Worth a pirate?
Buy it and we can play together,
>>322410970
nah
get CIV4 instead, avoid having to deal with Civ5s early game snowball bullshit.
>>322411912
Omit the words "early game snowball" from your post and I agree completely.
>>322412056
its an accurate assessment of Civ5s meta though, whoever finds the best ruins, and has the best location usually snowballs ahead of the other players. The entire meta for early game is all based around exploring for RNG freebies the game just gives you. Whoever collects the most RNG freebies usually gets 50-60 turns of advancement by turn 4 and outpace everyone elses
>>322412234
so turn ruins off, dipshit
>>322412458
not my choice in MP games, and most people are adamant about playing the standard MP setup of standard speed, standard whatever, 8 civs, 16 CS, ruins on, barbs, etc.
also
>wonders
>city states
>spawn location
>>322410970
Worth a purchase op.
For single player alone a single game spans longer than most AAA $60 games. Around 10-16 hours in a single game and that's playing with everything set on standard. You can go even larger with games lasting who the fuck knows how long.
This recommendation is based on single player only because I don't care about playing strategy games with other people. If you find any enjoyment out of multiplayer then there you go that's all the added bonus. The game is $12.50 for the complete edition right now on steam. If you like strategy or any previous civilization games you will like civ v.
>>322413072
>I don't care about playing strategy games with other people
aka "I'm a casual"
>>322410970
All expansions? Yes
Vanilla? Hell no, there are better alternatives, like AC.
>>322412642
starting locations are a snowball issue in all civ games though, and its not all that common to have a massive difference in starting location
and heck given nobody plays civ V MP competitively if you get a supremely shitty start (like say full jungle spawn as france or so) just ask everyone if they'd be okay with a reset
if not then well, you can always gang up on whoever gets the best start
ruins should be off for mp though, waaaay to much bullshit is possible with them
>>322413280
I prefer single player. Sorry buddy.
If being a casual is how I have fun then I am a casual.
>>322413557
you're missing out, its surprisingly incredibly exhilarating and engaging.
>>322413710
I have no friends that even play civ v that I know of so there's the first problem. I could always go on here or even the steam forum but I never bothered.
Civ V with expansons is the best in the series in my opinion, but this is a somewhat controversial opinion
>>322410970
without doubt, but almost half of my mods didnt worked properly till' i bought it
