Armstrong was right.
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: Armstrong was right.
The more I think about this character the more I agree with everything he said.
His methods were "flawed" but ultimately he was a passionate man who was completely right and his goals noble.
ITT: """"""""Villains""""""" you agree with.
we've had this thread about 10,000 times
nanomachines, son
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
But Armstrong believed that might makes right, retard. He lost the fight and so by his own admission he was wrong.
>>332204679
>DUDE WE SHOULD JUST FIGHT OUR OWN BATTLES SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST LMAO
t. beta skinnyfat /v/ manlets
>>332204852
I'm sorry am I spoiling your millionth "LOL", "HEY GUYS LET'S TALK ABOUT YOUTUBE E-CELEBS FOR 500 POSTS" or "feminism in gaming" thread?
Fuck me if I want to discuss video games, RIGHT?
>>332204970
How is "survival of the fittest" now a beta thing?
>>332204942
>He lost the fight
The physical one, yes. But not the mental one.
Might as well get his one out of the way.
>>332205184
The point is that /v/ is full of weak nerds who would get blown the fuck out in a real doggy dog world scenario.
>>332205337
i believe you mean dog eat dog world friend
>>332204679
Solidus was superior in philosophy and actions.
>>332205337
>a real
Protip: The world is already a doggy dog world.
>>332205475
Nah. His goal was weak compared to Armstrongs
>>332205619
>taking down the patriots that are controlling the world
>weak
>>332204679
Then your honestly angsty. Armstrong was insane ans an idiot. His "fight for your beliefs" world would only be chaos.
>>332205337
I think you're taking this shit for granite. Guys like the weak nerd you were just shitposting towards are a diamond dozen
>>332205668
Yes.
>>332205337
>doggy dog
>>332204679
Then why don't you go to somalia where the strong can carve their destiny op?
Inb4 bait
>>332205691
Things only seem chaotic for weaklings anon.
