and still PC faggots were saying (lying) in 2005 "my 50 bucks used graphic card is better than 360, hahaha , die fanboy"
''I asked Feldstein whether the shaders themselves are, at the hardware level, actually more general than those in current graphics chips, because I expected that they would still contain a similar amount of custom logic to speed up common graphics operations. To my surprise, he said that the shaders are more general in hardware. At the outset of the project, he said, ATI hired a number of compiler experts in order to make sure everything would work right, and he noted that Microsoft is no slouch when it comes to compilers, either. Feldstein said Microsoft "made a great compiler for it."
http://techreport.com/review/8342/details-of-ati-xbox-360-gpu-unveiled
In 2006, how much money you needed to have the same GPU of Xbox 360?
$299 !! (only for the GPU, not including Processor price + the bullshit you need, PSU, HDD, etc)
Consoles last for 5-10 years while you have to upgrade your PC every 2-3 years.
In 2005,2006 and 2007 this was the most powerful and less expensive way to play AAA games.
>>330531645
What games?
Halo and gears? I can't find anything else worth shit on xbox 360 that is exclusive.
>>330532094
Forzanot like that even matters anymore considering PC gets it too now
>>330532182
360 literally has no games.
>>330532094
Many many, Fable II, Project Gotham Racing 3, Most Wanted (2005), Resident Evil 5 (best version), Star Wars: The Force Unleashed I and II (best versions), Lost Odyssey, Perfekt Dark remake...
Well yes, 360 was quite good until 8800 GT cards started popping out. That was like 2 years after launch.
People shit post the lie that 360 had no games and PS4 have no haves and people actually believe it.
It's a dark hipster meme trend.
>>330532550
Is there even a way to get Mo}st wanted 2005 anymore?
>RE after 4
ded for me
>Star wars
No thx
>Lost oddysey
>Fable II
Nope
>Perfekt dark
you tried.
>>330532560
>8800 GT
Launch price $299,00 and even 12 months after release $199-$259 price..
So...
>>330532664
Post 3 games better (gameplay, fun, etc) than Most Wanted 2005, Resident Evil 5 and Perfect Dark
>>330532664
>>RE after 4
>ded for me
You are just saying this because it makes you feel "part of the hipster" group that shit because RE5 you shoot niggers in Africa.
>>330531463
Consoles were generally worth the price. Only until now, because this generation is shit. Console gaming peaked at the middle of the seventh gen, before all of these "cinematic press F to win loot" cancer got mainstream.
>>330532904
The problem is the jewish industry pushing cinematic and progressive themes into gaming, not consoles.
>>330532904
I think the 7th gen would be seen as a pretty good generation if it died at an appropriate time.
>>330532868
Nope
RE4 is good but it no longer survival horror
I don't need more shooters with zombies, thanks.
Killing niggers isn't an issue for me.
Those games may be good, but I am personally not interested in them.
>>330532989
Now saying it'll never be worth it again.
>>330533005
If you want ''MUH SURVIVAL EXPERIENCE" play RE0 , 1 remake and 2 and 3 on Gamecube/Dreamcast/PC and stop with this crying kikery that Resident Evil is like an action game.
>>330532991
Didn't start until like 2013, so it ended kind of prematurely.
I never found ONE SINGLE good argument against Resident Evil Revelations
All arguments were "MUH SURVIVAL TOP DOWN EXPERIENCE IS NOT THE SAME"
Well, then stick with RE0 and RE1 remake.
i can't remember did MS design the chip themselves? Or was it someone else?
>>330532991
>play Valkyria Chronicles and Demon's Souls at home
>go to friend's house and play Halo 3
It was a good gen.
>>330533165
I was planning on it
However this thread is about the 360, so please mention more worthwhile 360 games, can you.
Otherwise I am gonna sell this garbage of a console.
>>330533269
besides it's being a boring game as it is are you in the right thread?
>>330533283
IBM for CPU and ATI for GPU
>>330533346
>besides it's being a boring game
Typical IGN and Gamespot hipster reader comment.
Go back to [red d it] and shitpost there
>>330531463
Yeah, totally! That's why my 9600GT sure didn't run every multiplat better than the Xbox360. Fuck Fable 2 and it's single digit framerates.
>>330533384
well, that answers it
MS holding technology back. Recent Phil comments about performance only support it.
It's like defunct government, one branch has no idea what the other does. It would be pure profit for MS to sell more windows for 100 bucks with 70-90% returns than one console for 400 with 5-10% returns and it was leaking money at first.
>>330533615
The same "MUH 60fps only" crying hipster that only plays Call of Duty and Battlefield.
>>330533763
>MS holding technology back.
?? didn't understand, sorry.
>>Recent Phil comments about performance only support it.
can you explain please?
(I don't think Phil is doing a good job by the way)
>>330533906
>you need x4 performance GPU to run xbone game at same resolution
While all they need to do is open up API for it not to be a thing, and no dx12 is not enough. They cling to old trade tactics that have no meaning anymore and continue to bleed money.
>>330534338
Microsoft is doing a poor job now, but from 2005-2011 they did a good one
I always hated microsoft and I still hate Bill Fag Gates, but they did a good thing for the game community back in 2005.
Yeah the xbox 360 was a great console with bleeding-edge hardware that was unrivaled for a long time
It was udoutably the best way to play games for a few years
I wish Sony stop doing Gran Turismo and spending millions in this shit and start to put money on good projects like they did with Ico and Shadow of Colossus
