Can your PC run Dark Souls 3? You have less than 2 weeks to buy parts so you can run it.
>>332398258
>japenese version of OS
I'm good.
yeah, I'm good too
>>332398258
Fucking nope. Maybe Low? But I highly doubt I can run it.tfw Laptop fag
>>332398671
>Intel HD 520
Maybe you can run it at the NES' resolution
thinkin bout refunding and buying a ps4 desu
>>332398258
>Can your PC run Dark Souls 3? You have less than 2 weeks to buy parts so you can run it.
Yes and i don't care.All i've seen of the game so far makes me want to puke.
I am serious.
DS III looks like garbage.
Why did i even bother buying a new PC when all i end up playing on it is older games modded to oblivion??
>>332399219
Because you are dumb and you fail, even as a consumer.
>>332398864
>It's resolution is 256x240
I just wanted to play some new Souls. DS2 was disappointing compared to DS1 and DS3 is leaning towards Bloodborne than DS.
Prob not on max settings. Waiting for those new cards before I upgrade.
>>332399636
Low and Max looks exactly the same, except for reflections
I7 930 checking in
>>332398258
Will my palit microsystems gtx 970 be ok?
how fucked am i?
>GTX 770
I'll be fine
>r9 380
I think I'll be okay, if I can get 45 fps average maxed out I'll be solid
>>332398258
I'm only 560ti :/
>>332398258
>Falling for the PC meme
easy max settings right?
>>332399872
Will I be able to even run this game? And at what settings would I get 60 fps. dontevenbother, low, med, high, ultra?
>>332400401
What kind of r9 200?
>>332400449
It's an r7. He'll be lucky to get 30 fps at 900p on low
>>332400449
I have an r7 250
>>332398258
yes
>>332400587
>>332400606
Well shit, as far as r7s I have no clue. Only thing I can recommend is to buy it,try it then refund it (or pirate it) if it doesn't run well.
>>332398258
I'm idort but I'll be picking it up on PS4
>>332400729
Shit.
What card should I get that isn't too expensive that can run Dark Souls 3 at 60 fps?
>needs a $400 to even run it on recommended settings
PCMASTERRACE
>>332400836
Even a 980Ti drops below 60 on max. Don't expect 60 fps.
>>332400925
But if I have an R7, the game will be so unbearable to play. What card do you recommend? Also, I don't really care about max settings. I usually turn off shadows anyway.
>>332401042
R9 280 or GTX960 should be fine
>>332398258
recommended
>i7-2600
Minimal
>i5-2500
they are not even that much apart in tearms of performance... how is this even make sense?
>>332401272
Do you think I should upgrade? How often do you upgrade your card, personally?
>>332401523
Every 3-4 years. But yeah, definitely upgrade if you want to play this game at a reasonable framerate.
>>332401042
what r7 do you even have?
ill be fine
I bought the boxset for 109 euros, even if it runs like shit, i'll just upgrade my pc :^)
yo /v/ I want to stream it (no bully, friend from across the world likes to watch) reckon r9 280x and i5-4690k will be sufficient?
>>332398258
Literally just bought an FX-8350 months ago, weird to see it as the recommended AMD CPU.
>GTX 970
Fallout 4 said that I should have a 970, but ran fine on my 960, not even worried.
whats the difference between DS 2 specs and DS3? i can run DS2 high 60fps just fine, will i be okay?
Am i good or should i get ps4 version?
>980ti
>i7 5930K
>MSI X99A
>32gb ram
>SSD for OS and separate SSD for games
>27" 144Hz
I'm good to go. Hurry the fuck up game. Jesus. Waiting for months was fine but then japan got it and the wait has been horrible since.
>>332400235
>r9 380
I'm thinking about buying this card anon, the 4 gig version from Sapphire, how is it? I just want to game on 1080p with nice fps. My old gtx 560ti is dying
>>332398258
>Can your PC run Dark Souls 3?
I don't really know. Not that I play Souls games anyways. I only like the soundtracks of the games.
>>332398258
>tfw i own an i3
should i just get the ps4 version?
>>332404410
>8350
>960
JUST
![b5a1dc492e[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/4EPms8l.png "b5a1dc492e[1].png")
Could use a graphics card upgrade but other than that yeah.
If I was to upgrade my card what should I go to?
>>332406739
You might as well buy a new generation i5 with the money you would use for the ps4 if your current motherboard supports it. What's your GPU?
>>332400925
Or, you know, don't play on max.
>>332401372
I usually ignore the CPU requirements for these games. It usually has very little impact.
It becomes even more obvious when you look at more CPU-intensive games (like strategy games) with lower requirements.
>>332398258
>have PS4
>it just works
>>332408197
>have ps4.5
>it just werks (better)
#4THEPAYERS
>>332407804
i already have a ps4 though
>>332408806
Nevermind then.
Well I have an i5 2500k overclocked to 4.7ghz with a gtx 980 ti.
So maybe? Not quite sure why it would need hyperthreading.
Will an R7 260X double d be able to run this game? It's slightly better than the standard 260x
