How much does a review influence your gaming purchases?
>>323405438
why those awards look like Bloodborne
>>323405438
It doesn't. I know what I like and dislike enough to know if a game will fall within those boundaries.
>THE GAME ***ITSELF*** IS ACTUALLY SELF AWARE / HAUNTED AND IS EVIL
So this is an idea stolen from those shitty Unity games you find on YoYo games then?
>>323405438
>Placed 19th for "Mood"
Memory leaks are not a reason to buy a game.
I only trust Famitsu. They have never been wrong.
>>323405438
>reviews
I pirate the game first. if its fun enough, i MIGHT buy it while its on sale
>>323405438
>literally who allowed to have giant award on the side of steam store page
why is this allowed
>>323405863
So 13 is a 40/40?
Depends on the game.
If it's something I want I don't even look at reviews.
If it's something I'm mixed about I read reviews from various sites and videos and see if I really do want it. If it's on PC I disregard the reviews and just pirate it and try it out.
>>323405438
what a narcissist
>chromatic aberration in the fucking text
>>323405979
I certainly think so. If you don't think so then you're a fedora tipping meme meister.
When I go on steam if the game is anything below "mostly positive" I immediately leave the page because gamers have no standards, so if even they say its bad then it really must be hot garbage.
Other than that, I don't read or care about reviews at all. If its a multiplayer game I consult friends who own it and ask what its like, and if its a single player game I just watch some gameplay videos or see what people on /v/ think.
>>323405438
>Zoe Quinn's TOP GAMES OF 2014
Is it finally happening? the collusion of SF game journo/hipsters colluding with each other to prop up literally who's in the gaming community?
What's next? Anita Sarkessian's non problematic award?
Le just ignore them
>>323406361
Yeah but on the other hand anything that's "Overwhelmingly Positive" which only has a handful of reviews can be a red flag too.
>>323405438
i just watch gameplay videos if its been out for some time, if its new then i just buy it so.....
reviews don't influence me at all
>>323406426
>What's next? Anita Sarkessian's non problematic award?
Already happened, see:
anthony-burch-printed-cuck-award.jpg.exe
>People are actually trying to say this game is good
Will horse fuckers ever stop?
>>323405438
Who the fuck would care what some literally who twine developer thinks of a game.
Surely her and the developer know each other? that's fucking gross
>>323406137
Fucking this.
How the fuck is this considered "retro" these days? Even fake-retro games not that long ago didn't drown their graphics in CA.
This game is a wannabe undertale and that's so sad
I don't pay attention to reviews at all. 100% serious.
I was seriously considering giving Pony Island a try but the second I saw the name ZOE QUINN I had no interest in it any more.
>>323405438
Is that chromatic fucking aberration on the award image? Literally why
>>323407217
>been around for years
kek
>>323407718
So has Undertale, didn't the demo for it come out like 2 years ago?
Could they have made it anymore obvious that they fucked/want to fuck Zoe?
>>323405438
Never, I don't read gaming journalism because its all a scam to convince you to buy products from companies that are paying off the reviewers
