Metacritic score75
You know I'm right
It good be a damn fine game, but it'll still get a sub 80 score.
You're probably right. Don't care about reviewers think though. If the game doesn't disappoint me then I'm satisfied.
>>330636915
>reviews
>mattering
>>330636915
>84
>>330636915
What's up with the graphics?
I mean i know Nintendo titles aren't known for being graphic benchmarks but Starfox Zero straight up looks like a GC game.
Also, what the fuck were they thinking when they made the characters fur look like that?
>>330636915
Sounds about right. I'll still enjoy it but I guess I should expect meme posts of nothing but 75 repeated.
>>330637226
Yet you'll still read them
>>330637306
Nice bait
>>330636915
Those mech bits with the Arwing walking like a little rooster look so bad
>>330636915
i'm sure the contrarians would find something to shitpost about regardless of the score
>>330636915
More like:
Metacritic score91Yet it's pretty much a bland rehash of 64.
>>330637310
i haven't read a review in 5 years
>>330637306
Glad to see I'm not the only one wondering what the fuck is up with the fur
It looks disgusting even if "realistic"
>>330636915
The star fox series was always B-list
>>330637398
No, see it's Nintendo, and it's not very meaty in terms of content.
So that's 70s and 7s all around, 6s from the detractors, and 8s and 9s from the shills
>>330636915
>Flying Triggered me of my fear of heights so I took off 20pts - IGN
>>330636915
I can see the cons now - bad VA, no online multiplayer, short campaign and no replay value and too similar to 64
>>330637517
>con - too much flying
>>330637632
>>330637517
Con is going to be something like
>weak story
>>330637575
>no replay value
that one shouldn't be the case seeing as they brought back branching paths and made a big deal about going through them after beating the last boss
>>330637706
>weak story
>in a Nintendo game
They'll get a pass for that
I'm predicting below 70. It'll get hammered for its partially mandatory control scheme, lack of online multiplayer and graphics.
Except for Gamespot, where it'll get a 4 with retarded-ass bullets like
>+ Flying segments are great.
>- Too many flying segments.
It'll get a 67.
>brings Star Fox back to it's roots
>however, it's way too similar to the 64 version, with it almost feeling like a remake
>the new features such as the Walker, feel tacked-on and gimmicky
>visually it looks rather muddled
>amiibo support is lacking
>plenty of replayability if you enjoy it, however many people will feel done after their first playthrough
>gamepad utilized in a unique way
>>330637706
>>330637904
Hey now, even Shiggy actually said the game would have more story this time.
can you imagine the reaction if it got over 90?
>>330638074
>More Story
>Story is literally Star Fox 64
Unless they do something with the portals
>>330637306
I wouldn't go THAT far. They're sub-par, but Gamecube era graphics is stretching it by a mile man. The fur is a bit weird, but I'm slowly growing accustomed to it.
>>330638292
Yeah, it's the basic SF64 story structure but according to Shiggy, they've expanded it a lot.
>“For the Star Fox story, what’s really important are the relationships between General Pepper and Andross and Fox and his father. I didn’t want to try to tell a new story, so by keeping those relationships at the core, then going back to the Star Fox 64 story framework, we’ve added quite a bit of story to that and introduced the idea of these teleporters. The teleporters have an important role both from a story as well as a gameplay standpoint, and that’s allowed us to strengthen the original story that existed in Star Fox 64.”
>“In the original Star Fox 64, from a story perspective, there wasn’t a lot of depth beyond the character relationships. But this time we wanted to try to tell more of the story of the Star Fox universe, and in particular the relationships between Fox’s dad and Andross [the chief antagonist] and General Pepper [your boss]. That’s a focus of this game. And in particular the relationship between Pepper and Andross, and the questions “Why did Pepper kick Andross out?” and “Why can’t Andross accept the reasons he was kicked off the team?” That’s where the teleporters come into play from a story standpoint.”
>>330637226
literally it´s OK when Nintendo does it
>>330638292
>have to fight Andross's army
> Star Wolf
> over world map looks just like the layout of 64
REHASH
>>330638447
This is so weird coming from Miyamoto.
Feel sorry for wifi U only users. The amazing trailer of Uncharted 4 blew my mind then I look at the star fox trailer and think "Jesus"
How disconnected from its playerbase does a company need to be until it starts losing noticible sales? Are the influenced masses enough to keep them afloat?
>>330637982
This seems likely.
I loved SF64 and all, but Zero hasn't even looked promising at any point since it's reveal.
>>330637306
The game has to render 60fps twice because of the way they use the gamepad screen.
>>330638570
cool bro
>>330638591
How many children nowadays do you hear go ' I want the new StarFox game! ' how many kids do you know that know of StarFox or that he has robotic legs?
Series is dead and only being raped for 10 year olds who don't know any better.
Krystal was the first sign of this. If you disagree, get killed.
>>330637982
>amiibo support is lacking
HOW IS THIS A BAD THING
AMIIBOSHIT SHOULD -ALWAYS- BE LIMITED TO MINOR, UNIMPORTANT SHIT
>>330638629
Not him but that's pretty bold to say. Do you not admit that the game hasn't had improvements since E3 2015? The delay was a very good step.
No one in this thread has every actually heard another human being / in real life / say they want or are excited for a new starfox game. Nevertheless this puppet shit. gg fags.
I've been wanting a straight answer since the game was fucking announced. Can I play it like a normal Star Fox game without having to look at the gamepad? That's the only deciding factor for me buying it or not.
Your series is fucking dead.
>>330639049
Are you retarded? Did you not learn from DKC returns? You get a gimmick, and you get a tacked on game. Period. Then you'll go back to smash or actually finally grow up,
>>330639049
No.
>>330639170
What a fucking surprise. It's almost as if the wii was marketed as a decade-late playstation-eye that has nothing to fall back on now but meme gimmicks and established IP's. Keep buying in on the shit though. Sakurai will eventually notice you =]
>>330638813
I disagree you nigger
Am I the only one excited about the chicken walker? I really wanted Star Fox 2 to come out, and am fucking stoked that at least in some spirit, it lives on.
>>330639272
So you know someone besides you who is excited for the latest installation in the StarFox series? you honestly know you don't. This isn't even an argument. Starfox is literally tomba-tier unless we're talking smash. Then he's an op meme.
>>330639271
The fuck are you on about faggot
I just answered a question
>>330639271
ok.
>>330639271
More like a 2 decade late power glove.
>>330639318
Have you met anyone excited for starfox besides other niche players you met on a cantonese dog trading image board? No, you haven't. Your 10 year old brother / cousin doesn't know who he is. Get used to gimmicks and puppets. Surely you know who worked on OTHER-M and who works on this? idiots.
>>330639362
>posting this picture used to be a bannable offense
>>330639456
Are you okay anon?
>>330639479
>posting starfox used to be relevant
Back to searching ' fur ' on tbib huh
>>330639390
I don't know, this guy is sperging out for some reason. Someone or something triggered him today and he's not going to stop until he destroys everything and everyone in his autistic rage.
>>330639537
Are YOU ok? my name is Taylor ok? You get that right faggot. You learn that Taylor told you that StarFox is going to be a meme cash-in like Skyward Sword, Mario Maker and Majora's mask 3d.
>>330639591
I'm not that guy you were arguing with, I just saw the picture and it brought me back. Personally I'm also looking forward to the game.
>>330639657
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RpipJToXKQ
wow, sucks for you.
gg.
>>330639652
Well Taylor, you're quite ass ravaged today. What seems to be the problem?
>>330636915
>2016
>releasing a videogamy videogame
wtf Nintendo?
>>330639362
ugliest motorcycle ever built is a bannable offence
>>330639756
People seem to be happy about this shameless cash in. Don't worry, I'm an actual starfox fan from SNES. This rage has been building since 64.
Taylor personally takes credit for killing this hype-jew-thread. Thanks fags.
>>330639854
Well Taylor, some people are, but not everyone. It probably won't sell all that well. But man, it's just a game. SFV is too, and while I'm not happy about it, I'm not that angry over it.
>>330640096
I have to go eat. Getting kind of light headed. Others probably went to bed.
>>330640247
I just don't understand how. It started as an on-rails point shooter and is now a furry rpg wannabe with no respect to what it once was.
Are any of the games anywheres near as challenging as starfox snes? No. Period. Point blank. Out of cum. The end.
Series sold out to degeneracy.
>>330640573
Star Fox was only a rail shooter because of tech limitations
>>330640732
then it was only good and memorable because of tech limitations.
It was only furry and open world rpg because of cash grabbing faggotry.
Taylor wins.
