What Graphics card do you use?
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: What Graphics card do you use?
What Graphics card do you use?
>>332415323
550 ti
>>332415323
750 ti, it's starting to show its age tbqh
R9 380
>>332415323GTX 840m
>>332415323
780ti, hopefully I won't need to upgrade for a while. As long as I can max out the new DOOM I'll be fine.
>>332415323
980
6850
>>332415323
Titan X
980Ti
8600 gts
based riot
GTX 670
Waiting for the next price/perf card.
>>332415323
GTX 750
It cost me £35 brand new, 0 complaints.
980 Ti
GTX 550 TI
I really need to upgrade soon.
OC'd 2GB 760.
just waiting until pascal i guess
970Don't bully
gtx 770
do i upgrade to a 970/980 or wait for pascal
>>332417687
Me too
>>332417687
there is literally nothing that comes close to the 970 in terms of price/performance at 1080 resolution
prove me wrong chingos
980 Ti G1
HD 7950
R9 280x
No problems so far, but i cant get witcher 3 to run at high for 60fps
R9 m275x
I like playing vydias at my job ;_;
>>332417687
Same here, got it before the meme was exposed. No complaints at all really, its perfect for 1080p
540m 2GB
Radeon 6770
It's basically a jet engine, but as long as it does it's job I don't care.
>>332415323
Are there more images like this?
960ti, and I only play +3 yo games.
I´m a fucking retard
MSI R9 290
>>332417806
390
>>332415504
I've been trying to figure out how to get rid of my old 550ti
Also 750ti
>>332417710
4GB or 2GB? i have a pair of 2GB 770s in SLI and they still run pretty much everything i throw at them
760
Where can I find a 780ti for cheap
>>332418375
2gb
was also debating a 390x but i've never used AMD before so i dunno if i should expect differences
>>332418220
use it as a dedicated physx card
>>332417953
Add another, 970 here too. Not had any issues with it, very happy actually!
>>332418428
390x isn't a huge improvement so i'd wait if i were you
if you can pick up a second 770 for cheap then consider that instead
>>332417953
What meme is there about this card? I have one in my brother's rig and it seems to run pretty much any game maxed out in 1080 and it is paired with a haswell I7
2 GTX 980 Tis in SLI, both overclocked and water-cooled.
2 GTX 970s in SLI on a second gaming computer, also overclocked and watercooled.
And yet I spend more time shitposting on a Celeron J1800 miniPC than gaming...
GTX550, i still have no real many big reasons to upgrade, game graphics has been stagnant.
i can still run most of the games alright
ASUS 980 STRIX in 2 way SLI.
>>332415323
Hey, I've been having display driver issues the last few days and I've been trying to figure it out. Got hwinfo and this is what it says
Video Memory: -1 MBytes of SDRAM
That's not right, right? What could it mean? Is it just the driver? Or did the card get unseated?
>>332418448
I didn't know that was possible. Any benefits to doing this?
390x
Full to the brim with 8gb of memeory
>>332415323
Sapphire R9 290
Awesome card, plays everything maxed out 1440p.
>>332418448
I thought that most recent cards were powerful enough that dedicating a card for PhysX had minimal improvements, if any.
>>332418867
as you'd expect, it only works in games that support physx/gameworks
it puts less load on your cpu and handles the effects better
it's also a little bit of a waste of power but if you're like me and have it included where you live, it's not an issue
tl;dr improvements aren't huge but still somewhat noticeable if you use the effects
R9 390
I use it to play Roller Coaster Tycoon 2
where the fuck is the /v/ server?
>>332417806
>nothing that comes close to the 970 in terms of price/performance at 1080 resolution
Nigga, how about the R9 290/390
Perform better and are cheaper.
GTX 970 G1
>inb4 "I R8 3.5/4"
>>332418867
No benefits as no games use physX.
>>332418620
That Nvidia lied about the amount of VRAM in it.
<-- I have this shit right here, I recently bought a 3rd monitor to play sim racing games properly and this card shat itself instantly throttling at 81 degrees Celcius.
What to buy now for performance/price wise? gtx970? r390? Or should I wait a few months for the pascal to come out, maybe the prices for old cards will go down?
>>332419289
don't shitpost
>>332419043
yeah. like i said here >>332419070 the performance increase isn't huge but it does help if you don't worry about electricity used by the gpu
>>332419302
>That Nvidia lied about the amount of VRAM in it.
3.5+.5 is still 4GB, idiot
GTX 750 ti over clocked.
>>332417687
970 as well. Stuck with an i5-2300 CPU, but looking to upgrade. Any suggestions?
HD 7870
>>332418620
the 4gb of vram is segmented into two pieces, very fast 3.5gb and 512mb not as fast
when the card begins to use more than 3.5GB, it begins to throttle very badly. a lot of games right now don't break the 3.5GB barrier, but those that do suffer on GTX 970s
>>332417806
AMD's R9 3903.5
GT 540M
>>332415323
Currently running a 270x, wanna upgrade soon because the thing is a fucking toaster.
Tesla C2075
>>332415323
AMD HD 7870.
It's still enough to play most games at a decent quality. I'll probably upgrade once the next generation of VR headsets is released.
>>332419070
Interesting. Know I have a reason to keep it although i don't have to many physx laden games at the moment. Thanks for the info comrad
HD 4850
JElly ?
>>332415323
gtx 560 ti
Preatty outdated but it's enough for me
>>332417687
970 here as well. Honestly? It's a great card for 1080p at least.
Nvidia GeForce 310
>>332419843
no prob. just let me emphasize the improvements aren't huge at all. it's nothing like getting a second card for SLI
>>332419102
>mom click this one
lol
>>332419843
*now.
Also what is the best step up from a 750ti?
>>332419419
Triple monitorfag here. Remember, rendering on 3 1080p screens is nearly as many pixels as 4k.
Consider that if yohu plan on running anything recent on 3 monitors.
Plenty of newer games will make my 980ti sweat
>>332415323
I want to fuck that gpu
>>332420119
what kind of monitor and how much are you willing to spend
My card died, should I upgrade now or just wait and see what Polaris offers?
5750. It wasn't great when I got it, but at least it was free.
>>332420469
buy an R9 390
polaris is like 6 months away and the first ones will be like 20% better at best
then wait until HBM2 will be at reasonable price a few years later
>>332420240
No you don't
It will abuse your frames, not listen to you, and make your life miserable.
And it only likes black dicks
>>332420452
23in Samsung with 1920x1080 native resolution. I'm willing to spend at least $350
>>332420750
>tsundere GPU
>>332420750I'm confident my dick is dark enough from the constant rough jerking I've done these past 10 years.
>>332420134
Yeah, I was aware of that but I had to try, I really don't care about MUH ULTRA SETTINGZ so I don't wanna spend more than 300$ on a new card.
Besides I only play Assetto Corsa, iRacing and Dirt Rally most of the time, I just need something that can give me ~80 fps on medium/high settings.
>>332420798
oh, and where are you from? this is more important than you'd think due to how different gpu prices can be worldwide
>>332415323
Rip anon.
I remember when we used to be able to post that in /g/ and not get banned for it.
>>332420895
Burgerland aka America
>>332420705
Hmm, you might be right.
>>332415323
Recently got R9 390 for 150€.
I was expecting it to be shit because of all of you faggots saying amd sucks dick, but this card is actually really fucking good.
>>332419505
Does the 970 bottleneck with the i5-2300? I don't if I should upgrade my CPU
radeon 7950
Sapphire Radeon r9 380 4gb for my first gayming PC.
How'd I do?
>>332421006
then i'd honestly wait until AMD drops Polaris and Nvidia drops Pascal
>>332420750
>implying my dick dosent fill up her vram so much that the image of my dick will forever be stored on her memory
>>332415323
Where do I buy a GPU with my waifu on it?
>>332420894
If i had to repurchase a card, id have gone with amd. They seem to do way better with multi monitor gaming.
The shitty thing is, its really hard to find benchmarks for 3 monitors.
In our case, the $300 range would leave you with a 970 if you went nvidia, which obviously wouldnt work, the 3.5 would fuck us over hard.
Get the 390 or something similar.
>>332421109
>R9 380
>not R9 390
you might just as well kill yourself now
>>332421372
>thick loli
3, R9 290.
>>332421769
>thick
NO MEAT
O
M
E
A
T
>>332415323
GTX 650. Still works on everything.
>>332421769
>thick
>loli
Honorary loli at best.
>>332421858
well this picture is thin loli but the other representation is thicker than usual lolis
Two 4GB 680s
runs things alright I supposed. Should be around a single 980 in performance.
>>332416549
2x6850
GTX 660 stock OC'd
I'm gonna have trouble running Dark Souls 3, am I not
>>332421936
>Two 4GB 680s
why not a single 690 then hmmm?
2 X EVGA 660Ti
Fucking workhorses, man. Can still run most games on best settings at 1080p
This behemoth.
>this thread
>>332415504
I thought I'm the only one who still uses that sack of shit.
>>332422119
how do you want your gpu senpai?
>>332422189
Like my women, hot and huge.
>>332415323
gtx 780ti
>>332421936
Because at this point if I'm getting a new card it's going to be a Pascal with both fingers and toes crossed that AMD does really well next gen so maybe we can have driver stability for all
Also I got them both for free in a stupid trade for my old 770, so FUCK IT
>>332421440
>If i had to repurchase a card, id have gone with amd. They seem to do way better with multi monitor gaming.
I have a 7970 and sometimes I get really weird bugs along with crashes when I have both my screens on. I always switch to single screen when playing now.
>>332415323
SERIOUS QUESTION
I'm sure that I can come up with a template for a gpu sticker, but what kind of paper/sticker material and adhesive would I use? A waifu gpu cover seems neat.
560Ti and i5 2500k as was the meme build at the time
4GB 760
>>332421109
Badly.
280x.
>guy at store said I should wait for the 300 series
I showed him.
>>332422341
>the gimpening
These days a 780ti is closer to a 280x/7970 than the card it was built to kill (the 290x).
380X, pretty happy with it
>>332422504
the 2500k is still a fairly decent processor, especially once overclocked
>>332422367
Oops, forgot to attach Louise.
>>332419616
>>332419193
I admit the 390 is cheaper and a little better, but i found myself dependent on Nvidia Inspector. Most games are done so poorly for the PC, without some good "effects forcing" tool the quality would drop so much. I always heard it is so hard to atually force stuff like AA and AO on radeons. Is it still true?
>>332415323
970
>>332415323
evga 770
>>332421440
Yeah, I thought the same, 3,5gb meme will become a real problem on triple monitors but there are also many cons for r390 too; driver issues, power draw, running hot as fuck etc.
Best bet is to wait and see what the next gen brings I guess.
>>332422579
lol no
the 780ti is still very powerful, close to the 970 in most cases. Blops 3 runs better on AMD.
>>332421616
>>332422556
What's wrong with it?
>>332419801
I'm rocking the same card and can't complain. I don't have a reason to upgrade just yet.
>>332422776
>I always heard it is so hard to atually force stuff like AA and AO on radeons. Is it still true?
¯\(°_o)/¯
>>332422995
I dunno man.
>>332422562
My man, the 280x is a beast.
We competing with $500 GPUs as of now.
>>332423007
the 390 is just much better in price/performance ratio
>>332422776
It's easier on a radeon, actually.
I have one computer with a 970 and one with a 390, the AMD settings panel is way faster, my Nvidia settings (Not Geforce, the other one) takes forever to start and sometimes doesn't work at all
I'm still rocking a 4gb (lol) 770, it's pretty good, though I'm having to tone down the settings to High to get constant 60fps in these latest console ports.
>>332417994
this
>>332423007
It's really under powered.
R9 280 and 290 are better cards.
>>332417806
>at 1080
What is the GTX 960, Alex?
>>332423197
>You need a 980 or better to get 60fps at 1080p Ultra settings on Division
Let me guess, it's all due the shadows and lighting being resource hogs, right?
An HD7700 because I'm a massive poorfag ;_;
>>332415323
GTX 750 Ti
>>332415323
Where do ibuy anime comptuer parts
I want an itasha computer
>>332415323
780 TI
I fell for Nvidia's latest and greatest meme since I received it 1 day prior to them announcing the next gen of cards
It's bretty good though, perfectly fine for 1080p.
>>332423608
Pretty much.
feels good with lots of games to play
>>332415323
GTX 660
Can't find a new game worth playing so I don't upgrade
>>332421041
It's not a major bottleneck when playing games that are more GPU intensive than it is CPU intensive. I have no issues playing games like Alien Isolation and MGSV. But when I try and play games like GTAV, ooh boy does my CPU hold it back.
I use a 980.
>>332418064
That exists?
7870 2GB
380X
>>332423781
Is the R9 380x a viable upgrade for someone still using a 770? or should I wait?
>>332415504
Damn son, me too.
That old piece of shit isn't cutting it anymore.
I'm saving for a new rig now.
9800 gtx+
>>332419951
That was my first video card.
>>332415323
Using a GTX 660 TI, I can run games just fine. May upgrade in the future if i really need it
>bought a 280x less than a year ago
>already want to upgrade
2GB 7870 and i have no idea what the fuck i'm supposed to do when i end up upgrading
i'll probably just buy a whole new everything
>>332415323
GTX 780 (normal version, not TI)
It's perfectly suited to my needs at the moment and I can run basically every game at max settings 60fps.
Gonna upgrade once the next gen comes out though, assuming the power spike is as good as people are saying it'll be.
>>332420705
Forgot to ask, MSI or XFX for the 390?
>>332419801
This.
I can't find a justification to upgrade yet and it overclocks really good
>Yacht
fug
>>332415323
750 ti
I can get 58fps in GTA V with all the settings on ultra, and play The Divison at High settings with a constant 40fps. Upgrading to the 960 soon.
>Costs half than most current high end cards
>Can run everything on PC maxed out
Feels good mayne
>>332424498
>Is the R9 380x a viable upgrade for someone still using a 770?
No
> or should I wait?
Depends on how much performance you want to get and how desperate you are.
7970 6gb edition
>>332415323
a 960
Yea that's right and I got the ultra edition which comes with 4GB's of VIRTUAL RAM
>>332423984
>icons aligned vertically
>>332425517
best card of the 28nm generation
>>332425112
sapphire nitro tri-x my friend
but dont buy the MSI
>>332425734
whats wrong with it?
gtx 275 kill me now senpai
>>332415323
gtx950m
>>332425861
nothing
you are expected to go grow out of it once you grow up
how do i anime girl into gpu?
>>332425968
wat? i dont rice my desktop
>>332425861
>>332425968
forgot pic
should look something like this
please disregard the games
765M
>>332415504
I'm using that right now.
Just ordered a 950 and a new MoBo.
>inb4 poorfag
5770 hd
enough for what i play
Used the GTX 670 for years
>>332415323
970
>mfw it's good shit
>>332415323
Intel® HD Graphics
>>332426191
You poor soul. I'll pray for you.
>>332415323
MSI 970 memecard
Honestly having zero issues with it
GTX 7600GT, after all these years. Still plays Vanilla wow and F.E.A.R. like a raggedy old bitch
>>332425390
>16gig ram
>Those specs
>>332426050
GOD FUCKING DAMMIT HOW DO I FORGET THE IMAGE TWICE
>>332425806
Exactly, plus it doesn't need a power supply that can charge up the sun
>>332426480
>16gb of ram
I fell for the 8gb of ram is all you need for gaming meme too
>be someone that always has a shit ton of tabs open
>a shit ton of other apps open
>play game
>NO MEMORY
pls
Evga 980 sc
>>332425390
what site faggot
I want to see it call my pc a canoe
>>332426286
Thank you anon.. I think your prayer has giveth me 2 extra frames
>>332426686
>you only need 8gb
>people honestly believe this
Yeah nah better safe than sorry
>>332426480
>>332426686
Yeah, shortly after making my first PC with 8gigs I noticed I used, like, half my available ram constantly so I panicked and bought 8 more.
>>332425517
The card I would have if buttcoin wasn't around.
What is the best gpu on the market right now?
>>332426819
It's okay.
http://www.userbenchmark.com/
>>332425390
>Windows 10
>best at anything
I won't even bother posting a bait pic, since it's so obvious
>>332427106
For it's price point or for sheer power?
>>332426686
>"I fell for the 8gb of ram is all you need for gaming meme too"
>opens a fuck ton of random useless shit in the background
>plays an intensive game while all this other shit is running in the background
That's like complaining your car can't drive because you purposefully siphoned gas from it. Shut off all the useless shit you have in the background and the problem is solved you dumb mouthbreather.
>>332426819
userbenchmark
I got a 980 for 440$ on cyber monday, pretty rad discount.
>>332427162
It was my fault for blindly installing any available update one day and being too lazy to revert it back.
>>332427212
This, 8gb here for 3 years and no problemsuntil recently fucking firefox keeps crashing all the time now
gtx 750 oc
>980Ti
>>332425837
Thanks
>>332415323
HD 7970
Thinking i might need an upgrade in the near future.
But my mobo/cpu are mad old (intel i7 920 @3.6)
Back to playing games on med/high
>>332427360
that's because firefox has gone to shit
I have 8GB and the same experience
>>332420798
What game is that? I'm getting a boner from those animations.
>>332427163
Both
>>332425390
>tfw aircraft carrier, battleship, gunboat
>>332415323
GT 530JUST
New rig in a month tho
>>332427510
Even windows explorer and other stuff are starting to crash occasionally now too, not so often that it's unbearable but still annoying enough. I rarely have more than 3 programs running at a time.
650 Ti. Not the strongest but a). I don't often play grafix intensive games, and b). I don't care if I can't get max settings+60FPS
560Ti
It's really showing it's age, it's my only real bottleneck.
Graphic cards are too expensive, I wish I could get the newest meme cards, the 960/970 for less than 1000 dollars.
>>332427360
what add-ons are you using on FF? It hasn't crashed for me in months.
>>332427606
>Jet ski, sail boat, jet ski
>>332427596
For price point I'd go with the GTX 980 TI. $650 and more than enough power for anything you want to do ATM.
For Sheer power IDK, probably the Nvidia Tesla k80 but that's over $4000 and not intended for consumer use.
>>332427953
seaworthiness is the mark of a great toaster
>>332427360
I use Chrome and got no problems stopped using Firefox years back, and before I start a game I usually use CCleaner to wipe everything. Also never have anything intensive running in the background, usually it's just Steam, Speccy, and MSI Afterburner. Maybe I'll put on some music through foobar or a long youtube mix or playlist, but that's it.
>>332425390
>>332427135
>>332427212
Ayy
>win 7 is old update to 10 goy
Get fucked.
>>332425656
Those are rare as fuck.
Sure is mustard race in here
>>332427873
Greasemonkey, clickable links, extra flags for /int/ and a couple others.
>>332415323
Sapphire Radeon HD 7870 Ghz EditionWaiting for pascal and polaris
>>332423257
>>332423454
And yet mine can handle everything maxed out
I've though about having 2 380x in crossfire, but my budget didn't allow that and i wasn't sure the performance was worth it, also had to shell more money for the power supply if i were to go for it
There is also polaris, which is supposed to be much less energivore, so we'll see if two cards can run on a 650w psupply
>>332428097
>thread about PC parts
>people talking about PCs
Nooooooooooooooooo! Really?
>>332415323
Sapphire R9 290 Vapor-X
>>332428030
>better versions of explorer
>still doesn't have tabs
Fucking christ
>>332428030
Yeah it told me to upgrade as well, it can fuck off.
Also your numbers and what each of your component is(below average, average, and so on) can easily be increased if you shut off all programs and clean out cookies and so on.
>>332428060
For real? Got mine 3 years ago for nearly 700. Hate to see what they go for now.
>>332428193
>And yet mine can handle everything maxed out
no it cant
even my 390 cant max out everything
Kill me ...
>>332428270
What?
>>332428283
I have Rocket League running in the background so not sure if that would affect it as well.
750, not ti.
Managed to make witcher 3 run at 45-50fps, so I think I'll hold off on the upgrade.
Soon, but not now, no real reason to.
>>332427969
Thanks, I'm trying to compile a great pc parts list to build a good pc. I just need to find the most comfortable cpu, monitor, and motherboard.
7850
Probably upgrading after I hear what Nvidia's new shit is all about. I'm ready to be disappointed.
>>332428270
Anon please reccomend me an explorer alternative for windows that has tabs.
I never realized what I was missing until I saw your post, jesus christ.
>>332428295
>For real?
Yups - like the 8gb 290x models early on only Sapphire got dibs and even then they didn't make many. AMD did eventually let other companies make 8gb 290x models and in hindsight it was clearly to prepare them for the 390x.
>>332415504
Bought the 550ti back in 2011. I really need to upgrade, but not sure to what.
750ti
>>332428512
>I have Rocket League running in the background so not sure if that would affect it as well.
I'm 99% sure it did. Try closing every program you got and use something like CCleaner to wipe browsers and registry files, then run the program again. I'm certain you'll get higher scores. When I did mine the first time I don't think I even had a game open just documents and tabs, and it still affected the score.
>>332428656
7870 here
same
>>332428683
Either a 980 or hold off until the next gen to either grab one for a lower price or get something more powerful.
You could also get a 780 TI used for almost the same power and a crazy low price like $250 but buying used cards is always a gamble.
690 SLI, old but gold
>>332428428
Anon, I'm so sorry.
>>332418893
>>332426686
>>332426958
>>332426996
>>332427212
will having more than 8gb of ram stop the annoying issue of things slowing down after I leave them open too long?
for example, if I leave 20 chrome tabs open overnight, if I wake up and try to restore them from the background, it takes a bit and get's choppy.
I've never been able to figure this out but I've narrowed it down to either being the cpu (amd fx-8350), hard drive, or ram.
This has happened to every single computer I've ever had.
>>332428651
Not that anon:
A 980 Ti is pretty much top of the line all out, but again, it would be a really expensive PC in the end so if you can afford it go for it.
Remember to use pcpartpicker, it'll tell you if all the components you end up finding match together.
>>332417687
memecard masterrace
r9 270x, bought 2 years ago.
Currently waiting for the next series like others.
>>332428765
Eh, last time I ran CCleaner I selected the save passwords box and it went and deleted them anyway, I have important passwords stored away anyway but it's a hassle for all the other shit I sometimes need an account for.
>>332428682
That makes sense why the one I bought was the only listing on ebay at the time, I originally wanted an MSI Twin frozr 7970 but those were sold out EVERYWHERE online.
770
>>332415323
I wish they put waifus on gpus now.
>>332428325
Then you are doing something retarded.
>>332415504
Im using this too, on its last legs and heats up to 70c just from tf2.
>>332428848
I may just try to find a 780 TI since I don't do much heavy gaming on PC (but that's probably because of my outdated build). Truthfully I need to pretty much upgrade everythingyeah I have no idea why my temps are that high. I have 3 fans and software and a program to make them spin faster.
>>332425861
Nothing, the 380 is a fine card.
>>332429158
I prefer not having anything saved, I pretty much use CCleaner every day to keep everything wiped.
Also, you say you selected the "save passwords box", what the box actually asks is whether it should delete saved passwords or not(you check the things in the menu you want to wipe), checking it means you want to delete them.
>>332428991
It will be hard drive or ram - virtually no modern desktop class cpu is going to be killed by chrome. If your system is hibernating or sleeping windows will load back up from either ram or your hard drive so I/O of those is going to be a factor.
>>332429178
Probably 8xmsaa. So yes, retarded.
>>332429324
>126F
>52C
>just on idling
What the hell, man?
7850, I'm gonna upgrade when Polaris with HBM gonna be a thing (so I expect in mid-2017).
>>332429324
Damn dude get bigger fans.
>>332415323
R9 290 Reference Design, its fucking loud and hot but offers top notch performance.
protip Flash r9 390x bios, undervolt around 40mV and use a custom fan profile with MSI AB.
If only i had an SSD
GTX 680. A good card for its time, but I will be upgrading later this year and buying a 1440p monitor.
>>332429513
Post Speccy please, and if you can be bothered what the site says about each of your parts(below average, above average, and so on).
Rate please
GTX950 and I love it. Fantastic video game.
Got it during the past Black Friday
>>332429719
>AMD graphics are LITERALLY CGA
top kek
>>332429324
I'm scared to ask for a guts photo
but post a guts photo anyways
>>332429787
Also dat Processor score.
>>332415323
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850
>This is what being poor and having credit card debt looks like.
The bright side is I can still play most games at medium settings and they're usually just fine.
My laptop is stronger with games though.
>>332429485
I'm a bit tired and drunk and haven't used CCleaner for a while but whatever it said about passwords it did the opposite of what I set it to do. Might have been because it thought Chrome was my default browser or something I don't really know.
>>332429978
I like AMD. If I bought Intel/Nvidia, it would expand their monopoly, and I don't want that.
>>332429928
>43 C on GPU
increase the fan speed nigga
>>332415323
980
650Ti on the family pc. Holy shit this card is a pile of crap.
>>332430038
I updated from that exact video card last year
You must feel bad not being able to play Fallout 4 or Witcher 3.
>>332415323
750ti i got for 60 bucks of craigs.
shit is gravy. will ge tpascal later
>>332428680
FreeCommander XE. It's pretty feature rich. If you want something simpler there's Clover, which is just a .dll add-on to the default explorer which adds tabs.
who 760 here
>/waiting for pascal/
Old gurl has done me proud
it's okay I guess
>>332430362
Install your RAM correctly retard
>>332430106
There are two tabs in CCleaner, Windows(with IE) and Applications(other browsers), maybe you checked the IE one thinking it would save the ones in Chrome. Or you actually had the right tab open but still checked the box thinking it meant to save. All the boxes ask for what you want to delete, checking them means you wish to delete, having them unchecked means it won't get deleted. You dun goofed.
>>332430147
Good products sell well, what a surprise. Are you saying you wouldn't buy a PS4 because 'it would expand Sony's monopoly'?
>>332429324
>those temps
>high
My CPU has constantly gotten to 60c/140f and GPU 80c/176f during summer playing games maxed out for the last few years, they can handle it. When shit starts getting above that then you are actually stressing your hardware out.
HD 6770
It's horrifying how well it still works, I've yet to run into a game it can't handle, even if it does sound like a helicopter is preparing to take off inside my computer.
woe is me
>>332430475
Good thing they were inconsequential passwords then, I won't make that mistake twice.
>jetski
neat
>>332429872
cpu - outstanding (haven't overclocked it though)
gpu - (390x) outstanding
ssd - outstanding
hdd - excellent
Not completely sure how to reach UFO status, maybe "upgrade" to W10 :^)
>>332430026
Just took this. Had to use flash since otherwise you wouldn't be able to see clearly
>>332430362
>single channel
>>332430884
And here's an angle shothow bad is my dust boss?
R9 380, works great and handles everything. Saving up money to get a better card when pascal hits though
>>332430884
its not the worst I've seen honestly still kinda odd to be getting those temps though
>>332423357
Catalyst was pretty slow/shit before the crimson update too.
>>332431012
>Saving up money to get a better card when pascal hits
you mean when polaris hits?
>>332430484
>>332430484
No, I don't buy a PS4 because I only play PC video games. And also, AMD tends to be cheaper and more useful for some things (like for example, with my 120€ 8-core CPU, I can compile quickly my software, if I've had bought an i7, it would be a little bit better, I know, but also really much more expensive in euros !)
>>332431008
How long have you been using it? Maybe reapply cooling paste
>>332431145
Built it in late 2011. So just over 4 years
>>332431102
I'm fine with either.
>>332430471
>>332430920
>anons think single vs dual matters
Educate yourselves.
http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/1349-ram-how-dual-channel-works-vs-single-channel
>>332415323
>Had
Zotac GT 640 Low Profile
>Have now
Zotac GTX 960 4 GB
FEELZSOFUKKENGUDMAYNE
>>332415323
280x
>>332415323
I want to ravage that video card!
>>332431278
But if you have two sticks, there's literally no reason not to use dual channel
>>332430026
My PSU died and I ended up routing all the wires properly when installing the new one.
>>332431278
>he doesn't triple channel
>>332431278
The difference is small, but hey it's free performance boost
gtx 295, no bully, i'm not made of fucking money. Also it halves my heating bill and new games are shit anyway;_;
I just got a r9 380, used to have a 6950. Is it possible to use crossfire with two different cards or is it only intended for 2 of the same cards?
Should i be worried ?
Running a lil bit hot, should probably clean it soon.
r8 everything else though.
>>332431278
that website is unreadable
>>332415323
970 memester race reporting in
>>332431629
Same for Crossfire
Multi-gpu is catching on though but not sure if 380 + 6950 will be any good.
Still using the GTX 650 I got for 50 bucks four years ago desu. It works for what I play.
>>332431049
Yeah but it's fine now
Nvidia control panel is still shit
>>332431730
8,00 Go Dual-Channel Unknown
>>332431783
>30 anything in C
>hot
You are literally retarded.
those temps are absolutely fine unless you're super fucking uptight about ANY heat in your PC.
the fuck
Are there any cards that can do passive cooling other than >
>>332416059
Was thinking about getting this purely because I need a passively-cooled GPU for my new micro ATX build, what sort of games can it handle?
>>332431730
That's just speccy being retarded
>>332431926
>unless you're super uptight about ANY heat in your PC
I am though. I like keeping it clean and healthy.
>>332430170
What did you upgrade to?
Not really. I haven't played Witcher 2 yet, and like I said, my Laptop can do better (which is fine If I hook it up to my TV). Pretty much hate the direction Fallout has gone, so not playing 4 means nothing to me.
>>332431984
I think Gainwind makes a passively cooled 970
>>332431970Feel good to be french :^)
>>332432043
Good for you but sub 40c is absolutely acceptbale.
>>332432043
Those are standard idle temps. I have the same Mobo, a 3570k CPU and 7970 Card.
>>332430280
This shit is great, thanks anon
>>332432206
Acceptable*.
Fucking saw the -bale as I hit post.
fuck me
>>332427562
I'm thinking its either Condemned: Criminal Origins or its sequel.
>>332432206
Oh I know. If it was over 40 I wouldn't be shitposting. I'd be cleaning it out and lamenting the fact that I can't slap a bigger fan in there.
>>332432225
It can go a little bit lower if I clean if more often.
>>332432043
I know how you feel, my GPU is at ~27 right now after I changed fan settings, it used to be a bit over 30. Highest it goes is ~77 as opposed to roughly 80 before.
>>332415323
1023MB NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (PNY)
>>332420119
wait till pascal. 750ti is fine till this summer
>>332432430
I doubt it, I have a Full tower with 5 fans that's cleaned all the time, if that won't get the temps down nothing will.
>>332431278
if you have 2 sticks, you literally have no reason to not run dual. wtf are you thinking? put it in slots 2 and 4 dumbass
>>332429515
thanks for narrowing it down further anon.
I don't make it hibernate or sleep overnight because I download things.
>8gb of ram
>2016
top kek. games are using 8gb of ram for recommended specs ALREADY. Your toaster will be outdated by 2017
>>332428193
>And yet mine can handle everything maxed out
On what games? I find it hard to believe that you can play the newest and most demanding games maxed with that card.
GTX 460
is it bad if my gpu is 45c?
>>332432810
>b8 this bad
it stinks lad, at least make an effort
>>332415323
2 GTX 970s
Got them at release Sept 2014.
Might wait until second gen Pascal to upgrade unless I have problems with games on my HTC Vive.
is this a problem /v/? The only fan I can control is the one I have at 60, but the ambient temperatures are always high (labeled temp2 and temp3 in pic) , with cpu and gpu being in the 40-50's but temp2 and temp3 sometimes goes as high as 70C.
Will everything be okay? I never run this fan on full blast because it's noisy, it's nice to keep it at 50-70.
>>332432569
I can get it to 30 or so.
I've got a full tower too and spared virtually no expense on cooling. I also keep it pretty cool. I just haven't cleaned it in way longer than I'm happy with.
>>332430297
Aye
>>332432103
I'm the guy you're replying to.
I bought a whole new computer used off of craigslist, then upgraded the shitty GTX8800 that came with it (which honestly is worse than the 4850 in the little amounts of TF2 I played on it before upgrading the video card). I upgraded to a GTX950.
I'm this guy with the GTX950 >>332429946
I imagine based on the fact you're using a 4850 means that you were in the same boat as me with a Core 2 Duo processor. My advice to you is upgrade to ANYTHING with a Core i5 or Core i7. After upgrades, I only paid $400 for this tower. Wait for the deals, video cards are EXPENSIVE right now.
In terms of what you get out of an upgrade. Just upgrading to the "i5 2500 / GTX950" over my old "core 2 duo e8400 / Radeon4850" enabled me to do PS2, Gamecube/Wii emulation flawlessly, Core2Duo machine couldn't do them. I played through Fallout 4 on tweaked medium/high settings and Witcher 3 locked at 30fps (was able to play it as high as 45-50fps on medium setting, but the fluctuation of fps bothered me). I tried booting those games on my C2D/4850 machine and the games wouldn't even start, they don't even let you get to the title screens.
>>332430280
been using it for 20 minutes and I can't believe how stupid I was for not realizing this sooner.
I love you anon. Thank you.
>>332415323
390 reporting in. Good thing I got a deal on the nuclear powerplant I needed to run it.
>>332432103
>>332433423
me
One more thing. I actually did play through Witcher 2 on my C2D/4850 machine. It works. I played through the game on low/medium settings and it was 25-30fps the whole time. There is only one part of the entire game where you'll experience single-digit framerates.near the end of the game, there's this DLC quest where you go down some catacombs to face a golem. On the way there, you go through a sewer area that is completely packed with enemies. THIS ONE SPOT OF THE GAME made my game stagger so goddamn hard. Fortunately, you don't have to fight them, you can just run past this area.
>>332431245
>So just over 4 years
Your TIM is now flaky bits of ceramic and polymer that can't transfer heat like it used to. Replace that shit now for the sake of your CPU.
Remember, apply thermal paste every 1.5-2 years to keep your CPU from overheating.
>>332433172
I'd just run in on full blast to be safe. You'll get used to the noise super quickly and not notice it anymore.
>>332433158
Nice. I have the same heatsink.
>>332431245
>build in 2011
>550 Ti
I swore I saw a guy on Yahoo answers back in '11 asking for games, and asked why people thought "PC gaming is so expensive'. Is that you? What a small fucking world.
>>332415323
>mfw I'm actually still on 8800GT
Amazing that I can still run games off of it
here is mine
>>332425837
Looks like I'll have to buy the MSI. I only have a 6pin and only one 8-pin. Rip. Even on the length of my mid tower that 12" Sapphire came close.
>>332415323
I want to be Louise's toilet.
>>332433423
>1280x1024@60hz
could you check if it can do 75 or 76 hz?
>>332434071
Nah that wasn't me.
>>332434139
m8 if you only have 6pin and 8pin you should might as well consider upgrading that PSU
Got another one coming tomorrow for SLI.
>>332432127
>970
>buying a meme card
>>332434231
Sure? The guy had this for his avatar, if it rings any bells.
>>332434369
How on earth do you remember that?
>>332433423
>RL2455HM
I have the same monitor
its awesome once you calibrate those thing
hope you dont use it at the default color settings which is too much red
660 GTX
>>332434428
I'm really good at remembering pointless shit, but I can't remember important information for the life of me.
>>332434139
>>332434296
and make sure your PSU can do at least 40A on +12A
I'm either buying a GTX 970 or a 390 next week.
I understand that the 390 outperforms the 970 but is there anything similar to Shadowplay on AMD? Shadowplay is fucking amazing and I don't know if I can give it up.
>>332433851
>apply thermal paste every 1.5-2 years to keep your CPU from overheating.
If you run balls to the wall i'd check it much sooner than that.
Pic semi-related. While this is a synthetic stress test i'm running right up against my thermal limit.
680
960 4GB
![がんぼれコウモンほれほれfuckyou～僕がゲイになった理由～_ニコニコ動画_原宿_smile.flv_snapshot_00.55_[2016.03.26_13.38.14].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/VrmCRO9.jpg "がんぼれコウモンほれほれfuckyou～僕がゲイになった理由～ ニコニコ動画 原宿 smile.flv snapshot 00.55 [2016.03.26 13.38.14]")
HD 5450
>>332434743
They're developing something like that.
Personally I'd just wait for the next big cards to come out.
>>332420067
>>332422504
>>332427831
560ti represent. It still works fine after all these years unless you want high settings on a new game.
>>332427831
>$1000
where do you live that it costs 3 times as much
HD 7950
I got it in 2012. Maybe I should upgrade? I dunno, it never even occurred to me until now.
I really think I need a new CPU though.i 5-3570K just as old. Shit feels sluggish and there's no reason for it to.
>>332434296
>>332434709
This a good cheap one?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817438025
>>332415323
R9 270x
>>332433423
>I imagine based on the fact you're using a 4850 means that you were in the same boat as me with a Core 2 Duo processor.
Yep.
I'm saving this info. Your advice is really appreciated.
>>332433781
Good to know. I remember a lot of talk about how unplayable it was on anything less than a monster, but I figured those were people being melodramatic about performance and graphical sacrifices.
>>332434851
After actually reading the thread like I should have done in the first place,
>>332433851
I'll try this. I still have the same tube of Arctic Silver 5 from 2012.
>>332434810
>put anime girls on GPUs
>PC doesn't get any Japanese games
Is that the joke?
>>332421372
Who is this cause i cant read moon runes
>>332415504
I finally upgraded from a 550ti that ive used for 5 years to a 980 ti
Stay strong brother
This is Crysis ready, yes?
what are your guys gpu fan speeds at?
>>332415323
I have a meme cpu of low temps
I will probably pick up some more ram soon
>>332435238
>APU
>dedicated gpu
>>332435238
>118 C
>>332434183
The secondary monitor is an old Viewsonic LCD, it isn't special by any stretch of the imagination.
>>332434431
I tweaked it a little. The color/brightness all seem fine to me.
The only thing that irks me about this monitor is that it has poor viewing angles. It's great if I'm sitting and looking directly at it. However, if I'm looking while standing or from the side, it's all dark.
I'M GONNA BUY A 970 I'M TIRED OF WAITING FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF CARDS FUCK IT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
5 years with it
fine for games I play (fightahs, emulators and stuff)
GTX 660 non TI, most games i play work fine. Only witcher 3 was 45~ fps on medium/high.. might upgrade in time couple years when cyberpunk releases.
UserBenchmarks: Desk 67%, Game 49%, Work 41%
CPU: Intel Core i5-3570K - 79.3%
GPU: AMD HD 7950 - 48.8%
SSD: Samsung 830 128GB - 54.1%
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB - 89%
MBD: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H
Is it time to upgrade, boys?
>>332415323
8 x R9 380s.
>>332415504
Same
Fucking overheats
>>332434860
try this website
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/id-2547993/psu-tier-list.html
tier 3 and upwards are good
I got a tier 4 one and it works ok with the 390
I got a 770 3 years ago.
Now I have a job where I have loads of expendable income. What should I buy now?
>>332434369
Never had that avatar for anything.
>>332435657
DONT DO IT YOULL REGRET IT
Radeon HD 7850
>>332436204
980 TI OC
or some amd r9 390 x OC fury shit that will last you on ultra for next 6+ years probably.
Tho best option wait few more months for new generation of GPUs to show up and go bonkers from there.
>>332415323
370. Got the 4gb version even though it probably can't even utilize the extra ram because I'm stupid.
>>332435657
Just wait a bit longer, you'll be happy you didn't jump the gun.
>>332436204
980Ti G1. It's much cheaper than the Titan X, which is the fastest single card GPU, but it's not much slower.
For reference, the 980 Ti G1 costs 638. Titan X costs 1000.
>>332436790
Wait, how is 780 ti 3gb better then 970 4gb (memes aside). Its couple years older tech?
Sapphire 270x over clocked with 3GB
Works nice. I'm waiting for this pascal/Vulcan thing to take off so I can buy one of the next gen cards.
I only play at 1080p 21:9 so there's no real reason to dive into 4K 144hz ready cards yet.
I also don't care about VR so that's another reason to wait on upgrading I guess.
>>332436790
Newegg had this for $570 ($670 - $70 promo code - $30 rebate) a few days ago. Sold The Division code for another $45 off.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127912
amd radeon 5450
>>332436790
Ah, I'm in Canada so it may cost a bit more.
>>332436520
Sounds like a good plan. I'll just wait for some new shit to get some good reviews. I'll probably just rebuild my PC
>>332435657
Just wait a couple of months so you can wait a couple of months so you can wait a couple of months so you can wait a couple of months.
>>332437259
>270x over clocked with 3GB
>270x
>3gb
>>332435657
>I'M GONNA BUY A 970
buy a r9 390 dammit
not a gtx 3.5
>>332437210
There is insanely little difference between the 700 and 900 series aside form the 980. In fact there's so little difference Nvidia canned the entire 700 line because it was a better purchase than the 900 because of price.
Basically Nvidia came out with the Titan and BTFO everything else, but the Titan was super high end and honestly had too much power at the time for people to justify the price since nothing really required that much. So they released the 780 TI, basically a baby titan at a more affordable price point that could do everything the Titan could (at the time). Then they didn't really make all that much progress for a few years, releasing small upgrades with no major improvements while they wait to release their next gen cards. I'd imagine most of their current efforts are focused on getting their new stuff out the door instead of polishing their old stuff.
TLDR: 780 was an overachieving card at the start of the 'gen', 970 is an underachiever at the end of a 'gen'.Disclaimer: I have no actual qualifications aside from watching the market to see when something worth the money for an upgrade comes out.
>>332415323
380
>>332438272
>o they released the 780 TI, basically a baby titan at a more affordable price point that could do everything the Titan could (at the time).
This is wrong. The 780ti exists because the 290x was (and remains) a titan killer. The 780ti (and later titan black) are the full fat chips Nvidia had been keeping for the quadro line until that point.
Its why the 980ti exists - to ruin the fury x's day given the fury x is (relatively) only just behind a titan x but is half the cost.
>>332438770
>the 290x was (and remains) a titan killer
>>332435041
>I still have the same tube of Arctic Silver 5 from 2012
I doubt it will last the same as when it was new. You might need to change the paste a bit more frequently because TIM does degrade over time, especially from exposure to sunlight.
I personally would recommend that you buy a new tube for $4-7 if you want optimal thermals.
>>332438936
This chart is pretty old now, but believe it.
>>332438770
That's kinda what I said. The Titan was too expensive, so they released another, slightly weaker card that wasn't really part of the main 700 line at a more affordable price point.
>>332439110
That chart is weird. Who uses 1920x1200?
>gtx465
end me
>>332438272
Thanks for explanation. I heard something along those lines some time ago.
Feels bad that i got 660 at the time instead of something from 700 series then, but i was omega level scrub when it came to tech back then, so deserved it.
>>332429324
had a very similar CPU (i think it was 945 or 946, the one you cant overclock) and speccy and others could not find and show the temps, one of the softwares that works (dont know how) is Gamebooster3, yea, that shit shows temps in the bottom of the page, and they show cpu tems, tried to make a quick comparison with bios temps and the case temp, and they are pretty close, like 5 degrees of difference.
they can handle very intense shit, when i bought a newer cpu, i let that one with the mobo to my nephew, and i forgot to connect the fan.
>turn on pc
>windows start normally
>as soon as i want to open chrome the computer freezes
>shut it down and go to bios
>set defaults just in case and check temps
>60°C on BIOS
>well, thats a little high
>as soon as i finnish saying that, my nephew shows me the loose fan cable
>pull the power plug as fast as i can
>connect the fan
>everything smells like burnt plastic
>turn on pc and fan works ok
>no problems so fat
I had to add, the mobo is a shitty ASROCK, and the cooler was stock.
i really thought it was going to die, if its below 3.0, go for something else, but if yours is 3.0ghz, you can overclock it a litte (if you have the one that can be overcloced)
Im not an AMD fag anymore, now i have a 4790k, but i wont deny that they handle temps very well.
My gpu is a 760OC direct cu2
>>332428134
my nigga
>>332439586
It''s 16:10 aspect ratio instead of 16:9
>>332439991
I know that. But who uses 16:10? 16:9 is the standard.
>>332440117
16:9 is too narrow for portrait.
Warcraft 3 works fine
390 strix
got it on sale for $230
i'm pretty fucking happy with it.
8800GT
>>332440209
Yeah but its not a resolution used by most people who care much about graphics. Isn't it normally used when you wanna do a lot of stuff with documents so you can put two pages next to each other with no overlap for layout and shit?
very first pc build. I know the card isnt what i could be but i was shooting for under 1000.
still waiting on my AMD fx-8350 and Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB 2x8GB DDR3 2400MHz
>>332439586
>That's kinda what I said. The Titan was too expensive, so they released another, slightly weaker card that wasn't really part of the main 700 line at a more affordable price point.
Yes but the reason why is important - if the 290x hadn't come along and/or was slower than it turned out to be (given the relatively high clocks of it i'm betting Nvidia was hoping it would be in the 800-900mhz range like tahiti was given how dense hawaii is) then the ttian would've remained unchallenged and the 780ti would have never existed as the regular 780 would be besting this underclocked 290x.
>>332415323
GTX 780
I just bought a PS4 to play Bloodborne so I can't upgrade it anytime soon.
>>332440470
running on acer v3-571 right now. the case is empty
>>332440470
>amd cpu and nvidia gpu
No you ding dong you're supposed to do the opposite of that.
>>332440117
They are both standards. There is 21:9 as well.
>>332440470
>AMD FX-8350
just bought this bad boyI know it sucks, it's a temporary card until Pascal comes out. My 570 is pretty broken
>>332440470
Could bought aPREBUILTi7 6700 + 980 Ti for $135 more:
https://hardforum.com/threads/hp-prebuilt-i7-6700-980ti-16gb-ddr4-win10-1135.1894691/
>>332440470
>Vengeancy Rage Ultimate Pro MLG No-Scope 360 Fury Nothin-Personnel X 16GB RAM
>and a shitty CPU
should have bought cheap 1600mhz 16gb ram and a good i5 instead
>>332415504
650ti
It actually works quite. I can run almost anything without bigger problems. Even witcher 3 on medium/high settings
5870
Pascal or Polaris are going to be one hell of an upgrade.
>>332440717
19:10 is an outdated standard though. If you look at steam hardware stats 1920:1080 outpaced the more popular 19:10 resolution and that wasn't even 1920:1200, it was 1680×1050. Currently 1920:1200 isn't even 2% of steam's userbase. 1366:768 is far more popular and that resolution is a goddamned abomination.
>>332441329
Wow, people are poorfags or use their TV as their monitor. Who knew?
>>332441448
Well considering this was kicked off by a chart comparing high end graphics cards, you can kinda expect anyone who cared would have a dedicated monitor of decent quality.
Also still doesn't change the fact that nobody uses 19:10 which makes it a weird aspect ratio to benchmark with.
>>332441329
>>332441659
No one said 19:10 but you. And it's p. common in monitors whether you believe it or not.
>>332440821
>meanwhile, at ubisoft.
R9 270x
Msi HD7950 OC
>>332435838
Just your GPU.
>>332415323
GTX 750 TI too broke to upgrade.
>>332440957
>>332440950
>>332440821
>>332440659
It's the best I could do. I've got a couple of buds that claim to be decently build savvy but not experts and this is what the three of us threw together.
I was concerned about over heating so I ended up with 5 case fans and a liquid processor cooler. Also didn't want to break the bank so made gc last item to pick out. Both buds said cpu was a solid 8/10 for price point... was I lied to?
>>332442009
A $40 Intel G3258 beats it out in many benchmarks.
This one is semi old, since I am now back on Windows 7, but the hardware is the same.
Not sure yet if I am going to keep the 980 Ti and SLI it or if I will get a Pascal card (if the performance is like 2x what the 980 Ti can do on 2560 x 1440 and 4K, then maybe).
I am also doing a build for my friend at the moment, and it is:
GTX 960 4GB version
FX-8350
8GB of RAM
1 TB WD Blue Drive
I wish I could have gotten him a GTX 970 and at least a i5, but money was tight (was a $500 build).
Granted, they do not plan on doing anything too graphic intensive, just the odd Steam JRPG or Square Enix/Bethesda title, and their monitor doesn't even go up to 1080p anyway.
>>332442009
Nah its a good cpu for the cost. I'd think twice about serious overclocks on that mobo though, vishera chips are THIRSTY.
>>332442009
h60 isnt that great of a cooler, i mean its better than stock no doubt but you could of gotten an air cooler just as good a bit cheaper but a bit louder probably.
>>332415323
still running gtx 660 looking to upgrade soon, hopefully....
>>332441783
Oh fuck I've been hitting 9 instead of 6. Meant to be saying 16:10 and 16:9
Also 16:10 isn't common in monitors that aren't over 5 years old. Companies flocked away from that resolution in 2011
>>332442167
In ARMA, sure. In recent titles? Not a chance.
2GB 770
It can still run games at max or close to max at 60fps 1440p so long as it's not u optimized AAA trash or unoptimized early access trash.
Probably won't upgrade for another 3 years or so.
>>332442009
>fx-8350
>liquid processor cooler
should have just bought i5-4690, cheap 16gb ddr3 and coolermaster 212 EVO
you really fucked up your build senpai
>>332442491
>pentium
>980 Ti
>1440x900
what
are
you
doing
Guess I'll have to get a better CPU
>>332415323
gtx 960m
>>332442601
>Impressively, the overclocked G3258 darn near keeps pace with the eight-core FX-8350, one of AMD's fastest desktop processors.
970
>>332415323
8gb GTX 980m
>>332442601
>At stock speed, the image editing test saw it post a score 70 per cent faster than the FX-8350
>The Elder Scrolls: Skyrim saw it outperform the AMD FX-8350, even when the latter was overclocked
>The Shogun 2: Total War CPU Test is also a good indicator of raw CPU power and while the Pentium once again bettered the AMD CPUs
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2014/06/24/intel-pentium-g3258-review/
And it's $40 compared to $160 and can be upgraded to an actual good CPU.
>>332443149
My brain is full of fuck reading this. Using skyrim as a cpu test?
>>332417806
R9 faggot
>>332442791
>That UFO status
Fuk.
Also, I noticed that this thing rated the flash drives I had plugged in. That doesn't take off points for that, does it?
>>332442167
>>332442182
>>332442294
>>332442624
in my defense, the 1k price point also cover the c70 vengeance case, windows 10, optical drive, and hard drive.
>>332416374
i recognise that cat
>>332446158
>c70 vengeance case
>windows 10
>optical drive
I can't even
>tfw laptopfag
>>332415323
580 3GB
I've got 2 780 Tis collecting dust and a Skylake Pentium processor waiting for an H170 motherboard. Should I SLI these babies with this puny processor, or use my other 770s instead?
GTX 980ti
>>332415323
9800 GT
![T59dtNH[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/hPCW75l.png "T59dtNH[1]")
![c3-curve-amd[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/BJnRmOm.gif "c3-curve-amd[1]")
