Let's have a good Ol'fashioned hearthstone card thread
.
http://www.hearthcards.net
R8 H8 and particip8.
>>321791534
>>321792451
>>321792451
>>321792557
>>321792676
>if enemy has 00 health, you double kill him
>>321792451
I'd be interested, but probably broken as fuck.
>>321792557
As a minion, mite be good with charge, though the cost would probably be higher. As a weapon, drop damage a bit and just fine.
these cards are all stupid, unbalanced memeshitduelyst is better than hearthstone too, you can get a top tier meta deck without giving the devs hundreds of dollars/grinding for a whole year, it took me two days to get all the newbie rewards and open my like 15 free packs, dust what i didnt want, and get a S-rank capable deck.
Every day until you like it
>>321794228
>him
Gendered and sexist, kill yourself
t. Alberto Barbosa
>>321795529
someone explain this meme
seems forced
>>321796164
lurk more
>>321796293
>idk
>>321796164
>seems force
You don't need to force POORtugal being black, it is
>>321796715
so its spic meme
no wonder it seems so shit
vote for trump
>>321797015
>american education
>it's another faggots post their poorly worded and terribly balanced OC shit
It's not like the wording in Hearthstone is even complicated so I don't get how you faggots can fuck it up so bad.
>>321791534
Why not just 'random minion with Taunt'?
>>321797848
I doubt the OC creator intended it, but first choosing a mana cost and than choosing a minion (both at random) will have different minions appear more often compared to simply choosing a random minion.
>>321798778
Good thinking. And I thought I'm supposed to be the smart one!
>>321797139
WAT
WE WUZ WORLD POO-LEEZ
>>321791534
My Stormstrike.
>>321793706
So a glorified frost nova in minion form? Eh
>>321794070
Who doesn't like it that seems pretty neat
>>321794070
>>321794228
Rogues dont deserve secrets.
>>321791534
Very weak compared to Dr. Boom even if you need taunt
>>321792557
Thx doc
>>321801971
>discards a random card
WEEEWOOOWEEEWOOO the blizzard fun police is here, put the card down and your hands up!
>>321801971
Would be something like this possible?
>>321804292
That's a pretty good card. We need more pirate synergy with cards that aren't pirates
>>321804292
yes, the game does this with murlocks
http://www.hearthpwn.com/cards/27240-anyfin-can-happen
>>321800430
That's so fuckin weak.
>>321804515
True that. But that's Paladin. They get everything they want.
>>321800430
Who gains attack
>>321804913
what if you use it after doomhamer + some overload, than it's borderline OP
>>321805157
Oh well I'm sorry. I didn't think about that.
>>321801596
>the class based around subterfuge and stealth doesn't deserve secrets
>>321805483
>not a warrior card with that effect
>8mana for 8,9 with op effect and op battlecry
Is this bait? Make it 8 mana and 6-6
>>321805112
the hero.
>>321804470
we could use more pirates in general
>druid card with combo
as if I care
>>321806493
>>321807260
>3 1 mana cards in one 3 mana card
slightly OP, fits 4 mana better imo
>>321805989
Here go another thing for the Warrior I made.
>>321795063
>>321807989
>worse than senjin while costing more
>>321804292
i actually like this one.
>>321808389
Who cares abut Sinjin? He's a fucking faggot.
>>321808614
Sinjin is still objectively better than that other card. If it was 4 mana it would be closer to on par
>>321808895
I just don't like Sinjins face. But at least this c are could be enchanted and the legendary minions Deathrattle would still work.
>>321807552
its second effect is a combo effect though and it sort of mirrors the paladin muster for battle which is also essentially 3 mana cards in a 3 mana card
thoughts?
>>321809587
That's actually pretty cool. 10/10 would use in my warrior deck.
>>321809473
muster is 3 0 mana cards and 1 1mana card for 3 mana
2 0 mana cards are 1 1 mana card as that druid card with the saplings shows there for muster is 2 1 mana cards and 1 0 mana card with the combo making up for the difference
I guess you're right, the power is correct
>>321809587
blizz aproved
>>321809587
That's actually op. A random could be any cost from 1 to a pirate with 4/6 charge.
>>321807552
Only if you use the combo AND have a weapon, which means you have to use at least one card to get the full value. I think that's balanced.
>>321810625
ah yeh the 4/6 with charge
maybe make it a random 3 cost or lower pirate?
>>321811389
to be fair the card is build so that playing it without a weapon out is beyond stupid to begin with, and rogue shouldn't have issues getting a weapon
