Did...did you buy it?
You...don't hate snoopy, right /v/?
>>321040062
I did for the ps4, it was actually fun.
>>321040062
got it for 40 buck, Loving it.
>>321041585
why didn't you buy it anon? I hope you did.
>>321040062
movie was shit
>>321042417
I liked it.
>>321042417
You are shit
>>321041821
Does anyone remember that one anon who started a thread about it and he actually owned it
It was a pretty funny threadcompared to all of the other shit threads that have been plaguing /v/ for years
>>321042747
I'm also interested in this.
>>321042665
yes
It's really weird but Activison are really a scumbag comapny but with this and Transformers Devastation is a true glimmer of hope. These are two really good single player games with replay value. If they keep these little gems at a good price point they maybe can get a decent rep. But I'm high so fuck it
This looks like it's on-par with the Wii U exclusive 2D platformers /v/ praises like Yoshi's Wooly World.
Fuck you OP. I love Snoopy. I paid to see the movie 3 times. I will probably end up buying the bluray. Dont have a xbone or ps4 though.
It looks like it's a Wooly World clone.
Which is probably a great thing. I expected much less.
It even has the two-player gimmick from WW.
>>321046698
on-par is pushing it. it's clearly much lower budget than nintendo titles. it still looks fun, though.
I love Peanuts, and that's exactly why I won't play that shit or watch the fucking movie.
Schulz was very picky when it came to adaptations of his stuff. He drew them his entire fucking life. He trusted only one man with making animations of his stuff, and then his kids not happy enough with the shitload of money they already get, decide to make this excuse of a movie.
I know he's dead, but for fucks sake, at least they could have shown some respect for the man's work.
I bought it on 3DS for 10bux. It feels like a PS1 game, very cozy. More collectibles than I can be bothered with. Actually controls/plays well, it's just very generic. I recommend it if you like 2D platformers and know what to expect.
>>321048118
To add, one thing that looked cheap in gameplay vids is the tapping to swim. I can confirm this is wrong, it's just youboobers not realizing you can hold the button to swim up.
>>321047801
What was so disrespectful about the new movie?
>>321048819
Not that poster but I thought it was a bit lame that it focused on Charlie and Snoopy almost exclusively. Their plots weren't the most interesting (Charlie & little red-haired girl, Snoopy vs red baron), seemed like nostalgia baiting more than anything else. Peanuts stories were often quite clever but this was all formula.
It was nicely animated though and inoffensive. I liked it.