Squadron 42 on consoles
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: Squadron 42 on consoles
What would be your reaction if I told you that there are people already working on bringing Squadron 42 (SP part of Star Citizen) to current gen consoles - PS4 and XO?
Mad as fuck. They're already taking their sweet time on the game, wasting time and money on a port before they're even done would be shameless.
>>332056172
>cunt roberts wasting backer money for consoles
not surprising desu
>>332056172
I expected it to happen. But its only the SP, so people will probably pay 60 sheckles for 1/4 of the game.
>>332056172
I wouldn't care. there's no way it'd release to consoles successfully.
Played the most recent release of star citizen and holy shit does it not only run like shit, but it also plays like some real boring shit. might as well just go back to EDfucking dont
>>332056172
I'd be laughing my ass off at all the people who threw money at this scam.
Hasn't Roberts repeatedly insisted there won't be a console version?
OP here, you can screencap this if you want. This is the info I got from a dev in CIG.Hopefully there is somebody lurking in this thread.
>there are people already working on console version of Squadron 42
>there are no current plans for bringing whole game because of technical reasons
>the console version should also serve as a "teaser" for online part for console audience
>the current SP build is running suprisingly OK on current gen and in a current state of development - my source said right now they made the game run like 720p/20 fps on a PS4
>current console build is ofcourse quite downgraded
>they are deciding right now whether they should announce development of console versions during E3 or Gamescom
>they plan to release console versions after on PC
>>332057129
>720p/20 fps on a PS4
no PSVR no buy
>>332057208
Well, it is not that surprising that there won't be a support for PSVR. The game is already really big and demanding.
>>332057129
>there are no current plans for bringing whole game because of technical reasons
>the console version should also serve as a "teaser" for online part for console audience
So which is it?
>>332057834
are you retarded?
>>332057834
I realize I worded it incorrectly. It should be a teaser for PC version - there is higher chance people would buy online part of the game on PC if they can try atleast the singleplayer campaign (as I said - no current plans for bringing the whole game). Not many people on consoles will buy a online part + most likely new PC if they don't know about the game.
>>332058159
This bait thread is retarded
