There's no such thing as objectively bad video games, only games that don't appeal to you. When will people understand this?
What an objectively bad post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3no3T6QH0BQ
>>320978261
>only games that don't appeal to you
Which means they're objectively bad relative to my personal rating criteria.
There's no inherently objectively bad games is what you meant to say.
Superman 64 isn't bad. The controls just aren't my style, and I personally don't like the visuals. Nothing is objective. Make the bad feelings go away, mommy.
>>320978261
Who does Bubsy 3D appeal to? Masochists?
>>320978261
Go play Superman 64, Aquaman, and ET I guess
>>320978261BIGRIGS
Leave it to Youmu to say the dumbest shit.
>>320979169
no you mong, they arent objectively bad "relative to your personal rating criteria" thats the definition of subjectivity. stop trying to sound like an intellectual
>>320978261
DORK
>>320978261
Terrible bait, try harder next time.
>>320980369
>they arent objectively bad "relative to your personal rating criteria"
Yes they are.
>thats the definition of subjectivity
Yes it is.
Objective relative to my tastes, subjective relative to everyone else.
Point is, saying something is "objective" is totally useless unless you define the set of facts you're using to analyze things.
>>320982131
top W E W
>>320978261
what about games that don't function?
>>320982380
Some people intentionally inject their games to the point where they stop functioning.
>>320982131
2/10 ill give you a reply
>>320982338
>>320982696
Why is this always such a sensitive topic for everyone? I'm not even saying anything about a certain game. Just the semantics of "objective" and "subjective".
>>320983050
>>320978261
But Youmu's fight in PCB is objectively bad.
>>320983397
>Probably the hardest boss before Yuyuko
>Bad
>>320978261
Fuck off Genki
>>320985992
Play sonic 06 and say it's not objectively bad.
Play Ride to Hell and say it's not objectively bad.
Who is ready for the next Comiket?.
>saving a lot of arranges from C88
>just listened to half of them
>>320978261
>he never played Rugby 15
>>320978261
True, but that doesn't mean we can't identify common criteria for a video game to be considered 'good' and then discuss whether, from our individual perspectives, the game matches that criteria. Said discussion will hopefully lead to a productful synthesis of perspectives that enriches our apreciation for the game or opens our eyes to some of its flaws. And so the medium and its consumers both evolve.
>>320986743
Youmu is a low entry waifub8 and you're a disgrace.
>>320983050
Shitposters on /v/ would rather spam memes at you than refute your arguments.
Trying to get an actual discussion out of these shitflinging chimps is nearly impossible.
You are now realizing that buggy glitchy messes can't be considered bad because there are for sure some people out there who enjoy them
>>320987071
SWEDEN YES
Big Rigs is objectively bad
>>320987552
>low entry waifub8
Then tell me, what would be a high tier waifu?
>>320978261
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpIu6OaLkh8
>>320990765
Hina!
>>320990765
Who would willingly expose their patrician waifu to a bunch of plebs?
75% of the time when /v/ says a game is shit they never even played it. It's like all the FFXIII haters here. None of them even played the fucking game long enough to have an opinion, and even the ones who did seem to fundamentally misunderstand it.
i want an immortal phoenix
>>320978261
superman 64.
>>320979169
You're right, but it's pointless semantics.
>>320982131
is this the new "fun is a buzzword"?
>>320978261
What if a game is a buggy piece of shit which is barely playable?
It's just like art. All art is beautiful in its own way.
>>320978261
>There's no such thing as objectively bad video games
There have been games that the publishers have offered unconditional refunds on because they're so bad.
>>320990765
One of the heroes who fight back against the lunar threat, of course.
Revenge of the Sunfish.