is there an n64 game that aged worse?
inb4 Goldeneye
Barely
DK64 is still playable and can easily be %101 if your patient enough and follow the paths
>>320561916
i meant graphically.
gameplay wise it's still fun.
I haven't played most of the Rare games on the N64, but I'm pretty sure most of them except Banjo-Kazooie would have aged like old wine.
BK is an exception because its production value is staggering to this day. I can't think of a more fleshed out, living, breathing game than it. And I'm an "OoT will always be the best" fanboy.
I played Jet Force Gemini a year ago, and I tried, I really tried my hardest to like it, and get back to the controls, and there are these brief glimpses of gameplay where it shines above all other shooters (like when you're surrounded from side to side with those screeing drones, and you have to think strategically to hit them all while evading their shots). However, the platforming in the game is so unintuitive that as ahead of its time as it was, it's like tipping over a cow. Once it's on its side it's not able to get back up without a little help (i.e. your imagination).
Nintendo's games have aged better. Which just goes to show, that even back in the day, their popularity was warranted.
N64 forever. PC and PS1 were not even in the same league as the N64 from 1996 - 1999.
https://www.change.org/p/night-dive-studios-please-remaster-turok-3-for-pc
4 supporters!
C'mon we only need 96 more for the dream to happen!
>>320562957
>metroid
>n64
>>320561741
is there a way to play this well on an emulator?
I have a choice with small stutter and inaccurate graphics vs accurate graphics with lots of stutter
>>320564887
of course there is. a lot of speedruns are actually done on an emulator. not familiar with the best N64 one though
>>320561741
Is there any game period that aged worse than Goldeneye?
it didnt age any worse that it initially was. its just a tedious, padded collectathon
>>320562957
>PC and PS1 were not even in the same league as the N64 from 1996 - 1999.
>>320566223
it's true ya know :)
probably Banjo
jet force gemini
god its so bad
>>320566818
Maybe if you have shit tastes, N64 was objectively the best console of that generation.
In all fairness, man, Goldeneye plays like ass from a modern perspective.
>>320561741
Is anyone in this thread more of a complete dick gargler than OP?
inb4 starting a thread with inb4
(protip: no)
Cruisin' or any racing game is VERY hard on the eyes after all these years.
>>320561741
quest 64it wasprobablyalways bad
>Starts this thread
>inb4 an obvious answer.
Why? Might as well just list all of the ones you are aware of for yourself, and then not make a thread about it.
Also Mario 64
>>320561741
>inb4
fuck you
I mean if we're speaking from a purely graphics perspective, I think we can say they've all aged pretty poorly.
PS1 > Saturn >>> N64
jesus christ why is the n64 so shit
>>320565813
Most of them. Goldeneye has some of the most solid gameplay of any game ever made and beats the fuck out of most modern releases, period.
The only conceivable flaw it has it a tendency to drop frames of the original hardware. Hearing people claim the shooting mechanics have 'aged' is hilarious.
![545af0c0c63cf[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/V34jnkH.png "545af0c0c63cf[1].png")
>>320561741
>is there an n64 game that aged worse?
Oh you have no fucking idea how badly this has aged.
Dk64 didn't age that badly though.
>aged badly meme
So it was true that millenials invaded /v/
2000 was a bad year for N64.
>Paper Mario
>Majora's Mask
Then, nothing. And no, you'd better not mention Conker as a good game. That game is as terrible as it is profane. The only good thing was the multiplayer.
>>320571974
the character models are laughably bad compared mario 64 and similar titles
>>320568350
I actually just finished a play through of Banjo on my N64.
It's still great, but there's some painful artifacts. The camera is pretty eh most of the time but loses its fucking shit in tight or narrow arrows, like those around platforming segments. The framerate also gets pretty awful at some points, so much so that they interfere with gameplay.
Aside from those, it's still a blast with great worlds and a wonderful sense of exploration.
9.5/10
>>320572476
>The camera is pretty eh most of the time but loses its in tight or narrow arrows, like those around platforming segments.
I think that's deliberate, to add challenge. It has to be. Otherwise, shouldn't it follow you immediately when you fall? I recall it stays in place and watches you pummel to the bottom and hit before rubberbanding to you.
>The framerate also gets pretty awful at some points, so much so that they interfere with gameplay.
Don't recall this aside from when Gruntilda throws fireballs at you.
>>320572352
Forgot kirby 64, great game.
>>320571563
Nostalgia fags are this deluded
toy story 2
>>320571563
DN3D and Doom are way less dated than Goldeneye in terms of mechanics.
Embarrassing since they were released earlier.
>I think that's deliberate, to add challenge. It has to be. Otherwise, shouldn't it follow you immediately when you fall? I recall it stays in place and watches you pummel to the bottom and hit before rubberbanding to you.
Maybe in some places, but there are certain places where it just freaks the fuck out cause it got caught on something or suddenly make a 180 degree angle turn so you walk off something. It just feels cheap most of the time if it is on purpose. Okay, you got me, I didn't know my controls would reverse for no reason and I died, cool.
I noticed the framerate have the most issues with the fall portion of CCW, probably the leaf effect or something. But even the engine room of Rusty Bucket, more water heavy portions of TTC, it was a pretty noticeable constant.
Still one of my favorite games ever.
