>>332006882
Combat is even slower and clunkier than infinity engine shit. It's a cashgrab for people who want to believe that modern rpg dev's aren't incompetent.

>>332007454
Can it at least be considered an unoriginal rehash of Fallout 1-2?

>>332007973
Fallout 1 had well designed encounters. Wasteland 2 has none.

Please make trouble!

is it worth getting?

Well, I guess eventually it'll reach the $10 price. I'll just get it then.

>>332007973
Fallout was an unoriginal rehash of Wasteland, not the other way around.

>>332013149
We're talking about Wasteland 2 here, though.

I'll just re-phrase the question: Is Wasteland 2 criticized for lack of originality due to being too much like its predecessors (Wasteland 1, Fallout 1-2), or is there something else?

>>332006882
get shadowrun.

>>332006882
Poorly designed and extremely cookie cutter killing stuff simulator where you miss all your shots just. The skill balancing was so poor you had to save skill points up until you needed as you would be locked from content

Its closer to some pseudo third person shooter like ghost recon than an actual RPG

I still dont understand why devs don't fucknig focus on the story and the world and how can they fuck up the combat despite it being their only focus

>>332006882
/v/ hates it, but it's a pretty good game.

>>332006882
Ha ha!

>>332013559
>Its closer to some pseudo third person shooter like ghost recon than an actual RPG
Pretty sure you are not talking about the same game as OP.

>>332015810
I am.
The combat is turn based and all that but the overall game design philosophy isnt that far off from a third person shooter or a regular non RPG game