Sweet justice.
>>321039176
Reviews have never, do not, and will never matter.
Fuck off.
I guess no bonus for Bethesda.
>>321039260
>>321039176
It's obsidian s fault for releasing a broken ass game at launch. Funny how people don't remember that part of the story
>>321039260
>not knowing why its justice
shit up another thread
New Vegas got a low score because of bugs and glitches. F4 got a low score because it's just plain shit.
>>321039260
only when they disagree with you, right?
>>321039176
What will Todd do to his workers as punishment?
>>321039329
obsidian's qa dept has always been garbage but they didnt set the release date
>>321039312
>>321039330
>thinking reviews matter
You missed your stop >>>/r/eddit
>>321039362
Even if every single reviewer on the face of the earth said every single game I played was absolutely flawless and totally amazing they would still be irrelevant.
Reviews are irrelevant. Full stop. End of discussion.
>>321039669
Reviews are irrelevant if you're capable of forming your own opinion on something after researching it. Most people aren't/don't feel like it and need to be told or at least suggested what's good or bad.
Fallout 3 >>>>> NV
hahaha this is pathetic
the xbox 360 and pc version of new vegas scored a 84, ps3 version scored 82
the pc version of fallout 4 scored a 84, the ps4 version (the most reviewed version) a 87 and the xbone version a 88
get fucked obsidrones
>>321039669
>doesn't understand the point of the OP
educate yourself faggot: http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/obsidian-missed-fallout-new-vegas-metacritic-bonus-by-one-point/
Oh look, the version that actually got reviewed and was clearly the first priority version got a higher score
OP btfo
>>321039669
>the reviews meant nothing for nv
except for the fact that if it was shilled as hard as FO4 and got a 90+ they would be making more FOs and gotten a bonus.
I can meme too! >>>/trash/
Make sure you stay there
>>321039815
>doesnt understand that reviews are irrelevant
Simple concept, surprising hard for you to grasp.
Try not being stupid sometime.
>>321039732
Reviews are irrelevant even if you have no knowledge of the game at all.
You get just as good a understand of a game from reading tea leaves as you do listening to the morons who call themselves game reviewers.
>>321039931
more like Sony fags all have lower standards than everybody else
>>321039940
never claimed reviews were relevant or not.
wow you're retarded lol
>>321040034
>58 critics vs 34
most reviewers got the ps4 version so its the more widely reviewed version, thus the best representation of what critics thought of the game
>>321039936
>the point
>your head
Outstanding, first time iv seen someone just totally miss the point of everything.
>>321039931
>tfw theres a cat named Toro in the game
S O N Y
O
N
Y
>>321040056
>replies claiming reviews are relevant
>gets proven wrong
>n-never meant to say reviews are relevant!
Thanks for the backtrack and making yourself look even more stupid.
>>321040131
>the thread
>your head
Unbelievable, he still stays in a thread he doesn't understand!
>>321039732
>if you're capable of forming your own opinion on something after researching it.
For most people, reviews are part of that research
why do you assume that the publisher side of bethesda had a bonus tied to the metascore when they developed this shit in house?
obsidian was a special case, they were a 3rd party dev, outsourced job.
besides with how much FO4 is selling I think Todd and his team are set for a while money wise
also the console versions both scored well over 85
>>321040205
whatever you say, retard. just know you're wrong :)
>Obsidian misses their bonus from Bethesda by being 1 point shy of their goal for an 85 Metacritic score for NV
>FO4 Metacritic score ends up tying with NV
>not only did Bethesda not meet their own standards, but their user scores for FO4 were much weaker than New Vegas'
>the biggest criticism of NV was its crippling bugs at launch
>the bug testing for NV was done by Bethesda
>>321040331
I think its more irony than justice. Obviously there was no bonuss cause like you said it was in house. But its sweet no less that it got the same revew average AND lower ser score.
>>321040331
that's not it, its more of if they shilled NV as much as they did FO4, it probably would've gotten better reviews, and even despite the mass shilling of FO4 it still got that mediocre score.
>>321040095
>so the reviewers simply haven't played the superior version
>>321040379
Project as much as you want, I know im right.
>>321040234
>still cant comprehend the point
Absolutely hilarious. Read the posts again and try to not be so stupid next time.
Fo3>fo4>NV
>>321040390
Fallout 4 is also riddled with bugs so lol
>Genre: General
so what kind of fucking game is FO4
>>321039260
You are retarded son
>>321040665
you seem to have ranked them backwards anon
>>321039931
First priority how? What's special about the PS4 version?
>>321040720
The General of games
>>321039812
>>321039931
>playing fallout games on consoles
I hope you are just shitposting
>>321040909
Most reviews are based on the PS4 version these days.
>>321040720
A shitty one.
>>321039669
you just don't get the point of a review
>>321039732
>after researching it
and how do you research it? through reviews obviously
>>321039260
I can sense your butthurt from here
>>321040909
Well it certainly isn't an RPG
Even calling it an Action RPG is generous
Kind of a shame that the professional reviews were so lenient. The game needed to be properly bashed so we wouldn't get more Fallout Effect: Shitty Writing Edition
>>321041328
What is the difference between the versions?
>>321042890
all those marketing dollars though
those poor reviewers and their integrity, never stood a chance
