So this game was pretty much pointless right?
>>332116175
Yes, this game ruined the series. Also anyone that liked DaS2 should be killed.
Storywise? yes, but every souls is pointless
>>332116351
Come at me faggot
>>332116351
I-I liked the DLC areas
>>332116175
Why? No references in DS3?
Story-wise? yeah. To be fair those games aren't about the story.
Game-wise? Nah. It was really fun to play.
>>332116484
There are a lot actually, less than DS1 though
>>332116351
But it didn't, as everyone that has actually played Dark Souls 3 has only had good things to say about it.
>>332116582
Then it is OK.
>>332116175
Yes, pointless in every way. PVPers swear by it because of the technical improvements in the stat system and blah blah blah, but honestly playing a game like this strictly for the PVP is like playing a sports game just for the soundtrack- you're missing the point and should be playing a different game entirely.
>>332116175I liked DS2
>dark souls 2 is easy
When will this meme end?
>literally the only mention about the events of ds2 in ds3 is that there was an old king of want who fucked up hard and was consumed by his own greed
>mfw even official DS3 lore considers Vendrich to be THAT much of a failure
>>332116175
It did some stuff better than DaS1
>better inventory management
>better pvp
>easier to connect with friends
>no blurry as fuck graphics
don't get me wrong, the game has tons of issues, but I'd say it's still worth playing
>>332116175
It wasfun.
So no, I wouldn't call it poinless.inb4 "fun is just a buzzword!"
>>332118463
In a way it is. There are a bunch of save places, the leves are smaller and you have a bunch of health items.
>>332118610
Oh I forgot arguably the most important thing, that the Estus upgrading system is much better in DaS2 than DaS1
>>332116175
Yeah just skip it familia Bloodborne is way better in every way tbqh.
