How are we all enjoying Rainbow® Six Siege?
@321885468
I don't have it because no female characters.
Good game. Shit servers. It will die a death that could have been avoided.
>>321885468
Liked the betas, I'm not buying it for 60 quid since I know I won't get as much mileage out of it for it to be worth it and before it goes on sale the community will be dead.
Shame, but Ubi had to fuck something up
Fun game, shame it will die because it wants to compete with CS:GO which already is widely popular and is only 14 dollars. They signed the death warrant when they made it 60$ for Siege
>>321885468
I enjoy it but Ubisoft deserve a slap for making a fun game and then giving it fuck all support because it wasn't 'White 20 something male in a sandbox'.
I want it to succeed but get the feeling Ubisoft will think I like their business practices and fire the dev team instead.
I got it for free from Nvidia promo. Still never even launched.
I probably should before its completely deserted.
>>321888517
If you got it for free it's definately worth playing.
The pricing bullshit is one of the major issues with it
>>321885468
Huge amounts of fun. Might get disconnected like 1 in game in 15 though which is a bit annoying
>>321890374
Yeah the servers are fucking shit.
>>321885468
I have a toaster and can't play this or Blops 3 but I'm glad that FPS embraced new movement models (rappel isn't exactly new and futuristic parkour leaves much to be desired) which will probably bring about a good FPS game in the future if someone with half a brain starts designing maps and single player campaigns. Revival of stale arena shooters is yet another facet of devolution.
