http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/632733/Sony-PS4-PlayStation-VR-Headset-UK-Price-Release-Date
ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE CANADIAN DOLLARS
is this offical?
because
>worst specs
>highest price
So forty USD? Sweet, I'll pick that up.
>>323201996
>UK-Price
>CANADIAN DOLLARS
wut
>display that costs twice the price of the console
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA1ADXe8u2E
>yfw
/VR/i
/oculus/i
And there goes half of /v/ until summer when the fresh batch of twitch memes arrive.
>>323205070
I only see two VR threads up.
>>323204562
Could be
Rumors are going around that sony phgraded the external box to house an APU but that would cost 800+ dollars if true
>>323204967
>3DPD
>>323206281
>2DPD
>>323204967
It'll be hard to not get cum on the headset
>Over 700 Burgers
/v/ would be nothing but threads with that number for 2 weeks
>>323201996
wow
i would have even bought it for 599
1.1K? Seriously?
are they high?
>>323206632
You cum with your eyes?
Amazon prices before release are usually kinda fucked.
Sony is gonna undercut the Rift price to compete, even if they sell it at a big loss, mark my words.
>>323206745
Do you not?
>>323201996
Sonyggers will pay to justify their bloodbourne player
>>323201996
So 1200+ € after taxes?
Holy shit
>>323201996
Literally who
if the fucking rift costs $600 there ain't a way sony is gonna release it at that price. They'd get slaughtered. Not to mention the thing is lower spec'd than the rift AND Sony is manufacturing the goddamn thing so they can take a price cut.
>>323208008
Nevermind, it would be either 849 or 899€ then.
How much in burgerbucks?
>>323204967
>all those assmad women in the comments
Amazing.
>>323201996
>1 year from release
>Amazon knowing the price
>Sony even having set the price
These leaks are always wrong, especially this early.
>Amazone "leaks"
Oculus babbies trying to divert attention
>>323208807
According to google the vr is set to release in q1 2016
>>323208678
Do you realize how much they'll have to step their game up with MGTOW on the rise and VR porn imminent?
>>323209000
The Amazon leak shows December. Shows you how accurate Amazon's info is
>>323208348
The only thing going for the PlayStation VR is the content.
It's going to have a lot of actual games coming out for it like Ace Combat. I feel like the PC might end up with a lot of gimmick games and indie tech demos.
>people are taking this shitpost seriously
>>323201996
I'll give you 3000$ just to shut up.
>living in a 3rd world country
>>323208348
Still, there is rumours that the psvr will be shipped with an external processor. That could explain the price
>>323205525
>PSVR has a better APU than the PS4
Why can't they just accept the fact that current consoles can't handle VR?
>>323209442
You forgot simulators. This is the only place where VR has chance to settle down for longer than few months(for everything else it's a fad).
>>323210016
Are you giving him a thumbs up for living in a 3rd world country? or are you mocking him?
You pic and your text give me mixed messages
>>323210078
A processor doesn't cost 700 fucking dollars.
>>323211050
Probably not American dollarydoos, but our dollar is shit so it might just
>>323205525
It's not going to be a whole APU. It will be a graphics coprocessor.
Most likely there will also be a new version of the PS4 based on AMD Zen/Polaris that will offer better graphics in regular PS4 games and be VR ready. Regular PS4 will be rereleased as PS4 slim and be a $250 budget option.
>>323210163
PS4 could handle VR perfectly fine, just not AAA graphics. Think CS:GO graphics.
>>323204562
>is this offical?
The Amazon listing was made by Sony Computer Entertainment Canada and had all the PR shill stuff attached.
It's real
>>323211298
Keep in mind that vr has to have an absurdly high frame rate, In addition to rendering 2 images
>>323211279
there is no place in the world that a fucking small processor costs more than 200 anythings
>>323211579
The trick with VR is not adding power, but reducing requirements. Most VR-supported games are very basic in polygon count.
>>323211579
you can render CS:GO tier graphics at 200fps on a toaster.
>>323211647
>head set PLUS processor
If the whole bundle cost that much it translates to 799 USD, which seems realistic for the two together
>>323211548
>5.7 inch 1080p screen right in front of your eyes
That's gotta be like playing a game on your 21 inch monitor at 1024x768.
>>323212007
It's not going to be. That is way too high for a consumer item, and you have to remember: This is Playstation we're talking about. It's not like some enthusiast thing you can sell on PC and reduce the price on later. If they don't sell PM they aren't gonna make games for the thing. Consoles aren't as forgiving to development as PC is.
Plus, no porn content and no 3rd-party content.
>>323211548
>120fps
>ps4 can't even handle 30
>>323212007
Sony's headset isn't going to be that expensive.
They've been making OLED panels for personal cinema headsets for years, so they probably have a huge cost advantage over HTC and Facebook
Will psvr actually take off? It doesn't seem to have the enthusiast demographic like PC. I don't want this to end up like the vita
>>323212335
>>323212675
If it's not enthusiast-priced like the Rift then it will.
>>323212675
seriously doubt it. sony tries to ape other companies' gimmicks every generation, it never pans out.
>>323212880
RIP 3DTV
>>323212675
Technology wise it's the weakest VR offering, but it has two advantages when it comes to mainstream marketing:
1. It will work out of the box on a PS4
2. Sony has a lot of mainstream developers working on mainstream VR games (PC will probably have a lot of indie/experimental/unpolished VR games in comparison)
>Johnny likes VR but is an idort who only has a MacBook/Chromebook/Shitbook. PSVR is basically his only option.
If I had to bet though, PSVR is more likely to bomb than succeed.
>>323212335
I bet it could handle Half-life at 120 FPS.
>>323213804
Half life came out in 1998. It would be a fucking discrace if it couldn't
>>323204967
A motorized fleshlight and a program for sync instructions that you can download like video subtitles.
The future is looking good.
>Amazon leak
So when are PC fats getting Bloodborne?
>>323211579
>believing the "renders scene twice" meme
Mantle/Vulkan API allows caching draw calls (command queues)
>amazon "leaks"
holy fuck. pcucks are getting more and more desperate recently.
>>323214983
>I don't understand how ASINs work
>>323214983
It had an ASIN dumbass, those are only generated and applied to partner products for Amazon.
>>323215073
you're a fucking retard. please keep posting.
OH DOG
WERE
GETTING
BLOODBORNE
EAT SHIT SONYGGERS
>>323214817
>Clueless retard acts like an expert by parroting things he read on /v/
>>323215208
>>323215073
>i-i-it was a real leak i swear!
>>323215319
Except literally no one knows shit about Mantle/Vulkan; how can I parrot something that no one spews?
>>323212229
>Plus, no porn content and no 3rd-party content.
you're right about porn, but no one is going to spend 600$ (or around 800$ for the rest of these world) just to watch it, when there is a 10$ alternative for that.
But what are you smoking with "3rd-party content." ? no matter how sad you find it, PSVR has the most AA to AAA games announced for it, compared to competition. And the majority are 3rd party
>>323204967
I hope there's a good market for PoV lesbian porn, personally.
>>323204963
Well, displays are expensive, especially when the pixel density is that high.
>>323204779
$825 is the exact conversion rate. If you remove VAT, it's about £460, which is $687.
So expect it to be between $700 to $800.
>>323213804
>>323212335
For comparison, the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive do 90 fps
What games are there actually going to be on it at launch?
>>323212675
It will anon, believe in Sony for they exist only For The Players, they would never abandon something after they shamesly copied it from something else
>>323201996
What's that in REAL people money? 150 dollars or something?
>>323217741
Read the thread dipshit
More blatant misinformation on 4chan. So what else is new?
>>323211298
>Think CS:GO graphics.
At dual 1080p?
With that shit-tier APU?
Nah senpai, maybe if it had a CPU that wasn't shit sure, but as it stands now?
Nah
>>323218710
>plugs ears
LALALA I CANT HEAR YOU! PCMR! PCMR!! $1125 AMIRITE?!?!
>>323217176
The PSVR does 60 Hz interpolated to 120 Hz.
>>323219438
Extrapolated*
Someone should design a onesie that simulates touch
>>323201996
Anyone else think the VR manufacturers already have a gentleman's agreement to launch with ridiculously inflated prices?
>worse in every way
>still ends up being 200 dollaritos more
how will bronies defend this ?
>>323218979
It's not dual 1080p. neither is Vive or Rift
>>323220285
it comes with a brick with extra processing power. Of course it would be more expensive. The Oculus isn't being bundled with the $1500+ PC hardware you need to run it.
>>323220576
oh boy here we go
>>323220064
Why did you have to jinx it...uuuu huuuu huuu~
>>323212335
Are you dumb? The VR has its own custom computer to handle VR processing.
>>323220695
You did ask.
>>323201996
maybe it comes with playstaion 4 or something? It's hard to believe the price if it doesn't, especially when the'yre comptetitors are Rift and Vive. Nobody will buy this for that price.
>>323204967
>If I look behind me it's all black
Damn they are already getting ready to release this in Sweden
How dumb are you guys to be shocked by these prices? Did you think VR Was going to be cheap?
>console fags affording that
>>323204967
Totally worth 1k dollars
>>323221010
>Palmer claims consumer version of Rift will be $300 or less
>Frequently repeats and defends claim in interviews
>Claims Facebook aquisition will make it even cheaper
>Final product is twice the price
>>323221061
>>323216410
>PoV lesbian porn
>>323221010
if morpheus drops at that price it's dead in the water. maybe that much for a bundle would give it a chance, but on its own there's not a chance in hell that any of the consolefags would pay that.
i doubt the price is right though considering that they've actually seemingly got developer support for this thing.
So what happens if there's a vr 5chon app where you can shitpost with people in a 3d environment?
I wonder how many australians i would see
>>323211548
>Dec. 31 2016
It's clearly a placeholder, Sony will probably fully announce price and release date at E3
I guess I'll go buy some lotto tickets.
>>323220926
>>323213364
71 exclusive games from AAA to indie working and probably many of the next multiplat will be VR and some old games will be VR exclusive for pc.
http://store.steampowered.com/curator/6882545-Oculus-Compatible/?l=spanish
>>323218979
Look m8
GranTurismoSport. This is a PSVR game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h-Kycm8Jxo
Ace Combat 7. This is a PSVR game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zuBSUJfpBk
RIGS. This is a PSVR game, most similar to the CS:GO example (shooter in an arena)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDO7Ockyurk
Not to mention multiplats like EVE:Valkyrie and even shitty EarlyAccess unoptimized scams like ARK.
And in your mind it can't run CS:GO
sure.
>>323219438
it does any framerate (60, 90, 120) natively, without interpolation, although it's mandatory for 60fps and advised for 90fps
In theory there can be a native 120fps game, but it would only be an indie that looks like N++ or at best an "optimized" Gauntlet / Helldivers
>>323221527
It really is dead at that price.
But on the other hand Sony would be the only one of the 3 willing to sell it at a cost just to build the initial market.
I can imagine a PSVR demo booth at every Playstation space in general stores and game stores (akin to guitarhero demos) at the launch period. If it was just above the price of a PS4, say 400$, more people would be interested - exponentially more (cutting a price by half will net you way more than twice the sells)
It would at least grab those rich fucks who like to show of their new toy to friends, rather than just having the super niche enthusiast market, and then from word of mouth it could perhaps sell more.
>>323204562
NO! NO!!
IT IS OK WHEN SONY DOES IT!
>>323224541
>Believing trailers
Ayyyyy
>>323201996
DELETE THIS!!
>>323224541
>Trailers
Jesus christ, Sonyfags literally never learn.
>>323224861
I don't see why you use that game in your shitposts, pic related was fun as fuck, crazy taxy was fun as fuck. I see no reason why that zombie taxy game would be shit.
And I don't need to believe trailers when RIGS is already playable, I know you don't care at all but you can see plenty of live gameplay on youtube. EVE too. GTS and AC7 are still far from release so nothing I can do about that.
>>323201996
DELETE IT
DELETE IT
DELETE IT!!!!!!!!!!!
>>323224541
ok yeah rigs looks like csgo level of graphics
>>323226015
and you are in a constant state of delusion
that, or Sony is dedicating a lot of time overlaying pre-rendered CGI "gameplay" over some footage of paid actors at E3 and all the other conventions that had PSVR builds of RIGS or any other VR game
>>323227234
I know, right? CS:GO is the pinnacle of graphics, the ultimate GPU burner. The main demographic of that game needs high-end PCs to download it, and then rent a super computer at the arcade to actually play it. I'm surprised they don't use it at all benchmarks
>$800 for what is possibly the worst VR headset on the market
Kek
>>323224541
is you pic related the rendering resolution?
when yes sonycr confirmed shit since that game doesn't really look good
+console fps
>>323208697
1125 CanD is approximately equal to 800 USD.
While it's not as much as people are actually shilling about, we're still seeing a whopping 200 more USD than Rift.
Get shilled on.
>>323228186
no, I got a pic at random from google. we already know the resolution of all VR headsets.
CSGO doesn't really look good either, so it's a perfect match.
And just because I posted it as a graphical comparison doesn't mean I like the game. I'm not the least bit interested in it, actually. horrible theme, MLG branding everywhere, shit mech designs, etc
I would only consider getting it if it's substantially cheaper than the PC VR sets
No, it's a fucking amazon listing with a placeholder price FFS, when has any "store price leak" ever been accurate?
No one is going to spend over $600 for VR, nobody is going to spend over $400 for Sony's VR.
Oculus has a retarded price because they were kids in a candy store and over-engineered the fuck out of it dumping insane amounts of money into R&D and custom parts and developing magic fabric, Facebook saw the numbers and panicked knowing it was going way overboard and they couldn't actually subsidize all this new shit so it was pushed out at $600
Sony's VR is far more simple than the Rift and won't have anywhere near the manufacturing costs, hell even the Vive is using more simple and cheaper tech and molds at this point.
Oculus is $600 because the autist engineers fucked up with daddys credit card. I've even talked to someone who works as a supplier to Facebook in electronics and they said "They were like kids in a candy store and they got the worst deals because they had unlimited money" even the AMA basically admits this as well.
>>323231496
>when has any "store price leak" ever been accurate?
Every price drop leak for XB1 and PS4.
Wait & see what happens.
