issue with freemium games however, is that they have low staying power, they mainly depend on word-of-mouth esque exposure (social media) and mainly ride the fad wave until the game dies out, in a year or two at most, with some rare exceptions.
Traditional games have much more staying power, and with digital distribution, could take advantage of this by staying on the market, and being sold for MUCH longer as it does not depend on the "fad wave" to the same extent.
>>332449086
Now, nothing inherently wrong with in-app purchases either, it's mainly implemented in a fucking terrible fashion though in the common freemium model.
Mainly casual games are targeted towards mobile devices, obviously. The average mobile game relies more on addictive and simple gameplay, rather than more complex gameplay. Due to this, maybe if we took a whole game, and divided it into multiple parts, we could monetize it much more efficiently, while still keeping a more traditional game structure. In Pokemon GO, if they possibly divide these purchases in regions, where you could buy regions, which contain pokemon, for a low individual price, then maybe we would have a compromise between the freemium model, and the "complete" model.
>>332451465
That's because Clefairy, Jiggs sand Mr. Mime are fairy.
>>332449086
dumbass, wtf did you think it was going to be?
>>332449086
Wow this looks like ass. Pokemon is truly cancer.
>>332449909
there's plenty of decent paid games with no microtransactions
>>332453605
Not to genwunners they aren't.
We're talking "90s fat pikachu" fags here.
And it also has something from SM, as you can tell by "Starburst." Genwunsters would hate it.
>>332449086
Were you expecting a f2p game with no in app purchases?
>>332451720
never happening.
>talking about gen one like it was a bad thing
Gen one was pokemon when it was still creative, when it was still a novel idea and before the series became repetitive bullshit.
>>332449909
flappy buird
>he doesnt tip his pokemon
>>332449909
Does it count if they give you so much free shit toy donr.even need the micros
>>332454092
Never say Never fag
Nintendo said that they will never create games for mobiles and now look at them.
>>332454191
LOL
>>332454191
>Gen one was pokemon when it was still creative
Spoken like a true nostalgiafag.
>>332451183
>mfw 30 mil just to reskin their existing game
There is a sick irony to the fact the franchise known for making the same game a million times brought in a company to change it up, only for that company to just make the exact same game as their own previous one
>>332451925
Shuffle doesn't do this.
>>332450532
Anon, if you're not a millennial you're either 35+ or 18 and younger
>>332449919
Until 2017 when they add gen 2
>>332450079
ridiculous fishing isn't free
>>332449909
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.square_enix.android_googleplay.dq1_gp
>>332449086
Rule 34 of Lvl. 1 Paula when?
>people actually expected Go to be a well put together game and not genwun pandering money grubbing
>>332449909
>Japan exclusive
Uh no
I don't understand the gunwunner meme, gen 2 was great. It was gen 3 where designs started to get iffy
>>332449086
You are a goddamn idiot, especially after Pokemon Shuffle. Hell, Shuffle came out right around the time that Pokemon Go was announced, and Shuffle was a free game with in-game purchases like the worst mobile shit. How in the world did you think a free iPhone game would be any different?