>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LB4nc1oxQHk&t=5m5s
>People think this is a competitor to M&B
HAHAHAHAHAHA
>>330449481
>Skallagrim
Other than that yeah the game itself is really rough and the dialogue system is really shitty too.
but shits all over mountain blade.
Meanwhile in a game with not shit combat
>mfw people actually think this will hold a candle to M&B
Is this game not going to have battles? I don't see how with this kind of 1v1 lock on combat
How is the beta? Anyone playing it?
Found a torrent for it on Kickass
>>330451784
There was some footage somewhere and it was fucking awful and broken as shit. You can barely tell friendlies from enemies and everyone fights 1v1 while groups of 3-5 watch em do it from the sides.
I get that they tried something new and somewhat more realistic but there is a line that we have to draw and accept that it's a game that's supposed to be fun.
Mordhau will shit all over KC and M&B: Shitlord
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EVwamZgzeM
When will the first person melee meme end
>>330449836
>really rough
well, it IS early beta
>the dialogue system is really shitty too.
what exactly? watched some videos, it seems quite good, obviously the voices and faces are yet to be finalised (they have just started scanning them)
>>330452573
>upcoming multiplayer first-person melee
Closed the video right there.
>>330449481
>cry engine
no thanks
>>330452573
I really cant tell why this is any different from chivalry, can someone enlighten me?
>>330452573
>multiplayer
done, nope
>>330452981
Assumably, it has better hit detection that will avoid it devolving into finding out the glitchiest ways to get attacks to hit, which is what happened with Chivalry.
>>330452573
>discount chivalry
lol
>>330453267
Other way around. Chivalry is discount chivalry at this point.
>>330453267
>Hamhau
>>330453008
>>330452908
>Is so bad at games he has to fight stupid AI
>>330449481
>competitor to M&B
>doesn't let you haul around metric tons of butter
Dropped
>developing a kb/mouse/gamepad sword fighting game now when vr motion controllers will be available in a few months
>>330449481
is it even supposed to be a competitor to mountain blade?
I thought it was just a "fuck around in a small corner of medieval europe simulator"
not that I have a problem with that but I don't think they're supposed to be competing games
>>330454221
>Drastically limiting your scope and audience to develop for the first generation of an expensive accessory with unknown staying power
Holy shit, why did people even bother making games for controllers once the Kinect and Move came out?
>>330454221
>implying the lardasses that enjoy these games will be able to stand up and wave their arms around for more than a minute
>mfw recently discovering that Chivalry is shit and Mount & Blade did combat better.
M&B will always be the most satisfying first person melee combat. Faggots will whine about inconsequential things (ie: this game looks like ass or Help! I'm getting my shit shoved in!) But at the end of the day no other game gives you the experience of leading a cavalry charge in first person while you coordinate an infantry advance and begin lopping the heads off archers. When another game can give you that 1st person melee and RTS mixture, there will finally be something to compare to Mount and Blade
>>330455024
>M&B will always be the most satisfying first person melee combat
Eh. It does have problems, like it being a roleplaying game. It kind of feels unresponsive and wonky.
>>330449836
what's wrong with skallagrim?
other than him being your average retarded canadian liberal which only becomes more apparent in his rambling videos which I don't care much about
>>330455161
Chivalry felt less responsive than Warband ever did to me.
>>330450906
>MnB
>good combat
choose one
>>330455161
Are you choosing attacks with the mouse or by your foot movement? Could be why. Also have you ever taken anything out with a fully couched lance yet? I'm not saying its the most realistic, look at when the game was made. But it is unique
>>330455367
Chivalry always looked like shit so I never played it.
>>330455172
For being such a fucking roleplaying faggot who sucks medieval dick like it's 1066 he sure is a fucking degenerate. So fucking left it makes me sick.
>>330455390
>MnB combat is bad
I'm sorry anon but you have to more than just a contrarian faggot if you're gonna post here. what don't you like?
>mfw people still haven't played M&B's glorious multiplayer
the fuck is wrong with you
>>330455486
I use mouse. I've had enough footsies playing Morrowind. Couching doesn't need much though, it's just point and poke. I've played a lot of M&B and Warband, but it just feels like I should have more control over my guy. Polearms and thrusting in particular are awkward.
>>330455571
Sure is good in multiplayer with those autoclickers than change direction ten thousand times per second, while twisting around like coffee addicted monkeys.
>>330449481
I was hype for this game, but seeing the latest dev posts and the fact that they plan to release in a couple of months... It just doesn't look anywhere near as deep as it should be.
They're aiming for a hardcore fanbase, but only giving us a nice fighting system. Everything else looks and performs like garbage.
>>330455780
Well there's your problem anon, you're supposed to be waging battle for the king not fucking around with multiplayer.
>>330455759 I'll agree that pole arms need a much faster stabbing animation but I'm not sure how the rest of your reply would look in-game.
