Who is fucking hyped? I've always wanted a drug busting simulator where I can go full operator and kill untrained teenagers with assault rifles
Also, any games where you can beat the shit and/or kill degenerate drug peddling scum?
I would say
>Ubisoft
But R6:Siege was pretty good, so I'm optimistic about this too. The concept is at least neat.
Are there towers?
Can you co-op the single player/mission mode? It was a lot of fun taking down camps/doing assassinations in Far Cry 4 co-op.
Since Unity I vowed to never buy another Ubisoft game again.
So no.
>>323164603
its a full 4-player coop but you can also solo
>Open World
Jesus Godamn Tits and Shits Galore Fucking why
>>323165504
It could be good or bad, but honestly its Ubisoft were talking about here
Farcry 4 had at least a decent "open world" (lots of varied side content, base and strongholds to takeover, etc.)
>>323163620
mildly optimistic, yes
I like the setting
I want this to be good but it has so much potential to end up like Watch Dogs and The Division it hurts.
>>323166693
What's bad about The Division now? I haven't paid attention to it since it was first announced
>>323166795
Aside of the obvious graphics downgrade it looks boring.
From the gameplay they shown it looks fucking awful.
>bullets reach target instantly even if 600m away
>no bullet drop
>no recoil
>terrible bloodsplaptter effects and death animations I'd expect in a indie game with zero funds
>even slide of pistol didn't move
I don't expect a simulator, but some things just belong into a shooter which tries to be tactical.
Looks like the typical copy paste open world casual Ubishit game with no attention to details.
>>323163620
I just want to frank drug cartels and be able to do it from the start. Give me that and i'll buy it day one.
>>323166693
Me too, anon, me too. It could be a great military sandbox, but I'm so afraid that it will be ruined by the same cookie-cutter formula.
