What does /v/ think of "/v/: The Movie"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96EChBYVFhU
I really liked the short movie this is based off of, but I don't think this style will translate well into a full movie
>>330617426
Pretty much this
I'm interested to see how it goes but I dunno if the gimmick will last fur a full 90 minutes or whatever
>>330617262
most cringeworthy godawful looking shit i've ever seen
i've been in two theaters when this trailer played and every single person was groaning and pulling out their phones
neat idea for a youtube video, not for a fucking feature length film, even if it were acted or written well (which it clearly isn't)
Henry Henry HENRYHenry
Henry HENRY HENRY Henry Henry Henry
Henry HENRY HENRY HENRY HENRY HENRY HENRY
Hardcore Henry is such a fucking stupid name. Either keep it "hardcore" or completely change it. Fuck.
When did reddit start making films?
>>330617262
>Fight Back! You're capable of more than you think!
>>330617862
Hardcore Henry is an awesome name for a campy flick, it fits
>>330617862
its called alliteration
Looks pretty half-pressed
>>330618071
Thanks mr. scientist. That doesn't mean it sounds good.
>>330617262
Looks cool.
>>330617262
Looks fucking great, is it straight to dvd or is it legit?
How does he reload with a gun in each hand?
>>330617262
It looks like a movie comprised of really long one-shots which will be interesting itself if they pull it off.
If it's good then it'll be "Half Life: The Crazy Comedy Movie"
Never heard of it to be honest
>>330617262
Neat gimmick, I'll give it that.
The gimmick looks fun, but feels like it would overstay its welcome after 30-40 minutes.
I don't know what everyone's issue with it is. I think it looks cool and I don't even typically like mindless action movies. I'm wondering how they do the action scenes like this though since a lot of the takes look pretty long and long takes are something that always interests me in movies, especially if they have interesting things going on that might make them hard to film.
Also it has Sharlto Copley in it so that's a plus.
>>330617862
They had it as Hardcore initially but there's already a movie by that name and they had to change it. Also it would make Googling the movie impossible if it was just Hardcore.
>>330618402
Will be shown in theaters, gonna be a good time
>>330619369
Idunno, some of those scenes looked cool as fuck
>>330619561
If you google "hardcore movie", the majority of page one is about Hardcore Henry.
>>330619856
Wonder how much that cost them.
>>330619856
Hm, seems like it would bring up stuff about porn. In any case they had to change it because there was already a movie called that. I like the new title better anyway.
>>330618232
yeah hardcore george is much better
Won't the first person quick movement make people sick in theaters?
>>330620078
Some people yeah. But that doesn't mean movies like this shouldn't be made. I don't get motion sickness for instance so the people that do shouldn't ruin it for me.
