>>321410464
What's with the hate for Angry Joe? Least he ain't bought like the majority of reviewers. Is this just /v/ being /v/ and hating on everything popular?

>>321410638
YES

>>321410768
Well is there any valid criticism towards him at all? I'm genuinely curious.

File: AAEAAQAAAAAAAAaSAAAAJDhlMWQ2ZjI0LTQ1ZjMtNDM5My1iNzMwLWI3ZWJhN2IyOTZkZA[2].jpg (9 KB, 200x200) Image search: [Google]

9 KB, 200x200

>>321410464

Dom The Big Dawg Vanner is the only person who posts this pic. Beware!

>>321410875
I don't think so
but i heard he is a sjw

>>321411006
These last few months pretty much anyone who isn't basically a stormfag is an SJW according to 4chan
I've even heard him criticize SJW multiple times
He ain't one.

>>321410638
It's just memes anon.
He stays away from the sjw bullshit and called fallout 4 on its bullshit (sorta) so he's allright in my book.

>>321410464
About tree fiddy

>this angry spic manlet tried to fight Google employees on the street
would've been hilarious if he got rekt like that time by the Dorito Pope

>>321410638
/v/ isn't one person.

Different opinions.

Like what you want to like.

And so on and so on. Now can you stop asking dumb questions like that?

>>321411006
No, but he denounces some forms of sexism. Not everyone who has opinions that aren't hurr-durr is a sjw.