Is the muppet right, /v/?
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: Is the muppet right, /v/?
Is the muppet right, /v/?
>>331425391
yes
>>331425391
He was right about paper Mario but not this
>>331425391
Walking simulator describes the games far better than FPAE or whatever the fuck he wants to have instead.
FPAE might as well be a youtube video about exploring abandoned buildings with a go pro mounted to their head.
If everyone who had an opinion was right then the very fabric of reality would undo itself.
How about "Interactive software for people who can't handle actual games"
>>331426382
surely reddit would be that everyone is a special snowflake with an equally valid opinion?
>>331425391
>He changed the title of the video
Hah.
>>331426720
Reddit means "everything I don't like" in neo-/v/speak
>>331426976
"everything I don't like" 's translation is actually "neo-/v/" according to redditors
>>331427429
Lurk moar. By this point, shouting "Reddit" at something is admitting you don't have an argument, but still don't like something.
>>331425391
>a term that doesn't harm anyone should die
No, I can't see how he could be right by any stretch of the imagination.
Just stick with Glove and Boots for your puppet needs.
I typically refer to open world games, with big open areas with little to no content, where all you do is hold W as "walking simulators", such as Skyrim.
>>331425391
>''first-person atmospheric exploration''
yeah, fuck that noise
one of the reasons why 'walking sim' is a such an apt description of this retarded genre is because it sounds lazy - which it completely fucking is - and it accurately reflects poorly on the developers who make these mediocre pieces of shit
>>331426149
>My opinion is that opinions can be incorrect
Always shuts those faggots up
>>331426847
What was it?
