http://www.gamespot.com/videos/assassins-creed-syndicate-jack-the-ripper-gameplay/2300-6428560/
>You can only play as an older Evie in the Jack the Ripper DLC
DROPPED
R
O
P
P
E
D
>ever picking it up
>>319694219
Evie plays better anyways, also it fits considering it's about Jack the Ripper, ya know the guy that killed prostitutes and whores, so basically all women.
>>319694219
That's because Jacob is Jack the Ripper
>>319694219
>we want the Bloodborne audience
I want to cum all over Evie's freckles
Remember when Assassin's Creed 2 actually took place over quite a few years without it being DLC? I'm sick of this trend of the games only taking place over a short period of time. Fucking 2 has us playing Ezio from 17 to 39.
>>319696335
This would be the best plot twist ever.
>>319697263
There's a WW1 section in the main game i guess
>>319696874
>mistaking history for your booborne bullshit.
>>319697545
Yeah, but that's the pandering section to people who want World War Assassin games. Why could we play Syndicate all the way up until Jack the Ripper? Why couldn't we see Jacob and Evie have kids? Ezio got shit done in a believable amount of time. He spent months doing shit because Assassins are supposed to work in the shadows.
Not liberating all of London in like four months.
>>319694219
>Hey, we're making a game in Victorian London, should we use Jack The Ripper in any way? He was kind a big deal, y'know? He could be like a Templar or some shit killing prostitutes who are generally allies to the Assassins
>Nah, just throw him in some DLC, we need to work on our microtransactions instead
Bravo
>>319697967
Better plot twist would be Jack being a rogue assassin killing templar prostitutes. Makes more sense.
>you can only play as the good character
Wow yeah, fuck this shit am i right OP?
>>319697967
2
0
1
5
>>319698045
That would trigger a lot of peoplei'd be ok with that
>>319697263
I remember when Ezio was talking to someone, then the next cutscene he says how he hasn't seen them in years.
Ezio's games had the weirdest fucking time skips.
>>319698213
CURRENT YEAR
U
R
R
E
N
T
Y
E
A
R
>>319698273
Honestly this. I think the events of AC2 takes place over like 20+ years and AC3 is 10 years. Its weird as fuck.
>>319698273
I wished they fleshed out the assassins he worked with more, but otherwise it made sense that this guy wasn't buddy buddy with everyone he meets. Really the only people he seemed to care about were Leonardo and his sister.
>>319697781
never ever pckek
>>319697830
I feel your pain. It's dumb as fuck, but they wanted Syndicate to have a "tight" story.
>>319698864
Just went over the timeline
AC2:
>1476
Beginning of the game until you kill the Pazzi brat
>1478
Saving Medici
>1480
Traveling to venice and templars taking over doge position
>1486
Killing the templar doge
>1488
Finally being iniated into the true assassin order, find the apple,
first dlc where you loose the apple
>1497
second dlc, where you regain the apple
>1498
Final mission
Honestly the only reason for all the time skips were because the historical events. Everything from the Pazzi conspiracy to the Bonefie of Vanities. iirc AC3 was even worse at this though
>>319695850
Prostitutes aren't even in Syndicate, which is hilarious.
>>319700342
Not a single significant historical event happened in the one particular year they chose Syndicate to take place>>319700342
>>319700342
Was there even actually a historical event in Syndicate? I can't remember anything specific.
>>319700649
Nope. Even when the dude burnt down his theater, that didn't happen.
>>319694219
>Keeping the most obviously expected thing for a Victorian Era game out of it for DLC bait
Didn't see that coming from Ubisoft
>>319700649
Closest thing you get is probably charles darwin publishing his theory of human evolution.
>>319700342
>Loose the apple
>Dont regain it in 9 years
What the fuck where they doing during those nine years?
>>319701645
Right? I guess they just like, gave up.
